Re: [fossil-users] how to maintain a set of patches?

2012-02-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:

 I sincerely hope that fossil was not designed with only one work-flow
 (SQLite and fossil) in mind. Am I mistaken?


If i'm not sorely mistaken, fossil was indeed originally designed for
exactly one purpose: managing the sqlite repo.

-- 
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] how to maintain a set of patches?

2012-02-26 Thread Gour
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012 15:48:10 -0500
Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:

 I hope that you realize that one size fits all is not a good design
 principle for a general purpose tool.

/me nods

 And yes, I do need my private space for private experimentation. For
 instance I keep some branches where code does not yet compile. But the
 branches that I push to TEAM.fossil should pass a red face test,
 they should at least compile OK.

I also find reasonable not to clutter team members' repos with my
half-baked experiments.

 I sincerely hope that fossil was not designed with only one work-flow
 (SQLite and fossil) in mind. Am I mistaken?

Yeah...Fossil is very refreshing tool, beating many apps by its
simplicity, but Everything should be made as simple as possible, but
not one bit simpler.


Sincerely,
Gour


-- 
The embodied soul may be restricted from sense enjoyment, 
though the taste for sense objects remains. But, ceasing 
such engagements by experiencing a higher taste, 
he is fixed in consciousness.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] assign ticket to file(s) or abusing Fossil a bit

2012-02-26 Thread Gour
Hello!

Being (again) interested to try to use Fossil for all my DVCS needs, I
got idea to 'abuse' it even further and use to track records of our
counseling  homeopathy patients...The idea is to have single file per
patients with more detailed data about each client and then have tickets
connected with the files for the treatment history (think about poor
man's Electronic Medical Record (EMR).

Now I just wonder if there is some easy way to get report which would
show all the tickets connected with certain file and/or to assign
ticket to certain file or to tag tickets somehow that we could see all
the 'medical episodes' connected with certain patient?


Sincerely,
Gour


-- 
One who is not disturbed in mind even amidst the threefold 
miseries or elated when there is happiness, and who is free 
from attachment, fear and anger, is called a sage of steady mind.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] assign ticket to file(s) or abusing Fossil a bit

2012-02-26 Thread Chris Peachment
It looks to me like you could add a new field to the 'ticket' table,
say PatientIdentifier of type text, and enter its value as part of
the ticket add function. A new report selecting on this new field
would provide the view of all tickets ordered by PatientIdentifier.

The missing part is some way to pass the patient id to the report so
that it selects only tickets for the given patient.

You might need to hack the report menu source code to permit entry of
one (or more) parameters when the report is selected.

Regards,

Chris

On Sun, 2012-02-26 at 12:13 +0100, Gour wrote:
 Hello!
 
 Being (again) interested to try to use Fossil for all my DVCS needs, I
 got idea to 'abuse' it even further and use to track records of our
 counseling  homeopathy patients...The idea is to have single file per
 patients with more detailed data about each client and then have tickets
 connected with the files for the treatment history (think about poor
 man's Electronic Medical Record (EMR).
 
 Now I just wonder if there is some easy way to get report which would
 show all the tickets connected with certain file and/or to assign
 ticket to certain file or to tag tickets somehow that we could see all
 the 'medical episodes' connected with certain patient?
 
 
 Sincerely,
 Gour
 
 
 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] how to maintain a set of patches?

2012-02-26 Thread Leo Razoumov
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 04:48, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:

 I sincerely hope that fossil was not designed with only one work-flow
 (SQLite and fossil) in mind. Am I mistaken?


 If i'm not sorely mistaken, fossil was indeed originally designed for
 exactly one purpose: managing the sqlite repo.


GIT was originally designed as a BitKeeper replacement for linux
kernel. Then the scope broadens...

--Leo--
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] remaining warnings

2012-02-26 Thread Johan Samyn
Hi,

After pulling the latest changes (up to [affb0019c9]), I recompiled on
Windows 7 using MinGW. Below are the warnings that remain after the
recent clean-up by mistashkin.

src/checkin.c: In function 'create_manifest':
src/checkin.c:644:7: warning: variable 'nBasename' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
src/sqlite3.c: In function 'winShmPurge':
src/sqlite3.c:34471:8: warning: variable 'bRc' set but not used
[-Wunused-but-set-variable]
src/cson_amalgamation.c:3737:0: warning: ignoring #pragma warning 
[-Wunknown-pragmas]

Just wanted to let you know about this combination of platform and
compiler (building including openssl and activating json). I know these
are harmless, but it's my impression DRH likes clean code.

Johan

___
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away. - A. de Saint-Exupery

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] remaining warnings

2012-02-26 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Johan Samyn johan.sa...@gmail.com wrote:

 src/cson_amalgamation.c:3737:0: warning: ignoring #pragma warning
 [-Wunknown-pragmas]


That one should only be visible when MSVC is running. Coincidentally,
this morning i patched a mis-matched pair of #ifdef guards around the
warning pragmas. i've just merged that fix into the fossil tree - please
try it again with the latest trunk and see if that particular warning is
still generated.

-- 
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] remaining warnings

2012-02-26 Thread Johan Samyn
On 26-02-2012 16:22, Stephan Beal wrote:
 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:01 PM, Johan Samyn johan.sa...@gmail.com
 mailto:johan.sa...@gmail.com wrote:

 src/cson_amalgamation.c:3737:0: warning: ignoring #pragma warning
 [-Wunknown-pragmas]


 That one should only be visible when MSVC is running.
 Coincidentally, this morning i patched a mis-matched pair of #ifdef
 guards around the warning pragmas. i've just merged that fix into the
 fossil tree - please try it again with the latest trunk and see if
 that particular warning is still generated.

 -- 
 - stephan beal
 http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
 http://gplus.to/sgbeal



 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

That one is now gone allright, Stephan.

Johan

___
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add,
but when there is nothing left to take away. - A. de Saint-Exupery

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] assign ticket to file(s) or abusing Fossil a bit

2012-02-26 Thread Gour
On Sun, 26 Feb 2012 09:25:17 -0400
Chris Peachment ch...@ononbb.com wrote:

 It looks to me like you could add a new field to the 'ticket' table,
 say PatientIdentifier of type text, and enter its value as part of
 the ticket add function. A new report selecting on this new field
 would provide the view of all tickets ordered by PatientIdentifier.

OK.

 The missing part is some way to pass the patient id to the report so
 that it selects only tickets for the given patient.

Hmm...

 You might need to hack the report menu source code to permit entry of
 one (or more) parameters when the report is selected.

Huh...my C skills are rusty and I hoped I could do without surgery
'cause otherwise tweaking Roundup tracker might be easisier solution.


Let's see if there is some other idea.


Sincerely,
Gour


-- 
But for one who takes pleasure in the self, whose human life 
is one of self-realization, and who is satisfied in the self only, 
fully satiated — for him there is no duty.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] how to maintain a set of patches?

2012-02-26 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski

On Feb 26, 2012, at 15:00 , Leo Razoumov wrote:

 On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 04:48, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Leo Razoumov slonik...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 I sincerely hope that fossil was not designed with only one work-flow
 (SQLite and fossil) in mind. Am I mistaken?
 
 
 If i'm not sorely mistaken, fossil was indeed originally designed for
 exactly one purpose: managing the sqlite repo.
 
 
 GIT was originally designed as a BitKeeper replacement for linux
 kernel. Then the scope broadens...

Well, IIRC Mercurial was even more narrow, originally created to keep only some 
subsystem of the kernel ;)


Kind regards,
Remigiusz Modrzejewski



___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


[fossil-users] receommended value for crnl-glob setting

2012-02-26 Thread Gour
Hello!

What is the recommended value for crnl-glob setting in order to allow
smooth interoperability with (possible) Windows/Mac contributors when
we're using Linux OS natively?



Sincerely,
Gour


-- 
One who restrains his senses, keeping them under full control, 
and fixes his consciousness upon Me, is known as a man of 
steady intelligence.

http://atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users