[fossil-users] Version 1.27
Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, ... Thank you for making this release. For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote: For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of the other developers do -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;). -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. slightly related question: is there, or will there be, a regression-test suite for fossil? (I read about the sqlite testing method, which is truly amazing.) Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Maybe it is time to leave Windows? On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. The primary consequence being that people eventually upgrade ;). -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 So what? After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting. You can predict the near future by looking at the state of Windows 2000 now. I was a big fan of Win2K, but I wouldn't dream of running it today in anything but a test VM. There's a fair chance it won't even boot on a modern PC, due to lack of driver support. Another fun problem with Win2K now is that if you're in a part of the world where DST rules changed in the past few years (e.g. USA) the time will be off during part of the year, since the time zone DB isn't being updated any more. Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.comwrote: slightly related question: is there, or will there be, a regression-test suite for fossil? (I read about the sqlite testing method, which is truly amazing.) Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as sqlite's. For each release we (normally several of us) run through the following checklist: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki that said, most of us can only cover 1 or 2 of the more common platforms. sqlite's testing infrastructure is somewhat of an anomaly (in a good way, of course) and _extremely_ difficult to achieve. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
2013/9/11 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org: I don't have a WinXP system to test on. But maybe some of the other developers do WinXP should work fine, I tested fossil 1.25 or so on it. And as far as I know there are no fundamental differences in Windows API usage, so it still should work fine. (If not, you can file a bug!) Regards, Jan Nijtmans ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. There are plenty of people still using XP for various reasons and tasks. Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 After that, no more security patches. So what? Maybe XP is safer than any of the NSA-approved Windows versions. My unpatched firewalled copy has been running for over 10 years without any issues. It's time to be migrating off XP. If you have to use Windows you may as well use XP. /jl ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On 9/11/2013 08:36, Michai Ramakers wrote: For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 After that, no more security patches. It's time to be migrating off XP. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 64-bit. Jonathan Otuska On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On 11 September 2013 16:36, Michai Ramakers m.ramak...@gmail.com wrote: On 11 September 2013 16:03, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, ... Thank you for making this release. For my information: is WinXP still an 'officially supported' platform? I realise it's a bit old, but I happen to use fossil on that platform, occasionally. Michai ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:08:05AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: On 9/11/2013 08:59, John Long wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 08:49:14AM -0600, Warren Young wrote: Only 7 months left of MS support: http://goo.gl/dtpQj4 So what? After the EOL date, XP will quickly start bit rotting. Given my copy is about 13 years old and still perfectly usable and has been running as-installed with exactly two KBs applied I really don't know what difference it makes if it's EOLd or not. Auto-update is the first thing that gets turned off on any Winstall I've ever done. There's a long list after that. Another fun problem with Win2K now is that if you're in a part of the world where DST rules changed in the past few years (e.g. USA) the time will be off during part of the year, since the time zone DB isn't being updated any more. But we're not talking about Win2K which had a much shorter shelf life and was obsolete a lot faster than XP was. Everything I need XP for (VPN and some apps for work), and everything a few million other people need it for already works. Software can't go unmaintained indefinitely without consequences. Each piece of software has an independent and unknown lifetime and in this case for many if not most users the consequences of going without maintenance are preferable to throwing money down the toilet on a crappier, more bloated version. Most people are either going to get something newer against their will if they buy a new PC or will stay with what they have until their hardware catches on fire. Bottom line is a lot of people are using XP and will not upgrade and it is really not appropriate for anybody to lecture them about doing it. /jl -- ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) Powered by Lemote Fuloong against HTML e-mail X Loongson MIPS and OpenBSD and proprietary/ \http://www.mutt.org attachments / \ Code Blue or Go Home! Encrypted email preferred PGP Key 2048R/DA65BC04 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Thank you for this release. The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball. Samuel Le 11/09/2013 16:03, Richard Hipp a écrit : Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org mailto:d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users attachment: samuel_debionne.vcf___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Samuel Debionne samuel.debio...@ujf-grenoble.fr wrote: The manifest and manifest.uuid is missing from the source tarball. Thanks for the report. This should be fixed now. (Please let me know if you find otherwise.) I have also updated to release-build wiki with correct procedures that include manifest and manifest.uuid in the tarball. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe in place and ran: fossil server file.fossil I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify I just glanced over the Wiki portion of Fossil and nothing else. Jonathan Otsuka On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:00 AM, djg...@gmail.com wrote: This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 64-bit. Jonathan Otuska On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:52:44AM -0500, djg...@gmail.com wrote: I didn't know there was an official testing document, I just dropped the exe in place and ran: fossil server file.fossil I mostly just use fossil for the wiki which it looked fine so just to clarify I just glanced over the Wiki portion of Fossil and nothing else. Jonathan Otsuka Fossil has tons of regressions tests. Download the source, tclsh /path/to/fossil/source/test/tester.tcl /path/to/fossil On Sep 11, 2013, at 10:00 AM, djg...@gmail.com wrote: This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 64-bit. Jonathan Otuska On Sep 11, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page (http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- James Turner ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Hi, 11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. I'm getting fossil.exe is not a valid Win32 application error in WinXP. -- Regards, Hakki Dogusan ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Hi, 11-09-2013 18:40 tarihinde, Hakki Dogusan yazdı: Hi, 11-09-2013 17:03 tarihinde, Richard Hipp yazdı: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html [snip] I'm getting fossil.exe is not a valid Win32 application error in WinXP. DependencyWalker gives following: Error: At least one module has an unresolved import due to a missing export function in an implicitly dependent module. Missing functions in KERNEL32.EXE: CompareStringEx FlsAlloc/Free/GetValue/SetValue GetTickCount64 LCMapStringEx -- Regards, Hakki Dogusan ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. From a quick browse of the timeline it looks like the ssh changes did not make it in to this release. What needs to be done to make adding those changes to the next release possible? Also, a change summary would be helpful to direct testing efforts. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to be in the majority... ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. From a quick browse of the timeline it looks like the ssh changes did not make it in to this release. What needs to be done to make adding those changes to the next release possible? Also, a change summary would be helpful to direct testing efforts. Sorry, of course the change summary is on the web page. I think it would be helpful to paste it into announcement emails. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to be in the majority... -- Matt -=- 90% of the nations wealth is held by 2% of the people. Bummer to be in the majority... ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: From a quick browse of the timeline it looks like the ssh changes did not make it in to this release. What needs to be done to make adding those changes to the next release possible? I'd like to start moving those changes into trunk straight away. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Matt Welland estifo...@gmail.com wrote: Sorry, of course the change summary is on the web page. I think it would be helpful to paste it into announcement emails. See the bottom half of the download page link he sent: http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Windows platform. W dniu 2013-09-11 21:00, Jarek Lewandowski pisze: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support jl ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On 11 September 2013 11:00, djg...@gmail.com wrote: This worked on Windows 2008 R2 64-bit, Windows 7 32-bit, Mountain Lion 10.8.4 64-bit. and Snow Leopard 10.6.8 (and it's i386 so should work everywhere) Well done! Thanks ../Dave ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support jl ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski maxja...@softleg.plwrote: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support I new windows binary with SSL support has been uploaded. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
This version works ok. W dniu 2013-09-11 21:42, Richard Hipp pisze: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jarek Lewandowski maxja...@softleg.pl mailto:maxja...@softleg.pl wrote: I have problem with https: HTTPS: Fossil has been compiled without SSL support I new windows binary with SSL support has been uploaded. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org mailto:d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:03:58 -0400, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html Thanks a ton, Richard! -- Groet, Cordialement, Pozdrawiam, Regards, Kees Nuyt ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:58:56 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Hi, all, Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage' command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone who finds the idea of fossil recording which commands (not their arguments) and the times of their usage in the local checkout database offensive or insecure? These data are _only_ local to the current checkout and are never synchronized. The 'usage' command is only intended for informal personal statistics gathering, and not for spying on developer's activity within a given tree (that would be possible if devs have access to each others' checkout directories). I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands that modify the repository or a stash. I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline If you don't find the idea offensive/abusive, you needn't say anything. If you do, please voice your concerns. If there is sufficient outcry i'll drop that branch instead of integrating it. If we do decide to add it, i will add a config option to toggle it on and off (disabled by default). PS: feel free to suggest a better command name than 'usage'. 'history' would be the obvious choice (due to it's analog in Unix shells), but that command name potentially has better uses in a future fossil version, so i don't want to steal that one. usage - commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory Note: on Linux/unix, it doesn't add much, history [-OPTIONS] | grep fossil will do fine, on MS Windows, I think it really adds value. -- Groet, Cordialement, Pozdrawiam, Regards, Kees Nuyt ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
Hi, all, Once 1.27 officially goes out the door, i plan on pulling the new 'usage' command into the trunk (for 1.28). My question to you is: is there anyone who finds the idea of fossil recording which commands (not their arguments) and the times of their usage in the local checkout database offensive or insecure? These data are _only_ local to the current checkout and are never synchronized. The 'usage' command is only intended for informal personal statistics gathering, and not for spying on developer's activity within a given tree (that would be possible if devs have access to each others' checkout directories). If you don't find the idea offensive/abusive, you needn't say anything. If you do, please voice your concerns. If there is sufficient outcry i'll drop that branch instead of integrating it. If we do decide to add it, i will add a config option to toggle it on and off (disabled by default). PS: feel free to suggest a better command name than 'usage'. 'history' would be the obvious choice (due to it's analog in Unix shells), but that command name potentially has better uses in a future fossil version, so i don't want to steal that one. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands that modify the repository or a stash. i considered it, but the code overhead just wasn't worth it at that time of night. One of these days i'll miss having that, add it, and add a -verbose option which also shows the args. I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline Do you mean the SQL code itself? If so, try: f time -n 1 -sqltrace One can learn a lot about how fossil works by using that. usage - commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;). Note: on Linux/unix, it doesn't add much, history [-OPTIONS] | grep fossil will do fine, on MS Windows, I think it really adds value. Me, too, but i'm aware that many other people have much greater concerns regarding any sort of usage protocols. For me it's harmless, but it's not just about me. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:08 AM, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: fossil set tracker [on|off] ? Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]' i like cmdhist but my fingers don't like typing it :/. cmdhist. Just feels awkward to type. Kind of like the word awkward. cmdhist. cmdhist. Maybe it'll grow on me after a while. cmdhist. It's a bit better now, anyway. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:58 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: fossil set tracker [on|off] ? Or 'fossil set cmdhist [on|off]' Good idea. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: [Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: usage - commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;). Yeah, I'm happy with 'cmdhist' or 'chghist' or 'modhist' or 'shhist' ;) I'd say 'cmdhist'. Is both short and clear what it does. While 'usage' is technically correct as well, in Unix/Linux/POSIX, usage generally refers to how-to-use, not history if use. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
fossil set tracker [on|off] ? On Sep 11, 2013 2:32 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Kees Nuyt k.n...@zonnet.nl wrote: I wouldn't mind logging the arguments as well, especially for commands that modify the repository or a stash. i considered it, but the code overhead just wasn't worth it at that time of night. One of these days i'll miss having that, add it, and add a -verbose option which also shows the args. I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline Do you mean the SQL code itself? If so, try: f time -n 1 -sqltrace One can learn a lot about how fossil works by using that. usage - commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;). Note: on Linux/unix, it doesn't add much, history [-OPTIONS] | grep fossil will do fine, on MS Windows, I think it really adds value. Me, too, but i'm aware that many other people have much greater concerns regarding any sort of usage protocols. For me it's harmless, but it's not just about me. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] RFC before trunking 'usage' command
[Default] On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 23:32:10 +0200, Stephan Beal
sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
I wouldn't be interested in logging query-class commands, like
fossil ls, fossil status, fossil timeline
Do you mean the SQL code itself?
No, I now realize query is a confusing word.
I mean the class of commands that doesn't change anything to a
repository or a checkout is not interesting for logging.
So,
fossil {ls|status|timeline|changes|extra| ... }
don't have to be logged,
fossil {pull|push|sync|open|commit|stash| ... }
are interesting though.
usage - commandtrace or commandhistory or cmdtrace or cmdhistory
i think 3 of those might mess up the column alignment in 'help' ;).
Yeah, I'm happy with 'cmdhist' or 'chghist' or 'modhist' or 'shhist' ;)
--
Groet, Cordialement, Pozdrawiam, Regards,
Kees Nuyt
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Autosync: Too bad git doesn't have it...
It appears that autosync would have saved Linus Torvalds from losing some work yesterday. See http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1309.1/01669.html for details. Bummer. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. Hi Richard, I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to 4.8. So I guess we should change 4.7 to 4.8 on the download page too.. -- Martin G. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Versions of OpenBSD before 5.2 are obsolete and unsupported. On 12 September 2013 10:35, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Fossil version 1.27 has been tagged and precompiled binaries have been uploaded to http://www.fossil-scm.org/download.html I do this infrequently enough that I keep forgetting exactly how things were compiled the previous time. So please try out the precompiled binaries and let me know if you encounter any problems. I started a wiki page ( http://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/wiki?name=Release+Build+How-To) describing how the precompiled binaries are produced. If adjustments need to be made for compatibility purposes, please let me know. For example, will the Windows8 build using MSVC-x86 work for everybody, or do I need to redo that build on (say) Windows7 or perhaps using MinGW? Does the Mac binary work on all intel-based Mac systems? Etc. I'll send out an official release announcement once a few people have verified the current binaries. Hi Richard, I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to 4.8. So I guess we should change 4.7 to 4.8 on the download page too.. -- Martin G. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users -- Christopher Vance ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to 4.8. So I guess we should change 4.7 to 4.8 on the download page too.. Changed to a more generic 4.x. Updated version numbers for MacOS and Linux in the same way. -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com writes: Fossil's testing infrastructure is not as amazing as sqlite's. For each release we (normally several of us) run through the following checklist: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/trunk/test/release-checklist.wiki Can I just say, the inclusion of OpenBSD on that checklist as an, apparently, first-tier platform is one of the the things that makes me want to continue to use Fossil. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Version 1.27
Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org writes: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Martin Gagnon eme...@gmail.com wrote: I notice from your Release+Build+How+To wiki, you build the OpenBSD release from devious free shell service. I also have an account on devious and I just notice they recently upgrade from OpenBSD 4.7 to 4.8. So I guess we should change 4.7 to 4.8 on the download page too.. Changed to a more generic 4.x. Updated version numbers for MacOS and Linux in the same way. Given that the most recent version of OpenBSD is 5.3, and that only the current and previous releases are supported, is there anything--other than what James Turner (who I see is the port maintainer) is already doing--that I can do to ensure that Fossil works properly on OpenBSD? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
