[fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Richard Hipp
I have succumbed to the temptations of eye-candy.  Please offer your
thoughts and constructive comments on the new
lookhttp://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/index.wikiof the
Fossil website versus the previous
style http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki.

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:

 I have succumbed to the temptations of eye-candy.  Please offer your
 thoughts and constructive comments on the new 
 lookhttp://www.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/index.wikiof the Fossil 
 website versus the previous
 style http://www2.fossil-scm.org/fossil/doc/trunk/www/index.wiki.


i like the corners, but the background seems a bit too 1998. i like the
rotated skeleton, too. My roommate says the background clashes too much
with the site's colors.

-- 
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2012/3/31 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com:
 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:

 I have succumbed to the temptations of eye-candy.  Please offer your
 thoughts and constructive comments on the new look of the Fossil website
 versus the previous style.


 i like the corners, but the background seems a bit too 1998. i like the
 rotated skeleton, too. My roommate says the background clashes too much with
 the site's colors.

 --
 - stephan beal
 http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
 http://gplus.to/sgbeal


Everything is nice, but please forget about the background :)
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Baptiste Daroussin 
baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote:

 2012/3/31 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com:
  On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
 
  I have succumbed to the temptations of eye-candy.  Please offer your
  thoughts and constructive comments on the new look of the Fossil website
  versus the previous style.
 
 
  i like the corners, but the background seems a bit too 1998. i like the
  rotated skeleton, too. My roommate says the background clashes too much
 with
  the site's colors.
 
  --
  - stephan beal
  http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
  http://gplus.to/sgbeal
 

 Everything is nice, but please forget about the background :)



So now I have three variants up for consideration:

  (1)  http://www.fossil-scm.org/
  (2)  http://www2.fossil-scm.org/
  (3)  http://www3.fossil-scm.org/

#1 is the recent change, with the rock background, which I (being very old
school) prefer.  #2 is the original before recent changes.  #3 is like #1
but without the background image.

Please continue with feedback.

-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
2012/3/31 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org:


 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Baptiste Daroussin
 baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote:

 2012/3/31 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com:
  On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
 
  I have succumbed to the temptations of eye-candy.  Please offer your
  thoughts and constructive comments on the new look of the Fossil
  website
  versus the previous style.
 
 
  i like the corners, but the background seems a bit too 1998. i like the
  rotated skeleton, too. My roommate says the background clashes too much
  with
  the site's colors.
 
  --
  - stephan beal
  http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
  http://gplus.to/sgbeal
 

 Everything is nice, but please forget about the background :)



 So now I have three variants up for consideration:

   (1)  http://www.fossil-scm.org/
   (2)  http://www2.fossil-scm.org/
   (3)  http://www3.fossil-scm.org/

 #1 is the recent change, with the rock background, which I (being very old
 school) prefer.  #2 is the original before recent changes.  #3 is like #1
 but without the background image.

 Please continue with feedback.


I do prefer #3.

regards,
Bapt
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Stephan Beal
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:

   (1)  http://www.fossil-scm.org/
   (2)  http://www2.fossil-scm.org/
   (3)  http://www3.fossil-scm.org/

 #1 is the recent change, with the rock background, which I (being very old
 school) prefer.  #2 is the original before recent changes.  #3 is like #1
 but without the background image.


i like #3 except on my netbook, where another 50 pixels makes all the
difference in screen space.

-- 
- stephan beal
http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
http://gplus.to/sgbeal
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski

On Mar 31, 2012, at 18:31 , Richard Hipp wrote:

 So now I have three variants up for consideration:
 
  (1)  http://www.fossil-scm.org/
  (2)  http://www2.fossil-scm.org/
  (3)  http://www3.fossil-scm.org/
 
 #1 is the recent change, with the rock background, which I (being very old
 school) prefer.  #2 is the original before recent changes.  #3 is like #1
 but without the background image.

I dislike the disturbing margins. Apart from them, the change seems ok.


Kind regards,
Remigiusz Modrzejewski



___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Jacek Cała
Actually, the thing I like most is the rotated skeleton. BTW, have you
considered a different logo. For me fossils usually associate with
ammonites, like:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Haeckel_Douvilleiceras_mammillatum.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Haeckel_Ammonitida.jpg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonoidea

If you like it then perhaps there's someone on the list with enough
talent to produce a nice logo from one of the Haeckel ammonites.

  Cheers,
  Jacek

2012/3/31 Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org:


 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Baptiste Daroussin
 baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote:

 2012/3/31 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com:
  On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote:
 
  I have succumbed to the temptations of eye-candy.  Please offer your
  thoughts and constructive comments on the new look of the Fossil
  website
  versus the previous style.
 
 
  i like the corners, but the background seems a bit too 1998. i like the
  rotated skeleton, too. My roommate says the background clashes too much
  with
  the site's colors.
 
  --
  - stephan beal
  http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/
  http://gplus.to/sgbeal
 

 Everything is nice, but please forget about the background :)



 So now I have three variants up for consideration:

   (1)  http://www.fossil-scm.org/
   (2)  http://www2.fossil-scm.org/
   (3)  http://www3.fossil-scm.org/

 #1 is the recent change, with the rock background, which I (being very old
 school) prefer.  #2 is the original before recent changes.  #3 is like #1
 but without the background image.

 Please continue with feedback.


 --
 D. Richard Hipp
 d...@sqlite.org

 ___
 fossil-users mailing list
 fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
 http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users

___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Christopher Berardi
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:31:50PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
So now I have three variants up for consideration:
 
  (1)  http://www.fossil-scm.org/
  (2)  http://www2.fossil-scm.org/
  (3)  http://www3.fossil-scm.org/
 
#1 is the recent change, with the rock background, which I (being very old
school) prefer.  #2 is the original before recent changes.  #3 is like #1
but without the background image.

I don't like the wallpaper background in #1! It reminds me of a 1990's
website (and no, it didn't look good back then either). We shouldn't
strive to be _that_ kind of fossil.

I like the rotated fossil logo because it is more space efficient than
the upright version.

Whether or not to keep the new outside thick border, I could go either
way.

The link colors on #1 are nice - I especially like how the unclicked
link is a nice subtle blue. But, please leave it a bluish hue for
unclicked and a purplish hue for click - if for nothing else but
standard convention's sake. I got very confused very quick on the
reverse motif of whether or not I had been somewhere (but, I know I
clicked on that link and read that doc, why is the link still blue???).

-- 
Christopher Berardi
http://www.natoufa.com/

May grace and peace by yours in abundance.
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users


Re: [fossil-users] New CSS on the Fossil homepage

2012-03-31 Thread Richard Hipp
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Christopher Berardi
cbera...@natoufa.comwrote:

 On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:31:50PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
 So now I have three variants up for consideration:
 
   (1)  http://www.fossil-scm.org/
   (2)  http://www2.fossil-scm.org/
   (3)  http://www3.fossil-scm.org/
 
 #1 is the recent change, with the rock background, which I (being
 very old
 school) prefer.  #2 is the original before recent changes.  #3 is
 like #1
 but without the background image.

 I don't like the wallpaper background in #1! It reminds me of a 1990's
 website (and no, it didn't look good back then either).


Well, the consensus seems to be emerging that the background image is a bad
idea.  So I've taken it out of the CSS for now.  (It is only commented out,
so it can easily be added back in later - and I'll keep it active on my
person clones of the repo, of course).  All the rest is the same.
-- 
D. Richard Hipp
d...@sqlite.org
___
fossil-users mailing list
fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users