Re: [fossil-users] Support for Win9x?
On 09/13/12 16:02, Richard Hipp wrote: Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x? I don't think much Win9x development goes on today. But even if I'm wrong, I would guess that the intersection between the sets Win9X developers and Fossil users is roughly empty. Tag last win95-compatible version so anyone so inclined can dig it up easily, just in case? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Support for Win9x?
Even if someone is still supporting Win9X, it does not necessarily follow that they are doing anything more that testing binaries in that environment. I would not be heartbroken if such support were removed. SDR On Sep 13, 2012 8:25 AM, Jan Danielsson jan.m.daniels...@gmail.com wrote: On 09/13/12 16:02, Richard Hipp wrote: Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x? I don't think much Win9x development goes on today. But even if I'm wrong, I would guess that the intersection between the sets Win9X developers and Fossil users is roughly empty. Tag last win95-compatible version so anyone so inclined can dig it up easily, just in case? -- Kind regards, Jan Danielsson ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Support for Win9x?
On 13/09/2012, at 9:02 AM, Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org wrote: Is there any reason to try to keep Fossil working on windows9x? Only if you are a technonecrophiliac Steve ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
