Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
Richard Hipp wrote about this before: https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users%40lists.fossil-scm.org/msg11761.html His reponse in that link: The pull and sync are requesting and receiving all SHUN records. You can disable this using fossil setting auto-shun off On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said B Harder on Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:40:58 -0700: myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 424 bytes sent, 612 bytes received It seems that I gave you the wrong option. Please try: fossil pull --httptrace Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400053b9c98a ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
That looks to be the end of this mystery. For those wondering why do we request the same shun artifacts over and over and over and...: == The fact that the shunning list does not propagate is a security feature. If the shunning list propagated then a malicious user (or a bug in the fossil code) might introduce a shun record that would propagate through all repositories in a network and permanently destroy vital information. By refusing to propagate the shunning list, Fossil insures that no remote user will ever be able to remove information from your personal repositories without your permission. == Thanks Andy, Ron, Stephan, Donny. -bch On 7/7/14, Donny Ward donnyjw...@gmail.com wrote: Richard Hipp wrote about this before: https://www.mail-archive.com/fossil-users%40lists.fossil-scm.org/msg11761.html His reponse in that link: The pull and sync are requesting and receiving all SHUN records. You can disable this using fossil setting auto-shun off On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Andy Bradford amb-fos...@bradfords.org wrote: Thus said B Harder on Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:40:58 -0700: myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 424 bytes sent, 612 bytes received It seems that I gave you the wrong option. Please try: fossil pull --httptrace Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400053b9c98a ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:10 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Fossil insures that no remote user will ever be able to remove Shouldn't that be ensures? i always confuse the two. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do. -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
Good catch: you're correct. -bch On 7/7/14, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 10:10 PM, B Harder brad.har...@gmail.com wrote: Fossil insures that no remote user will ever be able to remove Shouldn't that be ensures? i always confuse the two. -- - stephan beal http://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ http://gplus.to/sgbeal Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist on a perfect world, freedom will have to do. -- Bigby Wolf ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
Thus said Donny Ward on Mon, 07 Jul 2014 12:56:03 -0700: His reponse in that link: The pull and sync are requesting and receiving all SHUN records. I'm not sure that this is what is happening in this case. The --httptrace output only showed 3 gimme cards requested and none of them are on the SHUN list. Also, the received count only increments for file, cfile and config cards if I'm not mistaken, so the data that comes in as part of the unclustered artifacts will not count for it. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400053bb05f5 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
Thus said Andy Bradford on 07 Jul 2014 14:40:51 -0600: I'm not sure that this is what is happening in this case. The --httptrace output only showed 3 gimme cards requested and none of them are on the SHUN list. Ok, apparently the --httptrace that was sent was not representative of the problem reported. I have been able to reproduce it and indeed it is due to receiving config data for shunned artifacts in the response. Included in the request was: reqconfig /shun And of course in the response: config /shun 63 1305210229 '0335363c1394804c7c9677842ddc81889d1e18b1' scom NULL config /shun 63 1305210229 '093ff6aedd0832beb6dc09e86606ea05e0ef42b5' scom NULL config /shun 63 1305210229 '0a838c29e8ba80fa9cb4e68c316e7f1a568e9eca' scom NULL $ grep -c '^config' http-reply-1.txt 74 Thanks Donny for digging up this information from the mailing list archive. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400053bb3045 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Can't answer, but i see it only with 'pull', not with 'update'. [odroid@host:~/fossil/fossil]$ f pull Pull from http://step...@fossil-scm.org/index.html Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 453 bytes sent, 2644 bytes received [odroid@host:~/fossil/fossil]$ f up Autosync: http://step...@fossil-scm.org/index.html Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 438 bytes sent, 612 bytes received Maybe there was nothing left for update to pull? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 439 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 425 bytes sent, 612 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 441 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 440 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 442 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 424 bytes sent, 612 bytes received On 7/6/14, Ron Wilson ronw.m...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:54 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: Can't answer, but i see it only with 'pull', not with 'update'. [odroid@host:~/fossil/fossil]$ f pull Pull from http://step...@fossil-scm.org/index.html Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 453 bytes sent, 2644 bytes received [odroid@host:~/fossil/fossil]$ f up Autosync: http://step...@fossil-scm.org/index.html Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 438 bytes sent, 612 bytes received Maybe there was nothing left for update to pull? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
Thus said B Harder on Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:40:58 -0700: myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 442 bytes sent, 2645 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 424 bytes sent, 612 bytes received Foiled! If you ever happen to get it to receive 74 artifacts with --http-trace, there will be some files named http-request*.txt and http-reply*.txt that will be useful to show us what was received. The other alternative is a debugger. Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400053b9c913 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] artifacts received
Thus said B Harder on Sun, 06 Jul 2014 14:40:58 -0700: myhost$ fossil pull http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org --http-trace Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 424 bytes sent, 612 bytes received It seems that I gave you the wrong option. Please try: fossil pull --httptrace Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400053b9c98a ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] artifacts received
What are the artifacts received below? Is these administrative, or is there something else at play? myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 442 bytes sent, 2308 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 439 bytes sent, 2307 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 441 bytes sent, 2308 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 442 bytes sent, 2308 bytes received myhost$ fossil pull Pull from http://joeb...@fossil-scm.org Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 74 Pull finished with 440 bytes sent, 2308 bytes received myhost$ ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] Artifacts received: pull/sync vs. update
The following output is a tad puzzling, --8-- $ fossil pull Pull from http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 68 Pull finished with 332 bytes sent, 4436 bytes received $ fossil sync Sync with http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 68 Pull finished with 2734 bytes sent, 4498 bytes received $ fossil update Autosync: http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 0 Pull finished with 315 bytes sent, 2571 bytes received[...] checkout: f4bcdb62fb[...] $ fossil pull Pull from http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 68 Pull finished with 331 bytes sent, 4437 bytes received $ fossil sync Sync with http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Round-trips: 1 Artifacts sent: 0 received: 68 Pull finished with 2735 bytes sent, 4498 bytes received --8-- Why do pull sync report 68 artifacts received, while update w/autosync reports 0? (This is fossil version 1.25 [f4bcdb62fb] 2013-05-09 15:30:43 UTC) Best, Marc ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
