Re: [fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?
On Dec 12, 2012, at 08:28 , Gour wrote: On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:59:59 -0600 C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com wrote: Is there some way to push just a specific branch to a server other than the private branch feature? No, but it was discussed in the past...btw, I'd also like to have selective push/pull feature. IIRC the conclusion of these discussions always was: there's no problem with that, we just need someone who wants it badly enough to implement it. Funny how this never happened. Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?
Actually it turns out I can do what I want the existing private branch feature. I noticed that on --push, --pull, and --clone there is a --private option that says to include private branches. So to use my earlier example, branch would be private, and pushes to sever1 would use the --private option. -- C. Thomas Stover Stover Enterprises, LLC ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?
On Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:21:41 -0600 C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com wrote: Actually it turns out I can do what I want the existing private branch feature. I noticed that on --push, --pull, and --clone there is a --private option that says to include private branches. The problem is in private branchES, iow, there is no ability to be selective. Same with getting rid of them - all or nothing. Sincerely, Gour -- But for one who takes pleasure in the self, whose human life is one of self-realization, and who is satisfied in the self only, fully satiated — for him there is no duty. http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?
Le 2012-12-12 13:21, C. Thomas Stover a écrit : Actually it turns out I can do what I want the existing private branch feature. I noticed that on --push, --pull, and --clone there is a --private option that says to include private branches. So to use my earlier example, branch would be private, and pushes to sever1 would use the --private option. But if I understand well this --private options, it will sync *all* private branches. -- Martin G. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
[fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?
Is there some way to push just a specific branch to a server other than the private branch feature? For example branch A and B are both stored locally, and are both pushed to server 1, yet only branch B is pushed to server 2. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] pushing only specific branches to specific servers?
On Tue, 11 Dec 2012 18:59:59 -0600 C. Thomas Stover c...@thomasstover.com wrote: Is there some way to push just a specific branch to a server other than the private branch feature? No, but it was discussed in the past...btw, I'd also like to have selective push/pull feature. Sincerely, Gour -- He who is regulated in his habits of eating, sleeping, recreation and work can mitigate all material pains by practicing the yoga system. http://www.atmarama.net | Hlapicina (Croatia) | GPG: 52B5C810 ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
