Re: [fossil-users] Fossil SCGI Server Regression (from 1.36 to 1.37)
So I did bisect yesterday and oh wonder, everything worked properly. I don't know why I had an issue on Sunday but today it works on a new test server as well as on my production server. So all-clear for the server --scgi command. I would like to use the occasion to thank you developers of fossil again for this magnificent piece of software. I have to use git at work which is a mess and I am so happy that I can use a good source control system for all my project. So, thank you again. Best regards. Thomas. > 2017-02-13 0:28 GMT+01:00 Richard Hipp: >>> I guess there was a regression introduced somewhere between [8b03934e] >>> and [fb4b87d9]. >> >> Would you be willing to bisect for us? > > Sure. I will report my findings later today. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil SCGI Server Regression (from 1.36 to 1.37)
2017-02-13 0:28 GMT+01:00 Richard Hipp: >> I guess there was a regression introduced somewhere between [8b03934e] >> and [fb4b87d9]. > > Would you be willing to bisect for us? Sure. I will report my findings later today. ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users
Re: [fossil-users] Fossil SCGI Server Regression (from 1.36 to 1.37)
On 2/12/17, Thomas Bilkwrote: > > I guess there was a regression introduced somewhere between [8b03934e] > and [fb4b87d9]. Would you be willing to bisect for us? -- D. Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org http://lists.fossil-scm.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fossil-users