Re: telnet_mail and a poke at contact information.

2001-09-19 Thread David Johnson

Hi Duc,

I did the write up on the various methods of e-mailing.  I would be willing 
to write it up more formally for the FAQ.  I'll have it to you by Friday.

As far as contact information goes:
This is kind of silly.  It is ridiculously easy to make an alternate e-mail 
address and subscribe to the list server.  Are we really going to start 
making phone calls before we answer questions on the list?  Most of the 
information provided here is freely available to anyone willing to read the 
Foxboro manual set (although the list is often helpful with the 
interpretation, tricks, etc).  If this is a real security concern then we 
should start sending PGP authenticated signatures with the messages, and do 
we really want that?

I am also sending Mark Holts latitude and longitude to our spy satellites 
to see if he is really there.


Regards,

David Johnson
Of course I'm who I say I am, why would anyone want to be me.
Premier System Integrators
(256) 355-1732



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




More on Archestra

2001-09-19 Thread David Johnson

James Kahlden gave a link to Wonderware's website about ArchestrA
http://www.wonderware.com/Aboutus/news/archive/010626-ArchestrA.htm

And today my Managing Automation issue had an article about it.

http://www.managingautomation.com/Scripts/WebObjects.exe/ma.woa/4/wo/a5c87UX 
7hKL02dH8QWv32a2OUuO/4.1.172.25.11.0.3.1.1.6

Here is a brief section of the article quoted out of context. (I gave you 
the link, read it yourself!) Bear in mind the guy quoted does not work for 
Invensys, so it's just his speculation.

[
As much as ArchestrA will benefit Wonderware and its customers, it could be 
an even bigger advantage to parent Invensys. Imagine the benefits ArchestrA 
would bring as the underlying framework for all Invensys products, with 
products from the various divisions all leveraging the framework for 
standard services.

Craig Resnick, director of hybrid manufacturing research for ARC Advisory 
Group (Dedham, MA), believes ArchestrA will be the foundation for all 
Invensys software products. He says, ArchestrA is the glue that lets 
customers centralize licensing and revision control, and coordinates all of 
the software that's running on the floor. It'll also be a platform they can 
take to third parties to build products to plug-and-play with the 
infrastructure. In the beginning, the biggest benefit will be to all 
Invensys plants that need to manage software from Foxboro, Baan, and other 
Invensys divisions and really create a sensor-to-boardroom solution.
]

The article was pretty good, but not very specific as to how all the pieces 
are supposed to fit together.

Regards,
David I am not now, nor have I ever been a member of the communist party
Johnson
Premier System Integrators
(256) 355-1732



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




What the future holds.

2001-09-14 Thread David Johnson

Hey gang,

I just got this in my weekly ARCwire email and thought some of you might be 
interested.

[
Invensys Software has announced a new ability to deliver open, unified 
automation and information solutions for process, batch, discrete, and 
hybrid manufacturing applications. The common platform is build around the 
Invensys ArchestrA framework, which has been in development since 1998. It 
will be used to unify the Invensys Foxboro, APV, Wonderware, Triconex, 
Esscor, and Simulation Sciences products for broader applicability across 
all manufacturing industry and application domains. The common 
architecture, which will run on Microsoft technology, will offer a 
migration path for customers, greater ease of use, scalability, and more 
functionality.
]

Let us dissect the last sentence.
  The common architecture, (we're putting all of our development effort 
into one platform) which will run on Microsoft technology(no surprise 
here), will offer a migration path for customers(Solaris users are in 
trouble), greater ease of use (always promised, seldom delivered), 
scalability (You can mix and match NT, 2000 and XP), and more 
functionality(comes with Excel plug-ins).

At least that's my take on it.  Any of you guys familiar with this 
ArchestrA stuff?  I'd like to know what you think.

Regards,
David


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




MKS toolkit vi (a new thread!)

2001-09-05 Thread David Johnson

Alex,

That should read:

Not all commercial products are bad things.

Speaking of the MKS toolkit. http://www.mkssoftware.com/

The MKS toolkit is very helpful to have around since the 70 series platform 
makes use of it.  If you buy it from MKS, you get really good hardcopy 
documentation, man pages that work (Hell Foxboro!) and some other nifty 
utilities and features, including vi  vi for windows (viw).  It's been 
very helpful to me and cost less than $500 for a single user developers kit.

Regards,

David Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Return Receipt Notification to the mail list.

2001-09-05 Thread David Johnson

I notice that return receipt notification puts this in the header of the 
headache inducing message.

Disposition-Notification-To:

Followed by the e-mail address to respond to. Would it be possible to 
bounce these messages from the server before they get posted?  Then people 
wouldn't have to worry about automatic notification.

Just a thought.

David Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: File system error massege

2001-09-04 Thread David Johnson

If you suspect a disk is full, first you need to determine which mount 
point is full.

 From vt100 mode try the following

df -k /
df -k /usr
df -k /var
df -k /opt
df -k /tmp

If any of these are show 100% under the capacity, then that's the file 
system with the problem.  Start looking for the usual suspects like core 
files, crash files, tar files, or log files that grow forever.  Now start 
drilling through the disk using the du command to find these really large 
files, if they can safely be deleted, whack them.

Good luck,
David



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: FoxCAE Enhancements

2001-08-21 Thread David Johnson

I don't know exactly how to put this, but every time I use FoxCAE for any 
serious work I feel like I have to beat the software into submission.  It 
is very non-intuitive.  Window conventions, icons, etc. are weird.  It 
occasionally crashes! It is possible to go into the sheet editor and modify 
sheets such that nothing can print. Standard page setups are inadequate for 
large plots.   Help is inconsistent where it is available.  It does not 
handle PLB logic. It does not handle sequence logic(HLBL).  It doesn't show 
(find) unsecured sets on parameters.

I like the graphical loop idea, I think some of the features of CAE are 
really neat, but it is one of the most aggravating products that I have 
ever repeatedly used.  (If there was an alternative, I would switch.)

I don't know why Foxboro / Invensys Process Systems / whatever waits so 
long for such incremental upgrades on this product.  I think it's so they 
can charge for some marginal improvements, while major holes remain.

Boy it felt good to vent.

Regards,
David


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Putting ECBs on/off line without using System Monitor

2001-07-30 Thread David Johnson

Does anyone know of a way to put ECBs on and off line without using the 
System Monitor?  I would like to be able to do this from a program or 
script file but do not know of a way to do it.


Regards,
David Johnson



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




AW70 System Monitor Question

2001-03-14 Thread David Johnson

I have an AW70 that I do not have the necessary privileges to set the time, 
make configuration changes, etc. in the system monitor.  The AW70 hosts a 
local system monitor and I would like to be able to add these privileges to 
it without having to re-make and re-install a commit disk.  Does anyone 
know a what files need to be modified to solve this inconvenience?

Thanks,
David



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: [Digest] Email from AW51B to MS Exchange

2000-11-17 Thread David Johnson

Chad,

Make sure that SMPT is turned in MS Exchange.  You can sometimes get more 
information by telneting into the Exchange Server.  If port 25 doesn't work 
try port 110 that should be the POP3 port.

here's a copy of my session

AW51B1# telnet mailhost 25
Trying 192.168.1.1...
Connected to BAMA_NT_SERVER2.
Escape character is '^]'.
220 bama-nt-server2.192.168.1.1 ESMTP Server (Microsoft Exchange Internet 
Mail Service 5.5.1960.3) ready
quit
221 closing connection
Connection closed by foreign host.
AW51B1#

So if you can telnet to port 25 (smtp) it might tell you something.


Good Luck,
David



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Alex's colon and other disturbing things.

2000-10-17 Thread David Johnson

At 10/17/00 03:43 PM, Bo Stear wrote :
Can anyone actually believe that Alex Johnson lost his COLON?

I can believe it.
I lost my ass once in a poker game.


By the way,

The Southeastern Users group meeting is Nov. 2nd and 3rd, a Thursday and 
Friday. It will be at the Embassy Suites in Greenville, SC.  If you are 
interested in attending contact Denise Kendrick or Bill Whitfield.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
803 808-2508 phone
770 329-2687 cell
803 808-0228 fax


Bill Whitfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
864 879-5011 phone

These are always good meetings, so make plans to attend.  You do not have 
to be from the Southeast region to attend!


Regards,
David


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




AW51B, blinktask and 24 bit color

2000-10-03 Thread David Johnson

Hello all,

I need to know if it is possible to get the blinktask to respond correctly 
to a SBus video card that supports 24 bit color.  When the station boots, I 
get a blinktask warning and some highlighting doesn't work.  I think it's 
possible to tell the workstation to use only 256 colors, but I don't know 
how. (Or why you would want to for that matter.)

Regards,
David


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




AB KF2 at 19.2 Kbaud?

2000-09-06 Thread David Johnson

I have noticed that most of the Allen-Bradley KF2 modules I come across in 
the field are running at 9600 baud.  I also know of some instances where a 
Foxboro Integrator 30 is communicating with AB KF2s at 19.2 Kbaud.  Is 
there any reason not to run the baud rate at 19.2K? You sure get a lot more 
I/O throughput that way.

Regards,
David


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Event triggered data collection

2000-08-30 Thread David Johnson

Hello all,

I was wondering if there is a good way to do event triggered data 
collection in the legacy (Informix) historian.  Ideally I would like to 
place a value in the historian only when a counter increments.  Is there a 
way to do this at the historian configuration level, or do I need to write 
some C code to take care of it?  Any thoughts on this would be appreciated.

Regards,
David


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




An interesting note on quality.

2000-07-27 Thread David Johnson

Here's a little something I found in the Invensys annual report that I 
thought might be of interest to those of you on the list.

We are aggressively applying Lean Enterprise and Six Sigma quality 
improvement practices in manufacturing, project engineering, administration 
and the supply chain.  During the year we cut the number of manufacturing 
plants by 22% and continued to shift production and engineering to lower 
cost countries: 20% of I/A Series(c) hardware is now produced in China.

Bruce Henderson
Invensys Intelligent Automation Division Chief Executive

from the Invensys 2000 annual reportpage 29




I have a hard time reconciling sentence number one with sentences two and 
three in the above paragraph.  Of course that could just mean SUN is 
manufacturing in China these days. :-o

BTW if you want an Invensys annual report just go to the Invensys web site 
and e mail for one to be sent to you.  It's more interesting reading than 
you might think.


Regards,
David




---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Some notes about the conference.

2000-07-26 Thread David Johnson

Hello all,

For those of you attending the conference, here are a few items of note.

I am speaking as a member of the steering committee here, so bear with me.

First.
There will be a welcome reception Sunday night at the Westin.  This should 
provide everyone with an opportunity to do a little informal mixing and 
would be a good place to discuss problems and lobby for improvements you 
want to see made to the system.  Plus a good turnout for the welcome 
reception would be appreciated by our Foxboro hosts.  And it makes us look 
good too. Oh yeah, free drinks!

Second.
There is supposed to be, a white board, or paper wall, or something to that 
effect, to post messages on during the conference.  If you want to get a 
group of people with similar ideas and issues together you can put a 
message up where everyone is SUPPOSED to check. Or you can decide to 
present a topic of your own choosing to see how it's received.

Third.
We have asked that some of the rooms at either the Hynes, or the Westin be 
made available for groups to meet after hours.  That way you could get 
thirty  plus people together for an ad hoc discussion.

Fourth.
Although the agenda is fairly crowded, do try to spend a little time after 
hours getting to know other users.  The conference is shorter this year, so
don't plan spending as many nights out on the town.  The whole point is to 
come together and get to know each other better.

Fifth.
That's my fifth! Don't drink my bourbon!

Sixth.
The steering committee will be turning over a lot of people at the end of 
this year, and some new faces are needed. If you are interested in serving 
on the steering committee next year, try to let Edward Prejean (el 
presidente') know about your interest as early in the conference as possible.


Hope to see you there.
David






---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: Back on the Soap Box

2000-07-20 Thread David Johnson

To add to what Neil just said, what about having to EPROM the FBMs, do we 
have to have redundant I/O too?

David


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




RE: Trouble with phasing blocks in an AB Integrator30

2000-06-19 Thread David Johnson

[Summary:
  I can't get an Integrator 30 to read from a PLC with Period 3, Phase 1.

  Tim Lowell suggested that I leave the COMPOUNDS PERIOD 1 PHASE 0 and then 
phase the ABSCAN and following blocks to reduce station loading. ]

Tim,

I did attempt to use a PERIOD 1 PHASE 0 on the compound, and then PERIOD 3 
PHASE 1 on the ABSCAN and subsequent BLOCKS. The problem persisted until I 
phased them to PERIOD 3 PHASE 0.

Any other ideas?

Thanks,
David




---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




[NOT] using in.routed with I/A [was Ethernet Networking Question]

2000-06-05 Thread David Johnson

Alex Johnson warns against starting in.routed which will forward packets 
between the two ethernet cards in the Solaris box.  This has the effect of 
routing the secondary ethernet traffic onto the nodebus.  I think you can 
see why that's a bad thing.  That's why Foxboro comments the in.routed 
lines out of a normal Solaris boot sequence.

However, if you use the -q (quiet) option when you start in.routed the 
routing tables are maintained for both ethernet cards, but no routing 
occurs between the cards.  This is part of setting up a firewall in 
Solaris.  I have successfully used this method for some time.  I believe 
Foxboro's concern is the difference between in.routed and in.routed -q is 
quite extreme for one little argument.  For safety's sake it is probably 
better to maintain the routing tables by hand.  Discretion being the better 
part of valor and all that.

I would recommend anyone interested in learning more about this check out 
http://docs.sun.com and see what they have to say about setting up your 
TCP/IP network.  The Solaris 2.6 System Administrator Collection Vol 1 does 
a much better job of explaining the options available to you than the man 
pages that get included with the systems.

Regards,

David Johnson
Premier System Integrators
(256) 355-1732


---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Thanks to all for the Modbus info.

2000-03-14 Thread David Johnson

I will attempt to summarize the responses I got about communications with a 
PC using the Modbus Integrator and send it to Duc to put on the web page.

Thanks to all who replied.

David



---
This list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by the Foxboro Company. All 
postings from this list are the work of list subscribers and no warranty 
is made or implied as to the accuracy of any information disseminated 
through this medium. By subscribing to this list you agree to hold the 
list sponsor(s) blameless for any and all mishaps which might occur due to 
your application of information received from this mailing list.

To be removed from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with unsubscribe foxboro in the Subject. Or, send any mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]