Re: Base Kerberos 5 support?

1999-07-24 Thread Mark Murray

 I would love to see krb 5 made part of the standard distribution.  BEST
 has been using it for several years now with no problems and I believe
 that it is a whole lot easier to administrate then krb 4.

I have Heimdal commit-ready (this has been the case for a year). I am
waiting for it to be more compatible with MITK5.

M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Re: Base Kerberos 5 support?

1999-07-24 Thread Mark Murray
 I would love to see krb 5 made part of the standard distribution.  BEST
 has been using it for several years now with no problems and I believe
 that it is a whole lot easier to administrate then krb 4.

I have Heimdal commit-ready (this has been the case for a year). I am
waiting for it to be more compatible with MITK5.

M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Base Kerberos 5 support?

1999-07-21 Thread Amancio Hasty



Howdy ,

I noticed this :

http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/server/Deploy/security/MitKerb.asp

Microsoft claims that they are going to be compatible with MIT Kerberos 5 
or so the story goes 8)

I noticed that the based kerberized tools in FreeBSD are for Kerberos IV...

I installed Kerberos 5 port on my system and it appears to work except
in multi-homed server: I get replay dispatch errors ...

My work around was simply to start moving my network services to a 
a box which I don't use often and it has a single interface which is okay
and right for internal network services such as kerberos .


Cheers


-- 

 Amancio Hasty
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Base Kerberos 5 support?

1999-07-21 Thread Amancio Hasty


Howdy ,

I noticed this :

http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/server/Deploy/security/MitKerb.asp

Microsoft claims that they are going to be compatible with MIT Kerberos 5 
or so the story goes 8)

I noticed that the based kerberized tools in FreeBSD are for Kerberos IV...

I installed Kerberos 5 port on my system and it appears to work except
in multi-homed server: I get replay dispatch errors ...

My work around was simply to start moving my network services to a 
a box which I don't use often and it has a single interface which is okay
and right for internal network services such as kerberos .


Cheers


-- 

 Amancio Hasty
 ha...@rah.star-gate.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: Base Kerberos 5 support?

1999-07-21 Thread Matthew Dillon
:Howdy ,
:
:I noticed this :
:
:http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/server/Deploy/security/MitKerb.asp
:
:Microsoft claims that they are going to be compatible with MIT Kerberos 5 
:or so the story goes 8)
:
:I noticed that the based kerberized tools in FreeBSD are for Kerberos IV...
:
:I installed Kerberos 5 port on my system and it appears to work except
:in multi-homed server: I get replay dispatch errors ...
:
:My work around was simply to start moving my network services to a 
:a box which I don't use often and it has a single interface which is okay
:and right for internal network services such as kerberos .
:
:   Cheers
: Amancio Hasty

Kerberos 5 is currently a port, /usr/ports/security/krb5.

I would love to see krb 5 made part of the standard distribution.  BEST
has been using it for several years now with no problems and I believe
that it is a whole lot easier to administrate then krb 4.

-Matt
Matthew Dillon 
dil...@backplane.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message