Re: The Trolls identity (was: Re: matthew dillon)

2003-02-12 Thread Rik van Riel
On Sun, 9 Feb 2003, Rahul Siddharthan wrote:
 (I assume I'm replying to the real PHK here)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  We know that the lamer behind the Troll is Bill Huey aka billh.

 Is there any evidence for it?  If so, you should share it and if not,
 you shouldn't make such accusations.

 This may be true, but this troll doesn't fit the pattern with billh.

Agreed.  While billh seems to enjoy the show when a creative
troll shows up, flooding is definately not his style.

Besides, he's busy with a cool new project...

Rik
-- 
Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say NIH.
http://www.surriel.com/ http://guru.conectiva.com/
Current spamtrap:  a href=mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]/a

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



The Trolls identity (was: Re: matthew dillon)

2003-02-09 Thread phk
In message 00af01c2d04a$e948e0e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED], Matthew Emmerton w
rites:
These messages aren't from the *real* Matt Dillon, they're from a stupid
troll who has been impersonating various FreeBSD developers for a few months
now.  This particular troll uses anonymous remailers so the postmaster is
helpless to block email addresses or IP ranges.

So, if the message looks like a fake, sounds like a fake, and is littered
with profanities (such as the F*ck Fumerola Licence), then please assume
this is the voice of the troll and is best ignored.

We know that the lamer behind the Troll is Bill Huey aka billh.

All I personally know about him is that he was dot-com road-kill
and that he think it is everybody else' fault.

I'm not privy to the various arrangements that are being made for
ridding ourselves of his pathetic existence.

Poul-Henning

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp   | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer   | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



The Trolls identity (was: Re: matthew dillon)

2003-02-09 Thread Rahul Siddharthan
(I assume I'm replying to the real PHK here)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 We know that the lamer behind the Troll is Bill Huey aka billh.

Is there any evidence for it?  If so, you should share it and if not,
you shouldn't make such accusations.
   
 All I personally know about him is that he was dot-com road-kill
 and that he think it is everybody else' fault.

This may be true, but this troll doesn't fit the pattern with billh.
We've already seen that billh is not reluctant to post extremely nasty
mails, containing personal accusations, under his own name.  Why would
he do this troll thing?  And why would he pretend to quote himself on
irc in the latest spate of messages?

I suspect that there's more than one troll -- if there is only one, he
has a quite schizophrenic attitude towards (the real) Matt Dillon.

R

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: The Trolls identity (was: Re: matthew dillon)

2003-02-09 Thread Mark Murray
Rahul Siddharthan writes:
 (I assume I'm replying to the real PHK here)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  We know that the lamer behind the Troll is Bill Huey aka billh.
 
 Is there any evidence for it?  If so, you should share it and if not,
 you shouldn't make such accusations.

He admitted to it.

M
--
Mark Murray
iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message



Re: The Trolls identity (was: Re: matthew dillon)

2003-02-09 Thread Brandon D. Valentine
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 04:06:52PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 We know that the lamer behind the Troll is Bill Huey aka billh.

FWIW if you or someone else can establish guilt in this matter, it is
actionable under 18 USC Sec. 1028[0].  If I were the real Matt Dillon I
would call my local FBI field office and have a chat.  Identity theft,
is nothing anyone should have to put up with.  You also might talk to a
civil litigator, as there is likely a large amount of civil liability
involved in identity theft.  Someone teach this guy a lesson.

[0] - http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1028.html

Brandon D. Valentine
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.geekpunk.net

We've been raised on replicas of fake and winding roads, and day after day up
on this beautiful stage we've been playing tambourine for minimum wage, but we
are real; I know we are real.  -- David Berman

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message