Re: __STDC__ removal?
Alfred Perlstein wrote: NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid conflicts. Umm, do we need it there in asm headers? We do not use the traditional cpp for our assembler files. I would be suprised if we needed it. In fact, I would be suprised if we build with -traditional any more. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Re: __STDC__ removal?
* Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020529 00:42] wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid conflicts. Umm, do we need it there in asm headers? We do not use the traditional cpp for our assembler files. I would be suprised if we needed it. In fact, I would be suprised if we build with -traditional any more. Well then we can nuke it from asm files too! Whee! -- -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology, start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Re: __STDC__ removal?
Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020529 00:42] wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid conflicts. Umm, do we need it there in asm headers? We do not use the traditional cpp for our assembler files. I would be suprised if we needed it. In fact, I would be suprised if we build with -traditional any more. Well then we can nuke it from asm files too! Whee! Well, subject of course to it actually working.. :-) Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Re: __STDC__ removal?
I'd support this. Makes maintaining the code a lot cleaner. M NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid conflicts. mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/defs.h:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/defs.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__GNUC__) mrouted/main.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/main.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mapper.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mapper.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mrinfo.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mrinfo.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__GNUC__) mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/main.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/main.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/options.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/pppd.h:#if __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ rtsold/rtsold.c:#if __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#ifdef __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#endif /* defined __STDC__ */ zic/zdump.c:#ifndef __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#endif /* !defined __STDC__ */ ee/ee.c:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus) ee/ee.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/ee.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#if defined(__STDC__) ee/new_curse.c:#if __STDC__ || defined(__cplusplus) ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#else /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#else /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifdef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.h:#if __STDC__ || defined(__cplusplus) find/getdate.y:#if defined (__STDC__) || defined (USG) find/getdate.y:#if defined (__STDC__) lex/NEWS: - Changed to only use '\a' for __STDC__ compilers. lex/NEWS: and free() for gcc, which defines __STDC__ but (often) doesn't lex/NEWS: - Generated scanner uses prototypes and const for __STDC__. lex/flex.skl:#if __STDC__ lex/flex.skl:#endif /* __STDC__ */ lex/flex.skl:#if __STDC__ lex/flexdef.h:#ifndef __STDC__ lex/flexdef.h:#define __STDC__ 1 lex/flexdef.h:#if __STDC__ lex/initscan.c:#if __STDC__ lex/initscan.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ lex/initscan.c:#if __STDC__ lex/misc.c:#if __STDC__ lex/misc.c:#if __STDC__ rpcgen/rpc_hout.c: f_print(fout, \n#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus)\n); rpcgen/rpc_main.c: f_print(fout, \n#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus)\n); telnet/externs.h:# ifdef__STDC__ telnet/externs.h:# if defined(__STDC__) telnet/ring.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(LINT_ARGS) yacc/skeleton.c:#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__, yacc/skeleton.c:#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__, yacc/skeleton.c:#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__, -- -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology, start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message -- o Mark Murray \_ O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn #text/plain; name=cv.doc [Mark Murray CV Plain Text] cv.doc #application/octet-stream; name=cv.pdf [Mark Murray CV PDF] cv.pdf To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Re: __STDC__ removal?
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always : defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen : is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid : conflicts. I've already started doing the same. Feel free to beat me to it, however, since I don't have many in my queue right now. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Re: __STDC__ removal?
* M. Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020527 11:22] wrote: In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always : defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen : is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid : conflicts. I've already started doing the same. Feel free to beat me to it, however, since I don't have many in my queue right now. I really havne't started, I just wanted to get the ball rolling if it needed it. :) -- -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
__STDC__ removal?
NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always defined. Do we want to do the same? The exception I've seen is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid conflicts. mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/cfparse.y:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/defs.h:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/defs.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__GNUC__) mrouted/main.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/main.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mapper.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mapper.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mrinfo.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mrinfo.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.c:#ifdef __STDC__ mrouted/mtrace.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__GNUC__) mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ mtree/create.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/main.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/main.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/options.c:#if __STDC__ pppd/pppd.h:#if __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ route6d/route6d.c:#ifdef __STDC__ rtsold/rtsold.c:#if __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#ifdef __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#endif /* defined __STDC__ */ zic/zdump.c:#ifndef __STDC__ zic/zdump.c:#endif /* !defined __STDC__ */ ee/ee.c:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus) ee/ee.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/ee.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#if defined(__STDC__) ee/new_curse.c:#if __STDC__ || defined(__cplusplus) ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#else /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#ifndef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#else /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.c:#ifdef __STDC__ ee/new_curse.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ ee/new_curse.h:#if __STDC__ || defined(__cplusplus) find/getdate.y:#if defined (__STDC__) || defined (USG) find/getdate.y:#if defined (__STDC__) lex/NEWS: - Changed to only use '\a' for __STDC__ compilers. lex/NEWS: and free() for gcc, which defines __STDC__ but (often) doesn't lex/NEWS: - Generated scanner uses prototypes and const for __STDC__. lex/flex.skl:#if __STDC__ lex/flex.skl:#endif /* __STDC__ */ lex/flex.skl:#if __STDC__ lex/flexdef.h:#ifndef __STDC__ lex/flexdef.h:#define __STDC__ 1 lex/flexdef.h:#if __STDC__ lex/initscan.c:#if __STDC__ lex/initscan.c:#endif /* __STDC__ */ lex/initscan.c:#if __STDC__ lex/misc.c:#if __STDC__ lex/misc.c:#if __STDC__ rpcgen/rpc_hout.c: f_print(fout, \n#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus)\n); rpcgen/rpc_main.c: f_print(fout, \n#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(__cplusplus)\n); telnet/externs.h:# ifdef__STDC__ telnet/externs.h:# if defined(__STDC__) telnet/ring.h:#if defined(__STDC__) || defined(LINT_ARGS) yacc/skeleton.c:#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__, yacc/skeleton.c:#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__, yacc/skeleton.c:#if defined(__cplusplus) || __STDC__, -- -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology, start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
