shp2pgsql core dumps when using -G and -g together
I am trying to use the converter 'shp2pgsql' from database/postgis version 1.5.2 to convert an ESRI shapefile into the geography data type of postgis/postgresql. It core dumps when using the two options '-G' and '-g' at the same time, at least on FreeBSD. Option '-G' switches from geometry to geography data type. With option '-g' I want to set another than the default name of the geography column. -- shp2pgsql -G -g geog_newname world.shp shp2pgsql: (malloc) /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/malloc.c:4287: Failed assertion: arena != NULL Abbruch(core dumped) -- This is reproducable with other shapefiles, too. It does not happen, if '-G' is used without the '-g' option. It seems there is a problem with memory allocation? As far as I know this works on other platforms than FreeBSD. As test data may serve the world shape from http://www.vdstech.com/mapdata/world.zip Any help is really appreciated. And please let me know if I can help or test something. Rainer Hurling ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: lang/guile build fails for me
on 01/06/2011 09:14 Andriy Gapon said the following:
lang/guile build fails in my environment with CURRENT amd64 FreeBSD and gcc45
as
ports compiler:
./guile_filter_doc_snarfage --filter-snarfage) regex-posix.doc || { rm
regex-posix.doc; false; }
cat alist.doc arbiters.doc async.doc backtrace.doc boolean.doc chars.doc
continuations.doc debug.doc deprecation.doc deprecated.doc discouraged.doc
dynl.doc dynwind.doc environments.doc eq.doc error.doc eval.doc evalext.doc
extensions.doc feature.doc fluids.doc fports.doc futures.doc gc.doc goops.doc
gsubr.doc gc-mark.doc gc-segment.doc gc-malloc.doc gc-card.doc guardians.doc
hash.doc hashtab.doc hooks.doc i18n.doc init.doc ioext.doc keywords.doc
lang.doc
list.doc load.doc macros.doc mallocs.doc modules.doc numbers.doc objects.doc
objprop.doc options.doc pairs.doc ports.doc print.doc procprop.doc procs.doc
properties.doc random.doc rdelim.doc read.doc root.doc rw.doc scmsigs.doc
script.doc simpos.doc smob.doc sort.doc srcprop.doc stackchk.doc stacks.doc
stime.doc strings.doc srfi-4.doc srfi-13.doc srfi-14.doc strorder.doc
strports.doc struct.doc symbols.doc threads.doc throw.doc values.doc
variable.doc vectors.doc version.doc vports.doc weaks.doc ramap.doc unif.doc
dynl.doc filesys.doc posix.doc net_db.doc socket.doc regex-posix.doc |
GUILE=/usr/obj/usr/ports/lang/guile/work/guile-1.8.6/pre-inst-guile
../scripts/snarf-check-and-output-texi guile-procedures.texi || {
rm
guile-procedures.texi; false; }
ERROR: unknown doc attribute: (location (string . alist.c) (int . 40) (hash .
hash))
gmake[3]: *** [guile-procedures.texi] Error 1
gmake[3]: Leaving directory
`/usr/obj/usr/ports/lang/guile/work/guile-1.8.6/libguile'
gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2
This one seems to be a known and fixed issue:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317175
I guess we could either update to a version that has the fix (when it's
released) or use the following simple patch:
--- libguile/guile-snarf-docs.in.orig 2011-06-02 11:49:24.423491408 +0300
+++ libguile/guile-snarf-docs.in2011-06-02 11:49:26.174492567 +0300
@@ -23,4 +23,4 @@
## Let the user override the preprocessor autoconf found.
test -n ${CPP+set} || CPP=@CPP@
-${CPP} -DSCM_MAGIC_SNARF_DOCS $@
+${CPP} -P -DSCM_MAGIC_SNARF_DOCS $@
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
problem with INDEX-5
Hi, I have a problem that when I run make fetchindex there is an error: fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-5.bz2: Not Found I have 5.5-RELEASE-p13. Kind regards. Sebastian Turzyński ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: problem with INDEX-5
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 07:08:38AM +0200, DLF Sp. z o.o. - Sebastian Turzy?ski wrote: Hi, I have a problem that when I run make fetchindex there is an error: fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-5.bz2: Not Found I have 5.5-RELEASE-p13. FreeBSD 5.x has not been supported for quite some time. Please see the support document at for more information: http://www.freebsd.org/portmgr/policies_eol.html Best, -erwin -- Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Prediction is very difficult especially about the futureer...@freebsd.org pgpViR1vSYLV9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: problem with INDEX-5
On Thu, Jun 02, 2011 at 07:08:38AM +0200, DLF Sp. z o.o. - Sebastian Turzy?ski wrote: I have a problem that when I run make fetchindex there is an error: fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-5.bz2: Not Found I have 5.5-RELEASE-p13. If I'm not mistaken, FreeBSD-5 (with 5.5 as its last member) was End of Life and stopped being supported three years ago. Even FreeBSD-6 was EoL last year. I think everyone would very strongly recommend that you update to a more recent (and supported!) version, either 7 or 8. Should you really need something from 5.5, you can probably find it in the archives, in: ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ The index for 5.5-RELEASE appears to be at: ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/ports/i386/packages-5.5-release/INDEX But updating to something more recent -- and supported -- would be a very good idea. -- greg byshenk - gbysh...@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
cvsup servers down
Hello, It is more likely than the cvsup servers are done for 2 weeks now and nobody complains about it. I usually use csup to fetch the ports tree but it seems I am the only one to do this :-p. Cheers, -- David Demelier ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cvsup servers down
On 2 June 2011 13:10, David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, It is more likely than the cvsup servers are done for 2 weeks now and nobody complains about it. I usually use csup to fetch the ports tree but it seems I am the only one to do this :-p. Which server do you use? Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cvsup servers down
В Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:10:15 +0200 David Demelier demelier.da...@gmail.com пишет: Hello, It is more likely than the cvsup servers are done for 2 weeks now and nobody complains about it. I usually use csup to fetch the ports tree but it seems I am the only one to do this :-p. Cheers, I also noticed this ;) and therefore use an alternative server (Primary Mirror Sites) for updates ... any of the available: cvsup1.FreeBSD.org cvsup2.FreeBSD.org cvsup3.FreeBSD.org cvsup4.FreeBSD.org cvsup5.FreeBSD.org cvsup6.FreeBSD.org cvsup7.FreeBSD.org cvsup8.FreeBSD.org cvsup9.FreeBSD.org cvsup10.FreeBSD.org cvsup11.FreeBSD.org cvsup12.FreeBSD.org cvsup13.FreeBSD.org cvsup14.FreeBSD.org cvsup15.FreeBSD.org cvsup16.FreeBSD.org cvsup18.FreeBSD.org ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: problem with INDEX-5
On 2011-06-02 13:58, Carsten Jensen wrote: On 2011-06-02 07:08, DLF Sp. z o.o. - Sebastian Turzyński wrote: Hi, I have a problem that when I run make fetchindex there is an error: fetch: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ports/INDEX-5.bz2: Not Found I have 5.5-RELEASE-p13. Kind regards. Sebastian Turzyński ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org I don't think that FreeBSD 5 is supported by the ports framework anymore, the earliest I can see is working is for FreeBSD 6. you can make your own index of the ports you have by make index cheers Carsten ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
databases/frontbase -- candidate for DEPRECATION
Hi all, I'm working on getting ports to use USERS= and GROUPS= rather than creating users/groups in pkg-install, to ease the implementation of pkgng. I've discovered that databases/frontbase uses a UID that conflicts with halcluster -- this needs to be changed. Does anyone still use frontbase or could it be deprecated? Also, if you use frontbase and are willing to fix it, would you also be willing to maintain it? Chris ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cvsup servers down
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 14:10 +0200, David Demelier wrote: Hello, It is more likely than the cvsup servers are done for 2 weeks now and nobody complains about it. I usually use csup to fetch the ports tree but it seems I am the only one to do this :-p. Cheers, Well you're definitely not the only one :) (Like, hell, is there any other option?) Still, when such things happen, I just move up/down a digit (to cvsup3., cvsup4., cvsup5., etc) without so much complaining, you know - unless one definitely runs out of numbers... m. -- Michal Varga, Stonehenge (Gmail account) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cvsup servers down
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/2/11 8:19 AM, Michal Varga wrote: On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 14:10 +0200, David Demelier wrote: Hello, It is more likely than the cvsup servers are done for 2 weeks now and nobody complains about it. I usually use csup to fetch the ports tree but it seems I am the only one to do this :-p. Cheers, Well you're definitely not the only one :) (Like, hell, is there any other option?) Still, when such things happen, I just move up/down a digit (to cvsup3., cvsup4., cvsup5., etc) without so much complaining, you know - unless one definitely runs out of numbers... m. It's also handy to use fastest_cvsup (http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fastest_cvsup), and then you'll always get the best choice of server: $ fastest_cvsup -Q -c us,ca,mx cvsup14.us.freebsd.org $ Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/cpucycle/ - Follow you, follow me -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3nh5oACgkQ0sRouByUApCVswCfeArc4ZiT5Ngp4K0hTF8Y9PRV SDIAn0hJ082C3RmN6tgvf9BNZj7Gsim4 =G4ki -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: cvsup servers down
Michal Varga writes: It is more likely than the cvsup servers are done for 2 weeks now and nobody complains about it. I usually use csup to fetch the ports tree but it seems I am the only one to do this :-p. Well you're definitely not the only one :) (Like, hell, is there any other option?) Still, when such things happen, I just move up/down a digit (to cvsup3., cvsup4., cvsup5., etc) without so much complaining, you know - unless one definitely runs out of numbers... To those who don't know about it, take a look at sysutils/fastest_cvsup. Robert Huff ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
mail/sympa now obeys hier!
Hi all, I've restructured the installation dirs for mail/sympa so we no longer have a nasty /usr/local/sympa directory. I'm asking for anyone to test the update as well as me -- I haven't found any problems but if there's anything major I need to fix it before it goes for committing! It also removes a superfluous dependency (thanks to Igor Zabelin). Thanks, Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/sympa-depfix.patch ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or expired??
On 2011-Jun-01 17:23:37 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote: It seems somebody isn't very knowledgeable about GPC. :-( ... the real deal: *BSD hates GPL, esp. GPLv3, Please stop spreading FUD. and I think GPC is indeed v3 Does that make you the somebody who isn't very knowledgeable about GPC? BTW, two more corrections: the latest version is not from 2006 but instead 20070904. Looking at http://www.gnu-pascal.de/gpc (which is listed as the project homepage), the latest version shown on the downloads page is 20060325. Even if there was another release 20070904, that is 3½ years ago - which seems to justify the development has ceased statement in the removal message. gpc 20060325_2 lang Deleted on this many watch lists=1 search for ports that depend on this port Deprecated DEPRECATED: development has ceased; use lang/fpc instead Expired This port expired on: 2011-04-11 GNU Pascal compiler There is no maintainer for this port. no maintainer means no-one in the FreeBSD Community has expressed any interest in maintaining the port. Each port requires Project resources just leave lying around. Since no-one has expressed any interest in maintaining this port and the underlying GPC project appears to have died, there is no reason to keep it around. If you believe there is a need for a port of GPC, you are welcome to submit a PR to update the port to the current version and take over the responsibility for maintaining it. -- Peter Jeremy pgp2U0tbnOj9Q.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: GPC 2006 (Pascal) -- deprecated or expired??
Hi, On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@acm.org wrote: On 2011-Jun-01 17:23:37 -0500, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote: It seems somebody isn't very knowledgeable about GPC. :-( ... the real deal: *BSD hates GPL, esp. GPLv3, Please stop spreading FUD. Sorry, not trying to be rude here (honestly), but it is GPLv3, which clearly is not popular with *BSD. Please don't act like licenses don't matter. The whole point is, even if GPLv3 isn't your favorite, you shouldn't throw away GPC without a suitable replacement. Sure, FPC is semi-related (barely), but it's a whole different dialect, so the code is NOT compatible! In other words, if you can temporarily get GPC up to speed, you can then compile Scott Moore's (ISO 7185) P5 with it, which is public domain. (FPC won't compile it as-is.) That's better than just dumping everything in favor of FPC only (incompatible), IMO. and I think GPC is indeed v3 Does that make you the somebody who isn't very knowledgeable about GPC? Eh? It's definitely GPL v3, here's what my GPC344B.ZIP (DJGPP) has: http://www.gnu-pascal.de/contrib/maurice/djgpp/ http://www.gnu-pascal.de/contrib/maurice/gpc-20070904.pdf 37552 09-05-2007 13:29 doc/gpc/copying Hmmm, I don't know why they don't have patches in the obvious place. Lemme find Waldek's homepage ... http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~hebisch/gpc/ http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~hebisch/gpc/gpc-20070904.tar.bz2 BTW, two more corrections: the latest version is not from 2006 but instead 20070904. Looking at http://www.gnu-pascal.de/gpc (which is listed as the project homepage), the latest version shown on the downloads page is 20060325. Their webpage is definitely outdated, I don't know why. But I'm 100% positive that 20070904 is the latest version. Even if there was another release 20070904, that is 3½ years ago - which seems to justify the development has ceased statement in the removal message. Development has ceased, yes. There were only a handful of maintainers over the years. Plus the real dealbreaker is that GCC has backend bugs (and incompatibilities) which the GPC devs either didn't understand or couldn't afford the time to fix. So it stagnated. Hence latest is only unofficial patches against GCC 3.4.4 (stable) and 4.1.2 (buggy). gpc 20060325_2 lang Deleted on this many watch lists=1 search for ports that depend on this port Deprecated DEPRECATED: development has ceased; use lang/fpc instead Expired This port expired on: 2011-04-11 GNU Pascal compiler There is no maintainer for this port. no maintainer means no-one in the FreeBSD Community has expressed any interest in maintaining the port. Each port requires Project resources just leave lying around. Since no-one has expressed any interest in maintaining this port and the underlying GPC project appears to have died, there is no reason to keep it around. There can't be any big maintenance except making sure it actually builds, esp. with newer GCCs. Other than that, I see no problems here. No reason to keep it around is silly. Practically speaking, I know most of you probably don't need or want Pascal, but it exists. And suggesting FPC as an alternative is not an answer since it lacks support for ISO 7185 (original, Wirth) or ISO 10206 (Extended). That's the big reason to keep it around (obviously?), though I admit FPC is much easier to build / bootstrap. Don't take this all the wrong way, I'm trying to point you in the right direction. If you believe there is a need for a port of GPC, you are welcome to submit a PR to update the port to the current version and take over the responsibility for maintaining it. How hard can it be to rebuild GCC 3.4.4?? Seriously, it can't be that hard for you guys. I've (rarely) even rebuilt DJGPP on Windows, and surely it's 1000x easier on *nix!! ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
