Re: Build of RELENG_5 fails in libmagic
On Saturday 13 Nov 2004 21:01, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 08:17:31PM +, Mark Dixon wrote: Hi, I'm trying to build 5-STABLE, I have cvsuped the latest source, cleared out /usr/obj and I still get this problem. Any idea what could be causing it? Check that your system's date/time is set correctly, I bet it's not. Right, that was it. I noticed sending that email, but thought nothing of it. Is this something we could easily sanity check for at the start of the build? Thanks for the help, -- Mark 'If it compiles, ship it' pgpcNomy0mwDF.pgp Description: PGP signature
subscription to 5.3 stable mailing list, thanks
___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IPv6 bridge + gif tunnel
Hi, About the combination between bridge function and gif tunnel function, I have tested it on FreeBSD 4.10, but not succeeded. FreeBSD 4.10 box shows the message when we typed 'sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=rl0,gif0', gif0 is not an ethernet, continue interface gif0 Not found in bridge. I changed operating system from FreeBSD to OpneBSD 3.5, and succeeded. Multicast and unicast UDP packets, ICMP packets are bridged without losing packets. It seems that the bridge function on OpenBSD is better than FreeBSD. Though I will use OpenBSD for a while as a test tool, I hope OpenBSD bridge function will be ported into FreeBSD in the future. Does anyone have a plan to port it? Regards, Hideki Yamamoto. From: Hideki Yamamoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: IPv6 bridge + gif tunnel Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 06:15:47 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, I would like to make my problems clear. I have two questions about bridge function in the following figure. (1) Can we use bridge function over psuedo devices such as gif and tun? box3# ifconfig bge0 inet 133.149.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 box2# ifconfig create gif0 box2# gifconfig gif0 inet 133.149.0.2 133.149.1.2 box2# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge: 1 box2# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: fxp0,gif0 box3# ifconfig bge1 inet 133.149.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 box3# ifconfig create gif1 box3# gifconfig gif1 inet 133.149.1.2 133.149.0.2 box3# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge: 1 box3# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg: gif1,fxp0 (2) Can any protocols go through between IPv6 MC router and IPv6 terminal in this step2 figure? Are there any limitations? Is IPv6 packet available? STEP2 IPv6 bridge cascaded by gif tunnel +--box#2--+ [IPv6 MC router ]-+-+-(fxp0) IPv6 bridge | | | | | (IPv4)133.149.0.2 +--+-(bge0) IPv6 bridge and IPv4 | | | (gif0) IPv6 over IPv4 | | +-+ | IPv4 router | | +---box#3-+ (IPv4)133.149.1.2 +--+-(bge1) IPv6 bridge and IPv4 | | (gif1) IPv6 over IPv4 | | | | | | | +--+-(fxp0) IPv6 bridge | | +-+ | |term#2 +-[IPv6 terminal(NDP client)] Thanks in advance Hidei Yamamoto - Hideki YAMAMOTO | Broadband Media Solutions Department | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Broadband Media Company | Tel: +81-48-420-7012 Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. | FAX: +81-48-420-7016 ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Build of RELENG_5 fails in libmagic
On 130104, 19:37, Mark Dixon wrote: I'm trying to build 5-STABLE, I have cvsuped the latest source, cleared out /usr/obj and I still get this problem. Any idea what could be causing it? /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lc *** Error code 1 I had the same exact problem while tryint to buildworld on an amd64 box I have, but this disappeared when I issued a make clean in /usr/src. Maybe it could help. Ciao ! -- Massimiliano Stucchi WillyStudios.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] Http://www.willystudios.com/max/ pgpK2p073mmZ5.pgp Description: PGP signature
Can't compile 5.3-STABLE from 5.3-RC2
Hi, I wanted to Update my System that runs FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 to the final 5.3-Level. However, compile reproducible stops in libstdc++, claiming a missing unwind.h. I already removed /usr/src and re-cvsupped it and also searched the /usr/src/UPDATING and the CURRENT- and STABLE-Lists for such Problems. The Update from 5.2.1 to 5.3-RC2 ran just fine on that machine (after removing the CXXFLAGS from /etc/make.conf). uname -a: FreeBSD beaster.home.folkerts-net.de 5.3-RC2 FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 #1: Mon Nov 1 15:42:06 CET 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTERKERNEL i386 I'll paste the libstdc++-Output and my /etc/make.conf below. What did I do wrong? As it worked fine from 5.2.1 to 5.3 I hope it's just a small Problem ;-) Would be great if I could get a hint! MTIA, cheers, _ralf_ --- /etc/make.conf --- PUTYPE=athlon-xp CFLAGS= -O -pipe NO_LPR=yes CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes NOINET6=true NOPROFILE=true COMPAT4X=yes # -- use.perl generated deltas -- # # Created: Sat Jan 17 12:55:06 2004 # Setting to use base perl from ports: PERL_VER=5.6.1 PERL_VERSION=5.6.1 PERL_ARCH=mach NOPERL=yo NO_PERL=yo NO_PERL_WRAPPER=yo X_WINDOW_SYSTEM=xfree86-4 --- end of /etc/make.conf --- === gnu/lib/libreadline/readline/doc === gnu/lib/libstdc++ ln -sf /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/config/cpu/i486/atomicity.h atomicity.cc rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a-DIN_GLIBCPP_V3 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++ -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libsupc++ -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/gcc -I/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/include /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/libmath/signbitf.c /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/libmath/signbitl.c /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/libmath/stubs.c/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/gcc/cp-demangle.c mkdep -f .depend -a /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/allocator.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/codecvt.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/complex_io.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/ctype.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/debug.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/functexcept.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/globals_locale.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/globals_io.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/ios.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/ios_failure.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/ios_init.cc/usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/ios_locale.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/limits.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/list.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/locale.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/locale_init.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/locale_facets.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/localename.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/stdexcept.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/strstream.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/tree.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/allocator-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/concept-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/fstream-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/ext-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/io-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/istream-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/locale-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/locale-misc-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/misc-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/ostream-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/sstream-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/streambuf-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/string-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/valarray-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/src/wlocale-inst.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc++/src/wstring-inst.cc atomicity.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/config/locale/generic/codecvt_members.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/config/locale/generic/collate_members.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc ++/../../../contrib/libstdc ++/config/locale/generic/ctype_members.cc /usr/src/gnu/lib/libstdc
new threads problem? pthread_cond_timedwait ?
My hard drive failed right around FreeBSD-5.3, so I got to do a fresh install of 5.3-RC1 followed by a cvsup to -STABLE (yesterday). Due to my nvidia video driver, I still have libmap.conf forcing libpthread to use libc_r. When compiling audio/xmms-imms, I get the following error, and I don't know how to deal with it: c++ -L/usr/X11R6/lib `xmms-config --libs` -lc -lm -lpcre -lsqlite3 -lz -ltag analyzer.o spectrum.o `pkg-config fftw3f --libs` libimmscore.a -o analyzer /usr/local/lib/libgthread12.so.3: undefined reference to `pthread_cond_timedwait' Dave. -- |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]| equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =GLO ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!
I'm trying to use sed under FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE in a new 'netqmail' port I am currently working on. I want to replace a bunch of digits (in plain English: a decimal number) in a text file at the beginning of a line. Here is how the original file looks before I do anything (this file is part of the netqmail-1.05 package, but it is unimportant): --- file conf-split begins 23 This is the queue subdirectory split. --- file conf-split ends Okay, so I try to replace 23 (or whatever number is there!) at the beginning of the first line to let's say 199 in this file using sed. I would expect this to work: sed -e s/^[0-9]+/199/ conf-split conf-split.new But it doesn't change anything in conf-spilt.new!! My regexp ^[0-9]+ doesn't match anything! After spending like an hour investigating this, I realized that the + after my bracket expression ( I'm talking about this part here: [0-9]+ ) does not match! If I omit the use of + and use * instead, I can make my regexp to match. So this works - but IMHO it's ugly: sed -e s/^[0-9][0-9]*/199/ conf-split conf-split.new It gives this output, which is what I always wanted: --- file conf-split.new begins 199 This is the queue subdirectory split. --- file conf-split.new ends According to the sed man page, the regexp syntax that is used by sed is documented in the re_format man page. And according to the re_format man page: A piece is an atom possibly followed by a single= `*', `+', `?', or bound. An atom followed by `*' matches a sequence of 0 or more matches of the atom. An atom followed by `+' matches a sequence of 1 or more matches of the atom. ... And the definition of an atom is (quoted from the same man page): An atom is a regular expression enclosed in `()' (matching a match for the regular expression), an empty set of `()' (matching the null string)=, a bracket expression (see below) ... So either my bracket expression ( [0-9] ) in my first sed command was not recognized as an atom, or if it was recognized as an atom then the + that followed it was not interpreted properly... Can anyone please tell me why? I believe this is a bug in sed or in the regexp library which sed uses. If it is a regexp library issue, then there is a chance that it affects other programs that use it, as well! At least it can break all programs that use sed regexps, especially ports... My uname -a is: FreeBSD www..com 5.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE #0: Fri Nov 12 01:07:41 PST 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ i386 Zoltan ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!
On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 18:39, Zoltan Frombach wrote: match anything! After spending like an hour investigating this, I realized that the + after my bracket expression ( I'm talking about this part here: Normal. According to the sed man page, the regexp syntax that is used by sed is documented in the re_format man page. And according to the re_format man page: A piece is an atom possibly followed by a single= `*', `+', `?', or You need to read it more carefully. There are two kinds of regular expressions, basic and extended. sed, ed, and grep speak BRE syntax, whereas awk and egrep speak ERE syntax. + is special only in ERE syntax. (And then there's GNU, where the difference between BRE and ERE is that some things use a preceding backslash in BRE and don't in ERE, and vice versa, so GNU sed does what you want if you use \+ instead of +.) -- brandon s. allbery[linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [WAY too many hats][EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Can't compile 5.3-STABLE from 5.3-RC2
On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 08:31:36PM +0100, Ralf Folkerts wrote: Hi, I wanted to Update my System that runs FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 to the final 5.3-Level. However, compile reproducible stops in libstdc++, claiming a missing unwind.h. I already removed /usr/src and re-cvsupped it and also searched the /usr/src/UPDATING and the CURRENT- and STABLE-Lists for such Problems. The Update from 5.2.1 to 5.3-RC2 ran just fine on that machine (after removing the CXXFLAGS from /etc/make.conf). uname -a: FreeBSD beaster.home.folkerts-net.de 5.3-RC2 FreeBSD 5.3-RC2 #1: Mon Nov 1 15:42:06 CET 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BEASTERKERNEL i386 I'll paste the libstdc++-Output and my /etc/make.conf below. What did I do wrong? As it worked fine from 5.2.1 to 5.3 I hope it's just a small Problem ;-) Did you follow the handbook to the letter? I was succesful at compileing from RC2 to STABLE. You could try my script. I've put it in www.kruijff.org/files/FreeBSD/update.sh Options are: update.sh cvs update.sh build (fails to build my special kernels) update.sh install GENERIC Log files goto /var/world/ -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. WWW: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!
You are right. My mistake. This indeed works: sed -E -e s/^[0-9]+/199/ conf-split conf-split.new Thanks for clearing this up. Zoltan On Sun, 2004-11-14 at 18:39, Zoltan Frombach wrote: match anything! After spending like an hour investigating this, I realized that the + after my bracket expression ( I'm talking about this part here: Normal. According to the sed man page, the regexp syntax that is used by sed is documented in the re_format man page. And according to the re_format man page: A piece is an atom possibly followed by a single= `*', `+', `?', or You need to read it more carefully. There are two kinds of regular expressions, basic and extended. sed, ed, and grep speak BRE syntax, whereas awk and egrep speak ERE syntax. + is special only in ERE syntax. (And then there's GNU, where the difference between BRE and ERE is that some things use a preceding backslash in BRE and don't in ERE, and vice versa, so GNU sed does what you want if you use \+ instead of +.) -- brandon s. allbery[linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] [EMAIL PROTECTED] system administrator [WAY too many hats][EMAIL PROTECTED] electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!
use -E ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
New 5.x packages uploaded
I've uploaded new packages for 5.3-stable; they'll make their way onto the ftp mirrors over the next day or so. Included are the new versions of GNOME and KDE, among others. Kris pgpwhOvbU0XR1.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!
Zoltan Frombach wrote: You are right. My mistake. This indeed works: sed -E -e s/^[0-9]+/199/ conf-split conf-split.new Thanks for clearing this up. For what it's worth, there is another way to write this regexp without using the -E flag. Since x+ == xx*, you can write it: s/^[0-9][0-9]*/199/. The reason for not using -E is that it's not portable, since it's not specified by the standard. GNU sed uses -r for extended REs. Cheers, Maxime ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Either I do something wrong or there is a regexp bug in sed !!
Thanks. I will not use the -E flag then. Zoltan Zoltan Frombach wrote: You are right. My mistake. This indeed works: sed -E -e s/^[0-9]+/199/ conf-split conf-split.new Thanks for clearing this up. For what it's worth, there is another way to write this regexp without using the -E flag. Since x+ == xx*, you can write it: s/^[0-9][0-9]*/199/. The reason for not using -E is that it's not portable, since it's not specified by the standard. GNU sed uses -r for extended REs. Cheers, Maxime ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 5.x packages uploaded
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've uploaded new packages for 5.3-stable; they'll make their way onto the ftp mirrors over the next day or so. Included are the new versions of GNOME and KDE, among others. BTW, are we getting long-standing security issues in ports fixed, for instance cups-base, open-motif, others? Yeah I know send patches, but my ressources are limited and committers are also overworked already... The general question I'd like to raise is how long will we allow ports with known security flaws linger around before they are marked BROKEN? -- Matthias Andree ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: New 5.x packages uploaded
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 04:06:07AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've uploaded new packages for 5.3-stable; they'll make their way onto the ftp mirrors over the next day or so. Included are the new versions of GNOME and KDE, among others. BTW, are we getting long-standing security issues in ports fixed, for instance cups-base, open-motif, others? Yeah I know send patches, but my ressources are limited and committers are also overworked already... The general question I'd like to raise is how long will we allow ports with known security flaws linger around before they are marked BROKEN? In general serious security flaws should be marked FORBIDDEN immediately, and they generally are. Fixing the security issues is up to the community. Kris pgpXpiCG8HFqu.pgp Description: PGP signature
gvinum setstate missing?
I'm in the uncomfortable position of needing to setstate down a gvinum drive. I can't seem to effect this as the gvinum command doesn't understand setstate (even though it proclaims that it does in gvinum help). Is there a way of making this so? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SIIG cards and puc
I've tried to get one of the 20x family 16C650 64-byte buffer SIIG cards to work. It does not work out of the box. I had to add 0x4001 into the flags in pucdata.c for my card and options COM_MULTIPORT into the kernel config. It's still limited to 115200 baud, but all I was interested is 9600 anyway. Can this be implemented into the source tree ? P. -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Paul Sandys | New York Connect http://www.nyct.net network operations manager | Total Solution provider - The Internet Solutions Provider You Can Count On ! -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
panic: APIC: Previous IPI is stuck
At work, I've just taken an old cast off NT server and used it as a replacement for an equally elderly low end PC which performs an important monitoring task. I took the opportunity to upgrade to 5.3 (5.3-RC2 now, yesterday's 5.3-STABLE when I get to work again) rather than stay on 4.10-RELEASE. The rationale was this would be a nice resilient machine, demonstrating how FreeBSD can extend the useful working life of aging hardware. The practice is that it it has now crashed three times in a couple of days with panic: APIC: Previous IPI is stuck, the most recent one dragging me out from home early in a Monday morning. Over in current there are a couple of threads starting in late September where a few people are suffering this problem. Like them, I'm using an old (1997) Pentium Pro multiprocessor, in my case a 4 way Fujitsu M700. The machine is running with the SMP kernel (ie GENERIC + SMP), 4BSD scheduler, without preemption. I've set kern.sched.ipiwakeup.enabled=0 and crossed my fingers. I'm a SMP novice. Would the machine become stable if I switched to a non-SMP kernel? Reliability is more important than speed in this case, and the opportunity for experimentation close to zero. Creditability has already been damaged by the gvinum RAID5 experience (8-( I'm not knocking 5.3 - in all other respects it seems wonderful. me too diagnostics: kern.sched.name: 4BSD kern.sched.quantum: 10 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.enabled: 1 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.requested: 858129 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.delivered: 858129 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.usemask: 1 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.useloop: 0 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.onecpu: 0 kern.sched.ipiwakeup.htt2: 0 kern.sched.followon: 0 kern.sched.pfollowons: 0 kern.sched.kgfollowons: 0 kern.sched.runq_fuzz: 1 MPTable, version 2.0.15 looking for EBDA pointer @ 0x040e, found, searching EBDA @ 0x0008f000 searching CMOS 'top of mem' @ 0x0008ec00 (571K) searching default 'top of mem' @ 0x0009fc00 (639K) searching BIOS @ 0x000f MP FPS found in BIOS @ physical addr: 0x000fdc30 MP Floating Pointer Structure: location: BIOS physical address: 0x000fdc30 signature:'_MP_' length: 16 bytes version: 1.4 checksum: 0x56 mode: Virtual Wire MP Config Table Header: physical address: 0x0008f151 signature:'PCMP' base table length:332 version: 1.4 checksum: 0x05 OEM ID: 'Fujitsu ' Product ID: 'Pro Server ' OEM table pointer:0x OEM table size: 0 entry count: 30 local APIC address: 0xfee0 extended table length:0 extended table checksum: 0 MP Config Base Table Entries: -- Processors: APIC ID Version State Family Model Step Flags 3 0x11BSP, usable 6 1 9 0xfbff 0 0x11AP, usable 6 1 9 0xfbff 1 0x11AP, usable 6 1 9 0xfbff 2 0x11AP, usable 6 1 9 0xfbff -- Bus:Bus ID Type 0 PCI 1 PCI 2 EISA -- I/O APICs: APIC ID Version State Address 8 0x11usable 0xfec0 9 0x11usable 0xfec0c000 -- I/O Ints: TypePolarityTrigger Bus ID IRQAPIC ID PIN# ExtINT active-hiedge2 0 80 INT conformsconforms2 1 81 INT conformsconforms2 2 82 INT conformsconforms2 3 83 INT conformsconforms2 4 84 INT conformsconforms2 5 85 INT conformsconforms2 6 86 INT conformsconforms2 7 87 INT conformsconforms2 8 88 INT conformsconforms2 9 89 INT conformsconforms210 8 10 INT conformsconforms211 8 11 INT conformsconforms212 8 12 INT
gvinum again?
I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now... I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes, but does gvinum not (yet) load balance on reads? ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: msdosfs - support for large disks?
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 18:27:08 +0200 Saulius Menkevicius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It support those, you just have to include options MSDOSFS_LARGE in you kernel config file. OK, I found that (shouldn't this be documented in the NOTES file, even if it is an experimental patch?), and made a new kernel with it. At least it works for me on 184GB fat32 partition. Well, it works here too, on a 234GB partition. Sort of, at least. I can mount the partition, and copy files to (and from) it, make directories and so on. But, I get lots of invalid file handle messages when I try to copy files to it. That makes it unusable for me. I guess I'll have to use something else. -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen, Norway ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gvinum again?
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 00:36 -0500, Zaphod Beeblebrox wrote: I'm looking at gstat while fsck'ing a gvinum partition. The trouble I'm seeing is that I don't see activity on the second disk. Now... I'm using fsck -n ... just checking things ... so there's no writes, but does gvinum not (yet) load balance on reads? Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers various load-balancing options). Cheers, Paul. -- e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Without music to decorate it, time is just a bunch of boring production deadlines or dates by which bills must be paid. --- Frank Vincent Zappa ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gvinum again?
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004 01:26:54 -0500, Paul Mather [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Your observation is correct: it doesn't (yet) load balance across plexes of mirrored volumes; geom_mirror (gmirror) does, though (and offers various load-balancing options). Is this something planned for the near future? I'm migrating legacy units here, so I don't really have a choice. ... also ... I suspect, whatever form it eventually takes, that volume management and geom and/or vinum is essential. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
