Re: Seeking 6.4 make source for ports

2012-06-20 Thread Ronald Klop
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:57:59 +0200, Michael R. Wayne  
freebs...@wayne47.com wrote:



Google is littered with messages from people who have 6.3 systems
and can no longer upgrade ports. It appears that a recent change
requires the version of make from 6.4.

While it would be ideal if freebsd.org would build a 6.4 make on a
6.3 system and pseudo-officially support it, a reasonable alternative
would be a simple way to download just the files required to build
the 6.4 version of make on 6.3.

Any possibility to get this tossed on a site someplace?


Do you have a problem yourself or did you just found some messages on  
google?
I presume you are running 6.3 yourself. Why don't you upgrade the OS to  
6.4 or 7+, but you do upgrade the ports on an unsupported OS?


Ronald.
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Seeking 6.4 make source for ports

2012-06-20 Thread Mike Pumford

Ronald Klop wrote:


Do you have a problem yourself or did you just found some messages on
google?
I presume you are running 6.3 yourself. Why don't you upgrade the OS to
6.4 or 7+, but you do upgrade the ports on an unsupported OS?

It is a little mind boggling. Unless required I wouldn't even recompile 
my ports when moving a system from 6.3 to 6.4. In fact I've got an 
internal system here that started life as 5.3 BETA and have been 
upgraded all the way to 7.4 via 6.4 with pretty much no downtime apart 
from the installworld part of the source upgrade. All the 5.x compiled 
ports ran fine on the 7.4 system until I got round to recompiling them.


Mike

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Seeking 6.4 make source for ports

2012-06-20 Thread Eugene Grosbein
20.06.2012 16:17, Mike Pumford пишет:
 Ronald Klop wrote:
 
 Do you have a problem yourself or did you just found some messages on
 google?
 I presume you are running 6.3 yourself. Why don't you upgrade the OS to
 6.4 or 7+, but you do upgrade the ports on an unsupported OS?

 It is a little mind boggling. Unless required I wouldn't even recompile 
 my ports when moving a system from 6.3 to 6.4. In fact I've got an 
 internal system here that started life as 5.3 BETA and have been 
 upgraded all the way to 7.4 via 6.4 with pretty much no downtime apart 
 from the installworld part of the source upgrade. All the 5.x compiled 
 ports ran fine on the 7.4 system until I got round to recompiling them.

You are not required to recompile ports when upgrading within major release,
e.g. from 6.x to 6.4. There is no one reason to do that. They all will work
just as usual.

Eugene Grosbein
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


error compiling

2012-06-20 Thread Sami Halabi
Hi,
i just cvsup standard 8.2, that pulled me 8.2-p4 into the source tree.

when i made:
make buildkernel KERNCONF=SAMI

i got this:
cc -c -x assembler-with-cpp -DLOCORE -O2 -frename-registers -pipe
-fno-strict-aliasing  -std=c99 -g -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs
-Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline
-Wcast-qual  -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc  -I.
-I/usr/src/sys -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL
-DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h -fno-common
-finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param
large-function-growth=1000  -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel
-mno-red-zone  -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -mno-mmx
-mno-3dnow  -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding
-fstack-protector -Werror /usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_switch.S
cc -c -O2 -frename-registers -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing  -std=c99 -g -Wall
-Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
 -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual  -Wundef
-Wno-pointer-sign -fformat-extensions -nostdinc  -I. -I/usr/src/sys
-I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include
opt_global.h -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100
--param large-function-growth=1000  -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel
-mno-red-zone  -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -mno-mmx
-mno-3dnow  -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables -ffreestanding
-fstack-protector -Werror  /usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c
/usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c: In function 'acpi_wakeup_ap':
/usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c:107: error: 'wakeup_pcb' undeclared
(first use in this function)
/usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c:107: error: (Each undeclared
identifier is reported only once
/usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c:107: error: for each function it
appears in.)
/usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c: In function 'acpi_sleep_machdep':
/usr/src/sys/amd64/acpica/acpi_wakeup.c:258: error: 'wakeup_pcb' undeclared
(first use in this function)
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SAMI.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src.
#

I Have the conf file with these options:
###
#SAMI ADDITIONS
###
device  lagg
options IPFIREWALL
options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD
options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE
options DUMMYNET
options HZ=1000
options TCP_SIGNATURE
device  crypto  # core crypto support
device  cryptodev   # /dev/crypto for access to h/w
options IPSEC
options DEVICE_POLLING
device if_bridge
options VIMAGE
#options SCTP
options  IPDIVERT
###

any ideas?


-- 
Sami Halabi
Information Systems Engineer
NMS Projects Expert
FreeBSD SysAdmin Expert
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


geli decrypt only one partition

2012-06-20 Thread joerg_surmann
hi all,

i have two partitions:   ada0p3.eli and ada1p3.eli
on bootprocess i must type a passphrase for ada0p3 and  have ada0p3.eli.
next i type the passphrase for ada1p3 and i become: wrong key
when the bootprocess is finish and i login and type geli attach -k
/path to keyfile /dev/ada1p3 and i type the passphrase then i have
ada1p3.eli.
why can i decrypt only one partition on bootprocess?
ada0p1.eli and ada1p3.eli are two parts on zfs miror.
the mirroe cant create when i decrypt ada1p3 by hand.

thanks for help
suri



___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


kern.geom.part.check_integrity=0 not working. not able to boot 9-STABLE

2012-06-20 Thread Ruben de Groot

I'm resending this email as I got no response the first time.

After over 3 years of uptime, I decided to upgrade one of my SUN boxes to 
9-stable. However the new kernel didn't boot because of geom integrity check 
issues. This I understand as I remember I had to use some weird tricks in the 
past to get the entire disks used in the first place. 
Anyway, I felt lucky this was a known and documented problem, with a workaround:

http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.0R/relnotes-detailed.html#AEN1277

However, the workaround doesn't seem to work :-(

Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK set kern.geom.part.check_integrity=0
OK boot
jumping to kernel entry at 0xc007.
Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
   The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #5: Thu Jun 14 19:24:33 UTC 2012

SNIP

Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
ada0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
ada0: MAXTOR STM3160215A 3.AAD ATA-7 device
ada0: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, PIO 8192bytes)
ada0: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
ada0: Previously was known as ad0
ada1 at ata3 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0
ada1: MAXTOR STM3160215A 3.AAD ATA-7 device
ada1: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, PIO 8192bytes)
ada1: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
ada1: Previously was known as ad1
GEOM: ada0: adding VTOC8 information.
GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, VTOC8)

this is where it hangs, just like without setting 
kern.geom.part.check_integrity.

Is this a regression?

--
cheers,
Ruben de Groot

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Kernel modules are broken after updating to the latestFreeBSD9-STABLE

2012-06-20 Thread Olav Gjerde
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Dewayne Geraghty
dewayne.gerag...@heuristicsystems.com.au wrote:
 Hi Olav,
 It seems that you're doing the same as I would, in that you start from a
 fresh base.

 I'd stay with csup, it is reliable and avoids the modula2 installation.

 Over the last 5 years, I have experienced the same weirdness on 2
 occasions, and out of desperation (no time), I've removed the source,
 /usr/obj, removed ccache (that's been a few problems), removed -j
 $((`sysctl -n hw.ncpu`+1)) and changed my source origin.  Because I'm in
 Australia, I use:

 *default host=cvsup3.au.freebsd.org
 #*default host=cvsup2.jp.freebsd.org
 #*default host=cvsup2.freebsd.org  # Only when updates are  1hour old

 There's a page in the Handbook for urls that are close to you. I'd suggest
 that course.
 Good luck.

 Regards, Dewayne.
 PS If successful, please post to the list, so the cause may be
 shared/reviewed.


I got the right kernel to load after doing a make installkernel in
single user mode.
However I still have a problem starting my jails. I get the following
error message for each jail I start.

/lib/libc.so.7: version FBSD_1.3 required by /bin/sh not found

I use ezjail, are there some other way to update it than just using
ezjail-admin update -i?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: kern.geom.part.check_integrity=0 not working. not able to boot 9-STABLE

2012-06-20 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 20.06.2012 19:14, Ruben de Groot wrote:
 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
 ada0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
 ada0: MAXTOR STM3160215A 3.AAD ATA-7 device
 ada0: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, PIO 8192bytes)
 ada0: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
 ada0: Previously was known as ad0
 ada1 at ata3 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0
 ada1: MAXTOR STM3160215A 3.AAD ATA-7 device
 ada1: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, PIO 8192bytes)
 ada1: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
 ada1: Previously was known as ad1
 GEOM: ada0: adding VTOC8 information.
 GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, VTOC8)
 
 this is where it hangs, just like without setting 
 kern.geom.part.check_integrity.
 
 Is this a regression?

Can you enable verbose boot mode and show what you will get?

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: kern.geom.part.check_integrity=0 not working. not able to boot 9-STABLE

2012-06-20 Thread Ruben de Groot

On 20 jun 2012, at 18:34, Andrey V. Elsukov wrote:

 On 20.06.2012 19:14, Ruben de Groot wrote:
 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
 ada0 at ata2 bus 0 scbus0 target 0 lun 0
 ada0: MAXTOR STM3160215A 3.AAD ATA-7 device
 ada0: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, PIO 8192bytes)
 ada0: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
 ada0: Previously was known as ad0
 ada1 at ata3 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0
 ada1: MAXTOR STM3160215A 3.AAD ATA-7 device
 ada1: 66.700MB/s transfers (UDMA4, PIO 8192bytes)
 ada1: 152627MB (312581808 512 byte sectors: 16H 63S/T 16383C)
 ada1: Previously was known as ad1
 GEOM: ada0: adding VTOC8 information.
 GEOM_PART: integrity check failed (ada0, VTOC8)
 
 this is where it hangs, just like without setting 
 kern.geom.part.check_integrity.
 
 Is this a regression?
 
 Can you enable verbose boot mode and show what you will get?

It looks like it gets stuck in some loop and I can only break to lom and reset.

Type '?' for a list of commands, 'help' for more detailed help.
OK unload
OK set kern.geom.part.check_integrity=0
OK boot kernel.9 -v
/boot/kernel.9/kernel data=0x5af3d8+0xc2fd8 syms=[0x8+0x77fe8+0x8+0x7119d]
/boot/kernel.9/geom_mirror.ko text=0x37a10 data=0x5a0+0x18 
syms=[0x8+0x1650+0x8+0x1159]
jumping to kernel entry at 0xc007.
Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The FreeBSD Foundation.
FreeBSD 9.0-STABLE #5: Thu Jun 14 19:24:33 UTC 2012

r...@morninglightmountain.hacktor.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MORNINGLIGHTMOUNTAIN 
sparc64
Preloaded elf kernel /boot/kernel.9/kernel at 0xc089a000.
Preloaded elf module /boot/kernel.9/geom_mirror.ko at 0xc089a1a0.
real memory  = 536870912 (512 MB)
avail memory = 503963648 (480 MB)
machine: SUNW,UltraAX-i2
cpu0: Sun Microsystems UltraSparc-IIe Processor (400.00 MHz CPU)
  mask=0x14 maxtl=5 maxwin=7
INTR: Adding CPU 0 as a target
ULE: setup cpu 0
nfslock: pseudo-device
mem: memory
null: null device, zero device
openfirm: Open Firmware control device
random: entropy source, Software, Yarrow
ctl: CAM Target Layer loaded
nexus0: Open Firmware Nexus device
pcib0: U2P UPA-PCI bridge mem 
0x1fe-0x1fe,0x1fe0100-0x1fe01ff irq 2032,2030,2031,2021 
on nexus0
pcib0: Sabre, impl 0, version 0, IGN 0x1f, bus A, 66MHz
pcib0: DVMA map: 0x6000 to 0x63ff 8192 entries
pcib0: PROM IOTSB size: 1 (2048 entries)
pcib0: bus range 0 to 0; PCI bus 0
initalizing intr_countp
pcib0: [GIANT-LOCKED]
pci0: OFW PCI bus on pcib0
pci0: domain=0, physical bus=0
found- vendor=0x108e, dev=0xa001, revid=0x00
domain=0, bus=0, slot=0, func=0
class=06-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
cmdreg=0x0146, statreg=0x02a0, cachelnsz=0 (dwords)
lattimer=0x40 (1920 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns)
found- vendor=0x10b9, dev=0x1533, revid=0x00
domain=0, bus=0, slot=7, func=0
class=06-01-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
cmdreg=0x000f, statreg=0x0210, cachelnsz=0 (dwords)
lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns)
powerspec 1  supports D0 D3  current D0
found- vendor=0x10b9, dev=0x7101, revid=0x00
domain=0, bus=0, slot=3, func=0
class=00-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
cmdreg=0x, statreg=0x0200, cachelnsz=0 (dwords)
lattimer=0x00 (0 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x00 (0 ns)
found- vendor=0x1282, dev=0x9102, revid=0x31
domain=0, bus=0, slot=12, func=0
class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
cmdreg=0x0147, statreg=0x0210, cachelnsz=0 (dwords)
lattimer=0x50 (2400 ns), mingnt=0x14 (5000 ns), maxlat=0x28 (1 ns)
intpin=a, irq=255
powerspec 2  supports D0 D3  current D0
map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x1, size  8, enabled
map[14]: type Memory, range 32, base 0, size  8, enabled
found- vendor=0x1282, dev=0x9102, revid=0x31
domain=0, bus=0, slot=5, func=0
class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
cmdreg=0x0147, statreg=0x0210, cachelnsz=0 (dwords)
lattimer=0x50 (2400 ns), mingnt=0x14 (5000 ns), maxlat=0x28 (1 ns)
intpin=a, irq=255
powerspec 2  supports D0 D3  current D0
map[10]: type I/O Port, range 32, base 0x10100, size  8, enabled
map[14]: type Memory, range 32, base 0x2000, size  8, enabled
found- vendor=0x10b9, dev=0x5237, revid=0x03
domain=0, bus=0, slot=10, func=0
class=0c-03-10, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
cmdreg=0x, statreg=0x0290, cachelnsz=0 (dwords)
lattimer=0x40 (1920 ns), mingnt=0x00 (0 ns), maxlat=0x50 (2 ns)
intpin=a, irq=255
powerspec 2  supports D0 D3  current D0
map[10]: type Memory, range 32, base 0x100, size 12, memory disabled
found- vendor=0x10b9, dev=0x5229, revid=0xc3
domain=0, bus=0, slot=13, func=0

Re: geli decrypt only one partition

2012-06-20 Thread Fabian Keil
joerg_surmann joerg_surm...@snafu.de wrote:

 i have two partitions:   ada0p3.eli and ada1p3.eli
 on bootprocess i must type a passphrase for ada0p3 and  have ada0p3.eli.
 next i type the passphrase for ada1p3 and i become: wrong key
 when the bootprocess is finish and i login and type geli attach -k
 /path to keyfile /dev/ada1p3 and i type the passphrase then i have
 ada1p3.eli.
 why can i decrypt only one partition on bootprocess?

This is frequently the effect of an incorrectly specified
keyfile in loader.conf. Do you get a boot message like the
following for both keyfiles when booting in verbose mode?

Jun 20 19:49:34 r500 kernel: Preloaded ada0s1d:geli_keyfile0 /boot/ad4s1d.key 
at 0x813951d0.

Fabian


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: Seeking 6.4 make source for ports

2012-06-20 Thread Michael R. Wayne
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
 On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:57:59 +0200, Michael R. Wayne  
 freebs...@wayne47.com wrote:
 
 Google is littered with messages from people who have 6.3 systems
 and can no longer upgrade ports. It appears that a recent change
 requires the version of make from 6.4.
 
 While it would be ideal if freebsd.org would build a 6.4 make on a
 6.3 system and pseudo-officially support it, a reasonable alternative
 would be a simple way to download just the files required to build
 the 6.4 version of make on 6.3.
 
 Any possibility to get this tossed on a site someplace?
 
 Do you have a problem yourself or did you just found some messages on  
 google?

Have the problem myself. There are ports with security vulnerabilities
and the recent change broke make for ports. I went to Google and
found lots of other people with the same problem. The suggested fix
is to use the make from 6.4. Hence my request.

 I presume you are running 6.3 yourself. Why don't you upgrade the OS to  
 6.4 or 7+, but you do upgrade the ports on an unsupported OS?

Upgrading a port can be done without rebooting the machine. Upgrading
the O/S is a MUCH more major undertaking and is almost never a clean
process. Plus the time investment multiplied by many machines is huge
(and dreaded).

So, any chance of getting a 6.4 make compiled for 6.3?
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: Seeking 6.4 make source for ports

2012-06-20 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On 06/20/12 11:56, Michael R. Wayne wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:26:02AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
 On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:57:59 +0200, Michael R. Wayne 
 freebs...@wayne47.com wrote:
 
 Google is littered with messages from people who have 6.3
 systems and can no longer upgrade ports. It appears that a
 recent change requires the version of make from 6.4.
 
 While it would be ideal if freebsd.org would build a 6.4 make
 on a 6.3 system and pseudo-officially support it, a reasonable
 alternative would be a simple way to download just the files
 required to build the 6.4 version of make on 6.3.
 
 Any possibility to get this tossed on a site someplace?
 
 Do you have a problem yourself or did you just found some
 messages on google?
 
 Have the problem myself. There are ports with security
 vulnerabilities and the recent change broke make for ports. I went
 to Google and found lots of other people with the same problem. The
 suggested fix is to use the make from 6.4. Hence my request.
 
 I presume you are running 6.3 yourself. Why don't you upgrade the
 OS to 6.4 or 7+, but you do upgrade the ports on an unsupported
 OS?
 
 Upgrading a port can be done without rebooting the machine.
 Upgrading the O/S is a MUCH more major undertaking and is almost
 never a clean process. Plus the time investment multiplied by
 many machines is huge (and dreaded).

Well, not upgrading the OS means you could leave serious security
issues unpatched, which may be Ok for certain trusted environment
(e.g. where absolutely no untrusted local user will ever present) but
not a wise idea for production system facing the Internet.  The good,
old time, when everyone wants to be a good neighbor with you, has gone
forever.

 So, any chance of getting a 6.4 make compiled for 6.3?

Of course, it would compile (you can grab the source from CVS, CVSup,
or SVN and compile it with:

cd src/usr.bin/make
make cleandir
make cleandir   # yes, do it twice, this is not a typo
make obj
make depend
make
sudo make install # or run this command as root without sudo
)

Please note that FreeBSD 6.x was EoL'ed 2 years ago and we (secteam@)
no longer support it anymore, which means you don't get security
advisories, etc. for the base system.  You are advised to upgrade to a
more recent and supported FreeBSD release as listed at:

http://security.freebsd.org/#sup

Cheers,
- -- 
Xin LI delp...@delphij.nethttps://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve!   Live free or die
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJP4iSBAAoJEG80Jeu8UPuzAM0IAJOMi7zT930RSGUIETOZZQnY
63RKEmwydRV4Tx3urgrEDJM9/ebBECU5aQpejy+ztV1Fpgm8x9TrR4sIt2fGjPj+
JKdkrKUZX2Vc/wrnc7qtnTJOfWjOm2W0JH9NuKQrjFFZQSkptIr7Tj0iOOTG0Cb3
Z/pvVSTeVSDfTbS2kZprIbNHZnERUyJfQgN/o6NjduNOXnb9Nhgtd6PE/SpNrdfe
ZIJt4+FkAmDf4QtnUMnqOKCSQg/FUbvBnjHfv645Jpud/cPvQeEZvQMVB2qG76Ex
f2dyyb2wSZtbRL4Oe2YkTzB+dKlHbxvJfbl1fagN3KYVszzW6jMmFXbJsQQjyaU=
=rukn
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org