Re: FREEBSD_4_EOL tag, last known index file?

2007-07-16 Thread Jonathan Dama
Mark: Thanks for some helpful comments.

   make-20050524   Berkeley make, back-ported to FreeBSD 4.x
Everyone: installing devel/make before running make index did
indeed allow me to get a proper index file.  You'll need to
make sure to use the resulting /usr/local/bin/make
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FREEBSD_4_EOL tag, last known index file?

2007-07-15 Thread Jonathan Dama
From Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 12:59:50AM +0200:
 On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:05:30PM -0700, Jon Dama wrote:
  Is there a port index file that corresponds to the FREEBSD_4_EOL tag?
  I am unable to rebuild the index from the tagged checkout.
 
 The official INDEX file is no longer available nor supported.  You
 should be able to build it by cd /usr/ports; make index'.  If that
I am aware of that.  The trouble of course is that for whatever reason
the make index target appears to fail--although I am not entirely
convinced that this isn't a local problem.  Still I would have expected
that the tag point to at least be useable, meaning that make index would
work.

 doesn't work for you, I'm afraid the only supported configuration is to
 upgrade to 6.2-RELEASE, which you probably want to do anyway, if not
 just because security fixes are not applied to earlier versions.
Strictly speaking the EOL means that the base has been abandoned by the
security officer and the ports collection, not that it is abandoned entirely.  
People with commit access may still make contributions into RELENG_4...

Anyways I'm only trying to act within the constraints that I've been given.
My mandate does not include upgrading to RELENG_6 so your advice is not
immediately useful.

What I am interested in hearing is confirmation that the EOL tag works to
the extent it was intended to work...
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


mfc of ipf 3.4.35 breaks POLA in 4.11, 4-Stable

2005-04-01 Thread Jonathan Dama
IPF in 4.11, 4-Stable breaks the semantics of icmp
keep-state rules.  This problem was mentioned in
http://msgs.securepoint.com/cgi-bin/get/ipfilter-0503/31/1/2/1/1.html

I wouldn't make a fuss over this simple matter 
except that this constitutes a POLA violation.

To that end, the following pr was submitted:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=79416

Incidentially, unless I really misunderstand ipf, there
appears to be a genuine bug here.  POLA issues aside, a
pass-rule is being used to block packets.

Thanks,
  Jon
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]