Re: HEADSUP: bridge(4) removed from HEAD

2005-09-28 Thread Simon L. Nielsen
On 2005.09.27 20:26:37 -0700, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
 Max Laier wrote:
 All,
 
 as discussed on -arch, the old bridge(4) implementation has been removed 
 from HEAD.  The new if_bridge(4) is there to serve as a full functional 
 replacement.  If you find anything that does not work with if_bridge(4) 
 that used to work with bridge(4), please let me or Andrew Thompson 
 (thompsa@) know.  Thanks.
 
 Have you updated the handbook to reflect this change?
 
 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bridging.html

Considering that we only (more or less) document -STABLE branches in
the Handbook it's not a big rush, as long as it's mentioned before 7.0
comes out, though documentation about if_bridge in the Handbook would
of cause be nice, considering it's also in 6.0 :-).

-- 
Simon L. Nielsen


pgpCv4zmdrZYr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: HEADSUP: bridge(4) removed from HEAD

2005-09-28 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Wed, 2005-Sep-28 08:13:32 +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
Considering that we only (more or less) document -STABLE branches in
the Handbook it's not a big rush, as long as it's mentioned before 7.0
comes out, though documentation about if_bridge in the Handbook would
of cause be nice, considering it's also in 6.0 :-).

bridge(4) no longer exists in -current and is (effectively) deprecated
in 6.x.  It is desirable that this is documented in the handbook and
the filtering bridges article.

I though that the Project guidelines stated that deprecated features
had to be retained for a full major release but having checked the
Committers' Guide, it's only required that they be retained until the
next major release.  This means that it's not essential that the
handbook be updated before 6.0-RELEASE but it is desirable that the
updates occur early in the 6.x-STABLE cycle to provide adequate notice.

There's no reason why the handbook can't mention both (or, preferably,
all three) bridging devices - it just needs to mention that if_bridge
doesn't exist in 5.x

-- 
Peter Jeremy
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: HEADSUP: bridge(4) removed from HEAD

2005-09-27 Thread Maxim Sobolev

Max Laier wrote:

All,

as discussed on -arch, the old bridge(4) implementation has been removed from 
HEAD.  The new if_bridge(4) is there to serve as a full functional 
replacement.  If you find anything that does not work with if_bridge(4) that 
used to work with bridge(4), please let me or Andrew Thompson (thompsa@) 
know.  Thanks.


Have you updated the handbook to reflect this change?

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bridging.html

-Maxim
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]