Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-08-01 Thread Eduardo Meyer
  4) Is your motherboard set to use AHCI for the SATA (ICH7) controller?
  There's reports that SATA300 is only available/used on some controllers
  when AHCI is used.

 I dont know. I could not find such a similar option on BIOS, so I dont
 know how to check it. Is it possible to be checked from system?

Just to let everyone know, for me this AHCI thing made the whole
difference. On BIOS there were some options to be combined with AHCI,
and doing the right combination made the disk get controlled as
SATA300.

Thank you veryone, specially Jeremy Chadwick for the valuable inputs.


-- 
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri

On 7/26/07, Eduardo Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 7/22/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:10:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
  'k, I just bought a new desktop, SATA/300MB/s interface, and this drive:
 
  http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=254
 
  Web site states 3Gb/s ... I'm seeing same SATA!50:

 Seagate and WDC both ship SATA300 drives with a SATA150-limiting jumper
 on them.  It's documented on the drive itself, and in the manufacturing
 manuals.  Both companies do this as a precaution; there are some buggy
 chipsets out there which claim to support SATA300 but then break badly
 when utilising it.  This is why the jumper's set to SATA150 by default.

 Chances are your drives have the jumper limiting the drive to SATA150.

I have the same situation here, but not the same hardware:

atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x3020-0x302f mem
0xe820-0xe82003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0

ad0: 76319MB SAMSUNG HD080HJ ZH100-47 at ata0-master SATA150

This drive is withtout the jumper, which according to the manual means
it should operate as SATA300 (while with jumper plugged, it is limited
to SATA150). But it is only controlled as SATA150.

So, chances are my disc also have some problem?


--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Here is me too.

FreeBSD services.wearab.net 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #2: Tue
Jul 24 05:07:02 GMT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SERVICES amd64

ACPI APIC Table: INTEL  D946GZIS
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU  6600  @ 2.40GHz (2397.61-MHz K8-class CPU)
 Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x6f6  Stepping = 6
 
Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
 Features2=0xe3bdSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM
 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM
 AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
 Cores per package: 2
usable memory = 2130096128 (2031 MB)
avail memory  = 2055856128 (1960 MB)
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs

atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x20a0-0x20af mem
0x9020-0x902003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0
ata0: [ITHREAD]
ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0
ata1: [ITHREAD]
ad0: 70911MB WDC WD740ADFD-60NLR1 20.07P20 at ata0-master SATA150
ad2: 238474MB WDC WD2500JD-50FYB0 02.05D02 at ata1-master SATA150
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a


--
Regards,

-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Eduardo Meyer

On 7/26/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:55:48AM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
  I have the same situation here, but not the same hardware:

  atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
  0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x3020-0x302f mem
  0xe820-0xe82003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0

  ad0: 76319MB SAMSUNG HD080HJ ZH100-47 at ata0-master SATA150

  This drive is withtout the jumper, which according to the manual means
  it should operate as SATA300 (while with jumper plugged, it is limited
  to SATA150). But it is only controlled as SATA150.

A few things (I'm not doubting your claim of a problem, just trying to
track it down):


Thank you a lot for asking.



1) What FreeBSD version and build date?  uname -a would suffice.


It is: 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #2: Sun Jun 24 23:37:46 BRT 2007



2) What controller (atapciX) is mapped to ata0?  You didn't include this
in your dmesg output.


atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x3020-0x302f mem
0xe820-0xe82003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0
ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0




3) Output of atacontrol cap ad0?


# atacontrol cap ad0

Protocol  Serial ATA II
device model  SAMSUNG HD080HJ
serial number S0JRJ56P629171
firmware revision ZH100-47
cylinders 16383
heads 16
sectors/track 63
lba supported 156301488 sectors
lba48 supported   156301488 sectors
dma supported
overlap not supported

Feature  Support  EnableValue   Vendor
write cacheyes  yes
read ahead yes  yes
Native Command Queuing (NCQ)   yes   -  31/0x1F
Tagged Command Queuing (TCQ)   no   no  31/0x1F
SMART  yes  yes
microcode download yes  yes
security   yes  no
power management   yes  yes
advanced power management  no   no  0/0x00
automatic acoustic management  yes  no  0/0x00  254/0xFE




4) Is your motherboard set to use AHCI for the SATA (ICH7) controller?
There's reports that SATA300 is only available/used on some controllers
when AHCI is used.


I dont know. I could not find such a similar option on BIOS, so I dont
know how to check it. Is it possible to be checked from system?



5) This drive isn't available in the United States, so I'll have to go
off of foreign docs.  AUS docs don't show this drive as having any such
jumper, but the docs are sparse:


It is made in Korea.



http://www.samsung.com/au/support/productsupport/download/Model_Select.aspx?type=Hard+Disk+Drivetypecode=12subtype=HDD%283%2E5%29cmssubtypecode=1203model=HD080HJfiletype=UM

6) Have you tried following the opposite the documentation you have
recommends?  That is: try putting the jumper on and see if SATA300
is negotiated?  Or is it SATA150 regardless of the jumper setting?


Yes, but no difference.


--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:14:02AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
 5) This drive isn't available in the United States, so I'll have to go
 off of foreign docs.  AUS docs don't show this drive as having any such
 jumper, but the docs are sparse:
 
 http://www.samsung.com/au/support/productsupport/download/Model_Select.aspx?type=Hard+Disk+Drivetypecode=12subtype=HDD%283%2E5%29cmssubtypecode=1203model=HD080HJfiletype=UM

I stand corrected, though in a weird way:

Version 5.0 of the manual for this disk does not mention any jumper.
Instead, Samsung insists you use software to ensure SATA150.  From
the 5.0 manual:

  Note: In some rare cases SATA 1.5Gb/s hosts can not establish SATA
  interface connection with SATA 3.0Gb/s devices due to interface
  protocol issues.
  In this case you should switch your drive to SATA 1.5Gb/s speed
  with a software which we are providing via www.samsunghdd.com.

The amusing part is that Version 3.0 and 4.0 of the manual mention the
drive having a SATA150-limit jumper.

P.S. -- I'm pulling freebsd-questions off the To list, because I'm
getting mails stating moderators need to approve my posts due to too
many recipients (I assume due to list cross-posting).

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 11:55:48AM -0300, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
  I have the same situation here, but not the same hardware:
 
  atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
  0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x3020-0x302f mem
  0xe820-0xe82003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
 
  ad0: 76319MB SAMSUNG HD080HJ ZH100-47 at ata0-master SATA150
 
  This drive is withtout the jumper, which according to the manual means
  it should operate as SATA300 (while with jumper plugged, it is limited
  to SATA150). But it is only controlled as SATA150.

A few things (I'm not doubting your claim of a problem, just trying to
track it down):

1) What FreeBSD version and build date?  uname -a would suffice.

2) What controller (atapciX) is mapped to ata0?  You didn't include this
in your dmesg output.

3) Output of atacontrol cap ad0?

4) Is your motherboard set to use AHCI for the SATA (ICH7) controller?
There's reports that SATA300 is only available/used on some controllers
when AHCI is used.

5) This drive isn't available in the United States, so I'll have to go
off of foreign docs.  AUS docs don't show this drive as having any such
jumper, but the docs are sparse:

http://www.samsung.com/au/support/productsupport/download/Model_Select.aspx?type=Hard+Disk+Drivetypecode=12subtype=HDD%283%2E5%29cmssubtypecode=1203model=HD080HJfiletype=UM

6) Have you tried following the opposite the documentation you have
recommends?  That is: try putting the jumper on and see if SATA300
is negotiated?  Or is it SATA150 regardless of the jumper setting?

7) Another FreeBSD user using this drive does in fact see SATA300
negotiated speed from it when using an nForce MCP55 SATA300 controller.

http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/questions/2006-12/msg01421.html

I'm left wondering if there's actually two revisions of this drive
floating around on the market; an older one that only supports SATA150,
and a newer that supports SATA300.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 06:50:32PM +0300, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
  Here is me too.
 
  ad0: 70911MB WDC WD740ADFD-60NLR1 20.07P20 at ata0-master SATA150
  ad2: 238474MB WDC WD2500JD-50FYB0 02.05D02 at ata1-master SATA150

Did you bother to look at the documentation on the disks you're buying?
It doesn't seem like it.  Taken from Western Digital's specifications
for the above drives:

WD740ADFD -- 
http://wdc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wdc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1405p_created=1135201452
WD2000JD  -- 
http://wdc.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wdc.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1027p_created=1056559256

Summary:

WD740ADFD -- 1rpm, 4.5ms seek, SATA150, 16MB cache
WD2000JD  --  7200rpm, 8.9ms seek, SATA150,  8MB cache

Neither of these drives have SATA300-capable controllers on them.
Therefore, there is no problem.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Clayton Milos


- Original Message - 
From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: Eduardo Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tim Daneliuk [EMAIL PROTECTED]; 
Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FreeBSD Mailing List 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; Marc G. Fournier [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2007 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150



On 7/26/07, Eduardo Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 7/22/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:10:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
  'k, I just bought a new desktop, SATA/300MB/s interface, and this 
  drive:

 
  http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=254
 
  Web site states 3Gb/s ... I'm seeing same SATA!50:

 Seagate and WDC both ship SATA300 drives with a SATA150-limiting jumper
 on them.  It's documented on the drive itself, and in the manufacturing
 manuals.  Both companies do this as a precaution; there are some buggy
 chipsets out there which claim to support SATA300 but then break badly
 when utilising it.  This is why the jumper's set to SATA150 by default.

 Chances are your drives have the jumper limiting the drive to SATA150.

I have the same situation here, but not the same hardware:

atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x3020-0x302f mem
0xe820-0xe82003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0

ad0: 76319MB SAMSUNG HD080HJ ZH100-47 at ata0-master SATA150

This drive is withtout the jumper, which according to the manual means
it should operate as SATA300 (while with jumper plugged, it is limited
to SATA150). But it is only controlled as SATA150.

So, chances are my disc also have some problem?


--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Here is me too.

FreeBSD services.wearab.net 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #2: Tue
Jul 24 05:07:02 GMT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SERVICES amd64

ACPI APIC Table: INTEL  D946GZIS
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU  6600  @ 2.40GHz (2397.61-MHz K8-class 
CPU)

 Origin = GenuineIntel  Id = 0x6f6  Stepping = 6

Features=0xbfebfbffFPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,DTS,ACPI,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2,SS,HTT,TM,PBE
 Features2=0xe3bdSSE3,RSVD2,MON,DS_CPL,VMX,EST,TM2,SSSE3,CX16,xTPR,PDCM
 AMD Features=0x20100800SYSCALL,NX,LM
 AMD Features2=0x1LAHF
 Cores per package: 2
usable memory = 2130096128 (2031 MB)
avail memory  = 2055856128 (1960 MB)
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs

atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x20a0-0x20af mem
0x9020-0x902003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
ata0: ATA channel 0 on atapci0
ata0: [ITHREAD]
ata1: ATA channel 1 on atapci0
ata1: [ITHREAD]
ad0: 70911MB WDC WD740ADFD-60NLR1 20.07P20 at ata0-master SATA150
ad2: 238474MB WDC WD2500JD-50FYB0 02.05D02 at ata1-master SATA150
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a


--
Regards,

-Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri
Arab Portal
http://www.WeArab.Net/


Running at SATA1 instead of SATA2 speeds I really think is hardware related.
To be honest I wouldn't worry about it if I was you. You're not going to get 
more than 90MB/s off the platters on a good day anyways so the bus speed 
isn't going to slow anything down.


I've got 2 RAID-0 arrays with 4 drives each. 64k stripe size. One array is 
SATA1 and the other is SATA2. I get the same read/write speeds to each array 
of around 280MB/s which works back to 70MB/s per drive which is not bad 
considering the arrays are about 85% full. Empty disks give you better 
speeds.


-Clay


___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Eduardo Meyer

On 7/22/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:10:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
 'k, I just bought a new desktop, SATA/300MB/s interface, and this drive:

 http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=254

 Web site states 3Gb/s ... I'm seeing same SATA!50:

Seagate and WDC both ship SATA300 drives with a SATA150-limiting jumper
on them.  It's documented on the drive itself, and in the manufacturing
manuals.  Both companies do this as a precaution; there are some buggy
chipsets out there which claim to support SATA300 but then break badly
when utilising it.  This is why the jumper's set to SATA150 by default.

Chances are your drives have the jumper limiting the drive to SATA150.


I have the same situation here, but not the same hardware:

atapci0: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x3020-0x302f mem
0xe820-0xe82003ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0

ad0: 76319MB SAMSUNG HD080HJ ZH100-47 at ata0-master SATA150

This drive is withtout the jumper, which according to the manual means
it should operate as SATA300 (while with jumper plugged, it is limited
to SATA150). But it is only controlled as SATA150.

So, chances are my disc also have some problem?


--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Eduardo Meyer

On 7/26/07, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 10:14:02AM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
 5) This drive isn't available in the United States, so I'll have to go
 off of foreign docs.  AUS docs don't show this drive as having any such
 jumper, but the docs are sparse:

 
http://www.samsung.com/au/support/productsupport/download/Model_Select.aspx?type=Hard+Disk+Drivetypecode=12subtype=HDD%283%2E5%29cmssubtypecode=1203model=HD080HJfiletype=UM

I stand corrected, though in a weird way:

Version 5.0 of the manual for this disk does not mention any jumper.
Instead, Samsung insists you use software to ensure SATA150.  From
the 5.0 manual:

  Note: In some rare cases SATA 1.5Gb/s hosts can not establish SATA
  interface connection with SATA 3.0Gb/s devices due to interface
  protocol issues.
  In this case you should switch your drive to SATA 1.5Gb/s speed
  with a software which we are providing via www.samsunghdd.com.

The amusing part is that Version 3.0 and 4.0 of the manual mention the
drive having a SATA150-limit jumper.


So it is probably a difference related to the date/version of the
disk. Mine one has the jumper. Probably some newer ones need it to be
software-configured.

I think I can find a nVidia chipsed SATA2 controller to find out if
this is a problem related to this disk + ICH controller combo.



--
===
Eduardo Meyer
pessoal: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
profissional: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-26 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - 
From: Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri [EMAIL PROTECTED]

ad0: 70911MB WDC WD740ADFD-60NLR1 20.07P20 at ata0-master SATA150
ad2: 238474MB WDC WD2500JD-50FYB0 02.05D02 at ata1-master SATA150


Those are SATA150 disks so no problem there.

   Regards
   Steve


This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 


In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please 
telephone +44 845 868 1337
or return the E.mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-21 Thread Marc G. Fournier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



- --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 11:55:39 -0500 Dan Nelson 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 In the last episode (Jul 21), Tim Daneliuk said:
 I asked this question a while back, but needed to do more digging to make
 sure I had latest sources etc.

 I have an Intel motherboard that shows this for a SATA controller:

 atapci1: Intel ICH7 SATA300 controller port
 0x20c8-0x20cf,0x20ec-0x20ef,0x20c0-0x20c7,0x20e8-0x20eb,0x20a0-0x20af mem
 0x90204000-0x902043ff irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0

 But the hard drive - a SATA 300 device - shows up like this:

 ad4: 238475MB WDC WD2500JS-00NCB1 10.02E02 at ata2-master SATA150
 ^^^
 Using dd, I have confirmed that the drive is running nowhere near
 SATA-III speeds, at least on reads:

 968470075 bytes transferred in 7.132891 secs (135775249 bytes/sec)

 What was your dd commandline?  If you've got more than 1GB of RAM and
 tested by reading a file and not the raw device itself, you just tested
 FreeBSD buffer cache. According to
 http://www.wdc.com/en/products/productspecs.asp?driveid=135 , that
 drive's maximum sustained speed is only 93.5 MB/sec, so it doesn't
 really matter if your interface is running at SATA150 or SATA300 unless
 you plan on reading exclusively from its 8MB buffer :)

'k, I just bought a new desktop, SATA/300MB/s interface, and this drive:

http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=254

Web site states 3Gb/s ... I'm seeing same SATA!50:

atapci0: JMicron JMB361 SATA300 controller port 
0xbf00-0xbf07,0xbe00-0xbe03,0xbd00-0xbd07,0xbc00-0xbc03,0xbb00-0xbb0f mem 
0xfdbfe000-0xfdbf irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2
atapci1: Intel ICH8 SATA300 controller port 
0xfa00-0xfa07,0xf900-0xf903,0xf800-0xf807,0xf700-0xf703,0xf600-0xf60f,0xf500-0xf50f
 
irq 19 at device 31.2 on pci0
atapci2: Intel ICH8 SATA300 controller port 
0xf300-0xf307,0xf200-0xf203,0xf100-0xf107,0xf000-0xf003,0xef00-0xef0f,0xee00-0xee0f
 
irq 19 at device 31.5 on pci0
ad8: 152627MB WDC WD1600AAJS-08PSA0 05.06H05 at ata4-master SATA150

Latest 6.x STABLE ...

- 
Marc G. Fournier   Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email . [EMAIL PROTECTED]  MSN . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yahoo . yscrappy   Skype: hub.orgICQ . 7615664
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFGosqU4QvfyHIvDvMRAhENAKDhq0K+IDbZvD9Lcm51aLTwzjhz9ACgnFZz
b3iDMLhANYWByT3a7Vu3utQ=
=ZnlY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-21 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:10:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
 'k, I just bought a new desktop, SATA/300MB/s interface, and this drive:
 
 http://www.wdc.com/en/products/products.asp?DriveID=254
 
 Web site states 3Gb/s ... I'm seeing same SATA!50:

Seagate and WDC both ship SATA300 drives with a SATA150-limiting jumper
on them.  It's documented on the drive itself, and in the manufacturing
manuals.  Both companies do this as a precaution; there are some buggy
chipsets out there which claim to support SATA300 but then break badly
when utilising it.  This is why the jumper's set to SATA150 by default.

Chances are your drives have the jumper limiting the drive to SATA150.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: SATA 300 Drive Being Run At 150

2007-07-21 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:10:12AM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
  In the last episode (Jul 21), Tim Daneliuk said:
  ad4: 238475MB WDC WD2500JS-00NCB1 10.02E02 at ata2-master SATA150

 ad8: 152627MB WDC WD1600AAJS-08PSA0 05.06H05 at ata4-master SATA150

Something else I thought I'd mention in passing (though neither of you 
are affected by this, but I thought I'd throw it out there so people
can find it):

There is a specific model of WDC drive that reports incorrect thermal
statistics via SMART.  The temperatures are approximately 20C off (20C
too high).  The problem may affect other models, but so far has been
confirmed by WD to affect 1 specific model.

Rumour is that a drive firmware update can fix the problem, but WD isn't
giving out the firmware nor the updater.  Instead they're insisting
owners file an RMA and send the drive back to WDC.  How convenient.

Two weeks ago I noticed one (Seagate) drive in our server was reporting
32C, while the WDC drive in the carrier next to it was reporting 54C.

As usual these days: Google to the rescue.

I opted to do the Advance Replacement, which is where you pay $80 or
so for a replacement drive to be shipped to you first, and you'll be
credited when WD receives the RMA'd drive.  I'm glad I did it this way
too, since chances are had I done a standard RMA it would've been
returned to me with a there's nothing wrong with this drive note.

The new drive I received had the same model and f/w revision, yet didn't
see +20C temperatures via SMART.  H!  The reason I'm pointing this
out: either it's a hardware problem (thermistor of the wrong kind being
installed), or a f/w problem.  If it's a f/w problem, they aren't
bothering to update the f/w revision number to differentiate drives with
the broken code vs. ones with the working code.  Naughty Western
Digital...

The file I kept on this matter is below, which includes a quote from
some forum user.

-- 
| Jeremy Chadwickjdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking   http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator  Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

=
Protocol  Serial ATA II
device model  WDC WD2500KS-00MJB0
firmware revision 02.01C03

http://episteme.arstechnica.com/groupee/forums/a/tpc/f/24609792/m/857003655731
http://forum.effizienzgurus.de/f40/temps-bei-wd-se16-250gb-wd2500ks-t1060.html

  So I got in touch with WD's Customer Support and I have just being informed
  that this paticular drive, WD2500KS-00MJB0, contains a bug in the Firmware
  (mine got version number 02.01C03) with regards to the usage of the SMART
  feature. The temperature of the drive which it reports is not correct. Mine
  read over 30 degrees centigrade just after I started the PC up. This
  Temperature got up to 62 degrees after a short while, whilst my other two WD
  drives still reported only 32-33 degrees in about the same position in the
  tower as this drive. I've been told an Firmware upgrade to rectify this is on
  it's way.

http://www.bugtrack.almico.com/view.php?id=468
http://secure.ncix.com/forumpost/displaythread.php?threadid=1026701
http://www.lavalys.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t1372.html
=
___
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]