[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|toolch...@freebsd.org |ger...@freebsd.org --- Comment #14 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Mikael Urankar from comment #13) > I'll be able to test it in early january. I engaged with others upstream, and there's essentially this change now, which we'll get with the next update of lang/gcc10-devel that I plan for tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 --- Comment #13 from Mikael Urankar --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #10) I'll be able to test it in early january. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 Mark Linimon changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #221046|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #12 from Mark Linimon --- Created attachment 221049 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=221049=edit reworked aarch64 patch file properly reformatted file files/patch-gcc_config_aarch64_aarch64-builtins.c , currently under test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 --- Comment #11 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #9) I'm aware of the tradeoffs with using BOOTSTRAP off. But my time preferences are such that on small arm boards and the like I normally use BOOTSTRAP off: BOOTSTRAP makes a big build-time difference in those contexts. I do sometimes do a BOOTSTRAP based build as a cross check on the status. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|New |In Progress -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #219435|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #10 from Gerald Pfeifer --- Created attachment 221046 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=221046=edit Proposed patch for aarch64 (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #7) > Approved by: gerald (maintainer) > > And I'll see that I get us to a fix via upstream in time for GCC 10.3. Instead of the Makefile change, can you please give this patch a try? This is what likely is going to get in upstream. I could not build test this, so if there's a \ or ; or the like missing somewhere, it would be great if you could adjust. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 --- Comment #9 from Gerald Pfeifer --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #8) > My guess is that my options made the difference > [...] >BOOTSTRAP : off >GRAPHITE : off BOOTSTRAP=off means that GCC never builds itself (and hence never fully exercises itself). In that case this may have helped; in general I recommend against it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 Mark Millard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marklmi26-f...@yahoo.com --- Comment #8 from Mark Millard --- (In reply to Mikael Urankar from comment #0) On head -r368500 on aarch64 (and more) I recently had poudriere build updated ports ( -r558163 ). gcc10.2.0 is one of the things that built (and I later installed). But I see that: http://ampere2.nyi.freebsd.org/data/head-arm64-default/p557699_s368500/logs/errors/gcc10-10.2.0.log shows the kind of error that you report. My guess is that my options made the difference (pkg info output): Options: BOOTSTRAP : off GRAPHITE : off vs. what the ampere2 log shows: ===> The following configuration options are available for gcc10-10.2.0: BOOTSTRAP=on: Build using a full bootstrap GRAPHITE=off: Support for Graphite loop optimizations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 --- Comment #7 from Gerald Pfeifer --- I believe this is fundamentally wrong both in principle (mixing C++ standards) and in not working via upstream, but having not been able to push the latter myself and this being contained, please go ahead. Approved by: gerald (maintainer) And I'll see that I get us to a fix via upstream in time for GCC 10.3. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 Mikael Urankar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||246700 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=246700 [Bug 246700] [exp-run] Update GCC_DEFAULT from 9 to 10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 --- Comment #6 from Mark Linimon --- I can confirm gcc10 builds on aarch64 under qemu using this patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Urankar --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #4) I haven't tried an earlier FreeBSD version llvm8, llvm90, llvm10 and llvm10 all fail the same way. with gcc9, it's only a warning: gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-builtins.c:1227:21: warning: extended initializer lists only available with '-std=c++11' or '-std=gnu++11' gcc11-devel has switched to std=c++11 so it's a gcc problem not a llvm one -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
[Bug 250932] lang/gcc10: fails to build on aarch64
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250932 Gerald Pfeifer changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ger...@freebsd.org |toolch...@freebsd.org CC||ger...@freebsd.org --- Comment #4 from Gerald Pfeifer --- Thanks for giving gcc10-devel a spin, too. To me this looks like clang induced breakage, and on 13-CURRENT only? Is it possible this is something clang should/could address, or should we see whether upstream GCC has an idea? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
