Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-17 Thread dos386
   There is an assortment of web content that _requires_ flash
  Isn't the Google document viewer among them ? AFAIK
 It is not.  Look stuff up.

I did. Last time I checked it pressured me to enable JS, when it
got JS, it asked for Flash ... this was the EOD for me.

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-17 Thread dmccunney
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:25 AM, dos386 dos...@gmail.com wrote:
   There is an assortment of web content that _requires_ flash
  Isn't the Google document viewer among them ? AFAIK
 It is not.  Look stuff up.

 I did. Last time I checked it pressured me to enable JS, when it
 got JS, it asked for Flash ... this was the EOD for me.

Er. *what* asked for Flash?  (That wasn't what I meant by look stuff up.)

Google products, including GMail and Google Docs use DHTML and *lots
and lots* of JavaScript.  The stuff you are talking about, like
rendering common attachment types in your browser, is JS powered.  (It
works on mobile devices that don't *have* flash.)  It you aren't
running a relatively current browser supporting a current version of
JavaScript, you will not have a good experience, because many things
simply won't work.

I use Firefox (actually, Aurora, which will become the next Firefox
release version.)  In Aurora, I run NoScript, which blocks scripting
activity unless the site is in a user maintained whitelist.  Mozilla
also implements the plugin_helper executable, which runs as a child
process of the browser, and implements a sandbox in which plugins can
run.  The idea is that a crashing plugin won't take the browser with
it, and Adobe Flash is a worst offender.

Flash (and plugins in general) are increasingly deprecated.  Current
browser development direction is Plugins are bad.  The user should be
able to do everything without requiring them.   And Adobe is
curtailing flash.  Development of flash for mobile has been ended, in
good part because many mobile devices simply don't support it.  (Apple
refused to support flash.)  Flash will still be supported on the
desktop, but I don't expect a lot of development. Adobe has a tool in
alpha intended to convert flash to HTML5, and will be going in that
direction in future efforts.

Avoid JS and flash if you prefer, but be aware your reasons for doing
so may not be valid.
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dos386
 Email is the principal vector for _v_i_r_u_s_ delivery, by attachments all
 reside on Google's servers too, and never reach my machine.

Funny ...

  Google has viewers for all common file types

Really? How does it work? How do you see the file on Gooogle's server?
Maybe you have the ADOBE FLUSH virus installed and let the author
deliver you a new version every day to you holy clean machine?

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dmccunney
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 8:52 PM, dos386 dos...@gmail.com wrote:
 Email is the principal vector for _v_i_r_u_s_ delivery, but attachments all
 reside on Google's servers too, and never reach my machine.

 Funny ...

True.  You can't deliver a virus by a nasty attachment if the
attachment never reaches the user's machine.

  Google has viewers for all common file types

 Really? How does it work? How do you see the file on Gooogle's server?

It's rendered in the browser, by code on Google's end.

 Maybe you have the ADOBE FLUSH virus installed and let the author
 deliver you a new version every day to you holy clean machine?

I do have the Adobe Flash player installed, but it's not involved in
the transaction.  The attachments in question are not SWF objects.

(I have Adobe Flash under Linux, as well.  There is an assortment of
web content that _requires_ flash, notably sites concerned with art
and design.  And while HTML5 offers hope down the road, an awful lot
of video is still handled by flash.).
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dos386
 I do have the Adobe Flash player installed, but it's not involved in
 the transaction.  The attachments in question are not SWF objects.

But Google maybe translates them into SWF ... does the attach
viewer still work when you disable or remove Adobe Flash ?

  There is an assortment of web content that _requires_ flash

Isn't the Google document viewer among them ? AFAIK
the good old Google's PDFtoHTML converter is now dead :-(

 notably sites concerned with art and design

not only :-(

 And while HTML5 offers hope down the road, an awful lot
 of video is still handled by flash

Indeed :-(

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-15 Thread dmccunney
On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:24 PM, dos386 dos...@gmail.com wrote:
 I do have the Adobe Flash player installed, but it's not involved in
 the transaction.  The attachments in question are not SWF objects.

 But Google maybe translates them into SWF ... does the attach

No, it doesn't.

 viewer still work when you disable or remove Adobe Flash ?

Yes, it does.  Google uses AJAX, with lots of DHTML and JavaScript.
You need a browser that supports current web standards.  (I use
Firefox.)  You don't need Flash.  (If you are on a mobile platform
like an iPad, you don't *have* Flash.  It's not supported on the
platform.)

  There is an assortment of web content that _requires_ flash

 Isn't the Google document viewer among them ? AFAIK

It is not.  Look stuff up.

 the good old Google's PDFtoHTML converter is now dead :-(

I have other ways to do that, and don't believe I ever used Google's.
I don't know what you think PDF might have to do with flash, however,
other than both coming from Adobe.

 notably sites concerned with art and design

 not only :-(

Agreed, many sites use flash that don't need to, and even some that
arguably need to use it badly.

But I'm a designer turned computer geek, have a number of volumes in
my library on art, architecture, design, photography, and typography,
and visit art and design sites that *do* use flash effectively.

 And while HTML5 offers hope down the road, an awful lot
 of video is still handled by flash

 Indeed :-(
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:

Build for Windows Store.

http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-07 Thread dmccunney
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com wrote:

 My usual response to worries about privacy is You *wish* you were
 important enough that anyone could be *bothered* to pay that sort of
 attention to you.  You aren't and they don't.

 http://www.osnews.com/story/27101/NSA_collects_phone_records_of_all_Verizon_customers_daily

So?  We are discussing email, not phone calls, and I *still* don't
care for the same reasons.  I'm not a Verizon customer, but what would
make *my* records of interest to anyone if I were?
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-07 Thread TJ Edmister
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 09:03:15 -0400, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com  
wrote:

 On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Rugxulo rugx...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com  
 wrote:

 My usual response to worries about privacy is You *wish* you were
 important enough that anyone could be *bothered* to pay that sort of
 attention to you.  You aren't and they don't.

 http://www.osnews.com/story/27101/NSA_collects_phone_records_of_all_Verizon_customers_daily

 So?  We are discussing email, not phone calls, and I *still* don't
 care for the same reasons.  I'm not a Verizon customer, but what would
 make *my* records of interest to anyone if I were?
 __
 Dennis
 https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519


http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/the-data-trust-blog/2009/02/debunking-a-myth-if-you-have-n.html

Aside from that, web-based email interfaces suffer in the usability  
department compared to a decent email program anyway.

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-07 Thread dmccunney
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 2:22 PM, TJ Edmister damag...@hyakushiki.net wrote:

 http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/the-data-trust-blog/2009/02/debunking-a-myth-if-you-have-n.html

And none of the issues pointed to are inherent to electronic
databases.  The problems mentioned have occurred for as long as
records have been kept.

 Aside from that, web-based email interfaces suffer in the usability
 department compared to a decent email program anyway.

Not from where I sit.  At one time or another, I've used Microsoft
Mail, Outlook Express, Outlook, Netscape Mail and News, and
Thunderbird for email, not to mention some text mode clients like
mailx on Unix.

I use GMail and *prefer* the web interface,  I could download my main
via POP and read it in a local client, but have no reason to do so.  I
 don't need a local copy of 99.99% of the mail I get,  I'm quite happy
to have it reside on Google's servers.  It also provides me with a
level of security.  Email is the principal vector for virus delivery,
by attachments all reside on Google's servers too, and never reach my
machine.  Google has viewers for all common file types, and there is
seldom need for a local copy of the attachment.

My GMail mailstore is a database, searchable with standard Google
queries.  Labels and filters provide a more flexible alternative to
local folders.  And labels are arbitrary index keys into the database,
and I can apply more than one label to a message.

I used to use Outlook for email and download via POP.  I would *not* go back.
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


[Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM, James Collins james.collin...@yahoo.com wrote:

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

Just for the record, here's yet another poor Yahoo! sap who's been
compromised by spammers. Sad, but oh well, what can you do? (Change
your password or use a different provider, I guess.)

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Chris Evans
The privacy of yahoo email users will decrease on July 1st when yahoo will
begin more aggressive ad scanning of your messages stored on their servers.
 I even noticed a new ad format that looks like it is part of your inbox
list but its a sponsered ad. I would recommend switching to other
providers, I wouldn't recommend gmail as google scans your messages too.
Http://digitalatoll.com offers email that is private and secure  but is not
free.

-Chris
Http://tawhakisoft.com



On Thursday, June 6, 2013, Rugxulo wrote:

 Hi,

 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM, James Collins 
 james.collin...@yahoo.comjavascript:;
 wrote:
 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

 Just for the record, here's yet another poor Yahoo! sap who's been
 compromised by spammers. Sad, but oh well, what can you do? (Change
 your password or use a different provider, I guess.)


 --
 How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
 1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
 2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
 3. A single system of record for all IT processes
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
 ___
 Freedos-user mailing list
 Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net javascript:;
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,
   AFAIK, Google's machines (not people) automatically scan your
messages to better target ads at you. They don't keep any private data
(or at least not beyond minimal legal limits).

My ISP is ATT, formerly Bellsouth (whom ATT bought out, among
others). Even they (Bellsouth branch) switched the whole email over to
a Yahoo!-based one a few years ago. For various minor reasons, I don't
use that account anymore anyways. (I'm not sure I'd recommend
Outlook.com either, but MS is pretty heavily pushing that these days
too. What else is there? Dunno )

I'm not really ragging on Yahoo! (though they aren't my favorite), but
a few years ago they were majorly hacked, and at least two other
Yahoo! users (who are real, trustworthy people in real life) have
indirectly spammed me personally. Scratch that, one other former
FreeDOS contributor also indirectly spammed this list a while back.

My point is:  1). Yahoo! may be insecure,  2). maybe these people need
to change their passwords to thwart the aforementioned hackers, 3).
these people probably aren't actively spamming anyone, so they are
innocent (and we shouldn't ban them all upon first offense, even if
annoying).


On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Chris Evans aaxiomfin...@gmail.com wrote:

 The privacy of yahoo email users will decrease on July 1st when yahoo will
 begin more aggressive ad scanning of your messages stored on their servers.
 I even noticed a new ad format that looks like it is part of your inbox list
 but its a sponsered ad. I would recommend switching to other providers, I
 wouldn't recommend gmail as google scans your messages too.
 Http://digitalatoll.com offers email that is private and secure  but is not
 free.

 -Chris
 Http://tawhakisoft.com



 On Thursday, June 6, 2013, Rugxulo wrote:

 Hi,

 On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 3:21 PM, James Collins james.collin...@yahoo.com
 wrote:
 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spam_(electronic)

 Just for the record, here's yet another poor Yahoo! sap who's been
 compromised by spammers. Sad, but oh well, what can you do? (Change
 your password or use a different provider, I guess.)

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread dmccunney
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Chris Evans aaxiomfin...@gmail.com wrote:

 I wouldn't recommend gmail as google scans your messages too.
 Http://digitalatoll.com offers email that is private and secure  but is not
 free.

I personally don't *care* that Google scans my mail.  The scanning is
done by algorithms, not human beings, with the intent to provide ads
topical to the content of the messages.  The ads are sometimes useful,
sometimes whimsical, and always unobtrusive.  I could quite easily
filter them out entirely, but don't bother.

As a general rule, I've never considered email secure, and normally
don't say things in email that would give me heartburn if they became
public. If it's *that* private, well, that's what GPG is for.

I'm contrarian on privacy.  The three areas I consider private are my
finances, my health records, and my sex life.  The first two are in
the hands of third parties who have legal as well as moral reasons to
try to *keep* them private, and my sex life never gets online in the
first place.  For the rest, I'm an open book.

My usual response to worries about privacy is You *wish* you were
important enough that anyone could be *bothered* to pay that sort of
attention to you.  You aren't and they don't.

 -Chris
 Http://tawhakisoft.com
__
Dennis
https://plus.google.com/u/0/105128793974319004519

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user


Re: [Freedos-user] more Yahoo! spam (was: Re: no sibject)

2013-06-06 Thread Rugxulo
Hi,

On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:41 PM, dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com wrote:

 My usual response to worries about privacy is You *wish* you were
 important enough that anyone could be *bothered* to pay that sort of
 attention to you.  You aren't and they don't.

http://www.osnews.com/story/27101/NSA_collects_phone_records_of_all_Verizon_customers_daily

--
How ServiceNow helps IT people transform IT departments:
1. A cloud service to automate IT design, transition and operations
2. Dashboards that offer high-level views of enterprise services
3. A single system of record for all IT processes
http://p.sf.net/sfu/servicenow-d2d-j
___
Freedos-user mailing list
Freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-user