Problem with rlm_ippool PW_STATUS_ACCOUNTING_ON/OFF

2003-12-17 Thread suxiang
When radiusd received a request of accounting on/off from NAS, ippool
cannot free IP that have been allocated to radclient via NAS.
I see the file rlm_ippool.c and find it doesn't deal with this request
of accounting on/off.
Why? And How can I free those pathetic IP?




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool

2003-12-06 Thread Rodrigo A. Simões
Hi,

I'm trying to use rlm_ipool with 2 subnets, but it doesn't work. Look:

ippool pool_1 {
range-start = X.X.1.1
range-stop = X.X.1.254
netmask = 255.255.255.255
cache-size = 800
session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
override = no
}

ippool pool_2 {
range-start = X.X.3.1
range-stop = X.X.3.254
netmask = 255.255.255.255
cache-size = 800
session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
override = no
}

The 2 pools are listed in pre-auth and accounting sessions...

id GroupName Attribute op Value 
 4 broadband Pool-Name := pool_2 
 3 broadband Pool-Name := pool_1 

When the 1st pool is full, the rlm_ippool don't allocate any more ip's for my 
customers...

Any advice?

Thanks!

-
Enviado pelo WebMail LIFE: http://webmail.life.com.br

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool

2003-12-06 Thread Alan DeKok
=?ISO-8859-1?B?Um9kcmlnbyBBLiBTaW31ZXM=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 The 2 pools are listed in pre-auth and accounting sessions...

  You mean post-auth...

 When the 1st pool is full, the rlm_ippool don't allocate any more ip's for my 
 customers...
 
 Any advice?

  Read doc/configurable_failover

  You've got to set it up in post-auth so that the first pool is
always used, and if it fail, then use the second pool.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool

2003-12-06 Thread Rodrigo A. Simões
Citando Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 =?ISO-8859-1?B?Um9kcmlnbyBBLiBTaW31ZXM=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The 2 pools are listed in pre-auth and accounting sessions...
 
   You mean post-auth...
 
  When the 1st pool is full, the rlm_ippool don't allocate any more ip's for
 my 
  customers...
  
  Any advice?
 
   Read doc/configurable_failover
 
   You've got to set it up in post-auth so that the first pool is
 always used, and if it fail, then use the second pool.

Thanks Alan! I have 2 questions:

- The 2 pool's will use the same DB files?
- I need to specify only 1 pool name on radgroupcheck?

Thanks!

 
   Alan DeKok.
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 


-- 
Rodrigo A. Simões
Life Soluções em Internet
http://www.life.com.br

-
Enviado pelo WebMail LIFE: http://webmail.life.com.br

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool

2003-12-06 Thread Alan DeKok
=?ISO-8859-1?B?Um9kcmlnbyBBLiBTaW31ZXM=?= [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  The 2 pool's will use the same DB files?

  Never.  They need seperate databases.

 - I need to specify only 1 pool name on radgroupcheck?

  Hmm.. you may have to specify both.  I'm not sure.

  ALan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool

2003-12-06 Thread Gustavo A. Lozano
Is the profile using the 2 pools?


On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 12:51, Rodrigo A. Simões wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm trying to use rlm_ipool with 2 subnets, but it doesn't work. Look:
 
 ippool pool_1 {
 range-start = X.X.1.1
 range-stop = X.X.1.254
 netmask = 255.255.255.255
 cache-size = 800
 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
 ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
 override = no
 }
 
 ippool pool_2 {
 range-start = X.X.3.1
 range-stop = X.X.3.254
 netmask = 255.255.255.255
 cache-size = 800
 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
 ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
 override = no
 }
 
 The 2 pools are listed in pre-auth and accounting sessions...
 
 id GroupName Attribute op Value 
  4 broadband Pool-Name := pool_2 
  3 broadband Pool-Name := pool_1 
 
 When the 1st pool is full, the rlm_ippool don't allocate any more ip's for my 
 customers...
 
 Any advice?
 
 Thanks!
 
 -
 Enviado pelo WebMail LIFE: http://webmail.life.com.br
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com 

 I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool way to realize an entry is stale

2003-10-31 Thread Jonathan Ruano
Hi there:

I messed with rlm_ippool sources in the past but I decided to give the 0.9.2
version a try, as I hadn't touched anything since July.

Not doing stress, full load tests, but took a look at the sources and
remembered how stale entries are found and fixed.

The ippool array is indexed by nas/port, so if we're to assign an IP address
to a dialup user using the same nas/port combination than a previous
(currently marked as active) one, then the latter must be a stale entry.

This works great (any real-life experiencies to share, anyone?) for just one
ippool instance, but not when there are several. I'll see if I can merge my
hacked version and 0.9.2's.

Jonathan Ruano


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool way to realize an entry is stale

2003-10-31 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Jonathan Ruano wrote:

 Hi there:

 I messed with rlm_ippool sources in the past but I decided to give the 0.9.2
 version a try, as I hadn't touched anything since July.

 Not doing stress, full load tests, but took a look at the sources and
 remembered how stale entries are found and fixed.

 The ippool array is indexed by nas/port, so if we're to assign an IP address
 to a dialup user using the same nas/port combination than a previous
 (currently marked as active) one, then the latter must be a stale entry.

 This works great (any real-life experiencies to share, anyone?) for just one
 ippool instance, but not when there are several.

Why? However many instances you may have they will all check for a stale entry
for that nas/port combination in their respective databases. So where exactly do
you see a problem?

 I'll see if I can merge my
 hacked version and 0.9.2's.

 Jonathan Ruano


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool update and call for testing

2003-10-03 Thread Paul Hampson
OK, I've committed a new rlm_ippool_tool that works with the latest
rlm_ippool.c. As such, anyone using rlm_ippool and FreeRADIUS can
now easily upgrade to the new rlm_ippool code without losing data.
http://www.freeradius.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c?rev=1.25content-type=text/plain
http://www.freeradius.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool_tool.c?rev=1.3content-type=text/plain

If you need a copy of the old rlm_ippool_tool, the one in branch_0_9
will work with the earlier version of rlm_ippool. This is (for reading
the DBs which is what's important here) functionally identical to
ippooltool which is probably known to those of you who've suffered
problems with rlm_ippool before.
http://www.freeradius.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool_tool.c?rev=1.3.2.1content-type=text/plain

And if all else fails, you can extract your IPpool details from radwho -r
if you're using utmp support.

So now we need testers. I'm running the new code myself, and its on track
for 0.9.2, barring new failure reports. Unless anything else comes up, this
will go into branch_0_9 on Wednesday next week, and 0.9.2 will hopefully
happen on Thursday or Friday. (And keep in mind that's probably on Australian
time, so I could be 16 hours ahead of you.)

Here're the scripts I used to update my installation with the minimum of downtime:

(Assuming you're in the dir with db.main* and have a copy of the old rlm_ippool_tool
compiled here as rlm_ippool_tool.091)

/etc/init.d/freeradius stop
./rlm_ippool_tool.091 -v db.mainpool db.mainindex | ./poolfromiptool.pl |sort -k 5 1
radwho -r | ./poolfromradwho.pl |sort -k 5 2
diff 1 2
No differences is good. Otherwise you have to work out which is more correct
and use it below.
mkdir save
mv db.main* save
(Install new FreeRADIUS with new rlm_ippool code. Start and stop server)
This generates new db.mainpool and db.mainindex files for you
bash 1
Or 2 if you prefer. :-)
rlm_ippool_tool -v db.mainpool db.mainindex | ./poolfromiptool.pl |sort -k 5 3
diff3 1 2 3
Again, no differences is good. 3 should match whichever of 1 or 2 you used
/etc/init.d/freeradius start

Test wildly. :-)

And now for the scripts:
poolfromradwho.pl:
#! /usr/bin/perl


while () {
next unless /^.*,.*,PPP,S(\d+),.*,(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+),(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+)$/;
my ($tty, $nas, $ip) = ($1, $2, $3);

# Only want pool IPs
next unless $ip =~ /^150\.203\.110\.(\d+)/;
# Skip static IPs
next if ($1  217);
print rlm_ippool_tool -n db.mainpool db.mainindex $ip $nas $tty\n
}
poolfromiptool.pl
#! /usr/bin/perl


while () {
next unless /NAS:(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+) port:(0x[0-9a-fA-Z]+) - 
ipaddr:(\d+\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+) active:1/;
my ($nas, $tty, $ip) = ($1, hex($2), $3);

# Only want pool IPs
next unless $ip =~ /^150\.203\.110\.(\d+)/;
# Skip static IPs
next if ($1  217);
print rlm_ippool_tool -n db.mainpool db.mainindex $ip $nas $tty\n
}

--
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On a sidewalk near Portland State
University someone wrote `Trust Jesus', and
someone else wrote `But Cut the Cards'.


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


FW: new feature patch for rlm_ippool: reject-on-drain

2003-10-01 Thread Ali Gunduz


 -Original Message-
 From: Berk D. Demir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:13
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: new feature patch for rlm_ippool: reject-on-drain
 
 
 Hi,
 
 rlm_ippool return NOOP when there are no available addresses in the
 pool.
 We considered using server side ip pool mgmt to simulate Group based
 Simultaneous-Use enforcement.
 
 This patch adds the ability to send Access-Reject in the post-auth
 section to rlm_ippool with a boolean parameter 
 reject-on-drain in case
 there are no available addresses in the pool. 
 
 Possible use case:
 
 In a scenario where a backbone provider gives virtual ISP service. The
 agreement is generally on simultaneous use of port capacity basis. For
 example maximum 1024 simultaneous connections nation-wide.
 
 This scenario holds at least for one ISP on the planet, the one that I
 work for :)
 
 Patches are below.
 The first one is relative to 0.9.1 release and the latter is 
 relative to
 the current CVS tree.
 
 They're also reachable from the URLs below
 http://mindcast.org/~bdd/freeradius/freeradius-0.9.1-rlm_ippoo
 l-reject_on_drain.patch
 http://mindcast.org/~bdd/freeradius/freeradius-CVS_current-rlm
_ippool-reject_on_drain.patch
 
 ---[ relative to 0.9.1 
 ]---
 
 diff -urN freeradius-0.9.1.orig/raddb/radiusd.conf.in 
 freeradius-0.9.1/raddb/radiusd.conf.in
 --- freeradius-0.9.1.orig/raddb/radiusd.conf.in   
 2003-08-26 15:25:40.0 +0300
 +++ freeradius-0.9.1/raddb/radiusd.conf.in2003-10-01 
 10:18:43.748129000 +0300
 @@ -1330,6 +1330,10 @@
  
   # override: Will this ippool override a 
 Framed-IP-Address already set
   override = no
 +
 + # reject-on-drain: Will we return an 
 Access-Reject packet in case
 + # there are no available addresses in the pool
 + reject-on-drain = no
   }
  
   # ANSI X9.9 token support.  Not included by default.
 diff -urN 
 freeradius-0.9.1.orig/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c 
 freeradius-0.9.1/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c
 --- freeradius-0.9.1.orig/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c 
 2003-07-14 20:29:30.0 +0300
 +++ freeradius-0.9.1/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c  
 2003-10-01 10:17:34.770721000 +0300
 @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@
   uint32_t netmask;
   int cache_size;
   int override;
 + int reject_on_drain;
   GDBM_FILE gdbm;
   GDBM_FILE ip;
   pthread_mutex_t session_mutex;
 @@ -119,6 +120,7 @@
{ netmask, PW_TYPE_IPADDR, 
 offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,netmask), NULL, 0 },
{ cache-size, PW_TYPE_INTEGER, 
 offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,cache_size), NULL, 1000 },
{ override, PW_TYPE_BOOLEAN, 
 offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,override), NULL, no },
 +  { reject-on-drain, PW_TYPE_BOOLEAN, 
 offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,reject_on_drain), NULL, no },
{ NULL, -1, 0, NULL, NULL }
  };
  
 @@ -667,7 +669,10 @@
   }
   else{
   DEBUG(rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool.);
 - return RLM_MODULE_NOOP;
 + if(data-reject_on_drain)
 + return RLM_MODULE_REJECT;
 + else
 + return RLM_MODULE_NOOP;
   }
  
   return RLM_MODULE_OK;
 
 ---[ relative to 0.9.1 
 ]---
 
 ---[ relative to current 
 ]-
 
 Index: raddb/radiusd.conf.in
 ===
 RCS file: /source/radiusd/raddb/radiusd.conf.in,v
 retrieving revision 1.157
 diff -u -r1.157 radiusd.conf.in
 --- raddb/radiusd.conf.in 30 Sep 2003 16:36:34 -  1.157
 +++ raddb/radiusd.conf.in 1 Oct 2003 07:43:06 -
 @@ -1436,6 +1436,10 @@
  
   # override: Will this ippool override a 
 Framed-IP-Address already set
   override = no
 +
 + # reject-on-drain: Will we return an 
 Access-Reject packet in case
 + # there are no available addresses in the pool
 + reject-on-drain = no
   }
  
   # ANSI X9.9 token support.  Not included by default.
 Index: src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c
 ===
 RCS file: /source/radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c,v
 retrieving revision 1.24
 diff -u -r1.24 rlm_ippool.c
 --- src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c   23 Sep 2003 
 13:59:59 -1.24
 +++ src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c   1 Oct 2003 
 07:43:06 -
 @@ -95,6 +95,7 @@
   uint32_t netmask;
   int cache_size;
   int override;
 + int reject_on_drain;
   GDBM_FILE gdbm;
   GDBM_FILE ip;
   pthread_mutex_t op_mutex;
 @@ -129,6 +130,7 @@
{ netmask, PW_TYPE_IPADDR, 
 offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,netmask), NULL, 0 },
{ cache-size, PW_TYPE_INTEGER, 
 offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,cache_size), NULL, 1000 },
{ override, PW_TYPE_BOOLEAN

RE: new feature patch for rlm_ippool: reject-on-drain

2003-10-01 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Ali Gunduz
 Sent: Wednesday, 1 October 2003 9:18 PM

  -Original Message-
  From: Berk D. Demir [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 12:13
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: new feature patch for rlm_ippool: reject-on-drain
  
  
  Hi,
  
  rlm_ippool return NOOP when there are no available addresses in the
  pool.
  We considered using server side ip pool mgmt to simulate Group based
  Simultaneous-Use enforcement.
  
  This patch adds the ability to send Access-Reject in the post-auth
  section to rlm_ippool with a boolean parameter 
  reject-on-drain in case
  there are no available addresses in the pool. 
  
  Possible use case:
  
  In a scenario where a backbone provider gives virtual ISP service. The
  agreement is generally on simultaneous use of port capacity basis. For
  example maximum 1024 simultaneous connections nation-wide.
  
  This scenario holds at least for one ISP on the planet, the one that I
  work for :)

This _could_ be handled with the configurable-failover, setting a REJECT
upon NOOP, I think...

In modules:
always reject {
  rcode = reject
}

In post-auth:
group {
  my_pool {
fail = return
notfound = return
noop = 1
ok = return
updated = return
reject = return
userlock = return
invalid = return
handled = return
  }
  reject
}

This will also reject people who haven't _gotten_ a Pool-Name check
item... So you may want to use the Post-Auth-Type support to only apply
this to people who've dialled in on these accounts.

I guess it also depends what else you want to do in post-auth.

--
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On a sidewalk near Portland State
University someone wrote `Trust Jesus', and
someone else wrote `But Cut the Cards'.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Mohsen Chirara
After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the
entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP
addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output:
NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1
NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x4e38 - ipaddr:172.16.4.6 active:1 cli:0 num:1
NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x20 - ipaddr:172.16.4.75 active:1 cli:0 num:1
NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x6 - ipaddr:172.16.4.145 active:1 cli:0 num:1
NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x13 - ipaddr:172.16.4.200 active:1 cli:0 num:1
NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x25 - ipaddr:172.16.4.244 active:1 cli:0 num:1
NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x2 - ipaddr:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1

What next ?

Mohsen

- Original Message -
From: Mohsen Chirara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

 Ok I installed rlm_ippool from cvs branch - I will let you know if
 everything is OK within
 2 days.

 - Original Message -
 From: Chris van Meerendonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:20 PM
 Subject: RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

  Hi Paul,
 I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to
 check
 
  This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs (the
  rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it. I'll
  let you know when I have something interesting.
 
  Chris
 
 
  -
  List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 --
-
 Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
 Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

---
Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mohsen Chirara wrote:

 After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the
 entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP
 addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output:
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x4e38 - ipaddr:172.16.4.6 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x20 - ipaddr:172.16.4.75 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x6 - ipaddr:172.16.4.145 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x13 - ipaddr:172.16.4.200 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x25 - ipaddr:172.16.4.244 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x2 - ipaddr:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1

 What next ?

So your pool started with only 7 ip's in it or did it shrink?

If you have enabled detail file accct logging can you find tge corresponding
acct-stop packets for the active nas/port pairs in it or where they lost?

If you try and log in through an already active nas/port pair isn't the
corresponding entry freed?

Thanks for the feedback


 Mohsen

 - Original Message -
 From: Mohsen Chirara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:05 PM
 Subject: Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

  Ok I installed rlm_ippool from cvs branch - I will let you know if
  everything is OK within
  2 days.
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Chris van Meerendonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:20 PM
  Subject: RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version
 
   Hi Paul,
  I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to
  check
  
   This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs (the
   rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it. I'll
   let you know when I have something interesting.
  
   Chris
  
  
   -
   List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
  http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
  
  --
 -
  Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
  Scann? par Escan Checked by Escan
 
 
 
 
  -
  List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
 http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 ---
 Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
 Scann? par Escan Checked by Escan




 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Mohsen Chirara
No, I shrunk. My pool is an entire class C. (172.16.4.1-172.16.4.254)

If you have enabled detail file accct logging can you find tge corresponding
 acct-stop packets for the active nas/port pairs in it or where they lost?

I do get a stop packet but only for the 7 Ip addresses available. I
configured my
cisco to assign an IP address if rlm_ippool does not do its job.

Here is a stop packet:
Mon Sep  1 09:37:03 2003
NAS-IP-Address = w.x.y.z
NAS-Port = 26
NAS-Port-Type = Async
User-Name = user
Called-Station-Id = 2060
Calling-Station-Id = 8643233
Acct-Status-Type = Stop
Acct-Authentic = RADIUS
Service-Type = Framed-User
Acct-Session-Id = 31A5
Framed-Protocol = PPP
Framed-IP-Address = 172.16.4.145
Acct-Terminate-Cause = User-Request
Acct-Input-Octets = 3026
Acct-Output-Octets = 8864
Acct-Input-Packets = 64
Acct-Output-Packets = 54
Acct-Session-Time = 25
Acct-Delay-Time = 0
Client-IP-Address = w.x.y.z
Acct-Unique-Session-Id = 9ef15654266b31bb

If you try and log in through an already active nas/port pair isn't the
 corresponding entry freed?

No sure I understand what you mean. If nas/port pair is active, how can I
log in to again. The cisco will do it ... Or do you mean testing it through
radpingtest or so ?

- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kalevras [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 9:30 AM
Subject: Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

 On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mohsen Chirara wrote:

  After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of
the
  entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP
  addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output:
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x4e38 - ipaddr:172.16.4.6 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x20 - ipaddr:172.16.4.75 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x6 - ipaddr:172.16.4.145 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x13 - ipaddr:172.16.4.200 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x25 - ipaddr:172.16.4.244 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x2 - ipaddr:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 
  What next ?

 So your pool started with only 7 ip's in it or did it shrink?

 If you have enabled detail file accct logging can you find tge
corresponding
 acct-stop packets for the active nas/port pairs in it or where they lost?

 If you try and log in through an already active nas/port pair isn't the
 corresponding entry freed?

 Thanks for the feedback

 
  Mohsen
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Mohsen Chirara [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 5:05 PM
  Subject: Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version
 
   Ok I installed rlm_ippool from cvs branch - I will let you know if
   everything is OK within
   2 days.
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Chris van Meerendonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:20 PM
   Subject: RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version
  
Hi Paul,
   I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how
to
   check
   
This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs
(the
rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it.
I'll
let you know when I have something interesting.
   
Chris
   
   
-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
   http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
   
 
 --
  -
   Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus
free
   Scann? par Escan Checked by Escan
  
  
  
  
   -
   List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
  http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
  

 --
-
  Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
  Scann? par Escan Checked by Escan
 
 
 
 
  -
  List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 

 --
 Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] National Technical University of Athens, Greece
 Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
 'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

---
Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Well, it seems I've got it up and running now. I'm running today's
cvs-snapshot. Because I'm testing it on a MaxTNT I also got the
Ascend-hack set in the config.

The results so far aren't very good, I'm ip's aren't freed after calls
are closed. In the radacct logging the start and stop records are
logged. I'll try to get more info.

Regards, Chris

On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 15:20, Chris van Meerendonk wrote:
 Hi Paul,
I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check
 
 This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs (the
 rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it. I'll
 let you know when I have something interesting.
 
 Chris
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Mohsen Chirara
 Sent: Monday, 1 September 2003 7:08 PM

 After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the
 entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP
 addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output:
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x4e38 - ipaddr:172.16.4.6 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x20 - ipaddr:172.16.4.75 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x6 - ipaddr:172.16.4.145 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x13 - ipaddr:172.16.4.200 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x25 - ipaddr:172.16.4.244 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x2 - ipaddr:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 
 What next ?

If that's with iptool -v, then we're in trouble, the fix didn't
solve it.

iptool -v shows every entry, active or not.

Oh, I forgot to say. You probably needed to recreate your
db files for rlm_ippool when you upgraded to CVS's rlm_ippool, or
otherwise confirm that the situation hasn't gotten worse since
you installed the CVS rlm_ippool.

In fact, I've just had a look at my own server (which has been
running the same fix from CVS for a while now) and my 230-odd
pool has been depleted to 26, of which only 15 have been used.
I had to repair mine last on July 26th, and its not a busy
server.

However, that's not decisive as the fix was only comitted on
the 28th, and I dunno how long I held off on installing it on
my production server.

I'll repair mine, and then see if I suffer further.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Mohsen Chirara
See below my answers:

  After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of
the
  entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP
  addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output:
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x4e38 - ipaddr:172.16.4.6 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x20 - ipaddr:172.16.4.75 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x6 - ipaddr:172.16.4.145 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x13 - ipaddr:172.16.4.200 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x25 - ipaddr:172.16.4.244 active:1 cli:0 num:1
  NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x2 - ipaddr:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 
  What next ?

 If that's with iptool -v, then we're in trouble, the fix didn't
 solve it.

 iptool -v shows every entry, active or not.
the output above is iptool -v.

 Oh, I forgot to say. You probably needed to recreate your
 db files for rlm_ippool when you upgraded to CVS's rlm_ippool, or
 otherwise confirm that the situation hasn't gotten worse since
 you installed the CVS rlm_ippool.
I did recreate the pool after upgrading cvs's rlm_ippool. The situation is
worse as my pool shrunk even more.

Conclusion:
THE SITUATION IS GETTING WORSE.

 In fact, I've just had a look at my own server (which has been
 running the same fix from CVS for a while now) and my 230-odd
 pool has been depleted to 26, of which only 15 have been used.
 I had to repair mine last on July 26th, and its not a busy
 server.

 However, that's not decisive as the fix was only comitted on
 the 28th, and I dunno how long I held off on installing it on
 my production server.

 I'll repair mine, and then see if I suffer further.

 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
 -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

---
Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-09-01 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Mohsen Chirara wrote:

 After 3 days of testing, I am still having the same problem. Now out of the
 entire class C, I aways have the same 7 IP
 addresses available for the pool. Here's is IP Tool output:
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x36 - ipaddr:172.16.4.147 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x4e38 - ipaddr:172.16.4.6 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x20 - ipaddr:172.16.4.75 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x6 - ipaddr:172.16.4.145 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x13 - ipaddr:172.16.4.200 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x25 - ipaddr:172.16.4.244 active:1 cli:0 num:1
 NAS:w.x.y.z port:0x2 - ipaddr:172.16.4.198 active:1 cli:0 num:1

 What next ?

 Mohsen

OK i 've most probably found the problem. Since it involves a lot of code
rewriting I 'll commit a fix tomorrow. Thanks for the help

--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-28 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Hi Paul,
   I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check

This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs (the
rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it. I'll
let you know when I have something interesting.

Chris


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-28 Thread Mohsen Chirara
Ok I installed rlm_ippool from cvs branch - I will let you know if
everything is OK within
2 days.

- Original Message -
From: Chris van Meerendonk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 1:20 PM
Subject: RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

 Hi Paul,
I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to
check

 This is gonna take some time. I installed rlm_ippool only from cvs (the
 rest is still 0.9.0 release), but by server is crashing with it. I'll
 let you know when I have something interesting.

 Chris


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

---
Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-27 Thread Paul Hampson
I'm looking for feedback from people using a CVS snapshot
more recent than Tue Jul 29 18:40:50 2003 UTC and using
rlm_ippool. There's an intended bugfix for the problem of
ippool entries disappearing on busy servers, but it's not
been shown to be correct yet.

The version of rlm_ippool.c with the bugfix is 1.23.

The reason I ask is that the bugfix is fairly important
for 0.9.1 but I don't want to pull code changes in like
this one without knowing that they fix the bug. (I'm using
the code myself, but my RADIUS server's not busy enough
to trigger the bug repeatably.)

Someone on this list had a test harness setup I think to
fire massive piles of requests at a FreeRADIUS server, and
had helped to identify the this bug. I'd _love_ to hear
from that person as to whether they can still do that test,
and whether the CVS fix works so I can roll it into 0.9.1
assured that it's good.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-27 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Hi Paul,

I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check
which ip-addresses are assigned according to the radius-server. On the
NAS I can check that, just need to know how to compare these. Radius
keeps these things in memory, doesn't it? Are there tools for tracking
this?

Chris

On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 10:38, Paul Hampson wrote:
 I'm looking for feedback from people using a CVS snapshot
 more recent than Tue Jul 29 18:40:50 2003 UTC and using
 rlm_ippool. There's an intended bugfix for the problem of
 ippool entries disappearing on busy servers, but it's not
 been shown to be correct yet.
 
 The version of rlm_ippool.c with the bugfix is 1.23.
 
 The reason I ask is that the bugfix is fairly important
 for 0.9.1 but I don't want to pull code changes in like
 this one without knowing that they fix the bug. (I'm using
 the code myself, but my RADIUS server's not busy enough
 to trigger the bug repeatably.)
 
 Someone on this list had a test harness setup I think to
 fire massive piles of requests at a FreeRADIUS server, and
 had helped to identify the this bug. I'd _love_ to hear
 from that person as to whether they can still do that test,
 and whether the CVS fix works so I can roll it into 0.9.1
 assured that it's good.
 
 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 
 



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-27 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Chris van Meerendonk
 Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2003 7:12 PM

 I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check
 which ip-addresses are assigned according to the radius-server. On the
 NAS I can check that, just need to know how to compare these. Radius
 keeps these things in memory, doesn't it? Are there tools for tracking
 this?

To check the IP pool records, you need ippooltool (available on the 'net,
we'd integrate it into FreeRADIUS if the original author would reply to
my emails...)

You need to stop FreeRADIUS to look at the files Otherwise they'll
appear blank due to GDBM file locking.

Basically, the problem is that under high load, IP addresses will disappear
from the pool. It's not a problem with the NAS, it's purely internal to
FreeRADIUS. Basically, the list output from ippooltool gets shorter, but
it _should_ stay the same length. Eventually you find you've got half your
maximum users, but no IPs to allocate.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool feedback from CVS version

2003-08-27 Thread Chris van Meerendonk
Wauw, that's fun! I'll try if I can find any bugs... 

Thanks,

Chris

On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 14:31, Paul Hampson wrote:
  From: Chris van Meerendonk
  Sent: Wednesday, 27 August 2003 7:12 PM
 
  I can install a recent (cvs) version, but I'd like to know how to check
  which ip-addresses are assigned according to the radius-server. On the
  NAS I can check that, just need to know how to compare these. Radius
  keeps these things in memory, doesn't it? Are there tools for tracking
  this?
 
 To check the IP pool records, you need ippooltool (available on the 'net,
 we'd integrate it into FreeRADIUS if the original author would reply to
 my emails...)
 
 You need to stop FreeRADIUS to look at the files Otherwise they'll
 appear blank due to GDBM file locking.
 
 Basically, the problem is that under high load, IP addresses will disappear
 from the pool. It's not a problem with the NAS, it's purely internal to
 FreeRADIUS. Basically, the list output from ippooltool gets shorter, but
 it _should_ stay the same length. Eventually you find you've got half your
 maximum users, but no IPs to allocate.
 
 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
 



- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Again - rlm_ippool problem.

2003-08-21 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Kleyson Rios
 Sent: Tuesday, 19 August 2003 9:52 PM

 In my lib directory exist the files.
 /usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool-0.9.0.so

Try:
ldd /usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool-0.9.0.so
and make sure it's able to resolve it's linked libraries.

 radiusd.conf[1258] Failed to link to module 'rlm_ippool': file not found
--
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Again - rlm_ippool problem.

2003-08-19 Thread Kleyson Rios

Please, someone can help-me !!!
I have installed freeradius and i need to use ippool, but when enable the
option in post-auth {} i get the follow error : radiusd.conf[1258] Failed
to link to module 'rlm_ippool': file not found

In my lib directory exist the files.

# ll /usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   13 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool-0.9.0.la - rlm_ippool.la
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root50606 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool-0.9.0.so
-rw-r--r--1 root root91296 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool.a
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root  770 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool.la
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   19 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool.so - rlm_ippool-0.9.0.so


my_server:/usr/local/freeradius/sbin # ./radiusd -X -p 1645
Starting - reading configuration files ...
reread_config:  reading radiusd.conf
Config:   including file: /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/clients.conf
Config:   including file: /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/snmp.conf
Config:   including file: /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/postgresql.conf
 main: prefix = /usr/local/freeradius
 main: localstatedir = /usr/local/freeradius/var
 main: logdir = /usr/local/freeradius/var/log/radius
 main: libdir = /usr/local/freeradius/lib
 main: radacctdir = /usr/local/freeradius/var/log/radius/radacct
 ...
radiusd.conf[1258] Failed to link to module 'rlm_ippool': file not found


Where is the problem ?

Tanks.
Kleyson Rios.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool problem.

2003-08-18 Thread Kleyson Rios
Hi,

# ll /usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool*
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   13 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool-0.9.0.la - rlm_ippool.la
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root50606 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool-0.9.0.so
-rw-r--r--1 root root91296 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool.a
-rwxr-xr-x1 root root  770 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool.la
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   19 Aug  7 11:12
/usr/local/freeradius/lib/rlm_ippool.so - rlm_ippool-0.9.0.so


my_server:/usr/local/freeradius/sbin # ./radiusd -X -p 1645
Starting - reading configuration files ...
reread_config:  reading radiusd.conf
Config:   including file: /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/clients.conf
Config:   including file: /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/snmp.conf
Config:   including file: /usr/local/freeradius/etc/raddb/postgresql.conf
 main: prefix = /usr/local/freeradius
 main: localstatedir = /usr/local/freeradius/var
 main: logdir = /usr/local/freeradius/var/log/radius
 main: libdir = /usr/local/freeradius/lib
 main: radacctdir = /usr/local/freeradius/var/log/radius/radacct
 ...
radiusd.conf[1258] Failed to link to module 'rlm_ippool': file not found


Where is the problem ?

Tanks.
Kleyson Rios.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Gustavo Lozano
 Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:44 PM

 So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already?

Yes. I have a preliminary patch, but I haven't posted it since
it doesn't do ML-PPP, and I haven't tested it due to my
development/testing machine's hard disk biting the dust.

 The problem with the current module seems very populated and as a matter
 of fact It is very persistent.

Yes. I think the problem is also inherent to the design of the
current module, and can't be easily worked around without
rewriting it to use a different DB layout. Currently, we have to
change the key of the IP pool list entries to record where they
are. It just seems _bad_.

If you're interested in the patch, I could post it as it is, and
would appreciate the testing.

There's also a patch posted by Johnathan (last name escapes me)
a while ago, but it doesn't apply to current CVS. :-( Based on
my design though, so it ought to be pretty much the same.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Alan DeKok
Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Here's my patch to ippooltool... There was some discussion
 of ippooltool being added to the FreeRADIUS CVS earlier.
 Was that ever decided for or against?

  Tools which administer the files used *only* by FreeRADIUS should be
part of the server.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Post it please :)

I can check it...

Rgds


On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 11:12, Paul Hampson wrote:
  From: Gustavo Lozano
  Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:44 PM
 
  So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already?
 
 Yes. I have a preliminary patch, but I haven't posted it since
 it doesn't do ML-PPP, and I haven't tested it due to my
 development/testing machine's hard disk biting the dust.
 
  The problem with the current module seems very populated and as a matter
  of fact It is very persistent.
 
 Yes. I think the problem is also inherent to the design of the
 current module, and can't be easily worked around without
 rewriting it to use a different DB layout. Currently, we have to
 change the key of the IP pool list entries to record where they
 are. It just seems _bad_.
 
 If you're interested in the patch, I could post it as it is, and
 would appreciate the testing.
 
 There's also a patch posted by Johnathan (last name escapes me)
 a while ago, but it doesn't apply to current CVS. :-( Based on
 my design though, so it ought to be pretty much the same.
 
 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-28 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Tue, 29 Jul 2003, Paul Hampson wrote:

  From: Gustavo Lozano
  Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:44 PM

  So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already?

 Yes. I have a preliminary patch, but I haven't posted it since
 it doesn't do ML-PPP, and I haven't tested it due to my
 development/testing machine's hard disk biting the dust.

  The problem with the current module seems very populated and as a matter
  of fact It is very persistent.

 Yes. I think the problem is also inherent to the design of the
 current module, and can't be easily worked around without
 rewriting it to use a different DB layout. Currently, we have to
 change the key of the IP pool list entries to record where they
 are. It just seems _bad_.

 If you're interested in the patch, I could post it as it is, and
 would appreciate the testing.

 There's also a patch posted by Johnathan (last name escapes me)
 a while ago, but it doesn't apply to current CVS. :-( Based on
 my design though, so it ought to be pretty much the same.

I 've made a few changes to the ippool module. Mainly maintan a transaction
mutex instead of per file mutexes and make MPPP work. I haven't tested it (i
don't use ippool) so feel free to test it (cvs update) and report any problems.


 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-27 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Paul.

Not everybody uses Linux :), inet_aton() is not present in Solaris as
example, dont ask my why, I didnt checked, so may be you can use another
function to do the translation of the Ip address into data.

Rgds

Gustavo


On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 00:40, Paul Hampson wrote:
 (I'm assuming all interested developers are _also_ on the
 -users list...)
 
 I've just hit the problem others have hit before about the
 ippool shrinking for no apparent reason. I'm not sure what
 does it exactly, as I'm more interested in the rewrite of
 rlm_ippool I proposed earlier and someone else actually
 _did_, which I'm now more motivated to test, and write
 transition code for. (I was earlier waiting for the 0.9.0
 release, which is now done. :-)
 
 Anyway, in order to get my services back up and running,
 I modified ippooltool 1.0 to also be able to _add_ entries,
 as well as remove them. I deleted the pool dbs, restarted
 radius to recreate the DBs, stopped radius, and then used
 this plus the info from radwho to rebuild the ippool DBs.
 
 The code currents assumes that you've -r'd the IP address
 already, if neccessary. (If not, it does nothing, happily)
 
 It also assumes you're wanting the 'num' set to 1. (That's
 the number of ports that IP's assigned to. It's for the
 (broken, AFAIK) multilink allocation)
 
 I realise this code could be neater, but I was in a hurry. :-)
 Tested fine here, and deals with ports  0x7fff.
 -n then -r produces expected results, and people are once
 again dialling in here... I know that's good 'cause if I
 send the NAS an IP address it already thinks I've allocated,
 then it will reject me. So I'm happy this works.
 
 Oh, all the debugging output says 'iptool2' since that's
 what I was calling the file. :-)
 
 Here's my patch to ippooltool... There was some discussion
 of ippooltool being added to the FreeRADIUS CVS earlier.
 Was that ever decided for or against?
 
 --- iptool.c  2003-05-23 23:09:21.0 +1000
 +++ iptool2.c 2003-07-26 15:10:07.0 +1000
 @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
  int cflag=0;
  int rflag=0;
  int vflag=0;
 +int nflag=0;
  
  typedef struct ippool_info {
  uint32_tipaddr;
 @@ -58,6 +59,150 @@
  #define MATCH_IP(ip1,ip2) ((ip1)==NULL || strcmp((ip1),(ip2))==0)
  #define MATCH_ACTIVE(info) ((info).active==1 || !aflag)
  
 +void addip(char *sessiondbname,char *indexdbname,char *ipaddress, char* NASname, 
 char*NASport) {
 +GDBM_FILE sessiondb;
 +GDBM_FILE indexdb;
 +datum key_datum,keynext_datum,data_datum;
 + datum nextkey;
 +ippool_key key;
 +ippool_info entry;
 +struct in_addr ipaddr;
 +int num;
 +int mode=GDBM_WRITER;
 +int rcode;
 + char *cli = NULL;
 + int delete = 0;
 +
 +sessiondb=gdbm_open(sessiondbname,512,mode,0,NULL);
 +indexdb=gdbm_open(indexdbname,512,mode,0,NULL);
 +
 + if (inet_aton(ipaddress, ipaddr) == 0)
 + {
 + printf(iptool2: Unable to convert IP address '%s'\n, ipaddress);
 + return;
 + }
 + 
 +if (sessiondb==NULL)
 + {
 + printf(iptools: Unable to open DB '%s'\n, sessiondbname);
 + return;
 + }
 + 
 +if (indexdb==NULL)
 + {
 + printf(iptools: Unable to open DB '%s'\n, indexdbname);
 + return;
 + }
 + 
 + /* Basically from rlm_ippool.c */
 +
 + memset(key.nas,0,MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE);
 + strncpy(key.nas,NASname,MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE -1 );
 + key.port = strtoul(NASport,NULL,0);
 + key_datum.dptr = (char *) key;
 + key_datum.dsize = sizeof(ippool_key);
 +
 + key_datum = gdbm_firstkey(sessiondb);
 + while(key_datum.dptr){
 + data_datum = gdbm_fetch(sessiondb, key_datum);
 + if (data_datum.dptr){
 + memcpy(entry,data_datum.dptr, sizeof(ippool_info));
 + free(data_datum.dptr);  
 + /* Found our entry? */
 + if (entry.ipaddr == ipaddr.s_addr){
 + datum tmp;
 +
 + tmp.dptr = (char *) entry.ipaddr;
 + tmp.dsize = sizeof(uint32_t);
 + data_datum = gdbm_fetch(indexdb, tmp);
 +
 + /*
 +  * If we find an entry in the ip index and the number 
 is zero (meaning
 +  * that we haven't allocated the same ip address to 
 another nas/port pair)
 +  * or if we don't find an entry then delete the 
 session entry so
 +  * that we can change the key (nas/port)
 +  * Else we don't delete the session entry since we 
 haven't yet deallocated the
 +  * corresponding ip address and we continue our search.
 +  */
 +
 + if (data_datum.dptr){
 + memcpy(num,data_datum.dptr

RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-27 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Gustavo Lozano
 Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:19 PM

 Paul.
 
 Not everybody uses Linux :), inet_aton() is not present in Solaris as
 example, dont ask my why, I didnt checked, so may be you can use another
 function to do the translation of the Ip address into data.

According to my man page, it's a BSD 4.3 thing.

As is inet_ntoa, which is used extensively in the part I _didn't_ write.

Mind you, Solaris appears to _have_ inet_ntoa, but not inet_aton...
*blargh*

How about inet_addr? It's present in the manpages on both my Linux box
and the SunOS box I have access to... I just have to extract the IP
address from the in_addr_t, rather than just storing the result
directly to a uint32_t. So not a major change, one or two places...

Feel free to try that and post the patch, I don't mind since it's
served its purpose for me, and I'm hoping to get my ippool module
revision completed before its needed again. :-)

Side note, Linux feels that inet_addr is an obsoleted interface
to inet_aton... It'd be nice if I could link these into libradius,
and use whatever it provides (ip_aton and ip_ntoa I think). :-)

In fact, it'd be nice to have the ippooltool actually use rlm_ippool
or at least share code... That way updates would be nice and safe,
but that'll wait until (if) ippooltool joins the FreeRADIUS CVS tree.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-27 Thread Gustavo Lozano
So are you rewriting the rlm_ippool already?

The problem with the current module seems very populated and as a matter
of fact It is very persistent.

We needed to write a script to correct the dbs every 10 minutes...



On Sun, 2003-07-27 at 22:31, Paul Hampson wrote:
  From: Gustavo Lozano
  Sent: Monday, 28 July 2003 1:19 PM
 
  Paul.
  
  Not everybody uses Linux :), inet_aton() is not present in Solaris as
  example, dont ask my why, I didnt checked, so may be you can use another
  function to do the translation of the Ip address into data.
 
 According to my man page, it's a BSD 4.3 thing.
 
 As is inet_ntoa, which is used extensively in the part I _didn't_ write.
 
 Mind you, Solaris appears to _have_ inet_ntoa, but not inet_aton...
 *blargh*
 
 How about inet_addr? It's present in the manpages on both my Linux box
 and the SunOS box I have access to... I just have to extract the IP
 address from the in_addr_t, rather than just storing the result
 directly to a uint32_t. So not a major change, one or two places...
 
 Feel free to try that and post the patch, I don't mind since it's
 served its purpose for me, and I'm hoping to get my ippool module
 revision completed before its needed again. :-)
 
 Side note, Linux feels that inet_addr is an obsoleted interface
 to inet_aton... It'd be nice if I could link these into libradius,
 and use whatever it provides (ip_aton and ip_ntoa I think). :-)
 
 In fact, it'd be nice to have the ippooltool actually use rlm_ippool
 or at least share code... That way updates would be nice and safe,
 but that'll wait until (if) ippooltool joins the FreeRADIUS CVS tree.
 
 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool and ippooltool

2003-07-25 Thread Paul Hampson
(I'm assuming all interested developers are _also_ on the
-users list...)

I've just hit the problem others have hit before about the
ippool shrinking for no apparent reason. I'm not sure what
does it exactly, as I'm more interested in the rewrite of
rlm_ippool I proposed earlier and someone else actually
_did_, which I'm now more motivated to test, and write
transition code for. (I was earlier waiting for the 0.9.0
release, which is now done. :-)

Anyway, in order to get my services back up and running,
I modified ippooltool 1.0 to also be able to _add_ entries,
as well as remove them. I deleted the pool dbs, restarted
radius to recreate the DBs, stopped radius, and then used
this plus the info from radwho to rebuild the ippool DBs.

The code currents assumes that you've -r'd the IP address
already, if neccessary. (If not, it does nothing, happily)

It also assumes you're wanting the 'num' set to 1. (That's
the number of ports that IP's assigned to. It's for the
(broken, AFAIK) multilink allocation)

I realise this code could be neater, but I was in a hurry. :-)
Tested fine here, and deals with ports  0x7fff.
-n then -r produces expected results, and people are once
again dialling in here... I know that's good 'cause if I
send the NAS an IP address it already thinks I've allocated,
then it will reject me. So I'm happy this works.

Oh, all the debugging output says 'iptool2' since that's
what I was calling the file. :-)

Here's my patch to ippooltool... There was some discussion
of ippooltool being added to the FreeRADIUS CVS earlier.
Was that ever decided for or against?

--- iptool.c2003-05-23 23:09:21.0 +1000
+++ iptool2.c   2003-07-26 15:10:07.0 +1000
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 int cflag=0;
 int rflag=0;
 int vflag=0;
+int nflag=0;
 
 typedef struct ippool_info {
 uint32_tipaddr;
@@ -58,6 +59,150 @@
 #define MATCH_IP(ip1,ip2) ((ip1)==NULL || strcmp((ip1),(ip2))==0)
 #define MATCH_ACTIVE(info) ((info).active==1 || !aflag)
 
+void addip(char *sessiondbname,char *indexdbname,char *ipaddress, char* NASname, 
char*NASport) {
+GDBM_FILE sessiondb;
+GDBM_FILE indexdb;
+datum key_datum,keynext_datum,data_datum;
+   datum nextkey;
+ippool_key key;
+ippool_info entry;
+struct in_addr ipaddr;
+int num;
+int mode=GDBM_WRITER;
+int rcode;
+   char *cli = NULL;
+   int delete = 0;
+
+sessiondb=gdbm_open(sessiondbname,512,mode,0,NULL);
+indexdb=gdbm_open(indexdbname,512,mode,0,NULL);
+
+   if (inet_aton(ipaddress, ipaddr) == 0)
+   {
+   printf(iptool2: Unable to convert IP address '%s'\n, ipaddress);
+   return;
+   }
+   
+if (sessiondb==NULL)
+   {
+   printf(iptools: Unable to open DB '%s'\n, sessiondbname);
+   return;
+   }
+   
+if (indexdb==NULL)
+   {
+   printf(iptools: Unable to open DB '%s'\n, indexdbname);
+   return;
+   }
+   
+   /* Basically from rlm_ippool.c */
+
+   memset(key.nas,0,MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE);
+   strncpy(key.nas,NASname,MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE -1 );
+   key.port = strtoul(NASport,NULL,0);
+   key_datum.dptr = (char *) key;
+   key_datum.dsize = sizeof(ippool_key);
+
+   key_datum = gdbm_firstkey(sessiondb);
+   while(key_datum.dptr){
+   data_datum = gdbm_fetch(sessiondb, key_datum);
+   if (data_datum.dptr){
+   memcpy(entry,data_datum.dptr, sizeof(ippool_info));
+   free(data_datum.dptr);  
+   /* Found our entry? */
+   if (entry.ipaddr == ipaddr.s_addr){
+   datum tmp;
+
+   tmp.dptr = (char *) entry.ipaddr;
+   tmp.dsize = sizeof(uint32_t);
+   data_datum = gdbm_fetch(indexdb, tmp);
+
+   /*
+* If we find an entry in the ip index and the number 
is zero (meaning
+* that we haven't allocated the same ip address to 
another nas/port pair)
+* or if we don't find an entry then delete the 
session entry so
+* that we can change the key (nas/port)
+* Else we don't delete the session entry since we 
haven't yet deallocated the
+* corresponding ip address and we continue our search.
+*/
+
+   if (data_datum.dptr){
+   memcpy(num,data_datum.dptr, sizeof(int));
+   free(data_datum.dptr);
+   if (num == 0){
+   delete = 1;
+   break

Re: rlm_ippool missing gdbm.h header file

2003-07-24 Thread Peter Nixon
On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 01:36 am, SPJ.Schembri wrote:
 Hi,

 I am new to FreeRadius and only just downloaded the 0.9.0-pre3 version on
 Monday, although I have been an avid list reader for 6 months now.

Please re-download the release version og 0.9.0 as it has a couple of bug 
fixes...

-- 

Peter Nixon
http://www.peternixon.net/
PGP Key: http://www.peternixon.net/public.asc


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool missing gdbm.h header file

2003-07-24 Thread SPJ.Schembri
Gustavo,

Thanks very much for the pointer, sorry if I wasted your time

Rgds
Stephen

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 July 2003 05:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Freeradius-Users digest, Vol 1 #2109 - 2 msgs


Send Freeradius-Users mailing list submissions to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.cistron.nl/mailman/listinfo/freeradius-users
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than Re: Contents of Freeradius-Users digest...


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: rlm_ippool  missing gdbm.h header file (Gustavo Lozano)
   2. Re: XTRadius to FreeRadius migration (Tom Emerson)

--__--__--

Message: 1
Subject: Re: rlm_ippool  missing gdbm.h header file
From: Gustavo Lozano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 23 Jul 2003 17:56:41 -0500
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Of course you need to get the files.

Get the package from sunfreeware.

Rgds


On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:36, SPJ.Schembri wrote:
 Hi,

 I am new to FreeRadius and only just downloaded the 0.9.0-pre3 version on
 Monday, although I have been an avid list reader for 6 months now.

 I am running Solaris 8 on my sparc server and compiled it with gcc with
what
 I thought was no problems.

 On running some tests and attempting to use the rlm_ippool module I found
 that it had not built the libraries due to gdbm header files being
missing.

 I have since (today) downloaded the 0.9.0 release and found that the
problem
 still exists.

 Do I have to download the gdbm.h headers and libraries seperately ?

 I have read the FAQs and the documentation and have found no mention to
 gdbm.h issues.

 Hopefully I am not doing something extremely silly, but could someone
please
 point me in the right direction.

 Thanking you in anticipation.

 Stephen


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
--
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein





--__--__--

Message: 2
From: Tom Emerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XTRadius to FreeRadius migration
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 18:31:24 -0700
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--Boundary-02=_vbzH/SPXwVSfPVI
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Description: signed data
Content-Disposition: inline

On Wednesday 23 July 2003 8:31 am, Sinisa Burina wrote:
  From: Alan DeKok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
  Sinisa Burina [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   accounting) by external scripts, with custom MySQL database in the
   background that holds all the information and flags for ADSL/VPN
   accounts.
 
FreeRADIUS can do this without running external scripts.

 I'm still puzzled - do I _have_ to follow proposed MySQL DB structure with
 attributes and operatirs, or there is a way to use my existing structure
 which is conceptually very different and is not to be changed? Let's leave
 all the rest on the side, and see how to authenticate the user against
 plaintext password stored in one simple MySQL table with only two fields:
 user and pass, using FR integrated features. A simple example would be
 very appreciated! :-) Please?

I'll jump in here with a suggestion -- it took a while for it to sink in fo=
r=20
me, so perhaps this will help someone else stay afloat...

The sql statements given in the EXAMPLE configuration files are EXAMPLES.

Once you catch on to that idea, it becomes obvious that instead of the giv=
en=20
SQL statement of:

 SELECT id,UserName,Attribute,Value,op
   FROM ${authcheck_table}
  WHERE Username =3D '%{SQL-User-Name}' ORDER BY id

You can fake it somewhat with

 SELECT id,user as username,Password as attribute,
password as value,=3D=3D as op
   FROM ${authcheck_table}...

in this example, I'm presuming actual field names of user and password,=
=20
which need to correspond to the names username and value as required by=
=20
the internals of the program [err, hope I have that part right]  Likewise,=
=20
this returns hard-coded field values of the word password and an operator=
=20
of =3D=3D for the attribute and op fields.

The downside, of course, is that no other attributes can be checked... [tho=
ugh=20
I suppose you could put those in another table and/or query and/or SQL=20
definition...]

=2D-=20

rlm_ippool missing gdbm.h header file

2003-07-23 Thread SPJ.Schembri
Hi,

I am new to FreeRadius and only just downloaded the 0.9.0-pre3 version on
Monday, although I have been an avid list reader for 6 months now.

I am running Solaris 8 on my sparc server and compiled it with gcc with what
I thought was no problems.

On running some tests and attempting to use the rlm_ippool module I found
that it had not built the libraries due to gdbm header files being missing.

I have since (today) downloaded the 0.9.0 release and found that the problem
still exists.

Do I have to download the gdbm.h headers and libraries seperately ?

I have read the FAQs and the documentation and have found no mention to
gdbm.h issues.

Hopefully I am not doing something extremely silly, but could someone please
point me in the right direction.

Thanking you in anticipation.

Stephen


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool missing gdbm.h header file

2003-07-23 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Of course you need to get the files.

Get the package from sunfreeware.

Rgds


On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:36, SPJ.Schembri wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I am new to FreeRadius and only just downloaded the 0.9.0-pre3 version on
 Monday, although I have been an avid list reader for 6 months now.
 
 I am running Solaris 8 on my sparc server and compiled it with gcc with what
 I thought was no problems.
 
 On running some tests and attempting to use the rlm_ippool module I found
 that it had not built the libraries due to gdbm header files being missing.
 
 I have since (today) downloaded the 0.9.0 release and found that the problem
 still exists.
 
 Do I have to download the gdbm.h headers and libraries seperately ?
 
 I have read the FAQs and the documentation and have found no mention to
 gdbm.h issues.
 
 Hopefully I am not doing something extremely silly, but could someone please
 point me in the right direction.
 
 Thanking you in anticipation.
 
 Stephen
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-18 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Pierluigi Frullani
 Sent: Friday, 18 July 2003 8:00 PM

  modules {
 
   ippool wpool {
   session-db = ${raddbdir}/wpool-sess-db
   ip-index = ${raddbdir}/wpool-idx-db
   range-start = 192.168.127.1
   range-stop = 192.168.127.127
   netmask = 255.255.255.255
   #netmask = 255.255.255.128
   cache-size = 5000
   }
 
 
   ippool dpool {
   session-db = ${raddbdir}/dpool-sess-db
   ip-index = ${raddbdir}/dpool-idx-db
   range-start = 192.168.126.160
   range-stop = 192.168.126.255
   netmask = 255.255.255.255
   cache-size = 800
   }
 
  So, what's wrong?
  Thanks for any hints!
 If I don't get wrong, the netmask in the config is for determine the
 address pool. So if you use the 255.255.255.255 netmask, you say to
 rlm_ippool that you have no network. You should use a higher netmask to
 provide some address. EG:
 range-start = 192.168.126.160
 range-stop = 192.168.126.255
 netmask = 255.255.255.128

 This will inform the module that you want to use the address in the
 network 192.168.126.128/25, starting from the .160

 I think that the 255.255.255.255 mask will lead the module to a confusion.

Actually, that's not correct. The ippool module only uses the Netmask to
set a value if one isn't set in the packet already. The Pool range will be
from the start value to the stop value.

Netmask of 255.255.255.255 is I would expect quite common from an ip pool,
since people getting those IPs are probably only on a point-to-point link,
at least when you're using a RADIUS server and not, say, DHCP to allocate
the IPs. Unless it's a wireless network, I suppose...

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-18 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Paul.

You are wrong.

The netmask shouldnt be /32 in the ippool configuration.

If you put /32 in the config the client will not connect.

Regards


On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 14:35, Paul Hampson wrote:
  From: Pierluigi Frullani
  Sent: Friday, 18 July 2003 8:00 PM
 
   modules {
  
ippool wpool {
session-db = ${raddbdir}/wpool-sess-db
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/wpool-idx-db
range-start = 192.168.127.1
range-stop = 192.168.127.127
netmask = 255.255.255.255
#netmask = 255.255.255.128
cache-size = 5000
}
  
  
ippool dpool {
session-db = ${raddbdir}/dpool-sess-db
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/dpool-idx-db
range-start = 192.168.126.160
range-stop = 192.168.126.255
netmask = 255.255.255.255
cache-size = 800
}
  
   So, what's wrong?
   Thanks for any hints!
  If I don't get wrong, the netmask in the config is for determine the
  address pool. So if you use the 255.255.255.255 netmask, you say to
  rlm_ippool that you have no network. You should use a higher netmask to
  provide some address. EG:
  range-start = 192.168.126.160
  range-stop = 192.168.126.255
  netmask = 255.255.255.128
 
  This will inform the module that you want to use the address in the
  network 192.168.126.128/25, starting from the .160
 
  I think that the 255.255.255.255 mask will lead the module to a confusion.
 
 Actually, that's not correct. The ippool module only uses the Netmask to
 set a value if one isn't set in the packet already. The Pool range will be
 from the start value to the stop value.
 
 Netmask of 255.255.255.255 is I would expect quite common from an ip pool,
 since people getting those IPs are probably only on a point-to-point link,
 at least when you're using a RADIUS server and not, say, DHCP to allocate
 the IPs. Unless it's a wireless network, I suppose...
 
 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-18 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Gustavo Lozano
 Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 6:03 AM

 The netmask shouldnt be /32 in the ippool configuration.
 If you put /32 in the config the client will not connect.

Wha? It works here. Why do you say it won't work?

Surely most point-to-point connections work when they've
got a netmask of /32, since they don't care what the address
on the other end is, as long as they send the data there.

In fact, I'd expect a point-to-point link to ignore a
netmask. (As opposed to a two-NIC ethernet network, which
needs... /30. Net, you, me, broadcast.)

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-18 Thread Gustavo Lozano
The author of the module told me that like 3 months ago

On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 15:21, Paul Hampson wrote:
  From: Gustavo Lozano
  Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 6:03 AM
 
  The netmask shouldnt be /32 in the ippool configuration.
  If you put /32 in the config the client will not connect.
 
 Wha? It works here. Why do you say it won't work?
 
 Surely most point-to-point connections work when they've
 got a netmask of /32, since they don't care what the address
 on the other end is, as long as they send the data there.
 
 In fact, I'd expect a point-to-point link to ignore a
 netmask. (As opposed to a two-NIC ethernet network, which
 needs... /30. Net, you, me, broadcast.)
 
 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-18 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Gustavo Lozano
 Sent: Saturday, 19 July 2003 6:35 AM

 The author of the module told me that like 3 months ago

Before or after April 26th when the person whom I _assume_
is the author of the module accepted a patch from me to
make netmasks of /32 work?

http://www.freeradius.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c

and you're looking at revision 1.16.

Although I must say I was wrong before, the netmask _is_
used to determine what's in the IP Pool, but only to
spot network and broadcast addresses. And a /32 netmask
skips that code.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-17 Thread Thomas Krause (Webmatic)
Hello,
I'm using 2 different ip pools. After some time my dialin users
doesn't get IP addresses. iptool reported that only a small amount
of avaiable ip addresses are in use. Running radiusd -X I see
modcall: entering group post-auth
  modcall[post-auth]: module wpool returns noop
rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 255.255.255.255/0
rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool.
  modcall[post-auth]: module dpool returns noop
modcall: group post-auth returns noop
modcall: entering group post-auth
rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 255.255.255.255/0
rlm_ippool: Found a stale entry for ip/port: 192.168.127.46/0
rlm_ippool: num: 0
rlm_ippool: Allocating ip to nas/port: 255.255.255.255/0
rlm_ippool: num: 1
rlm_ippool: Allocated ip 192.168.127.46 to client on nas 
255.255.255.255,port 0
  modcall[post-auth]: module wpool returns ok
  modcall[post-auth]: module dpool returns noop
modcall: group post-auth returns ok

(so it's working for wpool this time). I'm running 0.9.0-pre3,
the config looks so:
modules {

ippool wpool {
session-db = ${raddbdir}/wpool-sess-db
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/wpool-idx-db
range-start = 192.168.127.1
range-stop = 192.168.127.127
netmask = 255.255.255.255
#netmask = 255.255.255.128
cache-size = 5000
}
ippool dpool {
session-db = ${raddbdir}/dpool-sess-db
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/dpool-idx-db
range-start = 192.168.126.160
range-stop = 192.168.126.255
netmask = 255.255.255.255
cache-size = 800
}
...
}
accounting {
...
wpool
dpool
}
post-auth {
  ...
  wpool
  dpool
}
So, what's wrong?
Thanks for any hints!
Regards,
Thomas.


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool

2003-07-17 Thread labis siegfried
i have a big problem, the file rlm_ippool does not exist , is it normal?
how can i have ths file? do i create them ?
- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool

2003-07-17 Thread Thomas Krause (Webmatic)
Hi,
add rlm_ippool at
src/modules/stable

and compile freeradius again.

Regards,
Thomas.
labis siegfried wrote:

i have a big problem, the file rlm_ippool does not exist , is it normal?
how can i have ths file? do i create them ?
- List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See 
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html





- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-17 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Thomas Krause (Webmatic)
 Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 7:05 PM

 I'm using 2 different ip pools. After some time my dialin users
 doesn't get IP addresses. iptool reported that only a small amount
 of avaiable ip addresses are in use. Running radiusd -X I see

Assuming you're not out of IP addresses...

 modcall: entering group post-auth
modcall[post-auth]: module wpool returns noop
 rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 255.255.255.255/0
 rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool.
modcall[post-auth]: module dpool returns noop
 modcall: group post-auth returns noop

 So, what's wrong?

Stop the server, and use ippooltool (if you can't find it, look
in the mailling list archives, or google should pick it up) to
make sure that your IP pools have all the entries available that
you expect them to... This looks like a bug that was noticed before,
but no-one had a good solution for (that I remember).

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool

2003-07-17 Thread Gustavo Lozano
In 0.8.1 and before you need to set --enable-experimental modules .

With 0.9-pre1 and up the module will be compiled by itself, check the
dependencies and the output of configure




On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 04:43, labis siegfried wrote:
 i have a big problem, the file rlm_ippool does not exist , is it normal?
 how can i have ths file? do i create them ?
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-17 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Who has the ippooltool module working in Solaris?

I cant compile it:
# make
gcc -o iptool iptool.c -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lgdbm
Undefined   first referenced
 symbol in file
inet_ntoa   /var/tmp//cc5pKDtj.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to iptool
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [iptool] Error 1


On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 08:01, Paul Hampson wrote:
  From: Thomas Krause (Webmatic)
  Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 7:05 PM
 
  I'm using 2 different ip pools. After some time my dialin users
  doesn't get IP addresses. iptool reported that only a small amount
  of avaiable ip addresses are in use. Running radiusd -X I see
 
 Assuming you're not out of IP addresses...
 
  modcall: entering group post-auth
 modcall[post-auth]: module wpool returns noop
  rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 255.255.255.255/0
  rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool.
 modcall[post-auth]: module dpool returns noop
  modcall: group post-auth returns noop
 
  So, what's wrong?
 
 Stop the server, and use ippooltool (if you can't find it, look
 in the mailling list archives, or google should pick it up) to
 make sure that your IP pools have all the entries available that
 you expect them to... This looks like a bug that was noticed before,
 but no-one had a good solution for (that I remember).
 
 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
   -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =
 
 
 - 
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html
-- 
Gustavo A. Lozano Noldata Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Calle 46 No. 40-19
CTO   Bogota D.C. Colombia
Noldata Corporation   http://noldata.com

I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought,
   but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
   Albert Einstein




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool

2003-07-17 Thread Gustavo Lozano
Lame me!

add -lsocket -lnsl to the compilation flags...

Seems I am 2 tired after 18 hours of work.

C ya


On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 16:34, Gustavo Lozano wrote:
 Who has the ippooltool module working in Solaris?
 
 I cant compile it:
 # make
 gcc -o iptool iptool.c -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib -lgdbm
 Undefined   first referenced
  symbol in file
 inet_ntoa   /var/tmp//cc5pKDtj.o
 ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to iptool
 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
 make: *** [iptool] Error 1
 
 
 On Thu, 2003-07-17 at 08:01, Paul Hampson wrote:
   From: Thomas Krause (Webmatic)
   Sent: Thursday, 17 July 2003 7:05 PM
  
   I'm using 2 different ip pools. After some time my dialin users
   doesn't get IP addresses. iptool reported that only a small amount
   of avaiable ip addresses are in use. Running radiusd -X I see
  
  Assuming you're not out of IP addresses...
  
   modcall: entering group post-auth
  modcall[post-auth]: module wpool returns noop
   rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 255.255.255.255/0
   rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool.
  modcall[post-auth]: module dpool returns noop
   modcall: group post-auth returns noop
  
   So, what's wrong?
  
  Stop the server, and use ippooltool (if you can't find it, look
  in the mailling list archives, or google should pick it up) to
  make sure that your IP pools have all the entries available that
  you expect them to... This looks like a bug that was noticed before,
  but no-one had a good solution for (that I remember).
  
  --
  =
  Paul TBBle Hampson
  Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  This is a one line proof...if we start
  sufficiently far to the left.
  -- Cambridge University Math Department
  -
  Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
  =
  
  
  - 
  List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

2003-07-12 Thread ARC Informatique
Hi,

I just installed freeradius 0.9 pre1 with postgresql and rlm_ippool.
I have to migrate tonight so this is an urgent request

I have a Cisco AS5300 and here is what I would like  to do:

1. Assign public dynamic ip pool say from 1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.254

2. Assign private dynamic ip pool say from 172.16.1.1 to 172.16.1.254

So I am trying to setup rlm_ippool.

Here is what I have so far:

in radiusd.conf

ippool public_pool {

range-start = 1.1.1.1
range-stop = 1.1.1.254
netmask = 255.255.255.0
cache-size = 255
session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
override = no
}

ippool private_pool {

range-start = 172.16.1.1
range-stop = 172.16.1.254
netmask = 255.255.255.0
cache-size = 255
session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
override = no
}

In radgroupcheck, I have:

groupname  | attribute   | op |   value
publicgroup  | Pool-Name | :=  |  public_pool
privategroup | Pool-Name | :=  |  private_pool

In radgroupreply : what do I put exactly to tell my cisco what IP address is
assigned

Basically, I am lacking documentation here - Can someone give a sample
configuration
on what I have to put exactly in my freeradius config as well as my cisco
config.

Thanks in advance for you help

Mohsen
---
Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

2003-07-12 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: ARC Informatique
 Sent: Sunday, 13 July 2003 2:10 AM

 I just installed freeradius 0.9 pre1 with postgresql and rlm_ippool.
 I have to migrate tonight so this is an urgent request

 I have a Cisco AS5300 and here is what I would like  to do:
 
 1. Assign public dynamic ip pool say from 1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.254
 
 2. Assign private dynamic ip pool say from 172.16.1.1 to 172.16.1.254
 
 So I am trying to setup rlm_ippool.
 
 Here is what I have so far:
 
 in radiusd.conf
 
 ippool public_pool {
 
 range-start = 1.1.1.1
 range-stop = 1.1.1.254
 netmask = 255.255.255.0
 cache-size = 255
 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool

  session-db = ${raddbdir}/public.ippool

 ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

  ip-index = ${raddbdir}/public.ipindex

 override = no
 }
 
 ippool private_pool {
 
 range-start = 172.16.1.1
 range-stop = 172.16.1.254
 netmask = 255.255.255.0
 cache-size = 255
 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool

  session-db = ${raddbdir}/private.ippool

 ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

  ip-index = ${raddbdir}/private.ipindex

 override = no
 }

The problem here is that they need _seperate_ DB files...

Oh, and make sure you've got the private_pool and public_pool
instances in your accounting and post-auth sections of radius.conf

 In radgroupcheck, I have:
 
 groupname  | attribute   | op |   value
 publicgroup  | Pool-Name | :=  |  public_pool
 privategroup | Pool-Name | :=  |  private_pool

That should be correct.

 In radgroupreply : what do I put exactly to tell my cisco what IP address is
 assigned

Nothing. When the module runs in post-auth, it'll see the check item Pool-Name
and replace it with an IP address and netmask if you haven't specified one
already.

 Basically, I am lacking documentation here - Can someone give a sample
 configuration on what I have to put exactly in my freeradius config as well
 as my cisco config.

Basically, I have exactly what you have here, and it works a treat. For one
reason or another, I've had to patch my copy of rlm_ippool to use radgroupreply
instead of radgroupcheck, but that's irrelevant.

You should see the modcalls in radius debug... Warning, if you use radtest to
test this, you'll have to either use radzap or ippooltool (seperate program
from one of the list members) to remove that entry from the list of take IP
addresses.

Anyway, a ippool module will NOOP on the wrong Pool-Name, and OK on the correct
pool name. If no pool name is specified, you should see a warning in debug mode,
and get a NOOP response from the module.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

2003-07-12 Thread Steven Fries
Why not use the cisco device to do the actual assigning of IP's? I do
something like this with a Cisco 2600 and a VPN module. I have 2 sets of
IP's, one for the local network, and one range for VPN Dial-ins. Unless you
need something with the accounting of Radius, but can't you just use the
cisco logs?

Hope this helps

ip dhcp pool private-LAN
   network 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0
   domain-name neondsl.com
   dns-server 65.171.232.2 209.248.58.6
   default-router 10.1.1.3

vpdn-group vpngroup
! Default PPTP VPDN group
 accept-dialin
  protocol pptp
  virtual-template 1

ip local pool vpnpool 10.1.100.1 10.1.101.254
- Original Message -
From: ARC Informatique [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 11:09 AM
Subject: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool


 Hi,

 I just installed freeradius 0.9 pre1 with postgresql and rlm_ippool.
 I have to migrate tonight so this is an urgent request

 I have a Cisco AS5300 and here is what I would like  to do:

 1. Assign public dynamic ip pool say from 1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.254

 2. Assign private dynamic ip pool say from 172.16.1.1 to 172.16.1.254

 So I am trying to setup rlm_ippool.

 Here is what I have so far:

 in radiusd.conf

 ippool public_pool {

 range-start = 1.1.1.1
 range-stop = 1.1.1.254
 netmask = 255.255.255.0
 cache-size = 255
 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
 ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
 override = no
 }

 ippool private_pool {

 range-start = 172.16.1.1
 range-stop = 172.16.1.254
 netmask = 255.255.255.0
 cache-size = 255
 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
 ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex
 override = no
 }

 In radgroupcheck, I have:

 groupname  | attribute   | op |   value
 publicgroup  | Pool-Name | :=  |  public_pool
 privategroup | Pool-Name | :=  |  private_pool

 In radgroupreply : what do I put exactly to tell my cisco what IP address
is
 assigned

 Basically, I am lacking documentation here - Can someone give a sample
 configuration
 on what I have to put exactly in my freeradius config as well as my cisco
 config.

 Thanks in advance for you help

 Mohsen
 --
-
 Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
 Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

2003-07-12 Thread ARC Informatique
Thanks,

you are right. It works by itself. I did a test with radpingtest.
Now I am going to test it on my cisco.

- Original Message -
From: Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:27 PM
Subject: RE: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

  From: ARC Informatique
  Sent: Sunday, 13 July 2003 2:10 AM

  I just installed freeradius 0.9 pre1 with postgresql and rlm_ippool.
  I have to migrate tonight so this is an urgent request

  I have a Cisco AS5300 and here is what I would like  to do:
 
  1. Assign public dynamic ip pool say from 1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.254
 
  2. Assign private dynamic ip pool say from 172.16.1.1 to 172.16.1.254
 
  So I am trying to setup rlm_ippool.
 
  Here is what I have so far:
 
  in radiusd.conf
 
  ippool public_pool {
 
  range-start = 1.1.1.1
  range-stop = 1.1.1.254
  netmask = 255.255.255.0
  cache-size = 255
  session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool

   session-db = ${raddbdir}/public.ippool

  ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

   ip-index = ${raddbdir}/public.ipindex

  override = no
  }
 
  ippool private_pool {
 
  range-start = 172.16.1.1
  range-stop = 172.16.1.254
  netmask = 255.255.255.0
  cache-size = 255
  session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool

   session-db = ${raddbdir}/private.ippool

  ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

   ip-index = ${raddbdir}/private.ipindex

  override = no
  }

 The problem here is that they need _seperate_ DB files...

 Oh, and make sure you've got the private_pool and public_pool
 instances in your accounting and post-auth sections of radius.conf

  In radgroupcheck, I have:
 
  groupname  | attribute   | op |   value
  publicgroup  | Pool-Name | :=  |  public_pool
  privategroup | Pool-Name | :=  |  private_pool

 That should be correct.

  In radgroupreply : what do I put exactly to tell my cisco what IP
address is
  assigned

 Nothing. When the module runs in post-auth, it'll see the check item
Pool-Name
 and replace it with an IP address and netmask if you haven't specified one
 already.

  Basically, I am lacking documentation here - Can someone give a sample
  configuration on what I have to put exactly in my freeradius config as
well
  as my cisco config.

 Basically, I have exactly what you have here, and it works a treat. For
one
 reason or another, I've had to patch my copy of rlm_ippool to use
radgroupreply
 instead of radgroupcheck, but that's irrelevant.

 You should see the modcalls in radius debug... Warning, if you use radtest
to
 test this, you'll have to either use radzap or ippooltool (seperate
program
 from one of the list members) to remove that entry from the list of take
IP
 addresses.

 Anyway, a ippool module will NOOP on the wrong Pool-Name, and OK on the
correct
 pool name. If no pool name is specified, you should see a warning in debug
mode,
 and get a NOOP response from the module.

 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
 -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

---
Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

2003-07-12 Thread ARC Informatique
Now after testing on the cisco, do I have to remove the pools defined in it
because ip addresses are still beeing  assigned by cisco instead of
freeradius
although I have override = yes in pool definnition in radiusd.conf

- Original Message -
From: Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 4:27 PM
Subject: RE: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

  From: ARC Informatique
  Sent: Sunday, 13 July 2003 2:10 AM

  I just installed freeradius 0.9 pre1 with postgresql and rlm_ippool.
  I have to migrate tonight so this is an urgent request

  I have a Cisco AS5300 and here is what I would like  to do:
 
  1. Assign public dynamic ip pool say from 1.1.1.1 to 1.1.1.254
 
  2. Assign private dynamic ip pool say from 172.16.1.1 to 172.16.1.254
 
  So I am trying to setup rlm_ippool.
 
  Here is what I have so far:
 
  in radiusd.conf
 
  ippool public_pool {
 
  range-start = 1.1.1.1
  range-stop = 1.1.1.254
  netmask = 255.255.255.0
  cache-size = 255
  session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool

   session-db = ${raddbdir}/public.ippool

  ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

   ip-index = ${raddbdir}/public.ipindex

  override = no
  }
 
  ippool private_pool {
 
  range-start = 172.16.1.1
  range-stop = 172.16.1.254
  netmask = 255.255.255.0
  cache-size = 255
  session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool

   session-db = ${raddbdir}/private.ippool

  ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

   ip-index = ${raddbdir}/private.ipindex

  override = no
  }

 The problem here is that they need _seperate_ DB files...

 Oh, and make sure you've got the private_pool and public_pool
 instances in your accounting and post-auth sections of radius.conf

  In radgroupcheck, I have:
 
  groupname  | attribute   | op |   value
  publicgroup  | Pool-Name | :=  |  public_pool
  privategroup | Pool-Name | :=  |  private_pool

 That should be correct.

  In radgroupreply : what do I put exactly to tell my cisco what IP
address is
  assigned

 Nothing. When the module runs in post-auth, it'll see the check item
Pool-Name
 and replace it with an IP address and netmask if you haven't specified one
 already.

  Basically, I am lacking documentation here - Can someone give a sample
  configuration on what I have to put exactly in my freeradius config as
well
  as my cisco config.

 Basically, I have exactly what you have here, and it works a treat. For
one
 reason or another, I've had to patch my copy of rlm_ippool to use
radgroupreply
 instead of radgroupcheck, but that's irrelevant.

 You should see the modcalls in radius debug... Warning, if you use radtest
to
 test this, you'll have to either use radzap or ippooltool (seperate
program
 from one of the list members) to remove that entry from the list of take
IP
 addresses.

 Anyway, a ippool module will NOOP on the wrong Pool-Name, and OK on the
correct
 pool name. If no pool name is specified, you should see a warning in debug
mode,
 and get a NOOP response from the module.

 --
 =
 Paul TBBle Hampson
 Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 This is a one line proof...if we start
 sufficiently far to the left.
 -- Cambridge University Math Department
 -
 Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
 =


 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See
http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html

---
Ce mail ne contient pas de virus.   This mail is virus free
Scanné par Escan Checked by Escan




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

2003-07-12 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: ARC Informatique
 Sent: Sunday, 13 July 2003 4:22 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Re: URGENT HELP rlm_ippool

 Now after testing on the cisco, do I have to remove the pools defined
 in it because ip addresses are still beeing  assigned by cisco instead
 of freeradius although I have override = yes in pool definnition in
 radiusd.conf

The override = yes part only refers to whether the rlm_ippool module in
FreeRADIUS will override an IP address that has already been added to the
packet by a RADIUS server.

Nothing to do with ip pools on your NAS.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

This is a one line proof...if we start
sufficiently far to the left.
-- Cambridge University Math Department
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: Trying to debug rlm_ippool..

2003-07-02 Thread Jonathan Ruano
Hi there:

Didnt know if this would fit in freeradius-devel, so I just got Paul's
email (from June 19th) and hit reply to all :)

I needed this module functionality so badly that I coded ippool_postauth
and ippool_accounting following the algorithm he proposed. MPP detection
is not implemented, as I'm not sure to understand it well enough, and
there could be something we've missed, like what happens when there's 
no caller-id attr..

It's been working for a week or so in production here with just one
realm (but planning to make it general, as soon as I have time to 
migrate the user db) and it's doing a pretty good job so far. So 
I decided to expose myself to public shame by posting a patch against
the current (as of July 2nd, 2003) CVS source tree.

Have mercy.. They say some things you never forget, but it's my first
non-trivial hack in years :)

Cheers,
Jon


diff -urN radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c new.radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c
--- radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c	2003-06-20 19:50:10.0 +0200
+++ new.radiusd/src/modules/rlm_ippool/rlm_ippool.c	2003-07-02 23:08:02.0 +0200
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
 #endif
 
 #define MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE 64
+#define MAX_CLI_SIZE 32
 
 static const char rcsid[] = $Id: rlm_ippool.c,v 1.20 2003/06/20 17:50:10 phampson Exp $;
 
@@ -78,23 +79,66 @@
  */
 typedef struct rlm_ippool_t {
 	char *session_db;
-	char *ip_index;
+	char *ipindex_db;
+	char *callerid_db;
 	char *name;
 	uint32_t range_start;
 	uint32_t range_stop;
 	uint32_t netmask;
 	int cache_size;
 	int override;
-	GDBM_FILE gdbm;
-	GDBM_FILE ip;
-	pthread_mutex_t session_mutex;
-	pthread_mutex_t ip_mutex;
+	GDBM_FILE gsession_db;
+	GDBM_FILE gipindex_db;
+	GDBM_FILE gcallerid_db;
+	pthread_mutex_t mutex;
 } rlm_ippool_t;
 
+/*
+ * session-db:
+ * [cli,nas] - (ipaddr,port)
+ */
+typedef struct session_entry {
+	uint32_t	ipaddr;
+} session_entry;
+
+typedef struct session_key {
+	char	nas[MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE];
+	unsigned int port;
+} session_key;
+
+/*
+ * ipindex-db:
+ * [ipaddr] - (cli,nas,active)
+ */
+typedef struct ipindex_entry {
+	char	cli[MAX_CLI_SIZE];
+	char	nas[MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE];
+	char		active;
+} ipindex_entry;
+
+typedef struct ipindex_key {
+	uint32_t	ipaddr;
+} ipindex_key;
+
+/*
+ * callerid-db:
+ * [cli,nas] - (ipaddr,usage)
+ */
+typedef struct callerid_entry {
+	uint32_t	ipaddr;
+	char	usage;
+} callerid_entry;
+
+typedef struct callerid_key {
+	char	cli[MAX_CLI_SIZE];
+	char	nas[MAX_NAS_NAME_SIZE];
+} callerid_key;
+
+/* old structs */
 typedef struct ippool_info {
 	uint32_t	ipaddr;
 	char		active;
-	char		cli[32];
+	char		cli[MAX_CLI_SIZE];
 } ippool_info;
 
 typedef struct ippool_key {
@@ -113,7 +157,8 @@
  */
 static CONF_PARSER module_config[] = {
   { session-db, PW_TYPE_STRING_PTR, offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,session_db), NULL, NULL },
-  { ip-index, PW_TYPE_STRING_PTR, offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,ip_index), NULL, NULL },
+  { ipindex-db, PW_TYPE_STRING_PTR, offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,ipindex_db), NULL, NULL },
+  { callerid-db, PW_TYPE_STRING_PTR, offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,callerid_db), NULL, NULL },
   { range-start, PW_TYPE_IPADDR, offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,range_start), NULL, 0 },
   { range-stop, PW_TYPE_IPADDR, offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,range_stop), NULL, 0 },
   { netmask, PW_TYPE_IPADDR, offsetof(rlm_ippool_t,netmask), NULL, 0 },
@@ -137,8 +182,12 @@
 {
 	rlm_ippool_t *data;
 	int cache_size;
+	ipindex_entry entry;
+	ipindex_key key;
+	/*
 	ippool_info entry;
 	ippool_key key;
+	*/
 	datum key_datum;
 	datum data_datum;
 	int i;
@@ -166,11 +215,16 @@
 		free(data);
 		return -1;
 	}
-	if (data-ip_index == NULL) {
+	if (data-ipindex_db == NULL) {
 		radlog(L_ERR, rlm_ippool: 'ip-index' must be set.);
 		free(data);
 		return -1;
 	}
+	if (data-callerid_db == NULL) {
+		radlog(L_ERR, rlm_ippool: 'callerid-db' must be set.);
+		free(data);
+		return -1;
+	}
 	data-range_start = htonl(data-range_start);
 	data-range_stop = htonl(data-range_stop);
 	data-netmask = htonl(data-netmask);
@@ -181,36 +235,48 @@
 		return -1;
 	}
 	
-	data-gdbm = gdbm_open(data-session_db, sizeof(int),
+	data-gsession_db = gdbm_open(data-session_db, sizeof(int),
 			GDBM_WRCREAT | GDBM_IPPOOL_OPTS, 0600, NULL);
-	if (data-gdbm == NULL) {
+	if (data-gsession_db == NULL) {
 		radlog(L_ERR, rlm_ippool: Failed to open file %s: %s,
 data-session_db, strerror(errno));
 		return -1;
 	}
-	data-ip = gdbm_open(data-ip_index, sizeof(int),
+	data-gipindex_db = gdbm_open(data-ipindex_db, sizeof(int),
+			GDBM_WRCREAT | GDBM_IPPOOL_OPTS, 0600, NULL);
+	if (data-gipindex_db == NULL) {
+		radlog(L_ERR, rlm_ippool: Failed to open file %s: %s,
+data-ipindex_db, strerror(errno));
+		return -1;
+	}
+	data-gcallerid_db = gdbm_open(data-callerid_db, sizeof(int),
 			GDBM_WRCREAT | GDBM_IPPOOL_OPTS, 0600, NULL);
-	if (data-ip == NULL) {
+	if (data-gcallerid_db == NULL) {
 		radlog(L_ERR, rlm_ippool: Failed to open file %s: %s,
-data-ip_index, strerror(errno));
+data-callerid_db, strerror(errno

RE: Trying to debug rlm_ippool..

2003-06-19 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: Jonathan Ruano
 Sent: Tuesday, 17 June 2003 10:04 PM

 I'm debugging rlm_ippool, trying to catch the bug that causes
 ips to disappear..

(CC'd to -devel since this is leading towards a patch from me... :-)

I'm just having a look at it myself, and on first glance the
mutex locking is too fine grained, protecting the GDBM file
itself, but not the transactions being performed...

Just looking at the code, I think Multilink PPP is broken
too, since if we find an active==0 entry, we break out of
the loop, even if searching further would discover the
matching entry for Multilink PPP.

My current thought is that the module would be better served
by _one_ GDBM database, indexed by IP address. The current
system of having (nas,port) index into the IP address list
is (I think) supposed to save walking the entire database
each check, but supporting MLPPP requires almost exactly
that...

thinks

Maybe a DB indexed by IP address, and one indexed by CLI/NAS?

thinks more

Dunno, gonna need some more thought on that one, and see if
we can avoid walking the whole DB on _all_ paths:
Post-auth:
DB Lock
Stale NAS/Port: Lookup NAS,port; get old IP
(If there _was_ a NAS,port entry... Deallocate:)
Delete NAS,port;
Lookup IP; get oldCLI
Lookup oldCLI,NAS; decrement usage
delete if usage == 0
Lookup IP; mark inactive if deleted from (CLI,NAS)

Multilink PPP check:Lookup CLI,NAS; get current ML-PPP IP
elseFind unallocated IP... == Longest walk!!

Allocation: Lookup IP; record active, cli, NAS
Create NAS,port; record IP
Lookup CLI,NAS; increment usage or create entry
DB unlock

Accounting:
DB lock
Deallocation:   Delete NAS,port;
Lookup IP; get oldCLI
Lookup oldCLI,NAS; decrement usage
delete if usage == 0
Lookup IP; mark inactive if deleted from (CLI,NAS)
DB unlock

DBs:
(cli,nas):  ipaddr, usage
(nas,port): ipaddr
(ipaddr):   cli, nas, active

Where the (cli,nas) and (nas,port) tables are only containing active
entries, and the (ipaddr) table never has entries removed.

Entries are cleaned when either a stop-record for that NAS/port or
an Auth record for that NAS/port are seen.

Each NAS,port can only have one IP address.
Each cli,NAS can have one IP address assigned to multiple ports
Each IPadress can have one or zero CLI, NAS and be assigned to multiple ports

Big locks aren't bad to my mind here, since we're not walking the
entire table anyway, which would be a step up from the current code.
In fact, only once do we need to walk rather than looking up by index...
Which worries me that I've missed something.

Hopefully this would make the next step easier (or at least possible)
of altering the tables without having to delete and recreate them. At
least _adding_ to the IP pool would be easier... Deleting has problems
when the IPs to be deleted are in use... Maybe just skip 'em until
_next_ restart.

(And yes, I _am_ volunteering for this one... So I'd appreciate anyone
banging on the ideas here and telling me in what way I've been stupid.
Patch ETA is over the weekend)

Anyway, to reanswer the originally asked question, first glance
is that the mutexes need to be expanded to cover whole transactions
(ie subtracting one from the usage marker in the data-ip DB)
instead of the current query by query locking. It may not fix the
problem you're seeing, but it _is_ a problem waiting to happen. And
as far as I can see, that would unify the mutexes in rlm_ippool.c
into a single mutex.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Bubblesworth Pty Ltd (ABN: 51 095 284 361)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Creation of the Universe was made
possible by a grant from Texas Instruments.
-- PBS
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Trying to debug rlm_ippool..

2003-06-17 Thread Jonathan Ruano
Hello all:

I'm debugging rlm_ippool, trying to catch the bug that causes
ips to disappear..

Any hints or experience sharing would be appreciated.

Cheers,
Jonathan.

--
Jonathan Ruano kobalt at pobox dot com

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool sometimes doesn't assign IP addresses

2003-06-10 Thread Jonathan Ruano
Hola:

I've been testing fr0.8.1 for several day with low traffic RADIUS requests
(redirecting just a couple of realms to it), and my current configuration
works nice, except for dynamic pool ip addressing.

It occasionally authenticates users but doesn't assign any IP address.
I can see it because these dial-in users are assigned IPs by the NAS
(Ascend MAX, and MAX TNTs), thus showing with different network range
when radshowing.

I was wondering whether there could be a threading issue with this, and
whether proposed mutex section for crypt in auth.c is planned to be 
incorporated into CVS version. Just downloaded last night's snapshop 
and it's not there.

Just sneaking into the code and trying to wonder if NEED_GDBM_SYNC and
GDBM_NOLOCK are defined.

I'll set debugging on and try to catch some useful info.

Jonathan.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool sometimes doesn't assign IP addresses

2003-06-10 Thread Oliver Graf
On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 09:15:45AM +0200, Jonathan Ruano wrote:
 I was wondering whether there could be a threading issue with this, and
 whether proposed mutex section for crypt in auth.c is planned to be 
 incorporated into CVS version. Just downloaded last night's snapshop 
 and it's not there.

You can just try my patch, if you want to check if it is the crypt
problem. But the normal symptom of this is that users with crypt
password are not authenticated. If the auth succeeds for you, this has
certainly nothing to do with the threading crypt issues. A simple
check is to have some test user with plain password. The plain
password should work, even if radiusd is rejecting crypt users.

I'm using my mods an two high traffic production servers. They are
running fine since the posting of my patch.

Oliver.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool sometimes doesn't assign IP addresses

2003-06-10 Thread Jonathan Ruano
Thanks, Oliver. You're right, my issue is not dealing with 
auth process.

Now trying to sneak into ippool gdbm files.. One of them gets
eventually full, even though there are not enough active users
to fill it..

Jonathan.

--
Jonathan Ruano kobalt at pobox dot com

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: Publicite_suspecte 202 RE: rlm_ippool sometimes doesn't assign IP addresses

2003-06-10 Thread usr-tc
Le 10 Jun 2003 à 10:03, Jonathan Ruano a écrit:

 Thanks, Oliver. You're right, my issue is not dealing with
 auth process.

 Now trying to sneak into ippool gdbm files.. One of them gets
 eventually full, even though there are not enough active users
 to fill it..

 Jonathan.

 --
 Jonathan Ruano kobalt at pobox dot com

 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


ok we found at least two bug in the ippool.c
- first of them  :  when you have a connection on the same nas/port the entry is 
deleted
i'have patch this bug

- the other one is really strange, some times,  it seem  that this nas/port entry is 
delete
but the new one seem to be replace another one (A good one!) so the ippool database
decrease and drecrease 

you can try to use iptool to use your database
I don't find where is this bug for now but i look at this now
Lionel Drevon   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adeli   http://www.adeli.fr
618 Av. Gal de Gaulle   Tel 04 78 66 11 85
69760 Limonest  Fax 04 78 66 04 33


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool in 0.8.1

2003-04-03 Thread Alan DeKok
Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Umm, rlm_ippool is marked as really buggy in 0.8.1, but
 it doesn't seem to have changed significantly in last night's
 snapshot (apart from adding the netmask attribute insertion)

  really buggy?

 What exactly is wrong with it? It looks fine on a first
 glance, but I'm sure there are non-obvious problems.

  I don't know.  A lot of people have been using it with some measure
of success.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


RE: rlm_ippool in 0.8.1 + Another question

2003-04-03 Thread Paul Hampson
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Behalf Of Alan DeKok
 Sent: Friday, 4 April 2003 12:59 AM

 Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Umm, rlm_ippool is marked as really buggy in 0.8.1, but
  it doesn't seem to have changed significantly in last night's
  snapshot (apart from adding the netmask attribute insertion)

   really buggy?

Apologies... It actually says Highly experimental in
the entry in experimental.conf. I mis-remembered. :-)

  What exactly is wrong with it? It looks fine on a first
  glance, but I'm sure there are non-obvious problems.

   I don't know.  A lot of people have been using it
 with some measure
 of success.

Sounds good to me. :-)

Another question...
Is there a target set of release goals for 0.9? I'd like
to see freeradius re-enter Debian, and I'm curious to know
how you're viewing it's progress at the moment.

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Network Architect, Bandwidth Unlimited Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  --Nick Moffitt
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Re: rlm_ippool in 0.8.1 + Another question

2003-04-03 Thread Alan DeKok
Paul Hampson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Another question...
 Is there a target set of release goals for 0.9?

  Soon.

  I'll say before May 1, just because 0.8 was so long ago.

 I'd like to see freeradius re-enter Debian, and I'm curious to know
 how you're viewing it's progress at the moment.

  It's looking pretty good.  A number of serious issues (e.g. HUP)
have been fixed, and a lot of cool new features have been added
(e.g. LEAP)

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool in 0.8.1

2003-04-02 Thread Paul Hampson
Umm, rlm_ippool is marked as really buggy in 0.8.1, but
it doesn't seem to have changed significantly in last night's
snapshot (apart from adding the netmask attribute insertion)

What exactly is wrong with it? It looks fine on a first
glance, but I'm sure there are non-obvious problems.

(I've grabbed the ippool tool already and if the problem's
something like 'missed accounting stops will leave IPs in
limbo' then I can understand that and welcome suggestions
for an automated way of noticing that... I don't think I
can use checkrad{,.pl} sadly, but my dial-in provider
apparently will limit simultaneous-use on all but one account
for me, so that's not an issue for accounting.)

--
=
Paul TBBle Hampson
Network Architect, Videohost Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  --Nick Moffitt
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
-
Random signature generator 3.0 by Paul TBBle Hampson
=


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool.

2003-03-05 Thread Javier Castillo Alcibar

Hello all,

I have my freeradius configured with ippool support, but after 15
hours(aprox) working well, freeradius starts to fail allocating IP's,
although the ip pool is bigger than the number of users connected.


Login OK: [javier] (from client isp3 port 163 cli 971498178)
modcall: entering group post-auth
rlm_ippool: Searching for an entry for nas/port: 195.53.58.10/163
rlm_ippool: No available ip addresses in pool.
  modcall[post-auth]: module pool1 returns noop


My questions are:

1) How can I know how many free IP's has each ippool??
2) How long does freeradius wait to re-use a previously allocated IP??
3) Is there any patch available to solve this problem??


Thanks in advance.
Javier.



-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


Dynamic Ipaddress using rlm_ippool

2003-01-21 Thread Norbert Wegener
I've  got the dynmaic ippool handling working.
Looking at the source code, it seems to me, that ipaddresses are freed,
when an Accounting-Stop record comes along.
As those records arrive via udp (true??) some might be lost and the 
associated addresses will never be freed.
Is this true? If so: how can those addresses be set to unused during 
normal operations?
The module ippool is declared experimental. Does anyone have real 
experience with it?

Thanks
Norbert Wegener

--
Norbert WegenerPhone:(49)2012661379 Fax:(49)2012661377
SBS Essen,Germany  Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 	Mailfax:(49)2018165521379


smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature


Re: Dynamic Ipaddress using rlm_ippool

2003-01-21 Thread Alan DeKok
Norbert Wegener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've  got the dynmaic ippool handling working.
 Looking at the source code, it seems to me, that ipaddresses are freed,
 when an Accounting-Stop record comes along.
 As those records arrive via udp (true??) some might be lost and the 
 associated addresses will never be freed.
 Is this true? 

  Sort of.  The UDP packets may be lost, but the NAS *should* re-send
them.  If it doesn't, it's broken.

 If so: how can those addresses be set to unused during normal
 operations?

  Use a non-broken NAS.

  Hmm... the module SHOULD handle the case where a stop is lost
completely (rare, but possible) and a new start packet comes in for
the same port.  I haven't looked at the source to see if/how it does
this, though.

 The module ippool is declared experimental. Does anyone have real 
 experience with it?

  I'm not using it, but a lot of other people are.  If there are no
objections, it should be declared 'stable' before the next release.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: Dynamic Ipaddress using rlm_ippool

2003-01-21 Thread Kostas Kalevras
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Alan DeKok wrote:

 Norbert Wegener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I've  got the dynmaic ippool handling working.
  Looking at the source code, it seems to me, that ipaddresses are freed,
  when an Accounting-Stop record comes along.
  As those records arrive via udp (true??) some might be lost and the
  associated addresses will never be freed.
  Is this true?

   Sort of.  The UDP packets may be lost, but the NAS *should* re-send
 them.  If it doesn't, it's broken.

  If so: how can those addresses be set to unused during normal
  operations?

   Use a non-broken NAS.

   Hmm... the module SHOULD handle the case where a stop is lost
 completely (rare, but possible) and a new start packet comes in for
 the same port.  I haven't looked at the source to see if/how it does
 this, though.

If an Access-Request comes in for a port that has already an assigned ip that ip
is freed.


  The module ippool is declared experimental. Does anyone have real
  experience with it?

   I'm not using it, but a lot of other people are.  If there are no
 objections, it should be declared 'stable' before the next release.

   Alan DeKok.

 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: Dynamic Ipaddress using rlm_ippool

2003-01-21 Thread Norbert Wegener


Kostas Kalevras schrieb:

On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, Alan DeKok wrote:



Norbert Wegener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I've  got the dynmaic ippool handling working.
Looking at the source code, it seems to me, that ipaddresses are freed,
when an Accounting-Stop record comes along.
As those records arrive via udp (true??) some might be lost and the
associated addresses will never be freed.
Is this true?


 Sort of.  The UDP packets may be lost, but the NAS *should* re-send
them.  If it doesn't, it's broken.



If so: how can those addresses be set to unused during normal
operations?


 Use a non-broken NAS.

 Hmm... the module SHOULD handle the case where a stop is lost
completely (rare, but possible) and a new start packet comes in for
the same port.  I haven't looked at the source to see if/how it does
this, though.



If an Access-Request comes in for a port that has already an assigned ip that ip
is freed.

This is a reasonable behaviour. Nevertheless I would like to know, 
whether there is a chance to monitor how many ips are in use.
Does a tool for this already exist?
Norbert Wegener





--
Norbert Wegener Phone : (49) 201 2661 379
SBS Essen   Fax:(49) 201 2661 377
Germany Mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://relax.sbs.de (intranet)


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


rlm_ippool bug solved

2002-10-11 Thread Kostas Kalevras
OK, ip_pool not deallocating ips when accounting stops where received should
now be fixed in current CVS.

--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 210 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Problem of rlm_ippool

2002-08-28 Thread ho k

Hi

I got the warning message during compiled rlm_ippool
module:

rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_instantiate':
rlm_ippool.c:223: warning: decimal constant is so
large that it is unsigned
rlm_ippool.c:230: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:237: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_accounting':
rlm_ippool.c:321: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:337: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:352: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:363: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_authorize':
rlm_ippool.c:441: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:458: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:471: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:482: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:526: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:566: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:580: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:593: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:604: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
 

Would the error affect the radius
running. 

The overall output for rlm_ippool is as follows:
# ./configure
creating cache ./config.cache
checking for gcc... gcc
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) works... yes
checking whether the C compiler (gcc  ) is a
cross-compiler... no
checking whether we are using GNU C... yes
checking whether gcc accepts -g... yes
checking how to run the C preprocessor... gcc -E
checking for gdbm.h... yes
checking for gdbm_open in -lgdbm... yes
checking to see GDBM_SYNC status... needs it.
checking for gdbm_fdesc... yes
updating cache ./config.cache
creating ./config.status
creating Makefile
creating config.h
config.h is unchanged
# gmake
gcc  -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
-Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -I../../in
clude  -c rlm_ippool.c -o rlm_ippool.o
In file included from rlm_ippool.c:48:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:211: warning: `INADDR_ANY'
redefined
../../include/missing.h:73: warning: this is the
location of the previous definition
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:212: warning:
`INADDR_LOOPBACK' redefined
../../include/missing.h:77: warning: this is the
location of the previous definition
rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_instantiate':
rlm_ippool.c:223: warning: decimal constant is so
large that it is unsigned
rlm_ippool.c:230: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:237: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_accounting':
rlm_ippool.c:321: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:337: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:352: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:363: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_authorize':
rlm_ippool.c:441: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:458: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:471: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:482: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:526: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:566: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:580: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:593: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:604: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
/download/radius7temp/freeradius-0.7/libtool
--mode=link ld \
-module -static  -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT
-D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBU
G -I../../include  rlm_ippool.o -o rlm_ippool.a
mkdir .libs
ar cru rlm_ippool.a rlm_ippool.o
ranlib rlm_ippool.a
/download/radius7temp/freeradius-0.7/libtool
--mode=compile gcc  -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POS
IX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS -Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG
-I../../include  -c rlm_ippool.c
rm -f .libs/rlm_ippool.lo
gcc -g -O2 -D_REENTRANT -D_POSIX_PTHREAD_SEMANTICS
-Wall -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -I../../inc
lude -c rlm_ippool.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/rlm_ippool.lo
In file included from rlm_ippool.c:48:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:211: warning: `INADDR_ANY'
redefined
../../include/missing.h:73: warning: this is the
location of the previous definition
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:212: warning:
`INADDR_LOOPBACK' redefined
../../include/missing.h:77: warning: this is the
location of the previous definition
rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_instantiate':
rlm_ippool.c:223: warning: decimal constant is so
large that it is unsigned
rlm_ippool.c:230: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c:237: warning: assignment from
incompatible pointer type
rlm_ippool.c: In function `ippool_accounting

rlm_ippool

2002-08-20 Thread ho k

Dear All


Andrew Kelaidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I want to use ippool module (freeradius version 0.7
stable). I have tried
 the following configure commands but unfortunately
didn't work:
...
 I looked in configure, make messages but I didn't
see anything wrong. Are
 there any dependencies for this module??? What I
did wrong??

and Alan worte:
  The output of 'configure --help' gives you some
information.  You
can enable experimental modules.  But it won't
currently let you
enable the experimental modules one-by-one.

  Or, you can just build  install the server
without rlm_ippool.
Then, go to 'src/modules/rlm_ippool', and do
'configure;make;make
install' and it should work.

I follow the above steps, but there is the error
make: Fatal error in reader: ../rules.mak, line 65:
Unexpected end of line seen in step make

or How can I do for new installation with enable
rlm_ippool module. I learn the rlm_ippool module 
cannot be included for configure;make;make install
installation   

___
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com.hk address at http://mail.english.yahoo.com.hk

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: rlm_ippool / need help

2002-07-30 Thread Ador Dauz

  my problem, I need to stop the radiusd service then delete
  the db.ippool and db.ipindex files then restart the radiusd.
  Any help please to solve my problem...
 
        ippool hangar {
                  range-start = 172.16.10.50
                  range-stop =  172.16.10.60
                  netmask = 255.255.255.0
                  cache-size = 10
                  session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
                  ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

 I am not able to reproduce the problem. The ippool module will give out all
 the available ip's in it's pool and after that it will not do anything.
 Could you send some debuging info showing radiusd giving out a wrong IP?

this is what I have, I using 3Com Ras1500 as my RAS and RedHat 7.2. In my
RAS1500 box I have also an IPPOOL 172.16.10.10 size 10 means It will pool
10 ip address which this is for my default dialup users. I have also IPPOOL
configuration thru the rlm_ippool module and I need it because of the feature 
that it can define to limit the ippool. After I consumed  the range pool from 
my configuration 172.16.10.50 to 60, the next time I login it gave me 
172.16.10.11, 12, 13 and so on. So I need to stop the radius services then
delete the db.ippool and db.ipindex files and start again the radiusd 
servicecs. What I want to be even I consumed the IPPOOL range the next time
I login I can still pool with in the range specified. My biggest problem is 
I'm not a programmer so I don't know how to debug. 
Thank you Kostas for replying my email... I realy need the features.

Thanks again.
--ador

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



rlm_ippool

2002-07-30 Thread Andrew Kelaidis

Hi,

I want to use ippool module (freeradius version 0.7 stable). I have tried 
the following configure commands but unfortunately didn't work:
./configure . --with-rlm_ippool
./configure . --enable-rlm_ippool
I looked in configure, make messages but I didn't see anything wrong. Are 
there any dependencies for this module??? What I did wrong??
Please help.

_
Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: rlm_ippool

2002-07-30 Thread Alan DeKok

Andrew Kelaidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I want to use ippool module (freeradius version 0.7 stable). I have tried 
 the following configure commands but unfortunately didn't work:
...
 I looked in configure, make messages but I didn't see anything wrong. Are 
 there any dependencies for this module??? What I did wrong??

  The output of 'configure --help' gives you some information.  You
can enable experimental modules.  But it won't currently let you
enable the experimental modules one-by-one.

  Or, you can just build  install the server without rlm_ippool.
Then, go to 'src/modules/rlm_ippool', and do 'configure;make;make
install' and it should work.

  Alan DeKok.

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: rlm_ippool problem.May this be a good fix ?

2002-07-29 Thread Kostas Kalevras

On Tue, 16 Jul 2002, Alan DeKok wrote:

 Pierluigi Frullani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   Looking in the code I think I' ve found a bug that I fixed this way:
 ...
  Brief, when entering in this lines, if the user was missing the Pool-Name
  attribute, there were no return and some unpredictable Pool address was
  returned.

   Ah, that's a problem.

Well actually that was a design decision. If the Pool-Name attribute does not
exist then the first module instance in the authorize section will give out an
IP address. That way we have a default behaviour when the Pool-Name is missing.


  Is this correct.

   Yes.  I've added your patch, thanks.

   Alan DeKok.

 -
 List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html


--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 10 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf


- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



Re: rlm_ippool / need help

2002-07-29 Thread Kostas Kalevras

On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Ador Dauz wrote:

 To all,

 Please need your help or other solutions.

 I using freeradius 0.6 and I used the rlm_ippool module.
 this is what I observed, Using my setup which it pool 10
 IP Address range, so I try to login 10 times and It gave
 me the right IP address range which in my configuration.
 After that, In my 11 attempt login, It gave an IP address
 out of the range specified in my configuration.  So to solve
 my problem, I need to stop the radiusd service then delete
 the db.ippool and db.ipindex files then restart the radiusd.
 Any help please to solve my problem...

       ippool hangar {
                 range-start = 172.16.10.50
                 range-stop =  172.16.10.60
                 netmask = 255.255.255.0
                 cache-size = 10
                 session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
                 ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex

I am not able to reproduce the problem. The ippool module will give out all the
available ip's in it's pool and after that it will not do anything. Could you
send some debuging info showing radiusd giving out a wrong IP?

--
Kostas Kalevras Network Operations Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  National Technical University of Athens, Greece
Work Phone: +30 10 7721861
'Go back to the shadow' Gandalf


-
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



rlm_ippool / need help

2002-07-28 Thread Ador Dauz

To all,

Please need your help or other solutions.

I using freeradius 0.6 and I used the rlm_ippool module.
this is what I observed, Using my setup which it pool 10
IP Address range, so I try to login 10 times and It gave
me the right IP address range which in my configuration.
After that, In my 11 attempt login, It gave an IP address
out of the range specified in my configuration.  So to solve
my problem, I need to stop the radiusd service then delete
the db.ippool and db.ipindex files then restart the radiusd.
Any help please to solve my problem...

      ippool hangar {
                range-start = 172.16.10.50
                range-stop =  172.16.10.60
                netmask = 255.255.255.0
                cache-size = 10
                session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
                ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex


Thanks
--ador

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



rlm_ippool

2002-07-27 Thread Ador Dauz

Hi all,  

I using freeradius 0.6 and I used the rlm_ippool module.
this is what I observed, Using my setup which it pool 10
IP Address range, so I try to login 10 times and It gave
me the right IP address range which in my configuration.
After that, In my 11 attempt login, It gave an IP address
out of the range specified in my configuration.  So to solve
my problem, I need to stop the radiusd service then delete
the db.ippool and db.ipindex files then restart the radiusd.
Any help please to solve my problem.

  ippool hangar {
range-start = 172.16.10.50
range-stop =  172.16.10.60
netmask = 255.255.255.0
cache-size = 10
session-db = ${raddbdir}/db.ippool
ip-index = ${raddbdir}/db.ipindex


Thanks
--ador

- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html



rlm_ippool breaking authentication

2002-07-23 Thread Charles J. Boening

I'm having problems getting ippool to work.  The rlm_ippool module seems
to load and initialize ok, but when I add the Pool-Name attribute,
authentication starts failing.  I'm not sure if I'm putting the
Pool-Name attribute in the right spot or not.  I've tried putting it in
radcheck and radreply and radgroupcheck and radgroup reply as well.  I
was basing my Pool-Name attribute placement on a posting from Cassiano
Aquino on June 16th 2002.
http://www.mail-archive.com/freeradius-users@lists.cistron.nl/msg06510.h
tml

It sounded like he had ippool working but was having address
de-allocation problems.  Maybe my problem has something to do with the
mschap or postgres module , but I don't see how/why.

I've also tried creating a separate group and making that user a member
of both groups and putting the Pool-Name in radgroupreply as part of the
separate group.  I've also tried using different op values for
User-Password and Pool-Name with no luck

Here's what I have at this point.  I hope I've provided enough
information.  Many thanks to those working on freeradius and it's
modules ...


In SQL I have the following:
customers=# select * from radcheck where username = 'charlieb';
 id  | username |   attribute   |  value  | op 
-+--+---+-+
 771 | charlieb | User-Password | testing | :=

customers=# select * from usergroup where username = 'charlieb';
 id  | customer_user_id | username | groupname
-+--+--+---
 771 | CHA1646-100  | charlieb | dialplan1

customers=# select * from radgroupreply;
 id | groupname | attribute |  value  | op |
prio
+---+---+-++
--
  2 | dialplan1 | Service-Type  | Framed-User | := |
0
  3 | dialplan1 | Framed-Protocol   | PPP | := |
0
  4 | dialplan1 | Framed-IP-Netmask | 255.255.255.255 | := |
0
  5 | dialplan1 | X-Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool   | 1   | := |
0
  6 | dialplan1 | X-Ascend-Idle-Limit   | 900 | := |
0
  7 | dialplan1 | X-Ascend-Maximum-Channels | 1   | := |
0
  1 | dialplan1 | Acct-Authentic| RADIUS  | := |
0

customers=# select * from radreply;
 id | username |attribute | value | op
+--+--+---+
  2 | charlieb | BWControl-RxRate | 384   | :=
  3 | charlieb | BWControl-TxRate | 128   | :=

customers=# select * from radgroupcheck;
 id | groupname | attribute |  value   | op
+---+---+--+
 11 | dialplan1 | Pool-Name | wireless | :=



radiusd.conf
#in modules
ippool wireless {
   session-db = ${raddbdir}/wireless.db
   ip-index = ${raddbdir}/wireless.idx.db
   range-start = 63.167.49.1
   range-stop = 63.167.49.253
   netmask = 255.255.255.0
   cache-size = 1024
}


   authorize {
  preprocess
  suffix
  sql
  mschap
  wireless
   }

   authenticate {
  mschap
   }

   accounting {
  acct_unique
  detail
  wireless
  sql
  radutmp
   }


In users, I have:
   DEFAULT Auth-Type := Local
  Fall-Through = 1
   DEFAULT Service-Type == Framed-User
  Framed-IP-Address = 255.255.255.254,
  Framed-MTU = 576,
  Service-Type = Framed-User,
  Fall-Through = 1

   DEFAULT Acct-Authentic == RADIUS
  Service-Type = Framed-User,
  Framed-Protocol = PPP,
  Framed-Netmask = 255.255.255.255,
  Ascend-Assign-IP-Pool = 1,
  Ascend-Idle-Limit = 900,
  Ascend-Maximum-Channels = 1




With the Pool-Name attribute set in radgroupcheck, authorization fails.
(working debug log below this)


rad_recv: Access-Request packet from host 63.167.48.244:1029, id=104,
length=136
Service-Type = Framed-User
Framed-Protocol = PPP
User-Name = charlieb
MS-CHAP-Challenge = 0x5931d1c70b2cf8d5bf43d429d5c4f49c
MS-CHAP2-Response =
0x010066977855bea946c46a9ade213bad6cd21830fc78d1b993e139
8bcc47c98d26488c8f4eedcbb4075b
NAS-IP-Address = 10.100.1.1
NAS-Port = 0
modcall: entering group authorize
  modcall[authorize]: module preprocess returns ok
rlm_realm: Looking up realm NULL for User-Name = charlieb
rlm_realm: No such realm NULL
  modcall[authorize]: module suffix returns noop
radius_xlat:  'charlieb'
sql_set_user:  escaped user -- 'charlieb'
radius_xlat:  'SELECT id,UserName,Attribute,Value FROM radcheck WHERE
Username = 'charlieb' ORDER BY id'
rlm_sql: Reserving sql socket id: 2
query: SELECT id,UserName,Attribute,Value FROM radcheck WHERE Username =
'charlieb' ORDER BY id
rlm_postgresql Status: PGRES_TUPLES_OK
sql_postgresql: affected rows =
radius_xlat:  'SELECT
radgroupcheck.id

rlm_ippool problem.May this be a good fix ?

2002-07-16 Thread Pierluigi Frullani

Hi all,
 I'm trying to configure a radius server ( freeradius 0.6 ) where I would
 liketo receive the IP-Address from a pool.
To achieve this I would like to join some of the users in groups, by using
the following authentication user:
steve@Gruppo
where the user steve has some return pair, but not Pool-Name attribute,
and the group Gruppo has the PoolName attribute ( and more return pair ).

 Looking in the code I think I' ve found a bug that I fixed this way:
-
--- rlm_ippool.c.orig Tue Jul 16 15:29:01 2002
+++ rlm_ippool.cTue Jul 16 15:29:40 2002
 -405,7 +405,9 
if ((vp = pairfind(request-config_items, PW_POOL_NAME)) != NULL){
if (data-name == NULL || strcmp(data-name,vp-strvalue))
return RLM_MODULE_NOOP;
-   }
+   } else {
+   return RLM_MODULE_NOOP;
+}

/*
 * Get the nas ip address
-

Brief, when entering in this lines, if the user was missing the Pool-Name
attribute, there were no return and some unpredictable Pool address was
returned.
Is this correct.
T.I.A.
Pigi
P.s. Sorry for my not good english




- 
List info/subscribe/unsubscribe? See http://www.freeradius.org/list/users.html