Re: [ft] Still no luck not including modules
The make program reads the `rules.mk' and `mudule.mk' files using wildcards. This means that you have to rename or remove all `.mk' files in the various subdirectories you don't want to compile. And it looks like the Jamfiles are the same way? Jamfiles are only used if you build FreeType with Jam. `make' ignores them. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
Re: [ft] Still no luck not including modules
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Werner LEMBERG wrote: The make program reads the `rules.mk' and `mudule.mk' files using wildcards. This means that you have to rename or remove all `.mk' files in the various subdirectories you don't want to compile. And it looks like the Jamfiles are the same way? Jamfiles are only used if you build FreeType with Jam. `make' ignores them. I was aware of that. I was just wondering if there were differences in the level of support given to make vs. Jam. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - [EMAIL PROTECTED] BSEE(6/86) + BSChem(3/95) + BAEnglish(8/95) + MSCS(8/03) + $2.50 = latte ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
Re: [ft] Still no luck not including modules
Jamfiles are only used if you build FreeType with Jam. `make' ignores them. I was aware of that. I was just wondering if there were differences in the level of support given to make vs. Jam. On Unix, for shared libraries with libtool, you need GNU make. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
