Re: [ft] Outline Tags
If I understand the documentation correctly, the possible values in the array outline-tags are FT_Curve_Tag_On, FT_Curve_Tag_Conic or FT_Curve_Tag_Cubic. ORed by FT_CURVE_TAG_TOUCH_X and FT_CURVE_TAG_TOUCH_Y. Use the macro FT_CURVE_TAG to filter them out. I've fixed that in the glyphs-6.html file. Note that those documents are quite old and don't completely reflect the current status of FreeType. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
Re: [ft] Outline Tags
I just learned of FT_Outline_Decompose, which does the trick for me. Thanks for the answer! Nathan Werner LEMBERG wrote: If I understand the documentation correctly, the possible values in the array outline-tags are FT_Curve_Tag_On, FT_Curve_Tag_Conic or FT_Curve_Tag_Cubic. ORed by FT_CURVE_TAG_TOUCH_X and FT_CURVE_TAG_TOUCH_Y. Use the macro FT_CURVE_TAG to filter them out. I've fixed that in the glyphs-6.html file. Note that those documents are quite old and don't completely reflect the current status of FreeType. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Outline-Tags-tf2195351.html#a6089365 Sent from the Freetype - User forum at Nabble.com. ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
Re: [ft] Outline tags
Sorry for the late reply. Into the documentation (glyphs/index2.html), on the Outlines curves decomposition, I read on FT_Curve_Tag_On: Used when the point is on the curve, but if I load a char, for example an I with an Arial font (I'm sure that there is 4 segments and 8 points on the segments), I see that there is no FT_Curve_Tag_On flags set... Sometime, but I don't understand when, I see that that bit are set!? Just a side note: In TrueType and OpenType fonts which use second-order curves (contrary to third-order curves in PostScript fonts), if you have two consecutive `off' points in the glyf table, there is an implicit `on' point exactly in the middle between the two `off' points. I suggest that you use a font editor like FontForge to compare your results with the actual glyph. Werner ___ Freetype mailing list Freetype@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype
