Re: [FRIAM] The Climate Fixers May 14 New Yorker

2012-05-30 Thread Nicholas Thompson
I found the article horrifying.  Is anybody old enough to remember a sixties 
research project with a cute name which centered around a long running debate 
concerning whether setting off an abomb in the upper atmosphere would 
obliterate the vanallen belts, destroy the ozone layer, or just set the 
atmosphere on fire.  They couldn’t be sure theoretically, so they had to try it 
to see.  It didn’t. 

 

These people cannot be trusted.  

 

From: friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] On Behalf Of 
Paul Paryski
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2012 3:33 PM
To: friam@redfish.com
Subject: [FRIAM] The Climate Fixers May 14 New Yorker

 

I submitted a letter (see below) to the editor of the New Yorker about Michael 
Specter's excellent May 14th article on technical solutions to global warming. 

 

Any comments?

cheers, Paul



-Original Message-
From: Paul Paryski ppary...@aol.com
To: themail them...@newyorker.com
Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 1:28 pm
Subject: The Climate Fixers May 14

Dear Sirs, 

 

Thank you for publishing Michael Specter’s excellent and informative article on 
technical solutions to global warming which is, I believe, probably the most 
important challenge to our species and, indeed, other species. As a former 
chief technical advisor on environmental governance for the United Nations 
Development Programme I have followed climate change and anthropogenic global 
warming issues very closely primarily through the IPCC.

 

The Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering project is 
particularly (no pun intended) interesting and thought provoking even with its 
inherent, ecological, environmental and political risks. I wonder if another 
approach to particle injection might be adding certain reflective particles to 
aviation fuels.  Such a solution would be much less costly than a twelve-mile 
long pipe held aloft by a balloon and assure global dispersion at smaller 
densities.  

 

Of course, there are many who believe mistakenly that our government is already 
adding chemicals to jet fuel creating “chemtrails”. 

 

Paul Paryski

Santa Fe, New Mexico


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] The Climate Fixers May 14 New Yorker

2012-05-30 Thread Carl Tollander
I think it was called Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea.   Theodore 
Sturgeon.   I recall there were giant squid.


On 5/30/12 9:01 PM, Nicholas Thompson wrote:


I found the article horrifying.  Is anybody old enough to remember a 
sixties research project with a cute name which centered around a long 
running debate concerning whether setting off an abomb in the upper 
atmosphere would obliterate the vanallen belts, destroy the ozone 
layer, or just set the atmosphere on fire.  They couldn't be sure 
theoretically, so they had to try it to see.  It didn't.


These people cannot be trusted.

*From:*friam-boun...@redfish.com [mailto:friam-boun...@redfish.com] 
*On Behalf Of *Paul Paryski

*Sent:* Tuesday, May 29, 2012 3:33 PM
*To:* friam@redfish.com
*Subject:* [FRIAM] The Climate Fixers May 14 New Yorker

I submitted a letter (see below) to the editor of the New Yorker about 
Michael Specter's excellent May 14th article on technical solutions to 
global warming.


Any comments?

cheers, Paul

-Original Message-
From: Paul Paryski ppary...@aol.com mailto:ppary...@aol.com
To: themail them...@newyorker.com mailto:them...@newyorker.com
Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 1:28 pm
Subject: The Climate Fixers May 14

Dear Sirs,

Thank you for publishing Michael Specter's excellent and informative 
article on technical solutions to global warming which is, I believe, 
probably the most important challenge to our species and, indeed, 
other species. As a former chief technical advisor on environmental 
governance for the United Nations Development Programme I have 
followed climate change and anthropogenic global warming issues very 
closely primarily through the IPCC.


The Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering project 
is particularly (no pun intended) interesting and thought provoking 
even with its inherent, ecological, environmental and political risks. 
I wonder if another approach to particle injection might be adding 
certain reflective particles to aviation fuels.  Such a solution would 
be much less costly than a twelve-mile long pipe held aloft by a 
balloon and assure global dispersion at smaller densities.


Of course, there are many who believe mistakenly that our government 
is already adding chemicals to jet fuel creating chemtrails.


Paul Paryski

Santa Fe, New Mexico




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

[FRIAM] The Climate Fixers May 14 New Yorker

2012-05-29 Thread Paul Paryski
I submitted a letter (see below) to the editor of the New Yorker about Michael 
Specter's excellent May 14th article on technical solutions to global warming.


Any comments?
cheers, Paul



-Original Message-
From: Paul Paryski ppary...@aol.com
To: themail them...@newyorker.com
Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 1:28 pm
Subject: The Climate Fixers May 14


Dear Sirs,



Thank you for publishing Michael Specter’s excellent andinformative article on 
technical solutions to global warming which is, I believe, probably the most 
importantchallenge to our species and, indeed, other species. As a former 
chieftechnical advisor on environmental governance for the United 
NationsDevelopment Programme I have followed climate change and anthropogenic 
globalwarming issues very closely primarily through the IPCC.


The Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineeringproject is 
particularly (no pun intended) interesting and thought provoking evenwith its 
inherent, ecological, environmental and political risks. I wonder ifanother 
approach to particle injection might be adding certain reflective particlesto 
aviation fuels.  Such a solutionwould be much less costly than a twelve-mile 
long pipe held aloft by a balloonand assure global dispersion at smaller 
densities.  


Of course, there are many who believe mistakenly that our government isalready 
adding chemicals to jet fuel creating “chemtrails”. 


Paul Paryski
Santa Fe, New Mexico

 

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] The Climate Fixers May 14 New Yorker

2012-05-29 Thread Robert Holmes
A partially remembered quote from an Atlantic article a year ago: Fighting
climate change with particle injection is like trying to fight obesity with
a girdle and doughnuts.

—R

On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Paul Paryski ppary...@aol.com wrote:

 I submitted a letter (see below) to the editor of the New Yorker about
 Michael Specter's excellent May 14th article on technical solutions to
 global warming.

  Any comments?
 cheers, Paul


 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Paryski ppary...@aol.com
 To: themail them...@newyorker.com
 Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 1:28 pm
 Subject: The Climate Fixers May 14

  Dear Sirs,

  Thank you for publishing Michael Specter’s excellent and informative
 article on technical solutions to global warming which is, I believe,
 probably the most important challenge to our species and, indeed, other
 species. As a former chief technical advisor on environmental governance
 for the United Nations Development Programme I have followed climate change
 and anthropogenic global warming issues very closely primarily through the
 IPCC.

  The Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering project is
 particularly (no pun intended) interesting and thought provoking even with
 its inherent, ecological, environmental and political risks. I wonder if
 another approach to particle injection might be adding certain reflective
 particles to aviation fuels.  Such a solution would be much less costly
 than a twelve-mile long pipe held aloft by a balloon and assure global
 dispersion at smaller densities.

  Of course, there are many who believe mistakenly that our government is
 already adding chemicals to jet fuel creating “chemtrails”.

  Paul Paryski
 Santa Fe, New Mexico

 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org