Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance

2008-09-28 Thread Phil Henshaw
Marcus,

Thanks for acknowledging that there at least might be some process behind
the buzz words being used in the pop culture discussion of events.   The so
called 'sub-prime crisis' is referred to using a stereotype for ancient and
long discredited people and practices.  I think it's inadequate as a label
for our whole society's double mass hysterias in switching from perceiving
the potential value of real-estate as near infinite to being near zero.
That's a bigger process than a single stereotype explains.  From our present
hind sight the stereotype of a greedy lender fooling a foolish borrower is
so crystal clear, and covered with so much of our own chagrin for it not
having seen it clearly before, it's a wonder no one asks why it wasn't.   

What I think would bring the larger process to people's attention is
recognizing who profited from it (who offering the addict their drug) and
then ask why the same people pulled their funds out of risk when the wealth
hysteria they fed seemed in the process of collapse.   NOW the same people
want to use those profits to come back into the market and be white nights
and buy up all the devalued assets at a bargain.  What adds even further to
the irony, of course, is that, not seeing how it was done, the same people
plan on using the same method to just do the same thing all over again the
next time they get a chance, and everyone approves!   If offering
opportunity for mischief isn't a direct physical cause in this very one
sided kind of case, then tell me why it's so extremely profitable.

If I can't interest anyone in effective methods for investigating how these
kinds of whole system phenomena operate, and why they run into consequential
physical self-conflict, how about suggesting an appropriate stereotype for
any of the damn fool players in the larger tragedy?

Phil

 
 Phil wrote:
  By 'things', of course I mean physical systems rather than theoretical
ones,
  and by 'multiplying' I mean allowing them to operate only if they
produce a
  surplus you can use to expand them by %'s.
 
 Given the subprime mortgage crisis, I kind of wish that were the case!
 Credit worthiness, not consistent surplus, is what keeps families,
 companies, and our government running.   Investment is commonly done on
 credit (in various forms).
 
 Marcus
 
 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance

2008-09-28 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Phil Henshaw wrote:
 If offering
 opportunity for mischief isn't a direct physical cause in this very one
 sided kind of case, then tell me why it's so extremely profitable.
   
Funny how AIGFP could have been allowed to insure $300 billion in debt 
in private, but the whole company (300 times larger than this division) 
couldn't manage to post $15 billion collateral on this division's 
screwups (which we had to loan them), all while giving the ~400 people 
at AIGFP _all_ million dollar salaries.   Talk about dumb risk models.  
Meanwhile, they've had their credit rating downgraded twice since 2005 
before they went crying to the Federal Reserve. 

Marcus



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance

2008-09-28 Thread Phil Henshaw
Yes, it goes to the 'many world's' feature of social and economic systems.
Each world may be living in what seems to be an entirely different world.
You can see them at a distance, but moving from one to another is
particularly different.  Then you get things like the world of the press,
which is largely it's own fabrication of favorite discussion topics that
only describe the subjects we'd be interested like sweat left in the boxing
ring after the fighters are gone.

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
 Behalf Of Marcus G. Daniels
 Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2008 1:24 PM
 To: The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance
 
 Phil Henshaw wrote:
  If offering
  opportunity for mischief isn't a direct physical cause in this very
 one
  sided kind of case, then tell me why it's so extremely profitable.
 
 Funny how AIGFP could have been allowed to insure $300 billion in debt
 in private, but the whole company (300 times larger than this division)
 couldn't manage to post $15 billion collateral on this division's
 screwups (which we had to loan them), all while giving the ~400 people
 at AIGFP _all_ million dollar salaries.   Talk about dumb risk models.
 Meanwhile, they've had their credit rating downgraded twice since 2005
 before they went crying to the Federal Reserve.
 
 Marcus
 
 
 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance

2008-09-26 Thread Marcus G. Daniels
Phil wrote:
 By 'things', of course I mean physical systems rather than theoretical ones,
 and by 'multiplying' I mean allowing them to operate only if they produce a
 surplus you can use to expand them by %'s.
   
Given the subprime mortgage crisis, I kind of wish that were the case!   
Credit worthiness, not consistent surplus, is what keeps families, 
companies, and our government running.   Investment is commonly done on 
credit (in various forms).

Marcus


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance....

2008-09-23 Thread Phil Henshaw
As a question then, does trying the multiply things without limit cause them
to be limited by failure?   

By 'things', of course I mean physical systems rather than theoretical ones,
and by 'multiplying' I mean allowing them to operate only if they produce a
surplus you can use to expand them by %'s.

Phil

 -Original Message-
 From: Carl Tollander [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 1:16 AM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; The Friday Morning Applied Complexity Coffee Group
 Subject: Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance
 
 Doubtless, but since ignoring it we are, knowing of it we do not.
 
 Evidence alone won't find it (no matter how well or variously or
 repetitively presented).
 
 You have to ask   a   right question.
 
 Punctuation may help too; maybe some hyphens.
 
 
 Phil Henshaw wrote:
 
  Is there anything else around we can ignore the pump it till it quits
  problem for?
 
 
 
  pfh
 
 
 
 
 
  -
 ---
 
  
  FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
  Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
  lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


[FRIAM] well we did finance....

2008-09-22 Thread Phil Henshaw
Is there anything else around we can ignore the pump it till it quits
problem for?

 

pfh

 

 


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance....

2008-09-22 Thread Douglas Roberts
?

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Phil Henshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Is there anything else around we can ignore the pump it till it quits
 problem for?



 pfh





 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




-- 
Doug Roberts, RTI International
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
505-455-7333 - Office
505-670-8195 - Cell

FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org

Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance....

2008-09-22 Thread Owen Densmore
!

On Sep 22, 2008, at 7:30 PM, Douglas Roberts wrote:

 ?

 On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Phil Henshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Is there anything else around we can ignore the pump it till it quits
 problem for?



 pfh





 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org




 -- 
 Doug Roberts, RTI International
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 505-455-7333 - Office
 505-670-8195 - Cell
 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org



Re: [FRIAM] well we did finance....

2008-09-22 Thread Carl Tollander
Doubtless, but since ignoring it we are, knowing of it we do not.

Evidence alone won't find it (no matter how well or variously or 
repetitively presented).

You have to ask   a   right question. 

Punctuation may help too; maybe some hyphens.


Phil Henshaw wrote:

 Is there anything else around we can ignore the pump it till it quits 
 problem for?

  

 pfh

  

  

 

 
 FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
 Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
 lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org


FRIAM Applied Complexity Group listserv
Meets Fridays 9a-11:30 at cafe at St. John's College
lectures, archives, unsubscribe, maps at http://www.friam.org