[Bug c++/53610] C++11: constructors accept silly initializers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek --- Fixed by r11-1392.
[Bug c++/53610] C++11: constructors accept silly initializers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2019-10-24 CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Oop. Confirmed.
[Bug c++/53610] C++11: constructors accept silly initializers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610
Barry Revzin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Barry Revzin ---
Shorter reproduction:
struct S {
S(int);
};
S s{.why = 42};
This still compiles on trunk, even with all warnings and -pedantic.
Made for a very difficult-to-track down bug, since designated initializers are
a really nice way of mocking out named parameters (except when it's suddenly
not).
[Bug c++/53610] C++11: constructors accept silly initializers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610 Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andersk at mit dot edu --- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com 2013-01-29 10:23:45 UTC --- *** Bug 56137 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug c++/53610] C++11: constructors accept silly initializers
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53610 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-06-08 09:14:23 UTC --- This seems to be an incomplete implementation of C99 designated initializers, use -pedantic or -pedantic-errors to get a diagnostic.
