[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #16 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on 7.3, closing
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #15 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Fri Aug 18 21:36:50 2017 New Revision: 251189 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251189=gcc=rev Log: 2017-08-18 Jerry DeLisleBackport from trunk PR fortran/80164 * trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_call): If no code expr, use code->loc as warning/error locus. * gfortran.dg/array_temporaries_4.f90: New test. Added: branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_temporaries_4.f90 Modified: branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c branches/gcc-7-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zeccav at gmail dot com --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 80751 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #12) > Fixed on trunk, will backport to 7 in a few days. Thanks for the fix!
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle --- Fixed on trunk, will backport to 7 in a few days.
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle --- Author: jvdelisle Date: Wed Jun 28 02:17:40 2017 New Revision: 249718 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249718=gcc=rev Log: 2017-06-27 Jerry DeLislePR fortran/80164 * trans-stmt.c (gfc_trans_call): If no code expr, use code->loc as warning/error locus. * gfortran.dg/array_temporaries_4.f90: New test. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/array_temporaries_4.f90 Modified: trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED --- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #9) > Martin or Dominique, in looking at this I am unable to reproduce any > failures. Was this for a specific platform? Mac, PowerPC ? Disregard, I see it with -Warray-temporaries. It was not obvious to me at first.
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle --- Martin or Dominique, in looking at this I am unable to reproduce any failures. Was this for a specific platform? Mac, PowerPC ?
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > I will take this over, test the proposed patch, and see where we get soon. Great! I have the patch in my working tree and it fixes the issue (even the ieee ones) without regression.
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle --- I will take this over, test the proposed patch, and see where we get soon.
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Is there please any progress, I can confirm the suggested patch works for me.
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:48:20PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > The additional errors are > > /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_1.f90:82:69: > > pv((2_I4*i-1_I4):(2_I4*i))= iaef((/(2_I4*i-1_I4),(2_I4*i)/)) > 1 > Warning: Creating array temporary at (1) [-Warray-temporaries] > > /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_2.f90:46:45: > >x = (/a (0, 1),a (0, 2),a (0, 3),a (0, 4)/) > 1 > These aren't errors. These are warnings caused by the questionable addition of a specious warning option wrecklessly added to the compiler options for testcases that were never intended to be used in testing that warning option. gfortran created a temporary array in these testcases. So what?
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- The patch in comment 2 fixes the failures FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) but not FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_1.F90 -O* (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_3.F90 -O* (internal compiler error) The additional errors are /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_1.f90:82:69: pv((2_I4*i-1_I4):(2_I4*i))= iaef((/(2_I4*i-1_I4),(2_I4*i)/)) 1 Warning: Creating array temporary at (1) [-Warray-temporaries] /opt/gcc/_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_2.f90:46:45: x = (/a (0, 1),a (0, 2),a (0, 3),a (0, 4)/) 1 Would it be possible to have a better location?
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres --- *** Bug 79888 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: trans-stmt.c === --- trans-stmt.c(revision 246099) +++ trans-stmt.c(working copy) @@ -452,7 +452,11 @@ gfc_trans_call (gfc_code * code, bool de subscripts. This could be prevented in the elemental case as temporaries are handled separatedly (below in gfc_conv_elemental_dependencies). */ - gfc_conv_loop_setup (, >expr1->where); + if (code->expr1) + gfc_conv_loop_setup (, >expr1->where); + else + gfc_conv_loop_setup (, >loc); + gfc_mark_ss_chain_used (ss, 1); /* Convert the arguments, checking for dependencies. */
[Bug fortran/80164] ICE in gfc_format_decoder at gcc/fortran/error.c:933
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80164 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2017-03-23 Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres --- Duplicate of pr79888? Regtesting with RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix'{-m32/-Warray-temporaries,-m64/-Warray-temporaries}'", I see FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_2.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_3.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/where_operator_assign_1.f90 -O (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_1.F90 -O* (internal compiler error) FAIL: gfortran.dg/ieee/large_3.F90 -O* (internal compiler error)