[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2017-02-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška  ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #11)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> > Can't reproduce any of both tests on both x86_64-linux-gnu and aarach64. Is
> > it still valid?
> 
> I can reproduce the ICE on the original testcase on GCC 6 but not trunk.
> I can't reproduce the ICE in the second testcase anywhere

Ok, thanks. It really disappeared on trunk with the Richi's patch that does
reorganization in pass manager. Anyhow, as I debugged that on GCC6 branch, it's
dup of PR71351. Which still has a reproducible test-case.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 71351 ***

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2017-02-01 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

--- Comment #11 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #10)
> Can't reproduce any of both tests on both x86_64-linux-gnu and aarach64. Is
> it still valid?

I can reproduce the ICE on the original testcase on GCC 6 but not trunk.
I can't reproduce the ICE in the second testcase anywhere

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2017-02-01 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška  ---
Can't reproduce any of both tests on both x86_64-linux-gnu and aarach64. Is it
still valid?

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2017-01-30 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška  ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> Started with r236440.

Sorry, belongs to a different bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2017-01-30 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Martin Liška  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška  ---
Started with r236440.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2016-12-21 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|6.3 |6.4

--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
GCC 6.3 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2016-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 6.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def (graphite)

2016-08-22 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|6.2 |6.3

--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener  ---
GCC 6.2 is being released, adjusting target milestone.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def

2016-06-01 Thread ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Last reconfirmed||2016-06-01
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #3)
> I have a version that fails on x86_64 w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize:
> 
> int ii, nv, fw;
> int k2[4];
> 
> void
> c8 (int *u0)
> {
>   for (;;)
> {
>   ii = 0;
>   if (ii < 1)
> ++ii;
>   for (;;)
> {
>   int vn;
>   for (vn = 0; vn < 2; ++vn)
> {
>   int mm;
>   for (mm = 0; mm < 4; ++mm)
> k2[mm] = nv;
> }
>   if (ii != 0)
> break;
>   *u0 = 0;
> }
>   fw = 0;
> }
> }

This fails on me on current trunk on aarch64 as well.
The original testcase ICEs for me on the GCC 6 branch on aarch64 but not on
very latest trunk.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def

2016-06-01 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Arseny Solokha  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||asolokha at gmx dot com

--- Comment #3 from Arseny Solokha  ---
I have a version that fails on x86_64 w/ -O2 -floop-nest-optimize:

int ii, nv, fw;
int k2[4];

void
c8 (int *u0)
{
  for (;;)
{
  ii = 0;
  if (ii < 1)
++ii;
  for (;;)
{
  int vn;
  for (vn = 0; vn < 2; ++vn)
{
  int mm;
  for (mm = 0; mm < 4; ++mm)
k2[mm] = nv;
}
  if (ii != 0)
break;
  *u0 = 0;
}
  fw = 0;
}
}

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def

2016-05-31 Thread Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot ethz.ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Joost VandeVondele  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot 
ethz
   ||.ch

--- Comment #2 from Joost VandeVondele  
---
Doesn't fail for me on x86, but similar to PR71351, which does fail.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def

2016-05-18 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Jakub Jelinek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|P3  |P4
 CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
   ||spop at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek  ---
Graphite bug.

[Bug tree-optimization/71142] [6/7 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in ssa_default_def

2016-05-17 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142

Richard Biener  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |6.2