RE: [PATCH] aarch64: eliminate redundant zero extend after bitwise negation
Hi Alex, > -Original Message- > From: Alex Coplan > Sent: 22 April 2020 21:41 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Richard Earnshaw ; Richard Sandiford > ; Marcus Shawcroft > ; Kyrylo Tkachov ; > nd > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: eliminate redundant zero extend after bitwise > negation > > Hello, > > The attached patch eliminates a redundant zero extend from the AArch64 > backend. Given the following C code: > > unsigned long long foo(unsigned a) > { > return ~a; > } > > prior to this patch, AArch64 GCC at -O2 generates: > > foo: > mvn w0, w0 > uxtwx0, w0 > ret > > but the uxtw is redundant, since the mvn clears the upper half of the x0 > register. After applying this patch, GCC at -O2 gives: > > foo: > mvn w0, w0 > ret > > Testing: > Added regression test which passes after applying the change to > aarch64.md. > Full bootstrap and regression on aarch64-linux with no additional > failures. I have now pushed this patch to master with 1bd3a8af853. Thanks, Kyrill > > Thanks, > Alex > > --- > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > 2020-04-22 Alex Coplan > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*one_cmpl_zero_extend): New. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2020-04-22 Alex Coplan > > * gcc.target/aarch64/mvn_zero_ext.c: New test.
RE: [PATCH] aarch64: eliminate redundant zero extend after bitwise negation
Hi Alex, > -Original Message- > From: Alex Coplan > Sent: 22 April 2020 21:41 > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Richard Earnshaw ; Richard Sandiford > ; Marcus Shawcroft > ; Kyrylo Tkachov ; > nd > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: eliminate redundant zero extend after bitwise > negation > > Hello, > > The attached patch eliminates a redundant zero extend from the AArch64 > backend. Given the following C code: > > unsigned long long foo(unsigned a) > { > return ~a; > } > > prior to this patch, AArch64 GCC at -O2 generates: > > foo: > mvn w0, w0 > uxtwx0, w0 > ret > > but the uxtw is redundant, since the mvn clears the upper half of the x0 > register. After applying this patch, GCC at -O2 gives: > > foo: > mvn w0, w0 > ret > > Testing: > Added regression test which passes after applying the change to > aarch64.md. > Full bootstrap and regression on aarch64-linux with no additional > failures. > Thanks, this patch is ok. However, GCC 10 is now in stage 4, so I'll defer committing it until stage 1 reopens (hopefully not long to go!) If I do not commit it in the first few weeks of stage 1 feel free to ping me. Kyrill > Thanks, > Alex > > --- > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > 2020-04-22 Alex Coplan > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*one_cmpl_zero_extend): New. > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: > > 2020-04-22 Alex Coplan > > * gcc.target/aarch64/mvn_zero_ext.c: New test.
[PATCH] aarch64: eliminate redundant zero extend after bitwise negation
Hello, The attached patch eliminates a redundant zero extend from the AArch64 backend. Given the following C code: unsigned long long foo(unsigned a) { return ~a; } prior to this patch, AArch64 GCC at -O2 generates: foo: mvn w0, w0 uxtwx0, w0 ret but the uxtw is redundant, since the mvn clears the upper half of the x0 register. After applying this patch, GCC at -O2 gives: foo: mvn w0, w0 ret Testing: Added regression test which passes after applying the change to aarch64.md. Full bootstrap and regression on aarch64-linux with no additional failures. Thanks, Alex --- gcc/ChangeLog: 2020-04-22 Alex Coplan * config/aarch64/aarch64.md (*one_cmpl_zero_extend): New. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: 2020-04-22 Alex Coplan * gcc.target/aarch64/mvn_zero_ext.c: New test. patch.patch Description: patch.patch