Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback
Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 I declare this motion passed with support from FrankW, JukkaR, HowardB, DanielM, TamasS and myself. I will proceed soon in merging the implementation into trunk. -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback
On Dec 1, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote: Even Rouault even.rouault at spatialys.com writes: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 +1 +1 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback
On 14-12-02 10:16 AM, Howard Butler wrote: On Dec 1, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Jukka Rahkonen jukka.rahko...@mmmtike.fi wrote: Even Rouault even.rouault at spatialys.com writes: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 +1 +1 +1 Daniel -- Daniel Morissette T: +1 418-696-5056 #201 http://www.mapgears.com/ Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000 ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback
+1 Tamas 2014-12-01 19:48 GMT+01:00 Even Rouault even.roua...@spatialys.com: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. Since the call for discussion, I've made a change in the RFC and proposed implementation so that the GDALRasterIOExtraArg* psExtraArg argument of RasterIO() remains optional for out-of-tree C++ code, but compulsory for in- tree code : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress?action=diffversion=4old_version=3 https://github.com/rouault/gdal2/commit/31a814acd091c93bd498b4b8c219b83bb40bb3ae So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
[gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback
Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. Since the call for discussion, I've made a change in the RFC and proposed implementation so that the GDALRasterIOExtraArg* psExtraArg argument of RasterIO() remains optional for out-of-tree C++ code, but compulsory for in- tree code : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress?action=diffversion=4old_version=3 https://github.com/rouault/gdal2/commit/31a814acd091c93bd498b4b8c219b83bb40bb3ae So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback
+1 Frank On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 10:48 AM, Even Rouault even.roua...@spatialys.com wrote: Hi, I think that the points raised in the discussion have been answered. Since the call for discussion, I've made a change in the RFC and proposed implementation so that the GDALRasterIOExtraArg* psExtraArg argument of RasterIO() remains optional for out-of-tree C++ code, but compulsory for in- tree code : http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress?action=diffversion=4old_version=3 https://github.com/rouault/gdal2/commit/31a814acd091c93bd498b4b8c219b83bb40bb3ae So: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 Best regards, Even -- Spatialys - Geospatial professional services http://www.spatialys.com ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev -- ---+-- I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank Warmerdam, warmer...@pobox.com light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam and watch the world go round - Rush| Geospatial Software Developer ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: Adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback
Even Rouault even.rouault at spatialys.com writes: Motion : I move to adopt RFC 51: RasterIO() improvements : resampling and progress callback http://trac.osgeo.org/gdal/wiki/rfc51_rasterio_resampling_progress Starting with my +1 +1 -Jukka Rahkonen- ___ gdal-dev mailing list gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/gdal-dev
