[m5-users] full system simulation

2010-04-05 Thread sheng qiu
Hi all,

Dose m5 have statistics of memory page faults in full system mode?

Thanks,
Sheng
___
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

[m5-users] Fwd: Checkpointing PARSEC benchmark in m5.

2010-04-05 Thread Joel Hestness
Hi Bhushan,
  We haven't run across this issue in the context of checkpointing using our
infrastructure.  However, I did have this problem when I was trying to
modify M5, and I believe its caused by scheduling issues in the event queue.
 I have a couple questions:
   1) Have you made any modifications to M5?  If so, are they timing
related?
   2) Are you using the same simulated system and kernel image?
  Thanks,
  Joel


-- Forwarded message --
From: Mark Gebhart mgebh...@cs.utexas.edu
Date: Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [m5-users] Checkpointing PARSEC benchmark in m5.
To: Joel Hestness jthestn...@gmail.com


Hey Joel,

I haven't ever seen this error. It looks like from his commands that
is doing everything right so I am not sure why it is crashing.

Mark

On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 8:16 PM, Joel Hestness jthestn...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hey Mark,
   Do you have any insights on this?
   Thanks,
   Joel

 -- Forwarded message --
 From: Bhushan mo...@cs.virginia.edu
 Date: Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:22 PM
 Subject: Re: [m5-users] Checkpointing PARSEC benchmark in m5.
 To: M5 users mailing list m5-users@m5sim.org


 Any thoughts on the crash that I have mentioned?

 On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:10 PM, ef snorla...@gmail.com wrote:

 A good explanation can be found here on ROI and checkpoints, also check
 out parsec benchmark code :
 http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/TR-09-32.pdf
 basically roi region is where all the parallel portion of execution is
 done, exlcuding startup and exit code


 Ive also heard, take this with a grain of salt running 64 cores and
trying
 to restore checkpoint is a bit buggy. I think other people have had
similar
 problems.

 On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 4:03 PM, Bhushan mo...@cs.virginia.edu wrote:

 Hi,
 I'm trying to use the checkpoint feature in m5 for the benchmarks in the
 PARSEC suite. In the first run, the checkpoint gets created and in the
 second run when I try to run in detailed mode using the restore
checkpoint
 option, I get some errors.

 first run - creating checkpoint - successful.
 # ./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt ./configs/example/fs.py -n 1
 --script=./scripts/blackscholes_64c_simdev_ckpts.rcS


 second run - running in detailed mode:
 #./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt ./configs/example/fs.py --detailed --caches
 --l2cache --checkpoint-restore=1 -n 1
 ..
 ..
 Switch at curTick count:1
 info: Entering event queue @ 2254485270500.  Starting simulation...
 m5.opt: build/ALPHA_FS/sim/simulate.cc:68: SimLoopExitEvent*
 simulate(Tick): Assertion `curTick = mainEventQueue.nextTick() 
event
 scheduled in the past' failed.
 Program aborted at cycle 2254485270500


 The benchmarks in the PARSEC suite run fine if I do not use the
 checkpointing feature.


 Also, I have been trying to understand how exactly checkpointing is
 invoked?
 How does m5 know from which part the ROI starts? Where does (in the
 scripts) m5 create a checkpoint? If these questions sound repetitive,
could
 anyone point me to the mailing list discussions that explain
checkpointing
 (references to checkpointing in mail archive seem to explain specific
cases
 instead of the general working)?

 --
 Regards,
 Bhushan

 ___
 m5-users mailing list
 m5-users@m5sim.org
 http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users


 ___
 m5-users mailing list
 m5-users@m5sim.org
 http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users



 --
 Regards,
 Bhushan

 ___
 m5-users mailing list
 m5-users@m5sim.org
 http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users



 --
  Joel Hestness
  PhD Student, Computer Architecture
  Dept. of Computer Science, University of Texas - Austin
  http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~hestness




-- 
 Joel Hestness
 PhD Student, Computer Architecture
 Dept. of Computer Science, University of Texas - Austin
 http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~hestness
___
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

[m5-users] about m5 FS mode

2010-04-05 Thread sheng qiu
hi all,

but in my simulation results i did not see any statistics on page faults.
here's my simulation result with this email. my command line is

%./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt  configs/example/fs.py -b NetperfMaerts -t -d

do i miss anything?

Thanks,
Sheng
___
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

Re: [m5-users] about m5 FS mode

2010-04-05 Thread nathan binkert
there are stats on the dtb and itb.  The misses result in page faults.
 The access violations are also faults due to permission problems.

  Nate

 but in my simulation results i did not see any statistics on page faults.
 here's my simulation result with this email. my command line is

 %./build/ALPHA_FS/m5.opt  configs/example/fs.py -b NetperfMaerts -t -d

 do i miss anything?

 Thanks,
 Sheng



 ___
 m5-users mailing list
 m5-users@m5sim.org
 http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users

___
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users