[m5-users] Don know what to do next...
Hi, And thanx for reading it. I have got the linux dist from the m5sim site. 1. Do I need to compile it and save it to /dist/m5/system/binaries/vmlinux? 2. Do I compile it using my gcc or crosstool complier? I will be greatful for your advices -- Sudhanshu(genius.d...@gmail.com) Hathiram(banoth.hathi...@gmail.com) NIT Trichy ___ m5-users mailing list m5-users@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
Re: [m5-users] path problem when running SPECcpu2006
Yes, you need to modify the paths in Mybench.py or copy the data files
into your working directory where you're executing m5.
You'll need 416.gamess/data/test/input/exam29.* in order for it to
execute correctly. The wiki page
(http://m5sim.org/wiki/index.php/SPEC2006_benchmarks) should probably be
updated with a more usable version of Mybench.py
On 09/08/2010 10:55 PM, zhanglun...@ict.ac.cn wrote:
Hi,
I have encountered some path problem when running SPECcpu2006 benchmark.
I just followed the instruction on M5's SPEC2006 page, but some of the
benchmark cannot run correctly. For example, when I run 416.gamess
benchmark, I just get following errors:
info: Increasing stack size by one page.
At line 1589 of file iolib.fppized.f (unit = 5, file = '')
Fortran runtime error: File 'exam29.inp' does not exist
I suppose this is some path error, and I just add the following line in
the .bashrc file. But this does not solve the problem.
export PATH=${PATH}:X/CPU2006/416.gamess/data/ test/input
Does anyone can help to solve this problem?
___
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
___
m5-users mailing list
m5-users@m5sim.org
http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
Re: [m5-users] Some of PARSEC benchmarks never end.
Hi Aleksei, I've used these benchmarks fairly extensively, and I've only experienced problems with hangs in very old versions of M5 when using the O3 CPU model. Keep in mind that some of these benchmarks can run for a *long* time, so rather than hanging, you might just be experiencing (perceptibly) very slow simulation. Can you tell us more about your configuration (cache hierarchy, core type)? Unfortunately, I don't have much experience with Ruby, but I know that certain cache configurations and coherence protocols work. Brad Beckmann might be able to give a better update there. Joel On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 12:27 AM, Lesha Jolondz aleksei.jolo...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I have a troubles running Parsec benchmarks at FS mode as it is described at PARSEC v2.1 for M5(http://userweb.cs.utexas.edu/~parsec_m5/). When I run the benchmarks at 4 cores configuration some of them just hang, depending on timing. It is probably because of a problem at current memory system - a memory request gets lost. Does anybody has encountered the same problem? any solutions? patches to memory system? As I know you are currently working on new memory system called ruby. When are you expecting it to work stable? Thanks in advance, Aleksei ___ m5-users mailing list m5-users@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users -- Joel Hestness PhD Student, Computer Architecture Dept. of Computer Science, University of Texas - Austin http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~hestness ___ m5-users mailing list m5-users@m5sim.org http://m5sim.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/m5-users
