Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-05-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:27:28PM -0500, Heidi Buelow wrote:
 
 Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library 

+1.  -- justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-05-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 05:02:07PM -0700, Cliff Schmidt wrote:
 I saw the HP licensing note below, which seems fine; but, if the
 library was provided by other vendors, can you clarify the state of
 any other IP claims on the initial contribution?

I've been informed that Rogue Wave and HP are the only remaining copyright
holders.  HP has agreed to the legal notice that was listed in the proposal.

 When you say the code will be contributed back into the community,
 do you mean that Rogue Wave will work on in-house ports and
 occasionally drop new versions over the top of what happens to be in
 Apache at the time, or that Rogue Wave will be iteratively improving
 the code base/ports in collaboration with other committers on the
 project?  Of course, I'm hoping you mean the latter; but, please
 clarify.  There's nothing wrong with additional future contributions
 (in fact, that's goodness); but periodic replacements of a bunch of
 existing code would obviously be disruptive to the other committers.

My understanding is that future development will be centered in the Apache
codebase.

 Hopefully, you'll find some more interest from other folks reading
 this thread.

Yup, that's the idea.  =)

 This should be fine, as long as this notice can be placed in the
 NOTICE and/or LICENSE file of any distribution, and not required to be
 at the top of every source file.

I'm not aware what HP's specific terms were.  However, I have been told that
it only applies to a few files in the codebase and that has HP has requested
that the notices be preserved in the file themselves.

My understanding is that a copyright notice in a file itself is not a concern
for the ASF.  I know that httpd and APR have files that bear similar notices
for files originating under other copyright but bearing a suitable license
(i.e. RSA copyright with BSD style license).

 I certainly understand that it takes time once a project is accepted
 to align your company's logistics with the Apache infrastructure, but
 can you give us an idea of a) roughly how long are you expecting, and
 b) will the eventual contribution be significantly different than what
 you have posted now?

My understanding is that the initial code drop will be imported as soon as the
Subversion directories are available (which is dependent upon PMC approval
first).  Any further reorganization can then occur in Subversion.

  (5) identify apache sponsoring individual
  
  Justin Erenkrantz (justin @ erenkrantz dot-com)
 
 That says a lot!  (in a good way ;-)

Ha!  =)  -- justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Proposal for STDCXX

2005-05-14 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Fri, May 13, 2005 at 04:27:28PM -0500, Heidi Buelow wrote:
 Proposal for an Apache-run version of the C++ Standard Library 

One other comment that I should make now:

The APR PMC was privately approached about sponsoring this proposal.  The
PMC's consensus was that there was not sufficient overlap between APR and this
proposal to warrant APR being a 'sponsoring PMC' for this proposal and to
house this as a sub-project within APR.  Therefore, the intent is for this
project to evolve as an independent PMC/TLP.

Thanks!  -- justin

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]