Re: Question for mentors: crediting the original project?

2009-12-01 Thread Ross Gardler
2009/12/1 Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com:
 A question for mentors:
 As you know Wookie was originally developed within an EU-funded project;
 this has now finished and we're getting ready for the project review. I've
 been asked if:

 On http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ is it possible to add somewhere that
 the original development was funded by the European Commission through the
 TENCompetence Project?
 I've taken a look at other incubator sites and can't see any similar
 statements so I'm assuming the answer would most likely be no, however it
 would be useful to have a pointer to the policy to show the project
 reviewers.

I see no reason why this should not be allowed. I've cc'd this to
gene...@incubator but suggest you operate under lazy consensus on this
one. We can remove it if anyone objects. However, please add the link
as a nofollow to avoid upsetting any sponsors (who only have nofollow
links).

I am aware of at least one situation in which having this on the
Wookie site will be an advantage, that is providing evidence that the
EC is happy to see code come to the ASF.

One reason why others don't credit the original source of the code is
that it might give an impression that company X owns the code and thus
impacts the impartiality of the project. However, given that, in this
case, we are talking about public funding in the EU I don't see that
as an issue here.

I would suggest that as the project matures this credit should move to
a thanks page or similar.

Ross

 Thanks!
 S



-- 
Ross Gardler

OSS Watch - supporting open source in education and research
http://www.oss-watch.ac.uk

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Question for mentors: crediting the original project?

2009-12-01 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler
ross.gard...@googlemail.com wrote:
 2009/12/1 Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com:
... On http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ is it possible to add somewhere 
that
 the original development was funded by the European Commission through the
 TENCompetence Project?...

... I see no reason why this should not be allowed. I've cc'd this to
 gene...@incubator but suggest you operate under lazy consensus on this
 one. We can remove it if anyone objects. However, please add the link
 as a nofollow to avoid upsetting any sponsors (who only have nofollow
 links)

I agree with Ross, http://sling.apache.org/site/index.html is an
example (though out of incubation now) where credit is given to the
company which created the original code base (see history bit), with
a nofollow link as Ross suggests.

As long as you stick to facts, and use a nofollow link, I think that's
perfectly fine.

-Bertrand

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Question for mentors: crediting the original project?

2009-12-01 Thread Dan Brickley
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Ross Gardler
ross.gard...@googlemail.com wrote:
 2009/12/1 Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com:
 A question for mentors:
 As you know Wookie was originally developed within an EU-funded project;
 this has now finished and we're getting ready for the project review. I've
 been asked if:

 On http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ is it possible to add somewhere that
 the original development was funded by the European Commission through the
 TENCompetence Project?
 I've taken a look at other incubator sites and can't see any similar
 statements so I'm assuming the answer would most likely be no, however it
 would be useful to have a pointer to the policy to show the project
 reviewers.

 I see no reason why this should not be allowed.

I'd love to see it included. The structure of academia tends to reward
scholarly paper-publishing but doesn't really know what to do with
software and data work. European projects also tend towards producing
deliverables that are mostly likely to be giant PDFs rather than
running re-usable code. So when we do finally get useful outputs from
European research funding that enrich the open standards / open source
scene, please let's not be shy in celebrating that! Maybe others will
follow the great example, and start thinking more seriously about
opensource life-after-funding for their codebases, rather than taking
a throw the code over the wall and hope for the best approach.
Millions of euros get spend every year on these EU research projects,
that's a lot of lines of code that could be going into the common
pool...

cheers,

Dan

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: Question for mentors: crediting the original project?

2009-12-01 Thread Leo Simons
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 11:02 AM, Ross Gardler
ross.gard...@googlemail.com wrote:
 2009/12/1 Scott Wilson scott.bradley.wil...@gmail.com:
 On http://incubator.apache.org/wookie/ is it possible to add somewhere that
 the original development was funded by the European Commission through the
 TENCompetence Project?

 I see no reason why this should not be allowed.

Agreed! If the project feels its appropriate to do something like
that, it's quite ok. One particularly relevant example I can think of
is HTTPD crediting NCSA [1], so we have in fact a lng tradition of
doing this kind of thing :)

 please add the link as a nofollow to avoid upsetting any sponsors
 (who only have nofollow links).

Yep. Other kinds of foreign branding like an external project logo are
probably also best avoided.

 One reason why others don't credit the original source of the code is
 that it might give an impression that company X owns the code and thus
 impacts the impartiality of the project. However, given that, in this
 case, we are talking about public funding in the EU I don't see that
 as an issue here.

Hmm, I would actually not be that worried either if it was a company
credit. As long as such statements are (a) true and (b) they don't
interfere with sponsoring efforts. I think what's most important is to
stick to facts and provide relevant information to users and
(potential) contributors. I think a project's origin is relevant
(though it probably becomes less relevant over time).


cheers,


Leo

[1] http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/httpd/trunk/ABOUT_APACHE

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



[IP CLEARANCE] User Admin contribution to Felix

2009-12-01 Thread Richard S. Hall
Adam Wojtuniak contributed an implementation of the OSGi User Admin 
specification to Felix. This message is a request for IP clearance 
verification. The pertinent information is here:


http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-user-admin.html

Thanks.

- richard

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [IP CLEARANCE] User Admin contribution to Felix

2009-12-01 Thread Robert Burrell Donkin
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Richard S. Hall he...@ungoverned.org wrote:
 Adam Wojtuniak contributed an implementation of the OSGi User Admin
 specification to Felix. This message is a request for IP clearance
 verification. The pertinent information is here:

    http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-user-admin.html

took a quick look and everything seems in order but approval is lazy
if there any problem i've missed hopefully someone will jump in...

- robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org



Re: [IP CLEARANCE] User Admin contribution to Felix

2009-12-01 Thread Richard S. Hall

Thanks.

- richard

On 12/1/09 15:27, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:

On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Richard S. Hallhe...@ungoverned.org  wrote:
   

Adam Wojtuniak contributed an implementation of the OSGi User Admin
specification to Felix. This message is a request for IP clearance
verification. The pertinent information is here:

http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/felix-user-admin.html
 

took a quick look and everything seems in order but approval is lazy
if there any problem i've missed hopefully someone will jump in...

- robert

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

   


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org