Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Our mentor has come for the hama project. And, We're not proportionately I think attracting as many volunteer/person of interests as we should be, although the sheer numbers are clearly heading in the right direction. Therefore, i hoped the incubate would come quickly, for we know that the apache incubator is a good jumping-off point for our research and collaboration contacts. So, I wonder whether it can be entered into the voting thread at this time. Also, If you find that the lack of any of this proposal, I'd like to hear your advice. Thanks, Edward. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:11 PM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Bertrand, Thanks for your help. IMHO, if no one is interested in mentoring (dunno if it is the case), that might be a good sign that your project needs to grow a community elsewhere before entering incubation. That seems like a fair bet. I'll rev up the community of the hama and recruit the mentors for this project. Thanks. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... BTW, I wonder whether mentor is badly needed. Someone please reply to me Yes, at least one mentor, and ideally up to three, are needed for a project to enter incubation. IMHO, if no one is interested in mentoring (dunno if it is the case), that might be a good sign that your project needs to grow a community elsewhere before entering incubation. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- B. Regards, Edward J. Yoon -- B. Regards, Edward J. Yoon, http://blog.udanax.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... BTW, I wonder whether mentor is badly needed. Someone please reply to me Yes, at least one mentor, and ideally up to three, are needed for a project to enter incubation. IMHO, if no one is interested in mentoring (dunno if it is the case), that might be a good sign that your project needs to grow a community elsewhere before entering incubation. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Dear Grant, Thanks for your +1.
I feel with you about your mention of the lack of interest from
Hadoop, but I think that shouldn't be a problem; we can communicate
with hadoop people in real time if we need.
BTW, I wonder whether mentor is badly needed.
Someone please reply to me.
Thanks.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 on bringing this into incubation. I think it still needs a mentor
and I am also concerned about lack of interest from Hadoop, but they
have their own fish to fry, as they say, and it shouldn't stop this
from going forward.
I think it will be useful in Mahout, if there are Java APIs exposed.
-Grant
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:29 PM, edward yoon wrote:
Thank you very much for your advice.
I was going to fix that.
Last year I worked as a full-time open source developer at RD center
at NHN (search service company) for hadoop and hbase, and now i worked
for development projects in real service areas. Some (minchang,
changhee) are my fellow workers, Others { chanwit (Student), yongho
(TMAX software, database company), taehui (KRIBB, biomedical
government research center) } are came from hadoop community.
--
== Homogenous Developers ==
The current list of committers includes developers from several
different companies ( NHN, corp, TMAX software, Korea Research
Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Students) plus many
independent volunteers. The committers are geographically distributed
across the Europe, and Asia. They are experienced with working in a
distributed environment.
== Reliance on Salaried Developers ==
It is expected that Hama development will occur on both salaried time
and on volunteer time, after hours. While there is reliance on
salaried developers (currently from NHN, corp, but it's expected that
other company's salaried developers will also be involved), the Hama
Community is very active and things should balance out fairly quickly.
In the meantime, NHN, corp will support the project in the future by
dedicating 'work time' to Hama, so that there is a smooth transition.
Thanks,
Edward.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 24, 2008, at 1:56 AM, edward yoon wrote:
Dear IPMC,
I´m still waiting for hadoop's answer, but IMO, I would like to
continue to discuss this.
Apache (incubator) Pig project is built on top of Hadoop, but it is
not a hadoop sub-project.
Each different concept of project has inherently different
characteristics for its domain,
so by knowing the concept of project, we can get a clear view of
their project.
I think hama applies in this case, too.
Seems reasonable to bring it back here at this point, since Hadoop
has
not responded.
Can you fill in the background on the 4 proposed committers a bit?
Do
you all work together or not? It's not clear from the proposal, as
it
seems to suggest that you don't (Homogenous Devs section), but then
later in the Reliance on Salaried Devs it suggests that you 3 of you
do, but it may just be I am misreading the proposal.
-Grant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
B. Regards,
Edward J. Yoon
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Dear Bertrand, Thanks for your help. IMHO, if no one is interested in mentoring (dunno if it is the case), that might be a good sign that your project needs to grow a community elsewhere before entering incubation. That seems like a fair bet. I'll rev up the community of the hama and recruit the mentors for this project. Thanks. On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Edward J. Yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... BTW, I wonder whether mentor is badly needed. Someone please reply to me Yes, at least one mentor, and ideally up to three, are needed for a project to enter incubation. IMHO, if no one is interested in mentoring (dunno if it is the case), that might be a good sign that your project needs to grow a community elsewhere before entering incubation. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- B. Regards, Edward J. Yoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
As I mentioned before, I think the collaboration of Hama and Mahout is very
effective and beautiful.
I think it will be useful in Mahout, if there are Java APIs exposed.
-
Maybe, we could provide more things as well as Java APIs.
As time goes by, moreover, Hama will need a smart user as Hahout because
good feedbacks make a good software. :)
Cheers!
p.s Grant, thinks for your interest to Hama.
2008/3/28, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
+1 on bringing this into incubation. I think it still needs a mentor
and I am also concerned about lack of interest from Hadoop, but they
have their own fish to fry, as they say, and it shouldn't stop this
from going forward.
I think it will be useful in Mahout, if there are Java APIs exposed.
-Grant
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:29 PM, edward yoon wrote:
Thank you very much for your advice.
I was going to fix that.
Last year I worked as a full-time open source developer at RD center
at NHN (search service company) for hadoop and hbase, and now i worked
for development projects in real service areas. Some (minchang,
changhee) are my fellow workers, Others { chanwit (Student), yongho
(TMAX software, database company), taehui (KRIBB, biomedical
government research center) } are came from hadoop community.
--
== Homogenous Developers ==
The current list of committers includes developers from several
different companies ( NHN, corp, TMAX software, Korea Research
Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Students) plus many
independent volunteers. The committers are geographically distributed
across the Europe, and Asia. They are experienced with working in a
distributed environment.
== Reliance on Salaried Developers ==
It is expected that Hama development will occur on both salaried time
and on volunteer time, after hours. While there is reliance on
salaried developers (currently from NHN, corp, but it's expected that
other company's salaried developers will also be involved), the Hama
Community is very active and things should balance out fairly quickly.
In the meantime, NHN, corp will support the project in the future by
dedicating 'work time' to Hama, so that there is a smooth transition.
Thanks,
Edward.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 24, 2008, at 1:56 AM, edward yoon wrote:
Dear IPMC,
I´m still waiting for hadoop's answer, but IMO, I would like to
continue to discuss this.
Apache (incubator) Pig project is built on top of Hadoop, but it is
not a hadoop sub-project.
Each different concept of project has inherently different
characteristics for its domain,
so by knowing the concept of project, we can get a clear view of
their project.
I think hama applies in this case, too.
Seems reasonable to bring it back here at this point, since Hadoop
has
not responded.
Can you fill in the background on the 4 proposed committers a bit?
Do
you all work together or not? It's not clear from the proposal, as
it
seems to suggest that you don't (Homogenous Devs section), but then
later in the Reliance on Salaried Devs it suggests that you 3 of you
do, but it may just be I am misreading the proposal.
-Grant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Dear IPMC, I'd like to know what's going on in the proposal. If there isn't any problem, I would assume this could be encouraged further to vote. -- B. Regards, Edward J. Yoon - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
+1 on bringing this into incubation. I think it still needs a mentor
and I am also concerned about lack of interest from Hadoop, but they
have their own fish to fry, as they say, and it shouldn't stop this
from going forward.
I think it will be useful in Mahout, if there are Java APIs exposed.
-Grant
On Mar 25, 2008, at 11:29 PM, edward yoon wrote:
Thank you very much for your advice.
I was going to fix that.
Last year I worked as a full-time open source developer at RD center
at NHN (search service company) for hadoop and hbase, and now i worked
for development projects in real service areas. Some (minchang,
changhee) are my fellow workers, Others { chanwit (Student), yongho
(TMAX software, database company), taehui (KRIBB, biomedical
government research center) } are came from hadoop community.
--
== Homogenous Developers ==
The current list of committers includes developers from several
different companies ( NHN, corp, TMAX software, Korea Research
Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Students) plus many
independent volunteers. The committers are geographically distributed
across the Europe, and Asia. They are experienced with working in a
distributed environment.
== Reliance on Salaried Developers ==
It is expected that Hama development will occur on both salaried time
and on volunteer time, after hours. While there is reliance on
salaried developers (currently from NHN, corp, but it's expected that
other company's salaried developers will also be involved), the Hama
Community is very active and things should balance out fairly quickly.
In the meantime, NHN, corp will support the project in the future by
dedicating 'work time' to Hama, so that there is a smooth transition.
Thanks,
Edward.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 24, 2008, at 1:56 AM, edward yoon wrote:
Dear IPMC,
I´m still waiting for hadoop's answer, but IMO, I would like to
continue to discuss this.
Apache (incubator) Pig project is built on top of Hadoop, but it is
not a hadoop sub-project.
Each different concept of project has inherently different
characteristics for its domain,
so by knowing the concept of project, we can get a clear view of
their project.
I think hama applies in this case, too.
Seems reasonable to bring it back here at this point, since Hadoop
has
not responded.
Can you fill in the background on the 4 proposed committers a bit?
Do
you all work together or not? It's not clear from the proposal, as
it
seems to suggest that you don't (Homogenous Devs section), but then
later in the Reliance on Salaried Devs it suggests that you 3 of you
do, but it may just be I am misreading the proposal.
-Grant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
--
Grant Ingersoll
http://www.lucenebootcamp.com
Next Training: April 7, 2008 at ApacheCon Europe in Amsterdam
Lucene Helpful Hints:
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BasicsOfPerformance
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/LuceneFAQ
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
On Mar 24, 2008, at 1:56 AM, edward yoon wrote: Dear IPMC, I´m still waiting for hadoop's answer, but IMO, I would like to continue to discuss this. Apache (incubator) Pig project is built on top of Hadoop, but it is not a hadoop sub-project. Each different concept of project has inherently different characteristics for its domain, so by knowing the concept of project, we can get a clear view of their project. I think hama applies in this case, too. Seems reasonable to bring it back here at this point, since Hadoop has not responded. Can you fill in the background on the 4 proposed committers a bit? Do you all work together or not? It's not clear from the proposal, as it seems to suggest that you don't (Homogenous Devs section), but then later in the Reliance on Salaried Devs it suggests that you 3 of you do, but it may just be I am misreading the proposal. -Grant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Thank you very much for your advice.
I was going to fix that.
Last year I worked as a full-time open source developer at RD center
at NHN (search service company) for hadoop and hbase, and now i worked
for development projects in real service areas. Some (minchang,
changhee) are my fellow workers, Others { chanwit (Student), yongho
(TMAX software, database company), taehui (KRIBB, biomedical
government research center) } are came from hadoop community.
--
== Homogenous Developers ==
The current list of committers includes developers from several
different companies ( NHN, corp, TMAX software, Korea Research
Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Students) plus many
independent volunteers. The committers are geographically distributed
across the Europe, and Asia. They are experienced with working in a
distributed environment.
== Reliance on Salaried Developers ==
It is expected that Hama development will occur on both salaried time
and on volunteer time, after hours. While there is reliance on
salaried developers (currently from NHN, corp, but it's expected that
other company's salaried developers will also be involved), the Hama
Community is very active and things should balance out fairly quickly.
In the meantime, NHN, corp will support the project in the future by
dedicating 'work time' to Hama, so that there is a smooth transition.
Thanks,
Edward.
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:04 AM, Grant Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mar 24, 2008, at 1:56 AM, edward yoon wrote:
Dear IPMC,
I´m still waiting for hadoop's answer, but IMO, I would like to
continue to discuss this.
Apache (incubator) Pig project is built on top of Hadoop, but it is
not a hadoop sub-project.
Each different concept of project has inherently different
characteristics for its domain,
so by knowing the concept of project, we can get a clear view of
their project.
I think hama applies in this case, too.
Seems reasonable to bring it back here at this point, since Hadoop has
not responded.
Can you fill in the background on the 4 proposed committers a bit? Do
you all work together or not? It's not clear from the proposal, as it
seems to suggest that you don't (Homogenous Devs section), but then
later in the Reliance on Salaried Devs it suggests that you 3 of you
do, but it may just be I am misreading the proposal.
-Grant
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
B. Regards,
Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Dear IPMC, I´m still waiting for hadoop's answer, but IMO, I would like to continue to discuss this. Apache (incubator) Pig project is built on top of Hadoop, but it is not a hadoop sub-project. Each different concept of project has inherently different characteristics for its domain, so by knowing the concept of project, we can get a clear view of their project. I think hama applies in this case, too. Thanks, Edward. On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 9:51 AM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks very much, Bertand. I don't see why there is no answer, but i will wait some more. http://www.nabble.com/Hama-contribution-td16168912.html See you next week. Thanks, Edward. On 3/20/08, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:42 AM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... If I knock on the hadoop but there is no answer. Can i re-open this incubation proposal?... I don't see why there would be no answer, but yes, nothing prevents you from reopening this proposal later if needed. Given that three Lucene PMC members expressed concerns in this thread, though, I guess we'd want to have their opinion before going any further. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp.
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:42 AM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... If I knock on the hadoop but there is no answer. Can i re-open this incubation proposal?... I don't see why there would be no answer, but yes, nothing prevents you from reopening this proposal later if needed. Given that three Lucene PMC members expressed concerns in this thread, though, I guess we'd want to have their opinion before going any further. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Thanks very much, Bertand. I don't see why there is no answer, but i will wait some more. http://www.nabble.com/Hama-contribution-td16168912.html See you next week. Thanks, Edward. On 3/20/08, Bertrand Delacretaz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:42 AM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... If I knock on the hadoop but there is no answer. Can i re-open this incubation proposal?... I don't see why there would be no answer, but yes, nothing prevents you from reopening this proposal later if needed. Given that three Lucene PMC members expressed concerns in this thread, though, I guess we'd want to have their opinion before going any further. -Bertrand - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Edward, I was going to email you about this weeks ago, when I first saw this proposal. You are working in a vacuum too much, I think that's the main problem. You are mentioning private e-mails, and that doesn't sound right. Bring this up in the open on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and state what you'd like. I, like Yonik and Grant, feel that this fits very well under Hadoop, either as a sub-project or a simply a contrib. I *believe* that if you go the sub-project route, and especially if you simply make Hama a Hadoop contrib, no incubation is necessary, as long as Hadoop PMC welcomes the code. Much simpler. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 7:02:23 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal Do you have a mail thread reference? This seems small enough in scope and so tied to Hadoop that it seems like it should either just be part of one of the hadoop sub-projects or at a maximum, a hadoop sub-project of it's own. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00136.html But, i much talked about it via private e-mail. They gave me a welcome, However, They also all share the need to make incubation progress. Thanks, Edward. On 3/19/08, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems small enough in scope and so tied to Hadoop that it seems like it should either just be part of one of the hadoop sub-projects or at a maximum, a hadoop sub-project of it's own. I see you opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2878 what's the status of that? -Yonik On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:02 AM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Incubator PMC, I've updated the Hama project proposal. Please review/update as needed and report back any concerns. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HamaProposal Hama has a strong relationship with the hadoop, hbase and mahout project, so i discussed about become a sub-project of these project for a long time with the each community. However, The sub-project was beset with difficulties. Hence the list of committers, etc. And now we all agree that the Hama should aim to general purpose rathen than it becomes a specified piece in something. http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28MAHOUT-16%29-Hama-contrib-package-for-the-mahout-to15998717.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2878 If you think this will make a good ASF project, please encourage our team members to create the world's largest matrix computational framework. Thanks. B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Thanks for your review. Hmm. In fact, i was mentioned about it 1 years ago. If I knock on the hadoop but there is no answer. Can i re-open this incubation proposal? And, How long should i wait for the answer? Thanks, Edward. On 3/20/08, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Edward, I was going to email you about this weeks ago, when I first saw this proposal. You are working in a vacuum too much, I think that's the main problem. You are mentioning private e-mails, and that doesn't sound right. Bring this up in the open on [EMAIL PROTECTED] and state what you'd like. I, like Yonik and Grant, feel that this fits very well under Hadoop, either as a sub-project or a simply a contrib. I *believe* that if you go the sub-project route, and especially if you simply make Hama a Hadoop contrib, no incubation is necessary, as long as Hadoop PMC welcomes the code. Much simpler. Otis -- Sematext -- http://sematext.com/ -- Lucene - Solr - Nutch - Original Message From: edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: general@incubator.apache.org Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 7:02:23 PM Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal Do you have a mail thread reference? This seems small enough in scope and so tied to Hadoop that it seems like it should either just be part of one of the hadoop sub-projects or at a maximum, a hadoop sub-project of it's own. http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00136.html But, i much talked about it via private e-mail. They gave me a welcome, However, They also all share the need to make incubation progress. Thanks, Edward. On 3/19/08, Yonik Seeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This seems small enough in scope and so tied to Hadoop that it seems like it should either just be part of one of the hadoop sub-projects or at a maximum, a hadoop sub-project of it's own. I see you opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2878 what's the status of that? -Yonik On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:02 AM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Incubator PMC, I've updated the Hama project proposal. Please review/update as needed and report back any concerns. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HamaProposal Hama has a strong relationship with the hadoop, hbase and mahout project, so i discussed about become a sub-project of these project for a long time with the each community. However, The sub-project was beset with difficulties. Hence the list of committers, etc. And now we all agree that the Hama should aim to general purpose rathen than it becomes a specified piece in something. http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28MAHOUT-16%29-Hama-contrib-package-for-the-mahout-to15998717.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2878 If you think this will make a good ASF project, please encourage our team members to create the world's largest matrix computational framework. Thanks. B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
Dear Incubator PMC, I've updated the Hama project proposal. Please review/update as needed and report back any concerns. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HamaProposal Hama has a strong relationship with the hadoop, hbase and mahout project, so i discussed about become a sub-project of these project for a long time with the each community. However, The sub-project was beset with difficulties. Hence the list of committers, etc. And now we all agree that the Hama should aim to general purpose rathen than it becomes a specified piece in something. http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28MAHOUT-16%29-Hama-contrib-package-for-the-mahout-to15998717.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2878 If you think this will make a good ASF project, please encourage our team members to create the world's largest matrix computational framework. Thanks. B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
On Mar 18, 2008, at 8:02 AM, edward yoon wrote: Dear Incubator PMC, I've updated the Hama project proposal. Please review/update as needed and report back any concerns. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HamaProposal Hama has a strong relationship with the hadoop, hbase and mahout project, so i discussed about become a sub-project of these project for a long time with the each community. However, The sub-project was beset with difficulties. What's the issue w/ Hadoop sub project (I already know the Mahout discussion)? Do you have a mail thread reference? I'm not trying to push anything on the Hadoop PMC, but this logically seems to fit there in my mind as a subproject, but I suppose it could be a TLP as well. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [DISCUSSION] Hama Proposal
This seems small enough in scope and so tied to Hadoop that it seems like it should either just be part of one of the hadoop sub-projects or at a maximum, a hadoop sub-project of it's own. I see you opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2878 what's the status of that? -Yonik On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 8:02 AM, edward yoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear Incubator PMC, I've updated the Hama project proposal. Please review/update as needed and report back any concerns. http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HamaProposal Hama has a strong relationship with the hadoop, hbase and mahout project, so i discussed about become a sub-project of these project for a long time with the each community. However, The sub-project was beset with difficulties. Hence the list of committers, etc. And now we all agree that the Hama should aim to general purpose rathen than it becomes a specified piece in something. http://www.nabble.com/-jira--Created%3A-%28MAHOUT-16%29-Hama-contrib-package-for-the-mahout-to15998717.html https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-2878 If you think this will make a good ASF project, please encourage our team members to create the world's largest matrix computational framework. Thanks. B. Regards, Edward yoon @ NHN, corp. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
