Re: [gentoo-cluster] Herd split? hac-cluster and hpc-cluster
Donnie Berkholz schrieb: We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages into two separate groups for high-availability and high-performance computing. This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each group of folks will have a clearer idea of what they need to do. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? i vote yes. Alex -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-cluster] Herd split? hac-cluster and hpc-cluster
Donnie Berkholz wrote: We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages into two separate groups for high-availability and high-performance computing. This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each group of folks will have a clearer idea of what they need to do. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? It sounds like a good idea. Are there enough developers who would want to go with either herd to make it viable? -- Andrew Fant| And when the night is cloudy| This space to let Molecular Geek | There is still a light |-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | That shines on me | Disclaimer: I don't Boston, MA | Shine until tomorrow, Let it be | even speak for myself -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-cluster] Herd split? hac-cluster and hpc-cluster
Andrew D. Fant wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages into two separate groups for high-availability and high-performance computing. This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each group of folks will have a clearer idea of what they need to do. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? It sounds like a good idea. Are there enough developers who would want to go with either herd to make it viable? Here's the cluster alias: azarah ct george dberkholz pyrania voxus iggy xmerlin markusle ribosome Of those, I haven't seen azarah, ct, george, pyrania or iggy do anything lately. ha: xmerlin hpc: dberkholz, voxus, xmerlin, markusle, ribosome tantive also has metadata for much of the openmosix stuff. This pretty clearly shows that we could use extra help for HA packages. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-cluster] Herd split? hac-cluster and hpc-cluster
Philipp Riegger wrote: On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Does anyone else have thoughts on this? I think, hac-cluster and hpc-cluster sound strange, since c in hpc and hac already stands for cluster. or computing... -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-cluster] Herd split? hac-cluster and hpc-cluster
Le lundi 11 décembre 2006 02:11, Donnie Berkholz a écrit : We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages into two separate groups for high-availability and high-performance computing. This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each group of folks will have a clearer idea of what they need to do. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? Yes, definately... Thanks, Donnie -- Eric Thibodeau Neural Bucket Solutions Inc. -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-cluster] Herd split? hac-cluster and hpc-cluster
We might benefit from splitting the clustering packages into two separate groups for high-availability and high-performance computing. This will help to keep the bugs a bit cleaner so each group of folks will have a clearer idea of what they need to do. Does anyone else have thoughts on this? Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-cluster@gentoo.org mailing list
