Re: [gentoo-dev] Git commit mails/CIA.vc notifications

2011-02-04 Thread Christian Ruppert
Ah, btw. it is also possible to exclude files from commit mails/cia.
This is useful for e.g. Manifest files.
I'll try to enable it by default for gentoo overlays.

-- 
Regards,
Christian Ruppert
Role: Gentoo Linux developer, Bugzilla administrator and Infrastructure
member
Fingerprint: EEB1 C341 7C84 B274 6C59  F243 5EAB 0C62 B427 ABC8



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused eclasses

2011-02-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
On 02/01/11 19:57, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
 Hello ladies,
 Following cleanup of eclasses in main tree there still are few eclasses
 that are not used at all.

I guess that applies to the main tree.
If we do care if any of them are used in an overlay, Ycarus of
gpo.zugaina.org may find an answer rather quickly.


 I would like to ask you to reply to this mail that you want them to
 survive or I will just mark them as @DEAD in 30 days and remove from the
 tree in another 30.
 
 The list of sad lonely things:
 eclipse-ext.eclass
 fortran.eclass
 games-q3mod.eclass
 mozconfig-2.eclass
 mozreconf.eclass
 php-pear.eclass
 php5_2-sapi.eclass
 poppler.eclass
 ruby-gnome2.eclass
 tla.eclass
 
 
 Cheers
 
 Your favorite treecleaning gremlin



[gentoo-dev] Re: Unused eclasses

2011-02-04 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mar, 01/02/2011 alle 19.57 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal ha scritto:
 
 ruby-gnome2.eclass 

Please proceed, it'll be a while before gems.eclass is removed but at
least this one can be killed now.

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/




Re: [gentoo-dev] Git commit mails/CIA.vc notifications

2011-02-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:26:16 +0100
Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote:

 Hey guys,

Only half of people? :)


 jer



Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused eclasses

2011-02-04 Thread Sebastian Pipping
I assume (1) that Yannick is not subscribed to gentoo-dev, and (2) that
his mail is not private to him so I dare to forward his mail to you.
Yannick, thanks for investigating.

From the output he shares I conclude that the only eclasses truly not
used anymore are:
- games-q3mod
- ruby-gnome2
- mozreconf

See details below.



Sebastian


On 02/04/11 19:13, Yannick Chabanois wrote:
 The answer (dirty) :
 eclipse-ext :
 gentoojp/dev-util/pleiades/pleiades-1.2.0.ebuild:inherit eclipse-ext
 pentoo/dev-util/eclipse-pydev-bin/eclipse-pydev-bin-0.9.8.7.ebuild:inherit
 eclipse-ext
 pentoo/dev-util/eclipse-pydev-bin/.svn/text-base/eclipse-pydev-bin-0.9.8.7.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 eclipse-ext
 sunrise/dev-util/eclipse-epic-bin/.svn/text-base/eclipse-epic-bin-0.3.0.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 eclipse-ext
 sunrise/dev-util/eclipse-epic-bin/eclipse-epic-bin-0.3.0.ebuild:inherit
 eclipse-ext
 
 fortan :
 bgo-overlay/sci-physics/avl/avl-3.27.ebuild:inherit toolchain-funcs fortran
 bgo-overlay/sci-libs/cgnslib/cgnslib-2.5.3.ebuild:inherit fortran
 versionator multilib
 dberkholz/sci-chemistry/espresso/espresso-4.0_pre2.ebuild:inherit
 autotools eutils fortran toolchain-funcs
 dberkholz/sci-chemistry/refmac/refmac-5.6.0069.ebuild:inherit fortran
 base toolchain-funcs versionator
 dberkholz/sci-physics/abinit/abinit-5.7.3.ebuild:inherit fortran
 multilib toolchain-funcs
 dberkholz/sci-physics/exciting/exciting-0.9.74.ebuild:inherit fortran
 dberkholz/sci-physics/campos-dacapo/campos-dacapo-2.7.7.ebuild:inherit
 distutils fortran multilib
 dberkholz/sci-physics/octopus/octopus-3.0.0.ebuild:inherit fortran
 dberkholz/sci-libs/etsf_io/etsf_io-1.0.2.ebuild:inherit autotools eutils
 fortran flag-o-matic multilib
 dberkholz/sci-libs/bigdft/bigdft-1.2.0.ebuild:inherit eutils fortran
 multilib
 dberkholz/sci-libs/fox/fox-4.0.3.ebuild:inherit eutils fortran
 dberkholz/sci-libs/wannier90/wannier90-1.1.ebuild:inherit eutils
 multilib fortran
 dberkholz/sci-libs/libxc/libxc-0.9.ebuild:inherit fortran multilib
 dberkholz/sci-biology/TMalign/TMalign-.ebuild:inherit fortran
 dberkholz/sci-biology/mmult/mmult-1.0.ebuild:inherit autotools eutils
 fortran
 dev-zero/sci-mathematics/octave/octave-3.2.2.ebuild:inherit flag-o-matic
 fortran xemacs-elisp-common
 gentoojp/dev-ml/lacaml/lacaml-3.0.20.ebuild:inherit findlib fortran
 toolchain-funcs
 pentoo/sys-cluster/openmpi/openmpi-1.3.3.ebuild:inherit eutils multilib
 flag-o-matic toolchain-funcs fortran
 pentoo/sys-cluster/openmpi/.svn/text-base/openmpi-1.3.3.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 eutils multilib flag-o-matic toolchain-funcs fortran
 science/sci-libs/libxc/libxc-1.0.ebuild:inherit fortran multilib
 science/sci-libs/libxc/libxc-.ebuild:inherit fortran eutils multilib
 toolchain-funcs flag-o-matic autotools subversion
 sunrise/media-radio/wspr/wspr-2.00.ebuild:inherit autotools distutils
 flag-o-matic multilib python fortran
 sunrise/media-radio/wspr/.svn/text-base/wspr-2.00.ebuild.svn-base:inherit 
 autotools
 distutils flag-o-matic multilib python fortran
 
 mozconfig-2 :
 maggu2810-overlay/www-client/flock/flock-1.0.1.ebuild:inherit
 flag-o-matic toolchain-funcs eutils mozconfig-2 makeedit multilib
 fdo-mime mozextension autotools
 
 php-pear-r1 :
 funroll-loops/dev-php/PEAR-XML_RPC/PEAR-XML_RPC-1.5.4.ebuild:inherit
 php-pear-r1
 funroll-loops/dev-php/PEAR-XML_RPC2/PEAR-XML_RPC2-1.0.6.ebuild:inherit
 php-pear-r1
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_NLS/Horde_NLS-0.0.2.ebuild:inherit php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_NLS/.svn/text-base/Horde_NLS-0.0.2.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/PEAR-Net_IMAP/PEAR-Net_IMAP-1.1.0_beta1.ebuild:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/PEAR-Net_IMAP/.svn/text-base/PEAR-Net_IMAP-1.0.3-r2.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/PEAR-Net_IMAP/.svn/text-base/PEAR-Net_IMAP-1.1.0_beta1.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/PEAR-Net_IMAP/PEAR-Net_IMAP-1.0.3-r2.ebuild:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_Auth/Horde_Auth-0.1.1.ebuild:inherit php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_Auth/.svn/text-base/Horde_Auth-0.1.1.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_LDAP/Horde_LDAP-0.0.2.ebuild:inherit php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_LDAP/.svn/text-base/Horde_LDAP-0.0.2.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/PEAR-CodeSniffer/.svn/text-base/PEAR-CodeSniffer-1.1.0.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1
 kolab/dev-php/PEAR-CodeSniffer/PEAR-CodeSniffer-1.1.0.ebuild:inherit
 php-pear-r1
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_Kolab_Filter/Horde_Kolab_Filter-0.1.3.ebuild:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_Kolab_Filter/.svn/text-base/Horde_Kolab_Filter-0.1.3.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_Date/.svn/text-base/Horde_Date-0.1.0.ebuild.svn-base:inherit
 php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_Date/Horde_Date-0.1.0.ebuild:inherit php-pear-r1 eutils
 kolab/dev-php/Horde_Argv/Horde_Argv-0.1.0.ebuild:inherit php-pear-r1 eutils
 

[gentoo-dev] Re: Git commit mails/CIA.vc notifications

2011-02-04 Thread Duncan
Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:

 On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:26:16 +0100 Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org
 wrote:
 
 Hey guys,
 
 Only half of people? :)

That's just /begging/ a reply. (In reference to begging the question and 
the controversy surrounding it. Linguists and perscriptivists vs. 
descriptivists, etc. An entirely different topic but look up language log 
for some /hours/ of interesting reading, if you're ever bored. =:^)

On wictionary, guys has three definitions:

http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/guys

1. plural form of guy

2. (colloquial) Persons, irrespective of their genders. 

3. (colloquial) A form of address for a group of male persons or a group 
of mixed male and female persons. 

All three of those are potentially gender neutral.  There's two sets of 
synonyms listed, the first gender neutral (people, persons, folks), the 
second male persons (blokes, chaps, dudes, fellows, gents).

Following thru on the first def, guy (and disregarding the other meaning, 
noun/verb related to an anchor or support cable), we find that the 
original reference was to Guy Fawkes, an Englishman hanged in 1606 for his 
role in the Gunpowder Plot.

Here, we have five definitions:

1. (UK) (In direct reference to the origin.) An effigy of a man burned...

2.  A male.

3. (colloquial, in plural) people.

4. (colloquial, of animals and sometimes objects) thing, creature.

5. (colloquial, technology) thing, unit.
This usage is not always seen as accurate or correct.
(The example quotes are interesting but omitted for brevity.)

Of particular interest here is the usage note, mentioning Hey guys in 
particular:

In plural, guys is not completely gender-neutral but it may refer to 
people of either sex in some circumstances and forms; Hey guys can 
generally refer to either gender, as a greeting in its plural form. 
[R]eferring to a group of people as guys usually means a group of men or 
a mixed group[.]

So while it /could/ refer to only half of people (males), alternatively 
and in the wider sense, it /could/ refer to a /superset/ of all people 
instead, including not only animals but even things! (Usage: This guy 
here, measures the voltage.)

Just in case someone has a problem with wictionary, Merriam-webster.com 
has similar definitions, including specifically the person usage, and 
individual/creature usage.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/guy[3]

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master.  Richard Stallman




[gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: lince and slmodem

2011-02-04 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
Il giorno mer, 02/02/2011 alle 01.33 +, Matt Turner ha scritto:
 
 Maybe you did this already, but it seems like the amount of time spent
 masking a package could have been spent poking whoever is supposed to
 be maintaining it (Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org
 

I can't obviously speak for Alin, but I'd like to point out one
particular issue here: Alin has been maintaining for a long time the
whole net-dialup herd alone, and has been doing a very good job,
considering the amount of different packages in that.

On the other hand, packages that require specific hardware to be tested
cannot really be maintained by developers that don't have them (any
longer). What does that mean? Mostly it means that a lot of packages for
hardware devices that are no longer commonly used (such as softmodems)
cannot be easily kept up-to-date, unless we have people using them on a
daily basis who can step up to maintain them.

Furthermore, for the packages that are implemented in kernel-space or
mixed in kernel- and user-space, each kernel version will be a further
problem.

This said, I'd suggest users and developers alike to add themselves (or
ask to be added) to the metadata.xml files for packages requiring
specific hardware support, so that even if one maintainer ends up not
being active, we have a list of people who can actually tell us whether
a given package works or not.

And don't simply avoid doing so because there is someone else on that
list already; we don't have a limit of one, two or three people listed
in metadata.xml. The more people we know are ready to test a given
package on actual hardware, the better (and you can be listed as just a
tester after all).

-- 
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/




Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Lastrite: lince and slmodem

2011-02-04 Thread Chris Richards

On 02/04/2011 05:24 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:

This said, I'd suggest users and developers alike to add themselves (or
ask to be added) to the metadata.xml files for packages requiring
specific hardware support, so that even if one maintainer ends up not
being active, we have a list of people who can actually tell us whether
a given package works or not.

And don't simply avoid doing so because there is someone else on that
list already; we don't have a limit of one, two or three people listed
in metadata.xml. The more people we know are ready to test a given
package on actual hardware, the better (and you can be listed as just a
tester after all).
What's true of developers is also true of users; a user may add 
themselves to the list, forget they are on it, and a year from now be 
asked to test something they no longer have hardware for.


Not saying that this isn't worth doing, merely pointing out that we may 
discover that we don't have anyone to test even WITH the list of willing 
users.


Later,
Chris





Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Git commit mails/CIA.vc notifications

2011-02-04 Thread George Prowse

On 04/02/2011 22:41, Duncan wrote:

Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:


On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:26:16 +0100 Christian Ruppertid...@gentoo.org
wrote:


Hey guys,


Only half of people? :)


That's just /begging/ a reply.


No. It wasn't. Please stop filling up my inbox.

Yes I know what the next reply is.



Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Git commit mails/CIA.vc notifications

2011-02-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 22:41:57 + (UTC)
Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:

 Jeroen Roovers posted on Fri, 04 Feb 2011 16:08:24 +0100 as excerpted:
 
  On Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:26:16 +0100 Christian Ruppert
  id...@gentoo.org wrote:
  
  Hey guys,
  
  Only half of people? :)
 
 That's just /begging/ a reply. (In reference to begging the
 question and the controversy surrounding it. Linguists and
 perscriptivists vs. descriptivists, etc. An entirely different topic
 but look up language log for some /hours/ of interesting reading, if
 you're ever bored. =:^)
 
 On wictionary, guys has three definitions:

First of all, wikctionary. Get real. Second of all, most of us don't
need a dictionary to be in the right. Either you respectfully address
all users and developers on the announce list, or you don't even
respond like the original writer didn't. :)


 jer