Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Cell phone as modem

2007-12-04 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Grant wrote:
   I was looking for a relatively easy way to get online in most places
   around the world, but maybe GSM isn't it.  I swore off WIFI hunting
   after visiting the Greek island of Corfu, and from jiwire.com it looks
   like there is still nothing there.  Check this out though:
  
   http://www.geofone.net/bgan-sale.htm
  
   These are lightweight, plenty fast, USB, Bluetooth, ethernet, and the
   page even mentions Linux.  $20/day and $7.95/MB doesn't sound so bad.
   How can I figure out how much data I send/receive right now during
   minimal operation?
 
  Don't know how long you intend staying connected each day, or how much
  data you need to up/download, but $20 a day doesn't exactly hit me as a
  deal . . .
 
  That's well more than what I would expect to have to pay a month, even
  when I am on international roaming charges away from home.

 From what I can tell, there just isn't a good solution for staying
 connected while traveling around the world yet.  I think a
 lightweight, fast satellite connection like the ones in that link
 would be perfect, but they are a bit expensive.  Not as expensive as
 the last time I looked though.

That's right, they are along with satellite cell phones slowly reducing in 
price.

 Connecting via GSM sounds like a cheaper solution but I wonder how it
 would end up after phone rental charges, 

There may be no need to rent, unless you're off to Costa Rica.  A lot of PAYG 
deals throw in a phone for free over here.

 SIM cards, 

SIM cards are usually free (again I am only speaking for the UK market - 
YMMV), or cost no more than $20 and you get some free calls for that.

 international voice charges, 

OK, this can be a sting in the tail, some providers were charging too much for 
roaming abroad.  The telecoms regulator has brought this under control lately 
by capping the charges.  When I roam around Europe I can still ring my ISP's 
UK dialup number for a reasonable cost.

 however they charge you for local data, local dial-up 
 charges, getting ripped by the fine print because you're likely
 dealing with a different company every time, gas and time spent
 looking for a good signal and power outlet, etc.  

I know what you're saying, but WiFi coverage is increasing, even in rural 
areas.  OK, Corfu may still be an exception although the Starbux monopoly is 
spreading its wings across the globe.  Sometimes the local council may 
compete for WiFi provision.  I saw tens of kids with laptops hanging around 
and browsing obsessively in a central square in Athens, Greece, a couple of 
months ago.  I was told that this is a free WiFi hotspot offered by the Mayor 
to promote new technologies.  You could also find that a lot of hotel lobbies 
(my favourite option) offer peace  quite, a drink and a few hours of 
uninterrupted Internet usage.  Some of the hotels may charge for WiFi usage, 
but many more do not.

 With a satellite 
 connection it's straightforward.  You always deal with the same
 company and it works right from your hacienda on the beach.  In my
 experience, staying connected on the road is really hard.  A satellite
 system would make it really easy, but somewhat expensive.

Sure, but satellite reception and bandwidth is not always as good as it 
sounds.  I remember seeing a comparison between different Internet access 
media and the satellite Internet access did not exactly come on top.  
Reception was patchy (can't recall where they were trying it out) and at 
times throughput was no higher than a fixed line dialup connection.  
Depending where you are you may have to wait for Uncle Sam's sat to fly above 
before you can hook up.

Notwithstanding the above your needs do no doubt vary from mine and a 
satellite may well be the best solution. for you  Getting your company to pay 
for it may be the best option.  Trying it out from a retail place, or the 
next local electronics show could give you a taster under optimum conditions.

Good luck.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


[gentoo-user] How to reset Kwallet master passwd

2007-12-04 Thread Mick
Hi All,

A user has entered the wrong master passwd when he first used Kwallet.  Now he 
cannot use it anymore.  What's the recommended way of resetting the master 
passwd for Kwallet.  Losing all stored passwds in Kwallet is not an issue.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] How to reset Kwallet master passwd

2007-12-04 Thread Michal 'vorner' Vaner
Hello

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:53:59PM +, Mick wrote:
 A user has entered the wrong master passwd when he first used Kwallet.  Now 
 he 
 cannot use it anymore.  What's the recommended way of resetting the master 
 passwd for Kwallet.  Losing all stored passwds in Kwallet is not an issue.

You could open kwalletmanager and delete the wallet there.

Or you can delete .kde/share/apps/kwallet (I hope it is there).

-- 
A nuclear war can ruin your whole day.

Michal 'vorner' Vaner


pgppBojh3DDcr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] lxr and Mysql problem

2007-12-04 Thread Chuanwen Wu
Hi, guys!

I want to use lxr to view the kernel source and have installed it with
the guide in the file INSTALL in the lxr package .
But when I do genxref, the error occure.

I show a example below, in which I use a EMPTY file called
helloworld.c in the a directory called helloworld. I try to
genxref it and the output is:

# ./genxref --url http://localhost/lxr/

This is glimpseindex version 4.18.2, 2006.

Indexing /usr/src/mysrc/helloworld ...

Size of files being indexed = 72 B, Total #of files = 1

Index-directory: /var/www/localhost/htdocs/lxr/src/.glimpse/helloworld
Glimpse-files created here:
-rw--- 1 root root 41 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_filenames
-rw--- 1 root root  4 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_filenames_index
-rw--- 1 root root  0 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_filetimes
-rw--- 1 root root121 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_index
-rw--- 1 root root116 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_messages
-rw--- 1 root root 22 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_partitions
-rw--- 1 root root125 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_statistics
-rw--- 1 root root 262144 2007-12-04 21:03 .glimpse_turbo
*** / helloworld
*** /helloworld.c helloworld
--- /helloworld.c helloworld 1196773242-72
DBD::mysql::st execute failed: You have an error in your SQL syntax;
check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the
right syntax to use near 'release = 'helloworld'' at line 1 at
/usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/LXR/Index/Mysql.pm line 209.
DBD::mysql::st execute failed: You have an error in your SQL syntax;
check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the
right syntax to use near 'release) values ('18841', 'helloworld')' at
line 1 at /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/LXR/Index/Mysql.pm line
213.
/helloworld.c was already indexed
### / helloworld
### /helloworld.c helloworld
--- /helloworld.c helloworld 1196773242-72
/helloworld.c was already referenced

Then I opened firefox with the url http://localhost/lxr/source, but
nothing in the browser.  And when I used http://localhost/lxr/, I
could see the file in the lxr directory in my browser.

Other information:
$mysql -V
mysql  Ver 14.12 Distrib 5.0.44, for pc-linux-gnu (x86_64) using readline 5.2

And I use lxr-0.9.5 and dev-perl/DBD-mysql-4.00.5.

Any help will be very appreciated!



wcw
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] How to reset Kwallet master passwd

2007-12-04 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote:
 Hello

 On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 12:53:59PM +, Mick wrote:
  A user has entered the wrong master passwd when he first used Kwallet. 
  Now he cannot use it anymore.  What's the recommended way of resetting
  the master passwd for Kwallet.  Losing all stored passwds in Kwallet is
  not an issue.

 You could open kwalletmanager and delete the wallet there.

 Or you can delete .kde/share/apps/kwallet (I hope it is there).

Thank you.  Will try this out when I connect to that box later tonight.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Cell phone as modem

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
  With a satellite
  connection it's straightforward.  You always deal with the same
  company and it works right from your hacienda on the beach.  In my
  experience, staying connected on the road is really hard.  A satellite
  system would make it really easy, but somewhat expensive.

 Sure, but satellite reception and bandwidth is not always as good as it
 sounds.  I remember seeing a comparison between different Internet access
 media and the satellite Internet access did not exactly come on top.
 Reception was patchy (can't recall where they were trying it out) and at
 times throughput was no higher than a fixed line dialup connection.
 Depending where you are you may have to wait for Uncle Sam's sat to fly above
 before you can hook up.

 Notwithstanding the above your needs do no doubt vary from mine and a
 satellite may well be the best solution. for you  Getting your company to pay
 for it may be the best option.  Trying it out from a retail place, or the
 next local electronics show could give you a taster under optimum conditions.

Check this out:

http://www.satphonestore.com/index.cfm?page=rentals

$50/week and $7.95/MB sounds affordable.  I'll have to do some testing
to see what kind of data charges I might incur at that rate but that
sounds pretty good to me.

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Can't run binary packages

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
I've emerged firefox-bin and skype successfully, but neither will run
with very similar errors:

$ firefox-bin
/usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher: line 368:
/opt/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client: No such file or directory
Unknown error 127 from mozilla-xremote-client
/usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher: line 460: /opt/firefox/firefox-bin: No
such file or directory
firefox-bin exited with non-zero status (127)

$ skype
/usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: Success

I have all of the referenced files:

$ ls -l /usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 19912 Nov 30 22:08 /usr/libexec/mozilla-launcher

$ ls -l /opt/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10336 Oct 25 18:27 /opt/firefox/mozilla-xremote-client

$ ls -l /opt/firefox/firefox-bin
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10560452 Oct 25 18:27 /opt/firefox/firefox-bin

$ ls -l /usr/bin/skype
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 239 Dec  4 07:15 /usr/bin/skype

$ ls -l /opt/skype/skype
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root audio 18753060 Dec  4 07:15 /opt/skype/skype

Does this make sense to anyone?

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: Video Overlay Software API

2007-12-04 Thread James
Jonathan R. Haws Jonathan.Haws at sdl.usu.edu writes:

Hello,

 I am looking for a software API that I can use to develop a UI that will 
 display an analog video stream on the screen with overlaid controls 
 (buttons, indicators, etc.).  

Maybe these are a good place to look at developing software for gentoo:
[1][2]


 The latency for the video 
 display must be less than 1/4 second to meet the design requirements, so 
 something that can be programmed in separate threads (a video thread and 
 an overlay thread) may be the best option. 

You'll need to find or develop a 'low latency' method to collect the video
(frames). I'm not so sure how experienced you are with video, so some of this
advice may not be relevant for you:

1. Look at the existing projects for frame grabbers and the device drivers
for the hardware portion of the related software: bttv/xawtv/camE has been
around for ever and the driver code has been fundamentally changed over time. 

Here is a more current listing: [3]
Looking at some of the oldest driver code will show you have the 'bt848' chips
works. The bt848 chips have been replaced by new chips (878) and others.
Reading the data sheets on the chips will tell you quite a lot about
what is possible (This all assumes you are going to use  a 'cots'
video capture hardware system that plugs into the pci slot of a (gentoo)
computer. If you are custom designing hardwareware (fpga, dsp, analog circuits)
then it may not be useful.

2. Find the relevant devise drivers for other chipsets used in video capture,
in the latest linux kernels for good places to look at what has already been
coded. This is a very dynamic area for device drivers (over the last few 
years) so the driver code for a given video chipset and easily have changed 
of  the coarse of that time.

3. Look at ffmpeg and the developers therein, as you might be able to 
learn quite a lot from previously (failed) projects and new efforts.

3. Keep you gui tools simple and lightweight. There are many graphical
toolkits you can use to create your graphics (UI). This is a huge,
separate effort. You may decide to use existing code for all of the low
level code and then just spin your own (UI) on top of a striped down 
version of ffmpeg. My choice, QT4.

4. Read the sources to a lot of projects and talk to the folks at these
projects, before you start off 'half-baked'.(caveat emptor)!


On gentoo here is a great place to begin your search:

cd //usr/portage/media-video


Other keywords
camstream Ogg  OGM   matroska   


5. If you are looking into low latency video, for machine control
types of projects, then  look into some 'image processing' areas
such as robotics for ideas in published 'white paper' and from
the standard journal publications. ACM, IEEE and the various 
research area related to (computer) vision.


This is a very active, complex area you have chosen to work in. READ 
(research) quite a lot and then narrow your focus on something that is
realistically achievable.  Drop me some private email, if you like.


HTH,


James


[1] http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Installing_3rd_Party_Ebuilds
[2] http://overlays.gentoo.org/
[3] http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~reynolds/quickcam/

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Router/Firewall strangeness

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
I just tried to log into my local Gentoo router/firewall system and I got this:

ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host

From Google, It looks like it's a problem caused by too many ssh
connections, but that system should only ever be logged into by me,
and I hadn't logged in for at least 12 hours.  I checked the sshd logs
and they're suspiciously empty.  Just a few lines per day in there.
Does this seem like enough to wipe the machine over?

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Can't run binary packages

2007-12-04 Thread Alex Schuster
Grant writes: 


I've emerged firefox-bin and skype successfully, but neither will run
with very similar errors:


Do these threads help? 


http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-583184.html
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-565649.html
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182248 


   Wonko
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Router/Firewall strangeness

2007-12-04 Thread Joseph

On 12/04/07 07:56, Grant wrote:

I just tried to log into my local Gentoo router/firewall system and I got this:

ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host

From Google, It looks like it's a problem caused by too many ssh
connections, but that system should only ever be logged into by me,
and I hadn't logged in for at least 12 hours.  I checked the sshd logs
and they're suspiciously empty.  Just a few lines per day in there.
Does this seem like enough to wipe the machine over?

- Grant


I don't think it is a reason to panic. 
But why do you say it can be logged into by you?

I'm assuming you are using only ssh key (no password); do you run port 
knocking? (you should).

--
#Joseph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Router/Firewall strangeness

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
 I just tried to log into my local Gentoo router/firewall system and I got 
 this:
 
 ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
 
 From Google, It looks like it's a problem caused by too many ssh
 connections, but that system should only ever be logged into by me,
 and I hadn't logged in for at least 12 hours.  I checked the sshd logs
 and they're suspiciously empty.  Just a few lines per day in there.
 Does this seem like enough to wipe the machine over?
 
 - Grant

 I don't think it is a reason to panic.

Why not?

 But why do you say it can be logged into by you?

I just mean that it's my system and no one else should be in there.

 I'm assuming you are using only ssh key (no password); do you run port 
 knocking? (you should).

I do have a password and I don't run port knocking but I'll check that out.

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Can't run binary packages

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
  I've emerged firefox-bin and skype successfully, but neither will run
  with very similar errors:

 Do these threads help?

 http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-583184.html

This problem looks similar to mine and the solution was apparently:

downloaded glibc, binutils, and gcc from  tinderbox. Then used emerge
-k to install the prebuilt packages.

I'll do that as soon as qt finishes emerging which might fix skype.

 http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-565649.html
 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182248

These are specific to skype and the solution only involves the skype
ebuild so I'm sure they won't help with firefox-bin.

Could this have to do with my profile:

$ ls -l /etc/make.profile
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 38 Nov 30 09:55 /etc/make.profile -
../usr/portage/profiles/hardened/amd64

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Router/Firewall strangeness

2007-12-04 Thread Mick
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Grant wrote:
  I just tried to log into my local Gentoo router/firewall system and I
   got this:
  
  ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
  
  From Google, It looks like it's a problem caused by too many ssh
  connections, but that system should only ever be logged into by me,
  and I hadn't logged in for at least 12 hours.  I checked the sshd logs
  and they're suspiciously empty.  Just a few lines per day in there.
  Does this seem like enough to wipe the machine over?
  
  - Grant
 
  I don't think it is a reason to panic.

 Why not?

  But why do you say it can be logged into by you?

 I just mean that it's my system and no one else should be in there.

  I'm assuming you are using only ssh key (no password); do you run port
  knocking? (you should).

 I do have a password and I don't run port knocking but I'll check that out.

I'm not sure if you would get some message like the one you report if you have 
entered an incorrect passwd and you are using pam.  General rules apply here, 
e.g. use chkrootkit, rkhunter, lsof, etc., to see if something *obvious* is 
lurking in the background.  Alternatively, hook up a hub on the LAN in 
promiscuous mode and listen into the traffic from/to this box.  Within a 
couple of days something that shouldn't be there would probably rear its 
head.

Assuming that you are the only legit user, that your passwd is reasonably 
strong (random alpha-numeric chars  symbols) and long (more than 10 should 
be safe enough, although the longer the better), and that you do not rotate 
your logs every couple of hours, you should feel relatively comfortable.  
That said, what do you see in the rotated logs?

Besides port knocking in your future system (or this one if you are sticking 
with it) consider trying out fail2ban, or doing away with passwd 
authentication all together.  Where I can, I only allow pubkey authentication 
and disable passwd authentication and pam.

HTH.
-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Router/Firewall strangeness

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
   I just tried to log into my local Gentoo router/firewall system and I
got this:
   
   ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host
   
   From Google, It looks like it's a problem caused by too many ssh
   connections, but that system should only ever be logged into by me,
   and I hadn't logged in for at least 12 hours.  I checked the sshd logs
   and they're suspiciously empty.  Just a few lines per day in there.
   Does this seem like enough to wipe the machine over?
   
   - Grant
  
   I don't think it is a reason to panic.
 
  Why not?
 
   But why do you say it can be logged into by you?
 
  I just mean that it's my system and no one else should be in there.
 
   I'm assuming you are using only ssh key (no password); do you run port
   knocking? (you should).
 
  I do have a password and I don't run port knocking but I'll check that out.

 I'm not sure if you would get some message like the one you report if you have
 entered an incorrect passwd and you are using pam.  General rules apply here,
 e.g. use chkrootkit, rkhunter, lsof, etc., to see if something *obvious* is
 lurking in the background.  Alternatively, hook up a hub on the LAN in
 promiscuous mode and listen into the traffic from/to this box.  Within a
 couple of days something that shouldn't be there would probably rear its
 head.

 Assuming that you are the only legit user, that your passwd is reasonably
 strong (random alpha-numeric chars  symbols) and long (more than 10 should
 be safe enough, although the longer the better), and that you do not rotate
 your logs every couple of hours, you should feel relatively comfortable.
 That said, what do you see in the rotated logs?

 Besides port knocking in your future system (or this one if you are sticking
 with it) consider trying out fail2ban, or doing away with passwd
 authentication all together.  Where I can, I only allow pubkey authentication
 and disable passwd authentication and pam.

Alright, thanks Mick.

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



[gentoo-user] Hardened skype gcc-4*

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
According to this:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182554

skype is p.masked on hardened profiles waiting for gcc-4*.  I really
need skype working and I wonder if I should unmask gcc-4*, emerge it,
and try to emerge skype.  Would I need to follow the Gentoo GCC
Upgrade guide to do this if I only want skype compiled with gcc-4*?
Would I just be creating a mess doing this?

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Hardened skype gcc-4*

2007-12-04 Thread Michal 'vorner' Vaner
Hello

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:01:07PM -0800, Grant wrote:
 According to this:
 
 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182554
 
 skype is p.masked on hardened profiles waiting for gcc-4*.  I really
 need skype working and I wonder if I should unmask gcc-4*, emerge it,
 and try to emerge skype.  Would I need to follow the Gentoo GCC
 Upgrade guide to do this if I only want skype compiled with gcc-4*?
 Would I just be creating a mess doing this?

I guess it makes no sense for skype to need the GCC, since you do not
(can not) compile skype, it is close-sourced. You could download skype
from the pages and just unpack it and hope it will work.

BTW: IMO skype should not be allowed near a computer that needs to be
hardened -- personally, I do not trust it a bit (and I know a little
about the quality how it is written, and it talks by network).

-- 
I left the ssh key under the doormat

Michal 'vorner' Vaner


pgp54lE7RpNPF.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Hardened skype gcc-4*

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
  According to this:
 
  http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=182554
 
  skype is p.masked on hardened profiles waiting for gcc-4*.  I really
  need skype working and I wonder if I should unmask gcc-4*, emerge it,
  and try to emerge skype.  Would I need to follow the Gentoo GCC
  Upgrade guide to do this if I only want skype compiled with gcc-4*?
  Would I just be creating a mess doing this?

 I guess it makes no sense for skype to need the GCC, since you do not
 (can not) compile skype, it is close-sourced. You could download skype
 from the pages and just unpack it and hope it will work.

I'm actually able to emerge it, but it won't start with:

$ skype
/usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: No such file or directory
/usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: Success

even though /usr/bin/skype and /opt/skype/skype clearly exist.  What
you're saying makes sense about gcc-4* not being necessary, but then
why the above-referenced bug?

 BTW: IMO skype should not be allowed near a computer that needs to be
 hardened -- personally, I do not trust it a bit (and I know a little
 about the quality how it is written, and it talks by network).

What would you recommend as an alternative?  From what I understand, I
could sign up with a voip service and install a client.  Would you
recommend any in particular, both service and client?

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Hardened skype gcc-4*

2007-12-04 Thread Michal 'vorner' Vaner
Hello

On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:19:29PM -0800, Grant wrote:
  I guess it makes no sense for skype to need the GCC, since you do not
  (can not) compile skype, it is close-sourced. You could download skype
  from the pages and just unpack it and hope it will work.
 
 I'm actually able to emerge it, but it won't start with:
 
 $ skype
 /usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: No such file or directory
 /usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: Success
 
 even though /usr/bin/skype and /opt/skype/skype clearly exist.  What
 you're saying makes sense about gcc-4* not being necessary, but then
 why the above-referenced bug?

Take the statically linked version? And, no, I do not know about that
bug, I'm lucky enough not to have Skype installed any more.

  BTW: IMO skype should not be allowed near a computer that needs to be
  hardened -- personally, I do not trust it a bit (and I know a little
  about the quality how it is written, and it talks by network).
 
 What would you recommend as an alternative?  From what I understand, I
 could sign up with a voip service and install a client.  Would you
 recommend any in particular, both service and client?

If you need it user-friendly, then maybe wengo, or ekiga. AFAIK both
work over the SIP protocol, so you can replace the client with whatever
else comes to your path and speaks it.

And you may set up your own server too, if it comes to it. (Sorry, I
have not much experience with it, I just had something to do with skype
and was able to crash every version in multiple different ways, so I
just do not recommend it at all).

-- 
All flame and insults will go to /dev/null (if they fit)

Michal 'vorner' Vaner


pgpi6fuJkjHGD.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] Help applying a qt patch

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
I've set the ebuild up in an overlay and added:

epatch ${FILESDIR}/qt-4.3.1-r1_gcc3.4_compile_fix.diff

to the ebuild alongside other patches, but the patch always fails with this:

^[[31;01mACCESS DENIED^[[0m  rename:
/usr/portage/x11-libs/qt/qt-4.3.1-r1.ebuild
patch:  Can't rename file
/var/tmp/portage/x11-libs/qt-4.3.1-r1/temp/poIOMqJi to
/usr/portage/x11-libs/qt/qt-4.3.1-r1.ebuild : Permission denied

Here is the patch which reportedly works great:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=131080action=view

Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Hardened skype gcc-4*

2007-12-04 Thread Grant
  I'm actually able to emerge it, but it won't start with:
 
  $ skype
  /usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: No such file or directory
  /usr/bin/skype: line 10: /opt/skype/skype: Success
 
  even though /usr/bin/skype and /opt/skype/skype clearly exist.  What
  you're saying makes sense about gcc-4* not being necessary, but then
  why the above-referenced bug?

 Take the statically linked version? And, no, I do not know about that
 bug, I'm lucky enough not to have Skype installed any more.

   BTW: IMO skype should not be allowed near a computer that needs to be
   hardened -- personally, I do not trust it a bit (and I know a little
   about the quality how it is written, and it talks by network).
 
  What would you recommend as an alternative?  From what I understand, I
  could sign up with a voip service and install a client.  Would you
  recommend any in particular, both service and client?

 If you need it user-friendly, then maybe wengo, or ekiga. AFAIK both
 work over the SIP protocol, so you can replace the client with whatever
 else comes to your path and speaks it.

I can't believe it but I get the same error with wengo:

$ wengophone
/opt/bin/wengophone: line 10: /opt/wengophone/qtwengophone: No such
file or directory
/opt/bin/wengophone: line 10: /opt/wengophone/qtwengophone: Success

Maybe a hardened profile on a laptop is more trouble than it's worth.
skype, wengo, firefox-bin all won't work with this same type of error.
 vmware won't work either and I bet it's the same problem.

- Grant
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Help applying a qt patch

2007-12-04 Thread Andrey Vul
On Dec 4, 2007 5:40 PM, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've set the ebuild up in an overlay and added:

 epatch ${FILESDIR}/qt-4.3.1-r1_gcc3.4_compile_fix.diff
mv ${FILESDIR}/qt-4.3.1-r1_gcc3.4_compile_fix.diff
/qt-4.3.1-r1_gcc3.4_compile_fix.diff

 http://bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=131080action=view

 Could someone tell me what I'm doing wrong?

The patch overwrites the *ebuild*, not the *package files*

correct command:
/#patch -N qt-4.3.1-r1_gcc3.4_compile_fix.diff
(/# means root shell, root (/) directory)
-- 
Andrey Vul
int i;main(){for(;i[]i;++i){--i;}];read('-'-'-',i+++hell\
o, world!\n,'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/i);}
hail ioccc
-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list