Re: [gentoo-user] failure to login with xdm or gdm
on 06/08/2012 08:05 PM Allan Gottlieb wrote the following: On Fri, Jun 08 2012, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Allan Gottlieb gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: Just today I cannot log into one of my machines (the other has not had an emerge since early yesterday and is ok). With gdm, I don't get a welcome screen. Just the funny cursor going round and round. I have fixed the problem by downgrading polkit and udisks. Thanks :) (I had the same problem).
Re: [gentoo-user] Apache server setup
On Friday 08 June 2012 22:01:08 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
$ cat .htaccess
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://tideswellmvc.co.uk/.*$
[NC] RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://tideswellmvc.co.uk$
[NC] RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER}
!^http://www.tideswellmvc.co.uk/.*$ [NC]
RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://www.tideswellmvc.co.uk$
[NC] RewriteRule .*\.(jpg|jpeg|gif|png|bmp)$ - [F,NC]
Options +Includes
I suspect this particular error (Options not allowed here) is
because this .htaccess is running in a user home directory, and
Options +Includes can't be set by a user. You may need to declare
that in your apache httpd.conf Directory section for that path,
rather than in the .htaccess file.
Hmm. Sounds plausible. Maybe I'll have to put it back into /var/www/...
and try to work out why I can't see images there.
Thanks for your help Paul.
--
Rgds
Peter
Re: [gentoo-user] Does UEFI needs seperate /boot partition?
As UEFI needs a FAT partition /boot/efi/efi, can I create it from my previous /boot partition? I haven't tried it yet - my /boot and /boot/efi are still two seperate partitions on my sys - but in theory it should work just fine with only a UEFI partition as the UEFI bootloader just loads the grub2 loader (I don't know what it's called, sorry. but I mean the grubx64.efi file) and then grub2 loads the rest. grub2 does not care where the stuff is, it just needs to know where to find the files (and maybe load some extra modules if you keep your files on a rare filesystem, raid, lvm, etc...).
Re: [gentoo-user] Lockdown: free/open OS maker pays Microsoft ransom for the right to boot on users' computers
On Wednesday 06 Jun 2012 20:50:38 Michael Mol wrote: On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: [snip] This is my CPU, a first generation i7: cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 30 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU Q 720 @ 1.60GHz stepping: 5 microcode : 0x4 cpu MHz : 933.000 cache size : 6144 KB physical id : 0 siblings: 8 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 11 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm ida dts tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid bogomips: 3192.11 clflush size: 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: You note that power management: above is empty. grep-ping the /proc tree for remoteaccess does not bring up anything. According to Intel's site, your processor has the vPro feature in it. http://ark.intel.com/products/43122/Intel-Core-i7-720QM-Processor-(6M-Cache -1_60-GHz) Can you find the device you noticed under /sys? No, nothing when I search for remote or remoteaccess or access ... If this Intel AMT, or vPRO thingy is outside the MoBo chipset then it may not get probed or be accessible by the kernel? But then, how does lshw see it? *-remoteaccess UNCLAIMED vendor: Intel physical id: 2 capabilities: outbound --what does this mean? O_O -- Regards, Mick signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-user] Oh no! My raid5 is not assembled, and how I fixed it.
Are you using sys-fs/mdadm-3.2.4 or sys-fs/mdadm-3.2.5? If so see http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/255107 (Gentoo Dev list) and bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416081 -- Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
Re: [gentoo-user] Oh no! My raid5 is not assembled, and how I fixed it.
Am Samstag, 9. Juni 2012, 10:21:51 schrieb Walter Dnes: Are you using sys-fs/mdadm-3.2.4 or sys-fs/mdadm-3.2.5? If so see http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/255107 (Gentoo Dev list) and bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416081 yeah, saw similar for a while. My autoassembled raid5 setups still work, autoassembled raid1 to. But the stuff that is supposed to be assembled by mdadm has to be done by hand. So much about 'user space assembling is so much better and robust'. As shown: it isn't. Pisses me off everytime I reboot. which is, luckily, not THAT often. -- #163933
Re: [gentoo-user] failure to login with xdm or gdm
I have fixed the problem by downgrading polkit and udisks. To answer your questions Thanks, had the same problem. Was just about to leave the house, thought I'd do a quick reboot first, but instead of a login screen, I got a blank screen. It's always something when you are invited to a barbecue and try to be punctual :)
[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] USB hard drive puzzle
On 06/08/2012 08:13 AM, Paul Hartman wrote: On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/06/12 14:52, walt wrote: Does unloading and reloading the xhci module help? Brilliant :) It does indeed, thanks. Might be worth reporting as a bug perhaps. Or ask around on LKML. Maybe post about it to the usb-storage mailing list, the people who write those drivers might be hanging out there. It is a low-volume list so maybe a higher chance of being seen than LKML. https://groups.google.com/a/lists.one-eyed-alien.net/group/usb-storage Well, Greg K-H said it sounded to him like a pci hotplug issue and sure enough, adding pci_hotplug got it working. That leaves me wondering how a mere mortal tells the difference between a broken driver and a missing driver. Ask a kernel dev, obviously :)
Re: [gentoo-user] Oh no! My raid5 is not assembled, and how I fixed it.
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: Are you using sys-fs/mdadm-3.2.4 or sys-fs/mdadm-3.2.5? If so see http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/dev/255107 (Gentoo Dev list) and bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=416081 Yes, 3.2.5. So, that was the culprit! I just did a portage sync and now it wants to downgrade back to 3.2.3-r1. I had bad luck on the timing for my quarterly reboot, I guess. :) Thanks.
