Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4
don't, use 295.59 :) 2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net I haven't seen any mention of the problem here, but after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile. The solution (via Google + Launchpad bugzilla) is to copy 4 header files from /usr/src/linux/arch/arm/include/asm to -/-/-/-/x86/include/asm : system.h compiler.h system_info.h system_misc.h . Also the Ethernet kernel config lines have changed a bit I had to ask explicitly for my mobo's version with 'r8169'. HTH others -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
[gentoo-user] Re: Can't get any microphone to work
Hi again! I don't have pulseaudio and my device doesn't appear as a separate device. What I really can't get is why arecord -L shows me info about speakers when it's supposed to show only capture devices. Also, could someone please give me an example of arecord usage to capture from a (non-default) device named 2,0 in vlc. (I *did* read the man page but it's still a bit unclear) arecord -D hw:1,0 -f S16_LE -c2 -r48000 | aplay :-)
Re: [gentoo-user] Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4
120615 microcai wrote: 2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile. The solution (via Google + Launchpad bugzilla) is to copy 4 header files from /usr/src/linux/arch/arm/include/asm to -/-/-/-/x86/include/asm : system.h compiler.h system_info.h system_misc.h . Also the Ethernet kernel config lines have changed a bit I had to ask explicitly for my mobo's version with 'r8169'. don't, use 295.59 :) Do you mean Don't use 295.59 or Don't use 295.49, use 295.59 ? In any case, do you mean '295.49' or '295.53', the only versions available ? -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
[gentoo-user] still problems with nvidia-drivers-295.40 and above
Some time ago I wrote about a problem I have with nvidia-drivers causing X to segfault for versions above 295.20 (including the beta 302.x series) on a ASUS GT520, PCI-e board. Now it's becoming a mess to update the system because 295.20 is no longer in-tree. Rather than fiddling with overlays I'd like to understand where the problem is. Can anybody suggest a live cd that could include an nvidia-drivers-295.40 or later version so that I can at least rule out hw problems? thanks, raffaele
[gentoo-user] Re: Nvidia-drivers + kernel 3.4
On 15/06/12 18:14, Philip Webb wrote: 120615 microcai wrote: 2012/6/15 Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net after installing Kernel 3.4 , Nvidia-drivers 295.49 wouldn't compile. The solution (via Google + Launchpad bugzilla) is to copy 4 header files from /usr/src/linux/arch/arm/include/asm to -/-/-/-/x86/include/asm : system.h compiler.h system_info.h system_misc.h . Also the Ethernet kernel config lines have changed a bit I had to ask explicitly for my mobo's version with 'r8169'. don't, use 295.59 :) Do you mean Don't use 295.59 or Don't use 295.49, use 295.59 ? In any case, do you mean '295.49' or '295.53', the only versions available ? I can see that 295.53 and 295.59 are available. Use 295.59.
[gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I Rgds,
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I Rgds, Post could not be found. Your URL may be incorrect, the post may have been deleted, or this account may not have access to the post. (You'd think they'd have the decency to distinguish between 403, 404 and 410...) -- :wq
[gentoo-user] Re: OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
On 15/06/12 20:03, Michael Mol wrote: On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I Rgds, Post could not be found. Your URL may be incorrect, the post may have been deleted, or this account may not have access to the post. The link is: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4i (You'd think they'd have the decency to distinguish between 403, 404 and 410...) Who cares.
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I Rgds, Post could not be found. Your URL may be incorrect, the post may have been deleted, or this account may not have access to the post. (You'd think they'd have the decency to distinguish between 403, 404 and 410...) Try this one: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4i
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
Pandu Poluan writes: Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I That URL cannot be found. This seems to work for me: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/StQB1ftUp8D Wonko
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
Alex Schuster writes: Pandu Poluan writes: Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I That URL cannot be found. This seems to work for me: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/StQB1ftUp8D Argh, but it's the wrong post. How did this end up imy clipboard? This one is correct (your URL, with a lowercase 'I' at the end): https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4i Wonko
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
Pandu Poluan wrote: Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I Rgds, Is it me or is he upset? I don't mean a lot, just a little. ;-) I tried Gnome once. I think Linus likes it more than I did. lol Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words! Miss the compile output? Hint: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS=--quiet-build=n
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 13:38:52 -0500, Dale wrote: Is it me or is he upset? I don't mean a lot, just a little. ;-) Well, he clearly is, I don't now if you are :) I tried Gnome once. I think Linus likes it more than I did. lol IKWYM (and what Linus means). -- Neil Bothwick I@love~my,;It's%made in Taiwa~##$ ` #@ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] OT: Linus ranting about Gnome3
On Jun 16, 2012 12:25 AM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote: Alex Schuster writes: Pandu Poluan writes: Just in case anyone missed it: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4I That URL cannot be found. This seems to work for me: https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/StQB1ftUp8D Argh, but it's the wrong post. How did this end up imy clipboard? This one is correct (your URL, with a lowercase 'I' at the end): https://plus.google.com/102150693225130002912/posts/UkoAaLDpF4i Wonko Grr. Apparently my Android decides to auto-capitalize the lone i there... . I *despise* over-zealous autocorrection. Rgds,
