[gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Tanstaafl

Hi all,

This was discussed within a couple of threads in the last few months, 
but I wanted to ask for final clarification before I go ahead with this 
(yeah, I know, 'paranoia will destroy ya')...


I'm not afraid of an initramfs any more, but I've decided that I still 
just really don't want one, so I'm looking for the safest  simplest way 
to merge my separate /usr back into /.


The only thing I'm really unsure of is the optimal method and exact 
syntax (ie, trailing slashes? arguments?) for the actual copy of /usr.


Is rsync -a enough for my relatively simple system setup, or would using 
any or all of the other options suggested in those threads be 
safer/better? Specifically:


-a, or -axAHX, or -apogXx, or -PvasHAX

or should I go with a combined -apogsvxAHPX ?

So, here's the plan, please check me...

1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD

2. Mount / and create new /usr directory

mount /dev/sda3 /mnt/gentoo/
mkdir /mnt/gentoo/usr

3. Mount old /usr to be moved/merged

vgscan
vgchange -a y
mount /dev/vg/usr /mnt/gentoo/oldusr

4. Copy /oldusr to /usr

rsync -a? /mnt/gentoo/oldusr/ /mnt/gentoo/usr/

Are the trailing slashes required/important/necessary?

Which arguments should I use?

5. Edit /etc/fstab and comment/remove the /usr line

nano -wc /mnt/gentoo/etc/fstab

#/dev/vg/usr   /usrreiserfsnoatime 0 0

6. Unmount mounted filesystems

umount /mnt/gentoo/oldusr
umount /mnt/gentoo

7. Reboot into new system

Done?

I'm pretty sure that:

1. There is no need to chroot into the real system during this process,

and

2. I only need to mount / and the old /usr, no need to mount anything
   else (/proc, /sys, /var, /home, activating swap, etc)

Correct?

Thanks



Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread gottlieb
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:

 Is rsync -a enough for my relatively simple system setup, or would
 using any or all of the other options suggested in those threads be
 safer/better? Specifically:

 -a, or -axAHX, or -apogXx, or -PvasHAX

I am not an expert but here goes.
-x would not hurt but should not be needed since i believe that your
current /dev/vg/usr is just one partition.

I didn't need -X -A because I don't have acls or extended attributes

 or should I go with a combined -apogsvxAHPX ?

 So, here's the plan, please check me...

 1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD

 2. Mount / and create new /usr directory

I am missing something.  I would have thought your old / (dev/sda3)
already has an empty /usr directory where you previously mounted
/dev/vg/usr

 mount /dev/sda3 /mnt/gentoo/
 mkdir /mnt/gentoo/usr

 3. Mount old /usr to be moved/merged

 vgscan
 vgchange -a y
 mount /dev/vg/usr /mnt/gentoo/oldusr

 4. Copy /oldusr to /usr

This suggests that your current root (dev/sda3) is big enough to
include the previous /usr (dev/vg/usr).  That is indeed a simple case.
Many of us had to move partitions around to get a big enough partition
for / + /usr.

 rsync -a? /mnt/gentoo/oldusr/ /mnt/gentoo/usr/

 Are the trailing slashes required/important/necessary?

The first trailing slash (oldusr/) is important.  Without it, you would
be creating the directory /mnt/gentoo/usr/oldusr.  With it (as you
wrote) just the contents of /oldusr are copied not the directory itself.
So yes you want that slash.

I don't believe the 2nd trailing / (usr/) is needed, but doesn't hurt.
The rsync man page shows both uses and I don't see any words saying
anything about the difference.  I must say I never noticed the two
different uses in the man page can't remember what I used.  But again, I
believe the results are the same.

 Which arguments should I use?

Discussed above

 5. Edit /etc/fstab and comment/remove the /usr line

 nano -wc /mnt/gentoo/etc/fstab

 #/dev/vg/usr   /usrreiserfsnoatime 0 0

 6. Unmount mounted filesystems

 umount /mnt/gentoo/oldusr
 umount /mnt/gentoo

 7. Reboot into new system

 Done?

 I'm pretty sure that:

 1. There is no need to chroot into the real system during this process,

 and

 2. I only need to mount / and the old /usr, no need to mount anything
else (/proc, /sys, /var, /home, activating swap, etc)

 Correct?

Both of these seem correct to me.

Good luck!

allan



Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Tanstaafl

On 2013-12-02 11:26 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:

On Mon, Dec 02 2013, tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:

So, here's the plan, please check me...

1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD

2. Mount / and create new /usr directory



I am missing something.  I would have thought your old / (dev/sda3)
already has an empty /usr directory where you previously mounted
/dev/vg/usr


Hmmm... I guess you're right, although I guess I'd have realized that as 
soon as I mounted / to /mnt/gentoo and did an ls...



4. Copy /oldusr to /usr



This suggests that your current root (dev/sda3) is big enough to
include the previous /usr (dev/vg/usr).


Yep, plenty of room...

Are you saying you went through this too?

Hopefully a few others will chime in with more on the exact rsync 
arguments I should use...


Thanks Allan... :)



[gentoo-user] Help to upgrade perl?

2013-12-02 Thread Michael Higgins
Hey, all --

I have two systems, one of which got perl 5.16.1, somehow. My other
system is still at perl 5.12... and I'm having a heck of a time trying
to upgrade that system to 5.16.1.

Is there some trick that I should recall? 

This is what I tried:

 USE=-build emerge -v =dev-lang/perl-5.16.1

And this is what I got:

  (dev-lang/perl-5.12.4-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
~dev-lang/perl-5.12.4 required by
  (virtual/perl-i18n-langtags-0.35::gentoo, installed)

  (dev-lang/perl-5.16.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in
  by =dev-lang/perl-5.16.1
=dev-lang/perl-5.16 required by
  (dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL-1.840.0::gentoo, installed)
  =dev-lang/perl-5.16* required by
  (virtual/perl-digest-base-1.170.0-r1::gentoo, installed) (and 144
  more with the same problems)

144 more with the same problem? There must be some incantation that
handles all that, no?

Thanks for any pointers, foax!

Cheers,

- Michael Higgins




Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Thanasis
on 12/02/2013 04:02 PM Tanstaafl wrote the following:
 
 So, here's the plan, please check me...
 
 1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD

If you boot a different system to do the rsync, or, if you do it over
ssh, add the option --numeric-ids

I usually do
rsync -aHvxW --numeric-ids --delete sourcedit/ targetdir/




Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Tanstaafl

On 2013-12-02 1:47 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:

on 12/02/2013 04:02 PM Tanstaafl wrote the following:


So, here's the plan, please check me...

1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD


If you boot a different system to do the rsync, or, if you do it over
ssh, add the option --numeric-ids


Thanks, but no, like I said, I'll just boot that system to a LiveDVD and 
do it from there...


So, I guess my main question is...

Would it hurt anything to use all of the args:

ie... -apogsvxAHPX

I guess I may be overthinking this (again)...



[gentoo-user] Tinkerforge Software

2013-12-02 Thread Stefan G. Weichinger

has anyone maybe already written ebuilds for brickd and brickv for
accessing tinkerforge hardware?

http://www.tinkerforge.com/en/doc/index.html#software

I managed to get brickd running here but so far no success with brickv.

Planning to run that with Nagios ...

Greets, Stefan



Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Poison BL.
An alternative to booting to external media, etc, would be a bind
mount of / and /usr on separate temporary mount points, then dumping
the data between them, leaving the existing system chugging along. A
re-mount of the current /usr in -o ro mode might not be a terrible
idea in that case. I had a good bit of luck going that route. A simple
cp -a did the trick on the one system I've bothered with it on so
far. I have a couple laptops that're rushing headlong into unsupported
land right now though, so I'll be revisiting this soon enough.

As for specifics:

# Make the temporary working areas
mkdir /tmp/a; mkdir /tmp/b
# Make sure nothing changes in /usr while the copy is done
mount -o remount,ro /usr
# Mount a mirror of the source and destination filesystems
mount --bind /usr/ /tmp/a
mount --bind / /tmp/b
# And now, copy.
cd /tmp/a
cp -a ./ /tmp/b/usr/

The one big point of what not to do would be mount --rbind. Very
important (recursive bind would have the current /usr still visible in
/tmp/b/usr/).

After all that, comment out /usr in fstab and reboot. You *could* even
just drop to a minimal runlevel that doesn't require /usr, unmount the
old one and then jump back to your standard runlevel, but due to the
reasons this is required now, I'm not entirely sure that option exists
anymore (i.e. too much is dependent on /usr).

That said, if you are booting to a LiveDVD --

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
 On 2013-12-02 1:47 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:

 on 12/02/2013 04:02 PM Tanstaafl wrote the following:


 So, here's the plan, please check me...

 1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD


 If you boot a different system to do the rsync, or, if you do it over
 ssh, add the option --numeric-ids


 Thanks, but no, like I said, I'll just boot that system to a LiveDVD and do
 it from there...

That actually does fall under boot a different system since the
users won't line up between a LiveDVD and your actual system.

-- 
Poison [BLX]
Joshua M. Murphy



Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Tanstaafl

On 2013-12-02 2:25 PM, Poison BL. poiso...@gmail.com wrote:

An alternative to booting to external media, etc, would be a bind
mount of / and /usr on separate temporary mount points, then dumping
the data between them, leaving the existing system chugging along. A
re-mount of the current /usr in -o ro mode might not be a terrible
idea in that case.


snip

Not comfortable doing that on a productions server at all... but thanks 
anyway... :)



That said, if you are booting to a LiveDVD --

On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:

Thanks, but no, like I said, I'll just boot that system to a LiveDVD and do
it from there...



That actually does fall under boot a different system since the
users won't line up between a LiveDVD and your actual system.


Hmmm, ok, but if I chroot'd into the system (ie, like I might do if I 
had an interrupted install, and wanted to pick it back up), that would 
solve that?


Or, I could just figure out the right rsync arguments to use... ;)

I just asked on the rsync list too, maybe someone there will chime in 
with a little more confidence...




Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Thanasis
on 12/02/2013 08:58 PM Tanstaafl wrote the following:
 On 2013-12-02 1:47 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
 on 12/02/2013 04:02 PM Tanstaafl wrote the following:

 So, here's the plan, please check me...

 1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD

 If you boot a different system to do the rsync, or, if you do it over
 ssh, add the option --numeric-ids
 
 Thanks, but no, like I said, I'll just boot that system to a LiveDVD and
 do it from there...

Are you sure the user IDs of the LiveDVD are the same as the other
system's users' IDs?
That is why I recommend using the option --numeric-ids.
And using it would not hurt anyway.



Re: [gentoo-user] Help to upgrade perl?

2013-12-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 02/12/2013 19:41, Michael Higgins wrote:
 Hey, all --
 
 I have two systems, one of which got perl 5.16.1, somehow. My other
 system is still at perl 5.12... and I'm having a heck of a time trying
 to upgrade that system to 5.16.1.
 
 Is there some trick that I should recall? 
 
 This is what I tried:
 
  USE=-build emerge -v =dev-lang/perl-5.16.1
 
 And this is what I got:
 
   (dev-lang/perl-5.12.4-r1::gentoo, installed) pulled in by
 ~dev-lang/perl-5.12.4 required by
   (virtual/perl-i18n-langtags-0.35::gentoo, installed)
 
   (dev-lang/perl-5.16.1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in
   by =dev-lang/perl-5.16.1
 =dev-lang/perl-5.16 required by
   (dev-perl/IO-Socket-SSL-1.840.0::gentoo, installed)
   =dev-lang/perl-5.16* required by
   (virtual/perl-digest-base-1.170.0-r1::gentoo, installed) (and 144
   more with the same problems)
 
 144 more with the same problem? There must be some incantation that
 handles all that, no?
 
 Thanks for any pointers, foax!
 
 Cheers,
 
 - Michael Higgins
 
 
 
 

emerge -avuND world

Why 5.16.1? that is the lowest version that is ~arch; your next sync and
update is going to want to upgrade it anyway.

Lots of things have been moving around in perl land, modules moving into
core etc etc. A proper world update takes care of all the necessary
blockers.

Or, seeing as you are going to remerge everything perl related anyway,
you might as well just undelete everything perl-related (keeping an
accurate list), and then merge the whole lot back



-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com




Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Tanstaafl

On 2013-12-02 2:41 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:

on 12/02/2013 08:58 PM Tanstaafl wrote the following:

On 2013-12-02 1:47 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:

on 12/02/2013 04:02 PM Tanstaafl wrote the following:


So, here's the plan, please check me...

1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD


If you boot a different system to do the rsync, or, if you do it over
ssh, add the option --numeric-ids


Thanks, but no, like I said, I'll just boot that system to a LiveDVD and
do it from there...


Are you sure the user IDs of the LiveDVD are the same as the other
system's users' IDs?
That is why I recommend using the option --numeric-ids.
And using it would not hurt anyway.


Right... poison pointed this out...

This is why I asked for help about the arguments.

I honestly don't care about superflous/unnecessary arguments, I just 
want to make sure I use at least the ones needed for this to work.


Thanks...



Re: [gentoo-user] Help to upgrade perl? [SOLVED]

2013-12-02 Thread Michael Higgins
On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 22:24:35 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:

 emerge -avuND world

/me slaps forehead.

Of course. :(

 
 Why 5.16.1? that is the lowest version that is ~arch; your next sync
 and update is going to want to upgrade it anyway.

Ah, well, I'm not running ~arch anywhere and so not sure why my public
server got 5.16.1 to begin. So, I'm just updating the development
machine to match.

 
 Lots of things have been moving around in perl land, modules moving
 into core etc etc. A proper world update takes care of all the
 necessary blockers.

Yes. Perl surely is a PITA for the distro to maintain.

 
 Or, seeing as you are going to remerge everything perl related anyway,
 you might as well just undelete everything perl-related (keeping an
 accurate list), and then merge the whole lot back

This kind of on-the-side bookkeeping is exactly what I'm trying to
avoid. But I do get your point. ;-)

Looks like I'm good to go, as perl is updating and perl-cleaner --all
after the fact should be fine, I'm guessing. And if not, I know what
I'm in for, mostly.

Thanks!

Cheers,

- Michael





Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Mick
On Monday 02 Dec 2013 20:40:28 Tanstaafl wrote:
 On 2013-12-02 2:41 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:

  That is why I recommend using the option --numeric-ids.
  And using it would not hurt anyway.
 
 Right... poison pointed this out...
 
 This is why I asked for help about the arguments.
 
 I honestly don't care about superflous/unnecessary arguments, I just
 want to make sure I use at least the ones needed for this to work.
 
 Thanks...

The comment about --numeric-ids that Thanasis made is valid.  I messed up some 
fs of mine last time I used rsync, when I wasn't paying much attention!  I 
made a mental note to always use it in the future.  On the other hand, if 
you're not that comfortable with it, a quick trial run with a test filesystem 
will offer some assurance that your chosen command and options will work as 
you intended.  BTW, you do not *have* to use rsync:

  cp -a

will do the same.

  su -
  cd /old_usr
  tar --one-file-system -cf . | (cd /new_usr ; tar -xvpf - )

will also do the same.

Finally, star -copy is my favourite faster alternative to copying directories, 
inc. respecting any acl's and the like if you specify it in the options:

  su -
  star -copy options -C /old_usr . /new_usr

Then you can also add -diff to see if any file was not copied correctly (use 
star diffopts=!option to exclude things like ctime, or you'll drown in the 
noise of the output).


Speaking from experience I suggest that you do not blast your old /usr away 
until you have booted with /usr mounted in the new location and have verified 
that ownership and access rights are as you expected.

-- 
Regards,
Mick


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread William Kenworthy
You are looking far too deep 

just rsync -avP to /newusr
reboot to livecd
rsync again with --delete to update ... takes a only few seconds this
time - minimal downtime :)
mv /usr /oldusr
mv /newusr /usr
reboot

The --numeric-ids is a good idea but I've made my systems consistent
with the standard gentoo id's so that's no longer a problem.

Ive done this many times over the years, and to the system I am writing
this on many times (moving to lvm2, restoring from backups after disk
failures, restoring from backups after user failure - rm -rf /usr !)

If you need to practice, run up a vm and test/destroy :)

You have got the disk space, so if you have a backup its reversible so
don't be a wimp :)

BillK




On 03/12/13 05:36, Mick wrote:
 On Monday 02 Dec 2013 20:40:28 Tanstaafl wrote:
 On 2013-12-02 2:41 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
 
 That is why I recommend using the option --numeric-ids.
 And using it would not hurt anyway.

 Right... poison pointed this out...

 This is why I asked for help about the arguments.

 I honestly don't care about superflous/unnecessary arguments, I just
 want to make sure I use at least the ones needed for this to work.

 Thanks...
 
 The comment about --numeric-ids that Thanasis made is valid.  I messed up 
 some 
 fs of mine last time I used rsync, when I wasn't paying much attention!  I 
 made a mental note to always use it in the future.  On the other hand, if 
 you're not that comfortable with it, a quick trial run with a test filesystem 
 will offer some assurance that your chosen command and options will work as 
 you intended.  BTW, you do not *have* to use rsync:
 
   cp -a
 
 will do the same.
 
   su -
   cd /old_usr
   tar --one-file-system -cf . | (cd /new_usr ; tar -xvpf - )
 
 will also do the same.
 
 Finally, star -copy is my favourite faster alternative to copying 
 directories, 
 inc. respecting any acl's and the like if you specify it in the options:
 
   su -
   star -copy options -C /old_usr . /new_usr
 
 Then you can also add -diff to see if any file was not copied correctly (use 
 star diffopts=!option to exclude things like ctime, or you'll drown in the 
 noise of the output).
 
 
 Speaking from experience I suggest that you do not blast your old /usr away 
 until you have booted with /usr mounted in the new location and have verified 
 that ownership and access rights are as you expected.
 




Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread gottlieb
On Mon, Dec 02 2013, tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:

 On 2013-12-02 11:26 AM, gottl...@nyu.edu gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
 On Mon, Dec 02 2013, tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
 So, here's the plan, please check me...

 1. Boot off of the latest gentoo LiveDVD

 2. Mount / and create new /usr directory

 I am missing something.  I would have thought your old / (dev/sda3)
 already has an empty /usr directory where you previously mounted
 /dev/vg/usr

 Hmmm... I guess you're right, although I guess I'd have realized that
 as soon as I mounted / to /mnt/gentoo and did an ls...

 4. Copy /oldusr to /usr

 This suggests that your current root (dev/sda3) is big enough to
 include the previous /usr (dev/vg/usr).

 Yep, plenty of room...

 Are you saying you went through this too?

Yes I did, but did not have the room to simply stick /usr into /.
Like you I had lvm.

 Hopefully a few others will chime in with more on the exact rsync
 arguments I should use...

 Thanks Allan... :)

My pleasure.
allan



Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 06:24:43 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote:

 You have got the disk space, so if you have a backup its reversible so
 don't be a wimp :)

It's reversible even if there is no backup, because data it copied
from /usr to /, not moved. If the new /usr doesn't work for any reason,
just mount the old one on it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth.
 (Albert Einstein)


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Jc García
2013/12/2 William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au

 You are looking far too deep 


 just rsync -avP to /newusr

+1
I have done this more or less the same way

 reboot to livecd

 rsync again with --delete to update ... takes a only few seconds this
 time - minimal downtime :)
 mv /usr /oldusr
 mv /newusr /usr
 reboot


Let's make this thread more interesting, would it be possible to do
this without a reboot? ie: going single user mode, kill anything that
might still be running from usr,  umount /usr, mount it to /mnt, rsync
-avP to usr, going again into runlevel 3 or 5.
Obviously not possible if running systemd.


 The --numeric-ids is a good idea but I've made my systems consistent
 with the standard gentoo id's so that's no longer a problem.

 Ive done this many times over the years, and to the system I am writing
 this on many times (moving to lvm2, restoring from backups after disk
 failures, restoring from backups after user failure - rm -rf /usr !)

 If you need to practice, run up a vm and test/destroy :)

 You have got the disk space, so if you have a backup its reversible so
 don't be a wimp :)

 BillK




 On 03/12/13 05:36, Mick wrote:
  On Monday 02 Dec 2013 20:40:28 Tanstaafl wrote:
  On 2013-12-02 2:41 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
 
  That is why I recommend using the option --numeric-ids.
  And using it would not hurt anyway.
 
  Right... poison pointed this out...
 
  This is why I asked for help about the arguments.
 
  I honestly don't care about superflous/unnecessary arguments, I just
  want to make sure I use at least the ones needed for this to work.
 
  Thanks...
 
  The comment about --numeric-ids that Thanasis made is valid.  I messed up 
  some
  fs of mine last time I used rsync, when I wasn't paying much attention!  I
  made a mental note to always use it in the future.  On the other hand, if
  you're not that comfortable with it, a quick trial run with a test 
  filesystem
  will offer some assurance that your chosen command and options will work as
  you intended.  BTW, you do not *have* to use rsync:
 
cp -a
 
  will do the same.
 
su -
cd /old_usr
tar --one-file-system -cf . | (cd /new_usr ; tar -xvpf - )
 
  will also do the same.
 
  Finally, star -copy is my favourite faster alternative to copying 
  directories,
  inc. respecting any acl's and the like if you specify it in the options:
 
su -
star -copy options -C /old_usr . /new_usr
 
  Then you can also add -diff to see if any file was not copied correctly (use
  star diffopts=!option to exclude things like ctime, or you'll drown in the
  noise of the output).
 
 
  Speaking from experience I suggest that you do not blast your old /usr away
  until you have booted with /usr mounted in the new location and have 
  verified
  that ownership and access rights are as you expected.
 



PD: sorry if my english is not so good



Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread William Kenworthy
On 03/12/13 12:34, Jc García wrote:
 2013/12/2 William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au
 You are looking far too deep 


 just rsync -avP to /newusr
 +1
 I have done this more or less the same way
 reboot to livecd

 rsync again with --delete to update ... takes a only few seconds this
 time - minimal downtime :)
 mv /usr /oldusr
 mv /newusr /usr
 reboot

 Let's make this thread more interesting, would it be possible to do
 this without a reboot? ie: going single user mode, kill anything that
 might still be running from usr,  umount /usr, mount it to /mnt, rsync
 -avP to usr, going again into runlevel 3 or 5.
 Obviously not possible if running systemd.

I did try it single user mode - it works but I rebooted when the
pressure came off just in case.  Wanted minimal downtime.

BillK





Re: [gentoo-user] Merging separate /usr back into / - one last time...

2013-12-02 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Jc García jyo.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
 2013/12/2 William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au

 You are looking far too deep 


 just rsync -avP to /newusr

 +1
 I have done this more or less the same way

 reboot to livecd

 rsync again with --delete to update ... takes a only few seconds this
 time - minimal downtime :)
 mv /usr /oldusr
 mv /newusr /usr
 reboot


 Let's make this thread more interesting, would it be possible to do
 this without a reboot? ie: going single user mode, kill anything that
 might still be running from usr,  umount /usr, mount it to /mnt, rsync
 -avP to usr, going again into runlevel 3 or 5.
 Obviously not possible if running systemd.

I'm not so sure it's not possible. Perhaps it's even easier.

If you do systemctl isolate emergency.target then remount /
read/write, do the move, and then again isolate multi-user.target or
graphical.target, I think is possible. I will try on a virtual
machine; is an interesting question. You would need to use absolute
pathnames when actually performing the move, but I think is possible.

Regards.
-- 
Canek Peláez Valdés
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México