[gentoo-user] config file '/etc/mtab' needs updating

2023-04-10 Thread thelma

After update I get:
* IMPORTANT: config file '/etc/mtab' needs updating.

What is this, don't remember seeing it before.

cfg-update -u
doesn't give me an option to view it.




Re: [gentoo-user] X not starting after kernel upgrade

2023-04-10 Thread Matt Connell
On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 15:53 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is: make oldconfig  same as: make olddefconfig ?

No.  olddefconfig accepts the default answer for each new configuration
item, non-interactively.  oldconfig is interactive.

I can't really give you guidance with your original problem though.



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread jul...@jroy.ca
On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 22:10 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 4/10/23 18:53, Dale wrote:
> 
> 
> I've asked ChatGPT for explanation and here is what I got:
> 
> Here are the differences between emerge -U and emerge -N:
> 
> emerge -U: This option upgrades the specified package(s) to the
> latest available version. It will first download the new version,
> then build and install it. If a dependency of the package being
> upgraded also needs to be upgraded, it will also be upgraded.
> 
> emerge -N: This option installs the specified package(s) without
> upgrading any dependencies. It will only download and install the
> package(s) if they are not already installed. If any dependencies of
> the package(s) are not already installed, the command will fail.
> 
> In other words, emerge -U upgrades packages and their dependencies,
> while emerge -N only installs packages without upgrading any
> dependencies.
> 

This is a good example of why ChatGPT cannot be trusted.
When ChatGPT doesn't know the answer to something, rather than saying
it doesn't know the answer, it just makes it up.

The difference between -U and -N as explained by ChatGPT is wrong; in
fact, it has nothing to do with dependencies.

To have a truthful answer, let's not ask ChatGPT and instead look at
`man 5 emerge`:

--newuse, -N
Tells emerge  to include installed packages  where USE
flags have changed since compilation. This option also
implies the --selective option.  USE flag changes
include:

A USE flag  was added to a package.  A  USE flag was
removed from a package.  A USE flag  was
turned on for
a package.  A USE flag was turned off for a package.

--changed-use, -U
Tells emerge  to include installed packages  where USE
flags have changed  since installation.  This option 
also implies the --selective  option. Unlike --newuse,
the --changed-use option does  not trigger
reinstallation when  flags that the user has not
enabled are added orremoved.

In a nutshell, `--newuse` or `-N` rebuilds packages when USE flags have
changed, regardless of whether the changed USE flags affect the outcome
Where as `--changed-use` or `-U` rebuilds packages when the USE flags
have changed, AND the changed USE flags affect the outcome.

For example, suppose you are on an openRC system, and a package
introduces a new `systemd` USE flag;
With `-N`: this package will be rebuilt with `-systemd`
With `-U`: this package will not be rebuilt

-- 
Julien


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread thelma

On 4/10/23 18:53, Dale wrote:

the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N

I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U
might be better option but it takes longer.
Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.

.




I always do both except I use the lower case 'u'.  I started using
Gentoo back in 2003.  Over the years, I added/changed options to emerge
until I got a good sane system that works as expected and is stable.  My
command is emerge -auDN world and it has worked for years.  One
difference, I update once a week and on occasion two weeks if I have
something going on and need to wait.  I'd think tho, if one goes a long
time between updates, my way would result in a longer compile time but
also a system that is more stable or clean.

Everyone has their own way.  If what a person does is working, by all
means do it that way.  I picked my way because of problems I ran into.
The solutions to those problems resulted in the command I use.  If one
waits a long time between updates, more packages will have updated and
result in more updates regardless of the options.  In that case, any USE
changes would apply to those packages anyway.  If one updates often, as
I do, then the way I do it may have benefits and result in a more stable
system, even tho it requires more packages to compile.

Hope that helps.

Dale

:-)  :-)


I've asked ChatGPT for explanation and here is what I got:

Here are the differences between emerge -U and emerge -N:

emerge -U: This option upgrades the specified package(s) to the latest 
available version. It will first download the new version, then build and 
install it. If a dependency of the package being upgraded also needs to be 
upgraded, it will also be upgraded.

emerge -N: This option installs the specified package(s) without upgrading any 
dependencies. It will only download and install the package(s) if they are not 
already installed. If any dependencies of the package(s) are not already 
installed, the command will fail.

In other words, emerge -U upgrades packages and their dependencies, while 
emerge -N only installs packages without upgrading any dependencies.




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread Dale
Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2023-04-11, Dale  wrote:
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
>> I always do both except I use the lower case 'u'. I started using
>> Gentoo back in 2003.  Over the years, I added/changed options to emerge
>> until I got a good sane system that works as expected and is stable. My
>> command is emerge -auDN world and it has worked for years.
> Once upon a time, a little over 20 years ago, I did some studying, and
> I searched mailing lists postings for recommendations, and I settled
> on
>
>   emerge -auvND 
>
> I've been using that ever since on a handful of machines. I'd have to
> spend a few minutes reading the man page to remember the significance
> of a couple of the flags, but I note that differs only in verbosity
> from Dale's usage.
>
> --
> Grant

I need to add something.  I always forget the default options I have in
make.conf.  This is the options I put in there.

EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps y --backtrack=500 --keep-going -v
--quiet-build=y -1 --unordered-display --jobs=6 --load-average 8"

I added with-bdeps ages ago to correct some issues.  After I had to use
it a few times to fix issues, I added it to the default.  I used to have
backtrack set to 100.  After a while 100 just didn't allow it to go deep
enough.  I tried higher settings until I reached 500.  I don't recall
ever having to increase it manually since.  The -1 keeps my world file
clean.  If I want to add something to the world file, I use the --select
y option to bypass it.  The others are pretty obvious and are more of a
personal preference or based on my CPU etc. 

I might add, it is rare that emerge can't find a path to do updates. 
Other than known bugs, it's also rare that I have problems with things
not working with software, unless it is me doing something wrong of
course.  :/

Hope this helps, someone at least. 

Dale

:-)  :-) 



[gentoo-user] Re: emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread Grant Edwards
On 2023-04-11, Dale  wrote:
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
>
> I always do both except I use the lower case 'u'. I started using
> Gentoo back in 2003.  Over the years, I added/changed options to emerge
> until I got a good sane system that works as expected and is stable. My
> command is emerge -auDN world and it has worked for years.

Once upon a time, a little over 20 years ago, I did some studying, and
I searched mailing lists postings for recommendations, and I settled
on

  emerge -auvND 

I've been using that ever since on a handful of machines. I'd have to
spend a few minutes reading the man page to remember the significance
of a couple of the flags, but I note that differs only in verbosity
from Dale's usage.

--
Grant






Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread Dale
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
>
> I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U
> might be better option but it takes longer.
> Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.
>
> .
>


I always do both except I use the lower case 'u'.  I started using
Gentoo back in 2003.  Over the years, I added/changed options to emerge
until I got a good sane system that works as expected and is stable.  My
command is emerge -auDN world and it has worked for years.  One
difference, I update once a week and on occasion two weeks if I have
something going on and need to wait.  I'd think tho, if one goes a long
time between updates, my way would result in a longer compile time but
also a system that is more stable or clean. 

Everyone has their own way.  If what a person does is working, by all
means do it that way.  I picked my way because of problems I ran into. 
The solutions to those problems resulted in the command I use.  If one
waits a long time between updates, more packages will have updated and
result in more updates regardless of the options.  In that case, any USE
changes would apply to those packages anyway.  If one updates often, as
I do, then the way I do it may have benefits and result in a more stable
system, even tho it requires more packages to compile. 

Hope that helps.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



Re: [gentoo-user] X not starting after kernel upgrade

2023-04-10 Thread thelma

On 4/10/23 17:29, Jack wrote:

On 2023.04.10 18:22, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

On 4/10/23 15:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.

Is: make oldconfig  same as: make olddefconfig ?

Xorg.0.log showing;

[   673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so
[   673.829] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.829] compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.0.17
[   673.829] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.829] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "nv"
[   673.829] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nv
[   673.829] (EE) Failed to load module "nv" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so
[   673.830] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.830] compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.21.1
[   673.830] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.830] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module fbdev
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "vesa"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module vesa
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver
[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families :
[   673.830] RIVA TNT    (NV04)
[   673.830] RIVA TNT2   (NV05)
[   673.830] GeForce 256 (NV10)
[   673.830] GeForce 2   (NV11, NV15)
[   673.830] GeForce 4MX (NV17, NV18)
[   673.830] GeForce 3   (NV20)
[   673.830] GeForce 4Ti (NV25, NV28)
[   673.830] GeForce FX  (NV3x)
[   673.830] GeForce 6   (NV4x)
[   673.830] GeForce 7   (G7x)
[   673.830] GeForce 8   (G8x)
[   673.830] GeForce 9   (G9x)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 2xx/3xx (GT2xx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 4xx/5xx (GFxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 6xx/7xx (GKxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 9xx (GMxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 10xx    (GPxxx)
[   673.830] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms
[   673.831] (EE) [drm] Failed to open DRM device for pci::01:00.0: -19
[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting
[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
[   673.831] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
[   673.831] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.831] (EE) Device(s) detected, but none match those in the config file.
[   673.831] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[   673.831] (EE) no screens found(EE)

This is an old system and is using:  GeForce GTS 450


Does the newest kernel: linux-6.1.19-gentoo
supports my old  GeForce GTS 450 card?

grep KMS .config
CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y
CONFIG_DRM=y


I don't recall anything about the kernel that has to match the video card - 
it's the video driver for X, but if you're using Nouveau, I wouldn't expect a 
problem.  I know the current nVidia driver is often not ready for the latest 
kernel, but I don't think that's your problem.  Have you recompiled 
xv86-video-nouveau after installing the new kernel?  Are there any relevant 
errors in dmesg?



I think the problem is with latest kernel linux-6.1.19-gentoo
I'm using Nvidia dirver;  x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-390.157

and after compiling the driver on this kernel I was getting a message notice:
WARN: setup
Detected potential configuration issues with used kernel:
  CONFIG_FB_SIMPLE: is set, recommended to disable and switch to FB_EFI or
FB_VESA as it currently may be broken with >=kernel-5.18.13 + NVIDIA:
https://github.com/NVIDIA/open-gpu-kernel-modules/issues/341
(feel free to ignore this if it works for you)

I downgraded the kerenl to: linux-5.15.102-gentoo
and X is booting OK.

message after recompiling Nvida driver:
WARN: postinst

Be warned/reminded that the 390.xx branch reached end-of-life and
NVIDIA is no longer fixing issues (including security). Free to keep
using (for now) but it is recommended to either switch to nouveau or
replace hardware. Will be kept in-tree while possible, but expect it
to be removed likely in early 2027 or earlier if major issues arise.






Re: [gentoo-user] X not starting after kernel upgrade

2023-04-10 Thread Jack

On 2023.04.10 18:22, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

On 4/10/23 15:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.

Is: make oldconfig  same as: make olddefconfig ?

Xorg.0.log showing;

[   673.829] (II) Loading  
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so

[   673.829] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.829] compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.0.17
[   673.829] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.829] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "nv"
[   673.829] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nv
[   673.829] (EE) Failed to load module "nv" (module does not exist,  
0)

[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.829] (II) Loading  
/usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so

[   673.830] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.830] compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.21.1
[   673.830] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.830] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module fbdev
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not  
exist, 0)

[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "vesa"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module vesa
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not  
exist, 0)

[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver
[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families :
[   673.830] RIVA TNT    (NV04)
[   673.830] RIVA TNT2   (NV05)
[   673.830] GeForce 256 (NV10)
[   673.830] GeForce 2   (NV11, NV15)
[   673.830] GeForce 4MX (NV17, NV18)
[   673.830] GeForce 3   (NV20)
[   673.830] GeForce 4Ti (NV25, NV28)
[   673.830] GeForce FX  (NV3x)
[   673.830] GeForce 6   (NV4x)
[   673.830] GeForce 7   (G7x)
[   673.830] GeForce 8   (G8x)
[   673.830] GeForce 9   (G9x)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 2xx/3xx (GT2xx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 4xx/5xx (GFxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 6xx/7xx (GKxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 9xx (GMxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 10xx    (GPxxx)
[   673.830] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel  
Drivers: kms
[   673.831] (EE) [drm] Failed to open DRM device for  
pci::01:00.0: -19

[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting
[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no  
multi-card support
[   673.831] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config  
section.

[   673.831] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.831] (EE) Device(s) detected, but none match those in the  
config file.

[   673.831] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[   673.831] (EE) no screens found(EE)

This is an old system and is using:  GeForce GTS 450


Does the newest kernel: linux-6.1.19-gentoo
supports my old  GeForce GTS 450 card?

grep KMS .config
CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y
CONFIG_DRM=y

I don't recall anything about the kernel that has to match the video  
card - it's the video driver for X, but if you're using Nouveau, I  
wouldn't expect a problem.  I know the current nVidia driver is often  
not ready for the latest kernel, but I don't think that's your  
problem.  Have you recompiled xv86-video-nouveau after installing the  
new kernel?  Are there any relevant errors in dmesg?




Re: [gentoo-user] X not starting after kernel upgrade

2023-04-10 Thread thelma

On 4/10/23 15:53, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.

Is: make oldconfig  same as: make olddefconfig ?

Xorg.0.log showing;

[   673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so
[   673.829] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.829] compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.0.17
[   673.829] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.829] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "nv"
[   673.829] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nv
[   673.829] (EE) Failed to load module "nv" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so
[   673.830] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.830] compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.21.1
[   673.830] Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.830] ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module fbdev
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "vesa"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module vesa
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver
[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families :
[   673.830] RIVA TNT    (NV04)
[   673.830] RIVA TNT2   (NV05)
[   673.830] GeForce 256 (NV10)
[   673.830] GeForce 2   (NV11, NV15)
[   673.830] GeForce 4MX (NV17, NV18)
[   673.830] GeForce 3   (NV20)
[   673.830] GeForce 4Ti (NV25, NV28)
[   673.830] GeForce FX  (NV3x)
[   673.830] GeForce 6   (NV4x)
[   673.830] GeForce 7   (G7x)
[   673.830] GeForce 8   (G8x)
[   673.830] GeForce 9   (G9x)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 2xx/3xx (GT2xx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 4xx/5xx (GFxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 6xx/7xx (GKxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 9xx (GMxxx)
[   673.830] GeForce GTX 10xx    (GPxxx)
[   673.830] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms
[   673.831] (EE) [drm] Failed to open DRM device for pci::01:00.0: -19
[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting
[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
[   673.831] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
[   673.831] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.831] (EE) Device(s) detected, but none match those in the config file.
[   673.831] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[   673.831] (EE) no screens found(EE)

This is an old system and is using:  GeForce GTS 450


Does the newest kernel: linux-6.1.19-gentoo
supports my old  GeForce GTS 450 card?

grep KMS .config
CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y
CONFIG_DRM=y




[gentoo-user] X not starting after kernel upgrade

2023-04-10 Thread thelma

After upgrading to newest kernel the X will not start.

Is: make oldconfig  same as: make olddefconfig ?

Xorg.0.log showing;

[   673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/nouveau_drv.so
[   673.829] (II) Module nouveau: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.829]compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.0.17
[   673.829]Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.829]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "nv"
[   673.829] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module nv
[   673.829] (EE) Failed to load module "nv" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.829] (II) LoadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.829] (II) Loading /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers/modesetting_drv.so
[   673.830] (II) Module modesetting: vendor="X.Org Foundation"
[   673.830]compiled for 1.21.1.8, module version = 1.21.1
[   673.830]Module class: X.Org Video Driver
[   673.830]ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 25.2
[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "fbdev"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module fbdev
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "fbdev" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.830] (II) LoadModule: "vesa"
[   673.830] (WW) Warning, couldn't open module vesa
[   673.830] (EE) Failed to load module "vesa" (module does not exist, 0)
[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver
[   673.830] (II) NOUVEAU driver for NVIDIA chipset families :
[   673.830]RIVA TNT(NV04)
[   673.830]RIVA TNT2   (NV05)
[   673.830]GeForce 256 (NV10)
[   673.830]GeForce 2   (NV11, NV15)
[   673.830]GeForce 4MX (NV17, NV18)
[   673.830]GeForce 3   (NV20)
[   673.830]GeForce 4Ti (NV25, NV28)
[   673.830]GeForce FX  (NV3x)
[   673.830]GeForce 6   (NV4x)
[   673.830]GeForce 7   (G7x)
[   673.830]GeForce 8   (G8x)
[   673.830]GeForce 9   (G9x)
[   673.830]GeForce GTX 2xx/3xx (GT2xx)
[   673.830]GeForce GTX 4xx/5xx (GFxxx)
[   673.830]GeForce GTX 6xx/7xx (GKxxx)
[   673.830]GeForce GTX 9xx (GMxxx)
[   673.830]GeForce GTX 10xx(GPxxx)
[   673.830] (II) modesetting: Driver for Modesetting Kernel Drivers: kms
[   673.831] (EE) [drm] Failed to open DRM device for pci::01:00.0: -19
[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting
[   673.831] (EE) open /dev/dri/card0: No such file or directory
[   673.831] (WW) VGA arbiter: cannot open kernel arbiter, no multi-card support
[   673.831] (EE) Screen 0 deleted because of no matching config section.
[   673.831] (II) UnloadModule: "modesetting"
[   673.831] (EE) Device(s) detected, but none match those in the config file.
[   673.831] (EE)
Fatal server error:
[   673.831] (EE) no screens found(EE)

This is an old system and is using:  GeForce GTS 450

--
Thelma




[gentoo-user] Somebody deserves a medal...

2023-04-10 Thread Alan Grimes

Some hero fixed Ruby, all good atm.

Chromium still absolutely b0rk3d. All tabs spew crash dumps to disk at 
extremely high frequency, no functionality. "Error 11" not exactly same 
as signal 11, but very similar.


Seamonkey works fine for e-mail and non-multimedia pages; any multimedia 
-> segfault.


--
Beware of Zombies. =O
#EggCrisis  #BlackWinter
White is the new Kulak.
Powers are not rights.




Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread thelma

On 4/10/23 11:11, hitachi303 wrote:

Am 10.04.23 um 18:44 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:

Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N

I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be 
better option but it takes longer.
Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.



Just out of curiosity: Is that your update process for world or in which 
context do you use it? If this is your update process, with which other options 
do you combine it? 549-packages is quit a lot.


emerege -uDUavq @world

Haven't done done any updates since Dec. I think that is why.
-U came up with 549-packages
-N came up with 592-packages



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread hitachi303

Am 10.04.23 um 18:44 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:

Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N

I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U 
might be better option but it takes longer.

Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.



Just out of curiosity: Is that your update process for world or in which 
context do you use it? If this is your update process, with which other 
options do you combine it? 549-packages is quit a lot.




Re: [gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread Matt Connell
On Mon, 2023-04-10 at 10:44 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N
> 
> I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be 
> better option but it takes longer.
> Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.
> 

Since I learned the difference, I've always only done -U (--changed-
use) unless I need to change the value of some new flags.  The lynchpin
is this:

"Unlike --newuse, the --changed-use  option  does not  trigger
reinstallation when flags that the user has not en‐abled are added or
removed."

As far as "better"?  Use the option that fits your need or desire.  If
you don't care to rebuild a package when a new use flag is added, you
need not use --newuse.



[gentoo-user] emerge -U or emerge -N

2023-04-10 Thread thelma

Is it better to us emerge -U or emerge -N

I've always done -N but it didn't go very smoothly it seems to me -U might be 
better option but it takes longer.
Right now I'm doing -U and it is compiling 549-packages.



[gentoo-user] Re: Zoom calls make firefox/librewolf crash

2023-04-10 Thread Efe İzbudak
On 23/04/10 02:38AM, Efe İzbudak wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> So since this weekend whenever I try to join a zoom call, my firefox
> crashes and so does my librewolf. I've tried using both
> firefox-bin-102.9.0 and firefox-bin-111.0.1 and also
> librewolf-bin-110.0_p2.
> 
> This doesn't happen when I disable webgl.
> 
> I'm using dwl-0.4 and I'm on stable.
> 
> Does anyone have any ideas on how to solve this?
> 

For the sake of completeness, if anyone has this issue, downgrade
wayland to 1.21-0-r1 to solve it.

-- 
All the best,
Efe

The funny quote of this email is trivial and left as an exercise.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5 and net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500

2023-04-10 Thread Arve Barsnes
On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 at 22:37,  wrote:
>
> My system pulled IN two versions of webkit-gtk (slot 4 and 5)
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
>
> Running:
> equery d =net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
>   * These packages depend on net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500:
> app-office/gnucash-4.8 (net-libs/webkit-gtk:4/37)
> net-libs/libproxy-0.4.18 (webkit ? net-libs/webkit-gtk:4)
>
> equery d =net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5
>   * These packages depend on net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5:
> app-office/gnucash-4.8 (net-libs/webkit-gtk:4/37)
> net-libs/libproxy-0.4.18 (webkit ? net-libs/webkit-gtk:4)
>
> Which package is pulling IN slotted version?

It definitely seems like gnucash and libproxy are pulling in the slot
4 version? You might have other packages that don't depend on any
particular slot, and portage will then pull in the latest version,
which on a stable system is the slot 5 package. This could maybe be
considered a bug. On my system, I have one package depending on a slot
4.1 package, and one with no slot requirement, so I have both a slot
4.1 package and a slot 6 package installed. It's annoying, true.

Regards,
Arve



Re: [gentoo-user] net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5 and net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500

2023-04-10 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 9 Apr 2023 14:37:26 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:

> My system pulled IN two versions of webkit-gtk (slot 4 and 5)
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5
> net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
> 
> Running:
> equery d =net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500
>   * These packages depend on net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5-r500:
> app-office/gnucash-4.8 (net-libs/webkit-gtk:4/37)
> net-libs/libproxy-0.4.18 (webkit ? net-libs/webkit-gtk:4)
> 
> equery d =net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5
>   * These packages depend on net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.38.5:
> app-office/gnucash-4.8 (net-libs/webkit-gtk:4/37)
> net-libs/libproxy-0.4.18 (webkit ? net-libs/webkit-gtk:4)
> 
> Which package is pulling IN slotted version?

Use emerge instead of equery, it gives better, if slower, results:

emerge -cpv webkit-gtk:4
emerge -cpv webkit-gtk:5


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Q. Why do women have orgasms?
A: It gives them one extra reason to moan.



[gentoo-user] Zoom calls make firefox/librewolf crash

2023-04-10 Thread Efe İzbudak
Hi everyone,

So since this weekend whenever I try to join a zoom call, my firefox
crashes and so does my librewolf. I've tried using both
firefox-bin-102.9.0 and firefox-bin-111.0.1 and also
librewolf-bin-110.0_p2.

This doesn't happen when I disable webgl.

I'm using dwl-0.4 and I'm on stable.

Does anyone have any ideas on how to solve this?

-- 
All the best,
Efe

The funny quote of this email is trivial and left as an exercise.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature