Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 03:19:50 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:

 On Sunday, March 22, 2015 3:06:59 AM German wrote:
  On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 08:49:54 +0200
  Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
  
On Mar 22, 2015, at 8:32, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:


/sbin/poweroff says Must be a superuser :(
   
   Did you read any of the previous messages? They told you that you have to 
 have consolekit and polkit installed and configured for this to work!
  
  Yes, I've read them. However no one explianed how this has to be 
 accomplished with polkit and consolekit.
 
 You don't need those. It sounds like you somehow got both sysvinit and 
 systemd 
 installed. The message you're getting is from sysvinit. poweroff should be a 
 symlink to systemctl. Try:
 
 systemctl poweroff
 
 You may need to unmerge sysvinit and anything else related to openrc and then 
 re-emerge systemd. With systemd it should either shutdown or ask you for the 
 root password (if you're not logged in locally or there's other users logged 

Thanks, I decide to go with sudo on this one. However when I try to run it, it 
says:
Username is not in the sudoers file. Where is this file located and how can I 
add the user to it? Thanks

 in).
 
 -- 
 Fernando Rodriguez
 


-- 




Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 03:35:49 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:

 On Sunday, March 22, 2015 3:30:49 AM German wrote:
  On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 03:19:50 -0400
  Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:
  
   On Sunday, March 22, 2015 3:06:59 AM German wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 08:49:54 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 22, 2015, at 8:32, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
  /sbin/poweroff says Must be a superuser :(
 
 Did you read any of the previous messages? They told you that you 
 have 
 to 
   have consolekit and polkit installed and configured for this to work!

Yes, I've read them. However no one explianed how this has to be 
   accomplished with polkit and consolekit.
   
   You don't need those. It sounds like you somehow got both sysvinit and 
 systemd 
   installed. The message you're getting is from sysvinit. poweroff should 
   be 
 a 
   symlink to systemctl. Try:
   
   systemctl poweroff
   
   You may need to unmerge sysvinit and anything else related to openrc and 
 then 
   re-emerge systemd. With systemd it should either shutdown or ask you for 
 the 
   root password (if you're not logged in locally or there's other users 
 logged 
  
  Thanks, I decide to go with sudo on this one. However when I try to run it, 
 it says:
  Username is not in the sudoers file. Where is this file located and how 
  can 
 I add the user to it? Thanks
  
   in).
   
  
  
  
 
 See man sudo.

It is huge and my head is spinning. A simple search on the web showed that I 
had just to add one line to sudoers file.
Now I am able to poweroff with sudo.


 But the advice you're getting is for openrc (it will work until 
 something else breaks), you need to remove all openrc components and install 
 systemd properly.

Why is openRC is installed at all if I need to remove it? 

 -- 
 Fernando Rodriguez
 


-- 




Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 09:35:46 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 22, 2015, at 9:31, Fernando Rodriguez 
  frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:
  
  On Sunday, March 22, 2015 3:06:59 AM German wrote:
  On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 08:49:54 +0200
  Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
  
  On Mar 22, 2015, at 8:32, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
  /sbin/poweroff says Must be a superuser :(
  
  Did you read any of the previous messages? They told you that you have to
  have consolekit and polkit installed and configured for this to work!
  
  Yes, I've read them. However no one explianed how this has to be
  accomplished with polkit and consolekit.
  
  Actually systemd's poweroff should be on /usr/bin or /bin but if you got it 
  there you shouldn't have got the command not found error so something is 
  messed up with your system. Post the output to the folling
  
  ls -l /usr/bin/poweroff
  ls -l /bin/poweroff
  ls -l /sbin/poweroff
  ls -l /usr/sbin/poweroff
  
  Only one of them should list something and it should be a symlink to 
  systemctl.
 
 From previous messages by the OP I recall that he is using OpenRC.

Yes, as from fresh gentoo install.
 
 -- 
 -Matti


-- 




Re: [gentoo-user] RTL8192CU

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 10:26:09 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sunday 22 Mar 2015 05:19:41 German wrote:
  On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 09:01:03 +
  Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   In addidion, use modinfo to find out what parameters the particular module
   has and add these when you modprobe to switch off power management -
   which on buggy drivers tends to power down the card.
  
  Where do I have to use modinfo. Can you give an example. From my research,
  that is exactly the power management which powers down the buggy drivers,
  but I don't know what what are these module options which will prevent to
  power the card down.
 
 I don't have your NIC, but in a laptop I post this in I get:
 =
 $ modinfo iwlwifi
 filename:   /lib/modules/3.18.7-
 gentoo/kernel/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwlwifi.ko.gz
 license:GPL
 author: Copyright(c) 2003- 2014 Intel Corporation 
 i...@linux.intel.com
 version:in-tree:
 description:Intel(R) Wireless WiFi driver for Linux
 firmware:   iwlwifi-100-5.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-1000-5.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-135-6.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-105-6.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-2030-6.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-2000-6.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-5150-2.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-5000-5.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-6000g2b-6.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-6000g2a-5.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-6050-5.ucode
 firmware:   iwlwifi-6000-4.ucode
 srcversion: FDA022BCC86979326790D21
 alias:  pci:v8086d0892sv*sd0462bc*sc*i*
 [snip ...]
 
 depends:
 intree: Y
 vermagic:   3.18.7-gentoo SMP preempt mod_unload 
 parm:   swcrypto:using crypto in software (default 0 [hardware]) (int)
 parm:   11n_disable:disable 11n functionality, bitmap: 1: full, 2: 
 disable agg TX, 4: disable agg RX, 8 enable agg TX (uint)
 parm:   amsdu_size_8K:enable 8K amsdu size (default 0) (int)
 parm:   fw_restart:restart firmware in case of error (default true) 
 (bool)
 parm:   antenna_coupling:specify antenna coupling in dB (default: 0 
 dB) (int)
 parm:   wd_disable:Disable stuck queue watchdog timer 0=system 
 default, 1=disable (default: 1) (int)
 parm:   nvm_file:NVM file name (charp)
 parm:   uapsd_disable:disable U-APSD functionality (default: Y) (bool)
 parm:   bt_coex_active:enable wifi/bt co-exist (default: enable) 
 (bool)
 parm:   led_mode:0=system default, 1=On(RF On)/Off(RF Off), 
 2=blinking, 3=Off (default: 0) (int)
 parm:   power_save:enable WiFi power management (default: disable) 
 (bool)
 parm:   power_level:default power save level (range from 1 - 5, 
 default: 1) (int)
 parm:   fw_monitor:firmware monitor - to debug FW (default: false - 
 needs lots of memory) (bool)
 =
 
 So in my card I have: parm:   power_save:enable WiFi power management which 
 is by default disabled.  If I wanted to enable this parameter I would need to 
 use a boolean term, e.g. 'true', or 'on', or '1', or 'enable'.  Yours would 
 be 
 similar, but the exact parameter would be revealed when you run 'modinfo 
 your_module_name'
 
 Then call this parameter when you modprobe the module.  For example:
 
 modprobe -r your_module_name
 modprobe -v your_module_name  power_level=0
 
 Look at dmesg or syslog to see the result of your incantantion.
 
 If this solves your problem you can permanently define such a parameter in 
 your /etc/conf.d/modules.
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Mick
 
Thanks Mick, I'll take a closer look at it when I have time. Appreciate it.

-- 




Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 03:47:13 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:

 On Sunday, March 22, 2015 3:30:49 AM German wrote:
  On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 03:19:50 -0400
  Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:
  
   On Sunday, March 22, 2015 3:06:59 AM German wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 08:49:54 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 22, 2015, at 8:32, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
  /sbin/poweroff says Must be a superuser :(
 
 Did you read any of the previous messages? They told you that you 
 have 
 to 
   have consolekit and polkit installed and configured for this to work!

Yes, I've read them. However no one explianed how this has to be 
   accomplished with polkit and consolekit.
   
   You don't need those. It sounds like you somehow got both sysvinit and 
 systemd 
   installed. The message you're getting is from sysvinit. poweroff should 
   be 
 a 
   symlink to systemctl. Try:
   
   systemctl poweroff
   
   You may need to unmerge sysvinit and anything else related to openrc and 
 then 
   re-emerge systemd. With systemd it should either shutdown or ask you for 
 the 
   root password (if you're not logged in locally or there's other users 
 logged 
  
  Thanks, I decide to go with sudo on this one. However when I try to run it, 
 it says:
  Username is not in the sudoers file. Where is this file located and how 
  can 
 I add the user to it? Thanks
  
   in).
 
 Actually you never said anything about systemd so it's my bad.
 They where talking about logind and I got it messed up with another thread 
 about systemd.
 

No problem. I guess that's what happening when you try to help everyone.
 -- 
 Fernando Rodriguez
 


-- 




Re: [gentoo-user] RTL8192CU

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 09:01:03 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Saturday 21 Mar 2015 10:10:56 Neil Bothwick wrote:
  On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 06:00:24 -0400, German wrote:
Was the firmware for the driver in question installed as well?

What's the output of 'lspci -k' and 'lsusb -v' for your device?
   
   It works, so yes, firmare is installed. Module's name is rtl8192cu. It
   just drops the connection after a while, this is a problem
  
  You cannot assume that because it works, the firmware is there. The RTL
  NIC in my Asus Vivo Mini MythTV frontend complained about missing
  firmware at boot, but it still worked. Check dmesg, you may need firmware
  to fix your problems.
 
 +1
 
 In addidion, use modinfo to find out what parameters the particular module 
 has 
 and add these when you modprobe to switch off power management - which on 
 buggy drivers tends to power down the card.

Where do I have to use modinfo. Can you give an example. From my research, 
that is exactly the power management which powers down the buggy drivers, but I 
don't know what what are these module options which will prevent to power the 
card down.
 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Mick


-- 




Re: [gentoo-user] Mutt emerge USE flags for novice

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 17:28:37 -0700
Lee ny6...@gmail.com wrote:

 When I have a moment I'll send my Gmail enabled muttrc for u to ponder.
 Imap with Gmail on mutt is seamless ime.

Thanks, I'll be waiting for your .muttrc

 On Mar 21, 2015 3:42 PM, Julian Simioni jul...@simioni.org wrote:
 
  I don't currently use Mutt with Gmail, but one common suggestion is to
  use an external program like offlineimap for handling syncing. I
  remember hearing that Mutt's IMAP support is not the best.
 
  The guide I followed to get set up initially is Steve Losh's The Homely
  Mutt, it's really quite good.
 
  http://stevelosh.com/blog/2012/10/the-homely-mutt/
 
  Julian
 
  On 03/21, German wrote:
   I am about to emerge Mutt and wanted to ask community what are the
  optimal USE flags for novice. I am going to use it with gmail. I am about
  to emerge it with the following USE flags: berkdb, crypt, gdbm, nls, ssl,
  gpg, imap, mbox, pop, sasl, sidebar, smtp. If anyone feel I should add or
  remove something from USE, feel free to tell me. Thanks!
  
   --
   German gentger...@gmail.com
  
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 18:51:58 -0400
Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:

 On Saturday, March 21, 2015 4:58:42 PM German wrote:
  On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:32:25 -0400
  Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
  
   150321 German wrote:
If I run poweroff from root, the system shuts down.
When I run poweroff from user -- command not found.
How to shut down the system from user ?
   
   I'ld say Don't : it's contrary to the principles of Unix,
   which separate the roles of sysadmin (root) from those of ordinary users.
   
   To shut down, I first exit Fluxbox via its menu,
   then 'su' + root password, then alias 'down' = 'shutdown -h now'.
   That observes the proper roles + ceremonies (smile).
  
  Interesting. But as I said ealier, I can reboot the system when I am a user 
 by Ctrl+Alt+Delete. The user can reboot the system, but can't shut down? 
 Strange
   
 
 Either /sbin/poweroff or /usr/sbin/poweroff will do it from a local session 
 (if 
 there's no other users logged in locally).

/sbin/poweroff says Must be a superuser :(
 
 Like I said, /sbin is only on the search path for root by default on gentoo.
 
 -- 
 Fernando Rodriguez
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-22 Thread German
On Sun, 22 Mar 2015 08:49:54 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 22, 2015, at 8:32, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  
  /sbin/poweroff says Must be a superuser :(
 
 Did you read any of the previous messages? They told you that you have to 
 have consolekit and polkit installed and configured for this to work!

Yes, I've read them. However no one explianed how this has to be accomplished 
with polkit and consolekit.

 Also the use of sudo is another choice.

Sudo is just a package?
 
 If you want every user to be able to shutdown just run this command:
 
 chmod 6755 /sbin/poweroff
 
 -- 
 -Matti


-- 




Re: [gentoo-user] RTL8192CU

2015-03-21 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 10:36:08 +0200
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:

 Was the firmware for the driver in question installed as well?
 
 What's the output of 'lspci -k' and 'lsusb -v' for your device?

It works, so yes, firmare is installed. Module's name is rtl8192cu. It just 
drops the connection after a while, this is a problem
 
 On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 7:42 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Today I've bought a new USB wi-fi adapter which has rtl8192cu chip. I've
  plugged it into my lubuntu computer and it worked out of the box, however
  soon it drops the connection. I googled it and found out that many people
  have the same problem with this chip ( but mostly with *buntu flavours). I
  also found the workaround here: https://github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes
  This box will be soon ( I hope ) will be transferred to Gentoo. I wonder if
  some one here is using this chip with Gentoo with new kernels, does it run
  ok and if this problem of *buntu specific? Thanks
 
  --
  German gentger...@gmail.com
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] RTL-tm NICs (Was RTL8192CU)

2015-03-21 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 08:03:29 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 19, 2015, at 20:46, Ralf ralf+gen...@ramses-pyramidenbau.de wrote:
  
  Hi,
  
  I had a rtl8192ce in my laptop. Nothing but problems with Linux. Don't
  know why, but the signal strength always was much better when using Windows.
 
 I've had nothing but problems with RTL-chipsets. But if you buy ~10$ NICs 
 they just don't work like 400$ ones.
 
  No more Realtek WiFi cards for me.

Hi Matti. What about this one: 
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16833704045
I saw some recommendations on this one from people using linux

 +1
 
 -- 
 -Matti


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Mutt emerge USE flags for novice

2015-03-21 Thread German
I am about to emerge Mutt and wanted to ask community what are the optimal USE 
flags for novice. I am going to use it with gmail. I am about to emerge it with 
the following USE flags: berkdb, crypt, gdbm, nls, ssl, gpg, imap, mbox, pop, 
sasl, sidebar, smtp. If anyone feel I should add or remove something from USE, 
feel free to tell me. Thanks!

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-21 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 21:34:51 +0200
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:26 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  If I run poweroff from root, the system shuts down, however when I run
  poweroff from user -- command not found. How to shut down the system from
  user? Thanks
 
  --
  German gentger...@gmail.com
 
 
 poweroff(1) says:
 If  you're  not  the superuser, you will get the message `must be supe‐
ruser'.
 
 Either run poweroff as the superuser, or if you're running Gnome, KDE,
 XFCE, etc., you may use the shutdown option available in those desktop
 environments.

No, I am trying to shutdown from a console
 
 Others might suggest other ways of doing it.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-21 Thread German
If I run poweroff from root, the system shuts down, however when I run poweroff 
from user -- command not found. How to shut down the system from user? Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-21 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 15:47:16 -0400
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 3:39 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  No, I am trying to shutdown from a console
 
 Well, the old answer would be that you need to use sudo to run it, as
 shutting down is a privileged operation.
 
 I suspect that the new answer is that with appropriate
 policykit/consolekit/etc settings you can probably allow somebody
 sitting at a physical console to shut down the system, or any
 logged-in user if you prefer.  However, I haven't actually set that up
 myself.

Well, I am the only one sitting at the console :) Are there any key combination 
which allows that? I can reboot even if I am a user with Ctrl+Alt+Delete
 
 -- 
 Rich
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Mutt emerge USE flags for novice

2015-03-21 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 13:44:22 -0400
Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:

 150321 German wrote:
  I am about to emerge Mutt : what are the optimal USE flags for a novice ?
  I am going to use it with gmail.
 
 I've been a happy use of Mutt since c 1998 ; I don't use Gmail.
 
  I am about to emerge it with the following USE flags :
  berkdb, crypt, gdbm, nls, ssl, gpg, imap, mbox, pop, sasl, sidebar, smtp.
 
 In my system :
 
   root:518 ~ eix ^mutt$
   [I] mail-client/mutt
   Available versions:  1.5.22-r3 1.5.23-r5 ~1.5.23-r6 {berkdb crypt debug doc 
 gdbm gnutls gpg idn imap kerberos mbox nls nntp pop qdbm sasl selinux sidebar 
 slang smime smtp ssl tokyocabinet}
   Installed versions:  1.5.23-r5([2015-02-28 12:43:41])(crypt gdbm gnutls pop 
 slang smtp ssl -berkdb -debug -doc -gpg -idn -imap -kerberos -mbox -nls -nntp 
 -qdbm -sasl -selinux -sidebar -smime -tokyocabinet)
 
 HTH

Thank you, but are there anyone around who uses Mutt with gmail?
 
 -- 
 ,,
 SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
 ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
 TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Mutt emerge USE flags for novice

2015-03-21 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:33:54 +0100
Jean-Christophe Bach jc.b...@schplaf.org wrote:

 
   In my system :
   
 root:518 ~ eix ^mutt$
 [I] mail-client/mutt
 Available versions:  1.5.22-r3 1.5.23-r5 ~1.5.23-r6 {berkdb crypt debug 
   doc gdbm gnutls gpg idn imap kerberos mbox nls nntp pop qdbm sasl selinux 
   sidebar slang smime smtp ssl tokyocabinet}
 Installed versions:  1.5.23-r5([2015-02-28 12:43:41])(crypt gdbm gnutls 
   pop slang smtp ssl -berkdb -debug -doc -gpg -idn -imap -kerberos -mbox 
   -nls -nntp -qdbm -sasl -selinux -sidebar -smime -tokyocabinet)
   
   HTH
  
  Thank you, but are there anyone around who uses Mutt with gmail?
 
 Hi,
 
 In the past, I used it with gmail. I did not change any flag with or
 without gmail.
 
 My mutt flags:
 
 berkdb crypt debug doc gdbm gnutls gpg idn imap mbox nls pop sasl
 sidebar smime smtp ssl -kerberos -nntp -qdbm -selinux -slang
 -tokyocabinet
 
 I use Maildir, therefore I think mbox flag is useless.
 
 JC
Ok, thanks, will emerge it with those flags

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] How to poweroff the system from user?

2015-03-21 Thread German
On Sat, 21 Mar 2015 16:32:25 -0400
Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:

 150321 German wrote:
  If I run poweroff from root, the system shuts down.
  When I run poweroff from user -- command not found.
  How to shut down the system from user ?
 
 I'ld say Don't : it's contrary to the principles of Unix,
 which separate the roles of sysadmin (root) from those of ordinary users.
 
 To shut down, I first exit Fluxbox via its menu,
 then 'su' + root password, then alias 'down' = 'shutdown -h now'.
 That observes the proper roles + ceremonies (smile).

Interesting. But as I said ealier, I can reboot the system when I am a user by 
Ctrl+Alt+Delete. The user can reboot the system, but can't shut down? Strange
 
 -- 
 ,,
 SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
 ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
 TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] RTL8192CU

2015-03-19 Thread German
Today I've bought a new USB wi-fi adapter which has rtl8192cu chip. I've 
plugged it into my lubuntu computer and it worked out of the box, however soon 
it drops the connection. I googled it and found out that many people have the 
same problem with this chip ( but mostly with *buntu flavours). I also found 
the workaround here: https://github.com/pvaret/rtl8192cu-fixes This box will be 
soon ( I hope ) will be transferred to Gentoo. I wonder if some one here is 
using this chip with Gentoo with new kernels, does it run ok and if this 
problem of *buntu specific? Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-17 Thread German
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:33:59 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 06:08:34 -0400, German wrote:
 
   Forget about chmod 770. Better do a chmod g+rw. :-)  
  
  Tried it, it also doesn't stay permanently. OK, no solution :(
 
 The correct solution is a udev rule, but it appears that something may be
 overriding that when you login. A kludgy solution is to add the chmod
 command to ~/.bash_profile.
 
The system doesn't appear to have ~/.bash_profile Is that sufficient to run 
nano -w ~/.bash_profile and fill in the blanks?

 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Veni, vermini, vomui
 I came, I got ratted, I threw up


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-17 Thread German
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 14:03:21 -0400
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:08 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 01:16:32 +0100 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
  waben...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  So it seems that after login you first have to chmod 770 the tty
  before you do a su - user (user have to be in group tty of course).
 
  Forget about chmod 770. Better do a chmod g+rw. :-)
 
  Tried it, it also doesn't stay permanently. OK, no solution :(
 
 Because /dev is recreated at every boot.
 
 You have to override the tty rule(s) in
 /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules with a rule/rules in
 /etc/udev/rules.d/.
 
 Since the 50-udev-default.rules is an upstream rule that's shipped by
 all the distros that I use, perhaps you should track down why this is
 happening rather than overriding it.
 
 Canek had asked whether you were using systemd and therefore logind.
 Since you're using openrc, perhaps you should check whether installing
 consolekit is a fix because it's the precursor to logind.

Just to emerge consolekit and see if it fix it?
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-17 Thread German
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:16:42 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 17, 2015, at 18:11, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login process 
  reveals that login set things as you tell it to in /etc/login.defs
  
  In this file change the line:
  TTYPERM 0600
  To:
  TTYPERM 0620
  
  And your problem is fixed.
  
  Sorry, this didn't fix it
 
 Yes. Sorry. The mode was wrong:
 
 TTYPERM 660
 
 Will fix it, if your screen is setgid tty and ttyX is gid tty. If not then:
 
 TTYPERM 666
 
 Will fix it, but also your tty will be world readable. If you don't consider 
 that too big security risk, then just go

Neither 660 nor 666 fixed it. Sorry :(

 ahead.
 
 -- 
 -Matti
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-17 Thread German
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:39:46 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 17, 2015, at 19:33, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:16:42 +0200
  Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
  
  On Mar 17, 2015, at 18:11, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login process 
  reveals that login set things as you tell it to in /etc/login.defs
  
  In this file change the line:
  TTYPERM 0600
  To:
  TTYPERM 0620
  
  And your problem is fixed.
  
  Sorry, this didn't fix it
  
  Yes. Sorry. The mode was wrong:
  
  TTYPERM 660
  
  Will fix it, if your screen is setgid tty and ttyX is gid tty. If not then:
  
  TTYPERM 666
  
  Will fix it, but also your tty will be world readable. If you don't 
  consider that too big security risk, then just go
  
  Neither 660 nor 666 fixed it. Sorry :(
 
 If you have:
 
 TTYPERM 0666
 
 And logout and login. What mode and ownership do you have in you tty 
 (/dev/ttyX)?

Ok, Matti, 0666 worked, now I can run screen as a user. Thanks. Do you think I 
have to try to run it 0660? Will it be less security risk?
 
 -- 
 -Matti
 
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-17 Thread German
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 22:14:03 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 17, 2015, at 21:52, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 20:39:46 +0200
  Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
  
  On Mar 17, 2015, at 19:33, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:16:42 +0200
  Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:
  
  On Mar 17, 2015, at 18:11, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login 
  process reveals that login set things as you tell it to in 
  /etc/login.defs
  
  In this file change the line:
  TTYPERM 0600
  To:
  TTYPERM 0620
  
  And your problem is fixed.
  
  Sorry, this didn't fix it
  
  Yes. Sorry. The mode was wrong:
  
  TTYPERM 660
  
  Will fix it, if your screen is setgid tty and ttyX is gid tty. If not 
  then:
  
  TTYPERM 666
  
  Will fix it, but also your tty will be world readable. If you don't 
  consider that too big security risk, then just go
  
  Neither 660 nor 666 fixed it. Sorry :(
  
  If you have:
  
  TTYPERM 0666
  
  And logout and login. What mode and ownership do you have in you tty 
  (/dev/ttyX)?
  
  Ok, Matti, 0666 worked, now I can run screen as a user. Thanks. Do you 
  think I have to try to run it 0660? Will it be less security risk?
 
 Well 0666 = 666. The reason it now worked is because you logged out and then 
 back in. This is becaus login program only reads the /etc/login.defs-file 
 when you login.
 
I pretty much sure that I logged out and logged in back after setting to 666 
and it didn't work, but setting to 0666 has worked. Strange.

 With mode 0666 every user on your computer can read everything (every 
 character) you have in your screen (so not much privacy). If you set:
 
 TTYGROUP utmp
 TTYPERM 0660
 
 And have:
 
 -rwxr-sr-x root utmp /usr/bin/screen
 
 Everything will also work and you have more privacy.

I'll be the only user on this system. So I guess I can leave it as it is.

 
 When /bin/login us run it changes ownership of the tty to the user who logs 
 in. Su -l does not do this. That is why the screen doesn't work. ConsoleKit 
 is the program that is responsible for many of these permission changes. Do 
 you have that installed?

I think ConsoleKit was installed when I emerged screen, but I am not sure.
 
 -- 
 -Matti
 
 
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-17 Thread German
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 20:53:44 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 14, 2015, at 12:47, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:33:59 +
  Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
  
  On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 06:08:34 -0400, German wrote:
  
  Forget about chmod 770. Better do a chmod g+rw. :-)  
  
  Tried it, it also doesn't stay permanently. OK, no solution :(
  
  The correct solution is a udev rule, but it appears that something may be
  overriding that when you login.
  
  I have the same udev rule. Yes, something is overriding it.
  
  A kludgy solution is to add the chmod
  command to ~/.bash_profile.
 
 Don't hit your head to a brick wall. A small strace to the login process 
 reveals that login set things as you tell it to in /etc/login.defs
 
 In this file change the line:
 TTYPERM 0600
 To:
 TTYPERM 0620
 
 And your problem is fixed.

Sorry, this didn't fix it
 
 The problem has nothing to do with udev. If you don't like a volatile /dev 
 just remove udev and create everything you wan't by hand (not recommended ;)
 
 Another thing i'm puzzled by is, why do you wan't to login as root and the su 
 to someone else? I usually do it the other way around...
 
 -- 
 -Matti
 
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-14 Thread German
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 10:33:59 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 06:08:34 -0400, German wrote:
 
   Forget about chmod 770. Better do a chmod g+rw. :-)  
  
  Tried it, it also doesn't stay permanently. OK, no solution :(
 
 The correct solution is a udev rule, but it appears that something may be
 overriding that when you login.

I have the same udev rule. Yes, something is overriding it.

 A kludgy solution is to add the chmod
 command to ~/.bash_profile.

thanks
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Veni, vermini, vomui
 I came, I got ratted, I threw up


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-14 Thread German
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 01:16:32 +0100
waben...@gmail.com wrote:

 waben...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
  
   On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:16:28 -0400, German wrote:
   
after searching, I found the following solution to chmod tty1,
like so: chmod o+rw /dev/tty1 and this worked, I was able to use
screen as a user, however it doesn't stay permanently; after
reboot, I got the same problem. How to chmod tty1 so changes stay
permenently? Thanks
   
   /dev/tty1 is already group writeable, so you should get the same
   result by adding your user to the tty group.
  
  When I logged in as regular user then ownership of the tty that I
  used for log in is:
  
  crw--- 1 wabe tty  4,  1 13. Mär 17:49 /dev/tty1
  
  When I logged in as root, then owner is root (not surprising).
  
  crw--- 1 root  tty  4,  2 13. Mär 23:47 /dev/tty2
  
  Adding your user to group tty probably wouldn't resolve your problem
  (not tested), because group doesn't have any rights.
  
  So it seems that after login you first have to chmod 770 the tty
  before you do a su - user (user have to be in group tty of course).
 
 Forget about chmod 770. Better do a chmod g+rw. :-)

Tried it, it also doesn't stay permanently. OK, no solution :(
 
 --
 Regards
 wabe
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:59:04 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On 13 March 2015 15:52:41 GMT+00:00, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  This is very strange. When I boot up my box and login as a user I can
  use screen. But if I booted up and logged in as root first and then su
  user, the user have the error message displayed in the subject line.
  Any ideas?
  
  -- 
  German gentger...@gmail.com
 
 Try su - l user. 
 -- 
 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

after searching, I found the following solution to chmod tty1, like so:
chmod o+rw /dev/tty1 and this worked, I was able to use screen as a user, 
however it doesn't stay permanently; after reboot, I got the same problem. How 
to chmod tty1 so changes stay permenently? Thanks



-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Yet another update]

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:59:04 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On 13 March 2015 15:52:41 GMT+00:00, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  This is very strange. When I boot up my box and login as a user I can
  use screen. But if I booted up and logged in as root first and then su
  user, the user have the error message displayed in the subject line.
  Any ideas?
  
  -- 
  German gentger...@gmail.com
 
 Try su - l user. 

And after a little more searching interwebs I found this solution:
to run script /dev/null after I logged on to the user after root. This allows 
to launch screen
 -- 
 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 00:00:34 +0100
waben...@gmail.com wrote:

 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
 
  On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:16:28 -0400, German wrote:
  
   after searching, I found the following solution to chmod tty1, like
   so: chmod o+rw /dev/tty1 and this worked, I was able to use screen
   as a user, however it doesn't stay permanently; after reboot, I got
   the same problem. How to chmod tty1 so changes stay permenently?
   Thanks
  
  /dev/tty1 is already group writeable, so you should get the same
  result by adding your user to the tty group.
 
 When I logged in as regular user then ownership of the tty that I
 used for log in is:
 
 crw--- 1 wabe tty  4,  1 13. Mär 17:49 /dev/tty1
 
 When I logged in as root, then owner is root (not surprising).
 
 crw--- 1 root  tty  4,  2 13. Mär 23:47 /dev/tty2
 
 Adding your user to group tty probably wouldn't resolve your problem
 (not tested), because group doesn't have any rights.

Yes, it didn't resolve my problem. The only solution for now is to run script 
/dev/null.
Then I can run screen as a user. People are having the same problem all over 
the net.
 
 So it seems that after login you first have to chmod 770 the tty before
 you do a su - user (user have to be in group tty of course).
 
 Maybe it would ease things when you write a little script for this
 procedure.
 
 --
 Regards
 wabe
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check [Update]

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:28:32 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 23:22:50 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
 
  Interesting, here, as a normal user:
  
  % ls -l /dev/tty1
  crw--w 1 root tty 4, 1 Mar 13 22:26 /dev/tty1
  
   So it seems that after login you first have to chmod 770 the tty
   before you do a su - user (user have to be in group tty of course).
   
   Maybe it would ease things when you write a little script for this
   procedure.  
  
  A udev rule would be less kludgy.
 
 I have this in /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules:
 
 SUBSYSTEM==tty, KERNEL==tty[0-9]*, GROUP=tty, MODE=0620

thanks, I'll try that as well
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Windows Error #09: Game Over. Exiting Windows.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Make the user the member of portage group or not?

2015-03-13 Thread German
Question is in the subject line. Another question I have is there any point to 
use other frambuffer device ( I currently use efifb) and I am thinking to use 
fb for my radeon r4 graphics in hopes to get some acceleration. Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Make the user the member of portage group or not?

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 06:42:08 -0400
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:08:16AM -0400, German wrote
  Question is in the subject line.
 
   If the user is a member of portage he can do any emerge operation as
 long as the command includes --pretend or -p
 
 [d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv ufraw
 
 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
 
 Calculating dependencies... done!
 [ebuild   R] media-gfx/ufraw-0.20-r1  USE=-contrast -fits -gimp
 -gnome -gtk -openmp -timezone 0 KiB
 
 Total: 1 package (1 reinstall), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
 
 
   However, the regular user is not allowed to actually emerge or unmerge
 anything.  E.g...
 
 [d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -v ufraw
 emerge: superuser access is required
 
 
   The idea is to allow the user to find out what he would have to do if
 he wanted to emerge/unmerge something.

Thanks for your answer. It now got clearer to me.
 
 -- 
 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
 I don't run desktop environments; I run useful applications
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:59:04 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On 13 March 2015 15:52:41 GMT+00:00, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  This is very strange. When I boot up my box and login as a user I can
  use screen. But if I booted up and logged in as root first and then su
  user, the user have the error message displayed in the subject line.
  Any ideas?
  
  -- 
  German gentger...@gmail.com
 
 Try su - l user. 

The same error

 -- 
 Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:11:58 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:06 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 15:59:04 +
  Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
 
   On 13 March 2015 15:52:41 GMT+00:00, German gentger...@gmail.com
 wrote:
This is very strange. When I boot up my box and login as a user I can
use screen. But if I booted up and logged in as root first and then su
user, the user have the error message displayed in the subject line.
Any ideas?
   
--
German gentger...@gmail.com
  
   Try su - l user.
 
  The same error
 
 Are you using logind?

Good question. What is logind? How I can find out what am I using?
 
 Regards.
 --
 Canek Peláez Valdés
 Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check

2015-03-13 Thread German
This is very strange. When I boot up my box and login as a user I can use 
screen. But if I booted up and logged in as root first and then su user, the 
user have the error message displayed in the subject line. Any ideas?

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Screen: Cannot open your terminal '/dev/tty1' - please check

2015-03-13 Thread German
On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 10:31:11 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:22 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 [ ... ]
   Are you using logind?
 
  Good question. What is logind? How I can find out what am I using?
 
 If you are using systemd, you are using logind. Otherwise you are not.

No, I am using openRC
 
 Regards.
 --
 Canek Peláez Valdés
 Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Networkmanager emerged, system unstable

2015-03-12 Thread German
So yes, I did install networkmanager, however for some reason after emerging 
it, I got the problems:
Console cursor can not blink, keyboard input is unstable, sometimes cursor is 
stuck, sometimes it gets delays in ouput. Something broke my system. Does 
anyone have a clue what is going on? Also, while I am considering installing 
wicd ncurses, does anyone use CLI wifi tool iw? I can connect to network with 
cable attached, however there is no connection when I try to use wifi module. 
How networkmanager can be configured to use wi-fi? Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Networkmanager emerged, system unstable

2015-03-11 Thread German
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 16:25:00 -0400
Josh Lemerand emptykathar...@gmail.com wrote:

  nmcli dev wifi con Cafe Hotspot 1 password caffeine name My cafe
 
 creates a new connection named My cafe and thenconnects it to Cafe
 Hotspot 1 SSID using password caffeine. This is mainly useful when
 connecting to Cafe Hotspot 1 for the first time. Next time, it is
 better to use 'nmcli con up id My cafe' so that the existing
 connection profile can be used and no additional is created.

Thanks. Are there any ways to scan for available wi-fi hotspots in nmcli?

 
 from the nmcli man page.
 
 
 On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:40 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  So yes, I did install networkmanager, however for some reason after
  emerging it, I got the problems:
  Console cursor can not blink, keyboard input is unstable, sometimes cursor
  is stuck, sometimes it gets delays in ouput. Something broke my system.
  Does anyone have a clue what is going on? Also, while I am considering
  installing wicd ncurses, does anyone use CLI wifi tool iw? I can connect
  to network with cable attached, however there is no connection when I try
  to use wifi module. How networkmanager can be configured to use wi-fi?
  Thanks
 
  --
  German gentger...@gmail.com
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Network manager [ control of wireless and wired interafaces]

2015-03-11 Thread German
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:35:26 -0600
Jc García jyo.gar...@gmail.com wrote:

 2015-03-11 7:16 GMT-06:00 German gentger...@gmail.com:
  On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:38:08 +
  Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
 
  On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:14:13 -0400, German wrote:
 
 eix-e: command not found. What to do?
   
Insert a space between eix and -e.
   
  
   Same result - command not found
 
  emerge eix, then run eix-update as root.
 
  Ok, done that. Indeed there are anything related to x11-lib, but when I do 
  emerge --ask net-misc/networkmanager I see x11-proto and x11-libs to be 
  emerged. Use variable is set to -X. Anyone can shed a light on this? How 
  can I emerge networkmanager without X dependencies? Thanks so much
 
 If you want an easy way of configuring wirless without GUI use wicd
 and the wicd curses client(enabled via USE flag), NetworkManager is
 simpler to use with a GUI, the CLI client is not so easy to use, but
 if you want to, make sure none of the GUI related use flags are set
 e.g. gtk qt X emerge it, and then read and search info(man, google)
 about nmcli.

Did you hear about CLI wi-fi tool iw? I am testing it right now, but seem 
cannot figure out how to use it
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Network manager [ control of wireless and wired interafaces]

2015-03-11 Thread German
Hi. I was said that I need network manager to control my interfaces. What 
package should I emerge? I am in console mode. Is that ncurses based or command 
line? Any other pointers on how this can be configured are welcome. Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Network manager [ control of wireless and wired interafaces]

2015-03-11 Thread German
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:38:08 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 08:14:13 -0400, German wrote:
 
eix-e: command not found. What to do?  
   
   Insert a space between eix and -e.
 
  
  Same result - command not found
 
 emerge eix, then run eix-update as root.

Ok, done that. Indeed there are anything related to x11-lib, but when I do 
emerge --ask net-misc/networkmanager I see x11-proto and x11-libs to be 
emerged. Use variable is set to -X. Anyone can shed a light on this? How can 
I emerge networkmanager without X dependencies? Thanks so much
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Sarchasm : The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person
 who doesn't get it.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Network manager [ control of wireless and wired interafaces]

2015-03-11 Thread German
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:52:02 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 11/03/2015 13:40, German wrote:
  wpa_supplicant doesn't handle switching between wored and wireless
   interfaces, which is why I suggest a network manager. That could be
   NetworkManager, but you could equally use Wicd. Both are in portage.
   
   Alternatively, you could just set up the two interfacs
   in /etc/conf.d/net and switch between them by starting and
   stopping /etc/init.d/net.{eth0,wlan0}.
   
   It depends on how automatic you want it.
  Ok, I tried to emerge networkmanger and it tries to pull a bunch of 
  dependencies which I do not need, e.g. x11-proto, x11-libs. I already set 
  use flag to -X because for now I will be happy with console mode, but it 
  still tries to pull them. How do I tell portage not emerge unneeded 
  dependencies? Thanks
  
 
 
 You tell portage to not pull in unneeded dependencies by setting the
 appropriate USE flags. The people you are asking for assistance will
 determine this by reading the ebuild, or by using the appropriate
 portage tools to figure it out. You should start learning these skills
 yourself so you can answer your own questions.
 
 1. Run eix-e networkmanager. There is nothing there related to x11.

eix-e: command not found. What to do?


 
 2. Read the ebuild for networkmanager-1.0.0. There is nothing in there
 related to x11, so that's not it.
 
 3. Run emerge -pvt networkmanager. This will give an indented view of
 what is pulling in what. Find the entries of x11-proto etc and see what
 is pulling them in. Investigate those packages to disable x11.
 
 
 
 -- 
 Alan McKinnon
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Network manager [ control of wireless and wired interafaces]

2015-03-11 Thread German




On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:15:06 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 05:48:08 -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
 
  On Wednesday, March 11, 2015 5:19:32 AM German wrote:
   Hi. I was said that I need network manager to control my interfaces.
   What   
  package should I emerge? I am in console mode. Is that ncurses based or 
  command line? Any other pointers on how this can be configured are
  welcome. Thanks
   
 
  
  net-misc/networkmanager
  
  It comes with CLI tools but it's usually used with a frontend GUI. See 
  http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/NetworkManager#NetworkManager_GUI_bits_in_GTK
  
  For KDE I use kde-misc/plasma-nm. If you don't have a desktop it
  propably makes more sense to just use wpa_supplicant directly.
 
 wpa_supplicant doesn't handle switching between wored and wireless
 interfaces, which is why I suggest a network manager. That could be
 NetworkManager, but you could equally use Wicd. Both are in portage.
 
 Alternatively, you could just set up the two interfacs
 in /etc/conf.d/net and switch between them by starting and
 stopping /etc/init.d/net.{eth0,wlan0}.
 
 It depends on how automatic you want it.

Ok, I tried to emerge networkmanger and it tries to pull a bunch of 
dependencies which I do not need, e.g. x11-proto, x11-libs. I already set use 
flag to -X because for now I will be happy with console mode, but it still 
tries to pull them. How do I tell portage not emerge unneeded dependencies? 
Thanks

 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Therapy is expensive, popping bubble wrap is cheap! You choose.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Network manager [ control of wireless and wired interafaces]

2015-03-11 Thread German
On Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:12:04 +0100
Paul Klos gen...@klos2day.nl wrote:

 Op woensdag 11 maart 2015 08:03:06 schreef German:
  eix-e: command not found. What to do?
 
 Insert a space between eix and -e.
 

Same result - command not found
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 16:13:59 -0500
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:08 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:45:51 -0500
  Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:
 
  On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
   On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:47:36 +
   Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
  
   On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:37:39 -0500, German wrote:
  
   Is /var on your root filesystem? If so, it sounds like something
   is trying to write to it before it has been remounted rw. Try
   adding rw (and removing ro if present) to your kernel options.
  
 
  Ok, thanks. What file should I write these options to?

 Your bootloader config, that's where you specify the kernel boot
 options.
   
That's what I thought, however I use gummiboot. Can you give an
example, to show your gummiboot config once again?
  
   Add it to the options line in the relavent file in /boot/loader/entries.
  
   Or test it first by pressing e at the menu and adding it there
  
  
   So any other idea on hhow to fix it? Anyone?
 
  Can you please post the output of the following commands?
 
  stat /lib64/rc
 
  stat /lib64/rc/cache
 
  stat /lib64/rc/cache
 
  stat: cannot stat /lib64/rc/cache: No such file or directory
 
  I'll also put stat /lib64/rc later. I am thinking if there is no cache 
  file, probably this will give you some clue. I am retyping this from my 
  laptop screen and /lib64/rc is quite lengthy. Thank you. Please tell me if 
  you really need it ( and me) and I'll take my time and retype it.
 
 It's supposed to be a directory. Try running mkdir -p /lib64/rc/cache.

It seems the error is gone. But I wonder why I didn't have /lib64/rc/cache 
directory. This was a fresh install.
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:47:36 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:37:39 -0500, German wrote:
 
 Is /var on your root filesystem? If so, it sounds like something
 is trying to write to it before it has been remounted rw. Try
 adding rw (and removing ro if present) to your kernel options.
 

Ok, thanks. What file should I write these options to?  
   
   Your bootloader config, that's where you specify the kernel boot
   options.  
  
  That's what I thought, however I use gummiboot. Can you give an
  example, to show your gummiboot config once again?
 
 Add it to the options line in the relavent file in /boot/loader/entries.
 
 Or test it first by pressing e at the menu and adding it there


So any other idea on hhow to fix it? Anyone?
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Fragile. Do not turn umop ap1sdn!


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] See bootup/poweroff screen?

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 00:17:34 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 German wrote:
  I have a SSD in my laptop and the system boots really fast so I can't see 
  the details of the warnings it displays. Are there any way to scroll the 
  screen or see some system boot's logs? Thanks
 
 
 
 You may want to read this post and try this method too.  I did this ages
 ago and on occasion, it helps. 
 
 http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-7682938.html#7682938 
 
 It should scroll to it but it's the second post that is made by PeGa!
 that may help.  The messages go to this file:  /var/log/rc.log 
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-)  *
 *

Thanks Dale, done it. Unfortunately it doesn't log everything. For instance 
Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable wasn't written to /var/log/rc.log


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
How to fix this? Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 13:45:51 -0500
Mike Gilbert flop...@gentoo.org wrote:

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 12:28 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:47:36 +
  Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
 
  On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:37:39 -0500, German wrote:
 
  Is /var on your root filesystem? If so, it sounds like something
  is trying to write to it before it has been remounted rw. Try
  adding rw (and removing ro if present) to your kernel options.
 

 Ok, thanks. What file should I write these options to?
   
Your bootloader config, that's where you specify the kernel boot
options.
  
   That's what I thought, however I use gummiboot. Can you give an
   example, to show your gummiboot config once again?
 
  Add it to the options line in the relavent file in /boot/loader/entries.
 
  Or test it first by pressing e at the menu and adding it there
 
 
  So any other idea on hhow to fix it? Anyone?
 
 Can you please post the output of the following commands?
 
 stat /lib64/rc
 
 stat /lib64/rc/cache

stat /lib64/rc/cache

stat: cannot stat /lib64/rc/cache: No such file or directory

I'll also put stat /lib64/rc later. I am thinking if there is no cache file, 
probably this will give you some clue. I am retyping this from my laptop screen 
and /lib64/rc is quite lengthy. Thank you. Please tell me if you really need it 
( and me) and I'll take my time and retype it.




-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:36 +
Peter Humphrey pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote:

 On Wednesday 04 March 2015 21:26:53 German wrote:
  On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:25:07 +
  Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
   Now that you're connected, or should I say BEFORE you got connected,
   you should also consider configuring a firewall for your IPv4
   (and/or IPv6) network.
  
  What package I should use for this on a console? I want something
  simple but efficient.
 
 I use shorewall. It's not too hard to understand and I haven't seen any 
 reports of problems with it.

Thanks for recommendation
 
 -- 
 Rgds
 Peter.
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:34:05 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 05:10:03 -0500, German wrote:
 
   Is /var on your root filesystem? If so, it sounds like something is
   trying to write to it before it has been remounted rw. Try adding rw
   (and removing ro if present) to your kernel options.
 
  
  Ok, thanks. What file should I write these options to?
 
 Your bootloader config, that's where you specify the kernel boot options.

That's what I thought, however I use gummiboot. Can you give an example, to 
show your gummiboot config once again?
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 If at first you don't succeed, redefine success.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 08:24:44 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 03:09:46 -0500, German wrote:
 
  How to fix this? Thanks
 
 Is /var on your root filesystem? If so, it sounds like something is
 trying to write to it before it has been remounted rw. Try adding rw (and
 removing ro if resent) to your kernel options.
 

Ok, thanks. What file should I write these options to?

 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 For security reasons, all text in this mail is double-rot13 encrypted.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:22:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 03:09:46 -0500
 German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  How to fix this? Thanks
  
 
 I haven't the foggiest idea.
 
 
 But, in your shoes, I'd probably find out more about chown and chmod

Perhaps it sholdn't be writable. I thought about chmod +x but decided to wait 
before I hear a few explainations about what's going on
 
 
 -- 
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Warning: /lib64/rc/cache is not writable

2015-03-05 Thread German
On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:47:36 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Thu, 5 Mar 2015 07:37:39 -0500, German wrote:
 
 Is /var on your root filesystem? If so, it sounds like something
 is trying to write to it before it has been remounted rw. Try
 adding rw (and removing ro if present) to your kernel options.
 

Ok, thanks. What file should I write these options to?  
   
   Your bootloader config, that's where you specify the kernel boot
   options.  
  
  That's what I thought, however I use gummiboot. Can you give an
  example, to show your gummiboot config once again?
 
 Add it to the options line in the relavent file in /boot/loader/entries.
 
 Or test it first by pressing e at the menu and adding it there.


Ok Neil, I hit e at the boot and added rw to boot option, so it looked like 
root=/dev/sda3 rw
I still get cache is not writeable warning when system poweroffs. What else can 
be causing this?
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Fragile. Do not turn umop ap1sdn!


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

2015-03-04 Thread German
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:07:39 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 06:57:48 -0500, German wrote:
 
  On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 +
  Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
  
   On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20 -0500, German wrote:
   
So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for
Wi-fi NIC, however I can't connect to internet. I think the problem
here with interfaces, but could be something else, have no clue. I
remember when I installed openSuse, it listed my interfaces like
SP0_something instead of eth0. But I followed gentoo install doc
and configured it with eth0. Can it be that problem lays somewhere
here? And how to get the list of interfaces on my machine? 
   
   ifconfig -a lists all interfaces present.
  
  Of course I don't have any eth0 interface. What I have are:
  
  enp2s0
  lo
  sit0
  wlp1s0
 
 Did you read the links later in my post? They explain this.
  
  What I am about to do:
  Update my /etc/conf.d/net like so:
  
  config_enp2s0=dhcp
  config_lo=dhcp
 
 you need nothing for lo.
 
  config_sit0=dhcp
  config_wlp1s0=dhcp
  
  cd /etc/init.d
  ln -s net.enp2s0 net.sit0 net.wlp1s0
 
 Interfaces in init.d should each be symlinked to net.lo. But if you put
 all interfaces in init.d openrc will try to start all of them. Is that
 what you really want? If you have both wired and wireless interfaces, it
 is usual to use a network manager to control them.
 
 
  
  rm /etc/init.d/net.eth0
  
  rc-update del net.eth0 default
  
  rc-update add net.enp2s0 sit0 wlp1s0 default
  
  Please let me know if you find these steps correct. Thanks
  
   
   Unless you added net.ifnames=0 to your kernel options, you will be
   using the new(ish) predictable network interface names, see
   
   http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade#udev_208_to_216
   and
   http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/
   
   
   -- 
   Neil Bothwick
   
   Bug: (n.) any program feature not yet described to the marketing
   department.
  
  
 
 
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Accordion: a bagpipe with pleats.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] No network ( Solved, I am connected, thanks)

2015-03-04 Thread German
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 18:25:07 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Wednesday 04 Mar 2015 15:40:12 German wrote:
  On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:07:39 +
  
  Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
   On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 06:57:48 -0500, German wrote:
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 +

Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
 On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20 -0500, German wrote:
  So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for
  Wi-fi NIC, however I can't connect to internet. I think the problem
  here with interfaces, but could be something else, have no clue. I
  remember when I installed openSuse, it listed my interfaces like
  SP0_something instead of eth0. But I followed gentoo install doc
  and configured it with eth0. Can it be that problem lays somewhere
  here? And how to get the list of interfaces on my machine?
 
 ifconfig -a lists all interfaces present.

Of course I don't have any eth0 interface. What I have are:

enp2s0
lo
sit0
wlp1s0
   
   Did you read the links later in my post? They explain this.
   
What I am about to do:
Update my /etc/conf.d/net like so:

config_enp2s0=dhcp
config_lo=dhcp
   
   you need nothing for lo.
 
 You also do not need to define dhcp for enp2s0, because it will be used by 
 default.
 
config_sit0=dhcp
 
 You only need this if you intend to set up and use IPv6 through an IPv4 
 tunnel.  Most people won't need this.
 
 
config_wlp1s0=dhcp

cd /etc/init.d
ln -s net.enp2s0 net.sit0 net.wlp1s0
   
   Interfaces in init.d should each be symlinked to net.lo. But if you put
   all interfaces in init.d openrc will try to start all of them. Is that
   what you really want? If you have both wired and wireless interfaces, it
   is usual to use a network manager to control them.
   
rm /etc/init.d/net.eth0

rc-update del net.eth0 default

rc-update add net.enp2s0 sit0 wlp1s0 default

Please let me know if you find these steps correct. Thanks

 Unless you added net.ifnames=0 to your kernel options, you will be
 using the new(ish) predictable network interface names, see
 
 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade#udev_208_to_216
 and
 http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkIn
 terfaceNames/
 
 Now that you're connected, or should I say BEFORE you got connected, you 
 should also consider configuring a firewall for your IPv4 (and/or IPv6) 
 network.

What package I should use for this on a console? I want something simple but 
efficient.

 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Mick


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] See bootup/poweroff screen?

2015-03-04 Thread German
I have a SSD in my laptop and the system boots really fast so I can't see the 
details of the warnings it displays. Are there any way to scroll the screen or 
see some system boot's logs? Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] No network

2015-03-04 Thread German
On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 08:09:12 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Wed, 4 Mar 2015 02:01:20 -0500, German wrote:
 
  So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for
  Wi-fi NIC, however I can't connect to internet. I think the problem
  here with interfaces, but could be something else, have no clue. I
  remember when I installed openSuse, it listed my interfaces like
  SP0_something instead of eth0. But I followed gentoo install doc and
  configured it with eth0. Can it be that problem lays somewhere here?
  And how to get the list of interfaces on my machine? 
 
 ifconfig -a lists all interfaces present.

Of course I don't have any eth0 interface. What I have are:

enp2s0
lo
sit0
wlp1s0

What I am about to do:
Update my /etc/conf.d/net like so:

config_enp2s0=dhcp
config_lo=dhcp
config_sit0=dhcp
config_wlp1s0=dhcp

cd /etc/init.d
ln -s net.enp2s0 net.sit0 net.wlp1s0

rm /etc/init.d/net.eth0

rc-update del net.eth0 default

rc-update add net.enp2s0 sit0 wlp1s0 default

Please let me know if you find these steps correct. Thanks

 
 Unless you added net.ifnames=0 to your kernel options, you will be using
 the new(ish) predictable network interface names, see
 
 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Udev/upgrade#udev_208_to_216
 and
 http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/PredictableNetworkInterfaceNames/
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Bug: (n.) any program feature not yet described to the marketing
 department.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] No network

2015-03-03 Thread German
So I rebuilt my kernel with r8169 for network NIC and rtl8723be for Wi-fi NIC, 
however I can't connect to internet. I think the problem here with interfaces, 
but could be something else, have no clue. I remember when I installed 
openSuse, it listed my interfaces like SP0_something instead of eth0. But I 
followed gentoo install doc and configured it with eth0.
Can it be that problem lays somewhere here? And how to get the list of 
interfaces on my machine? Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] RTL8723BE and RTL8111/8168/8411

2015-03-03 Thread German
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 15:27:02 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:00:05 +0200, Matti Nykyri wrote:
 
  As for RTL8723BE wifi NIC I don't know the module. It should be quite
  easy to find.
 
 As it happens, I've just helped someone with a problem with such a NIC.
 There is a module in the latest kernels but you may need to add fwlps=0
 ips=0 to the module's options to stop it going into power saving mode
 and not waking up until a reboot.

where such options have to be added?


 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 What Aussies lack in Humour they make up for in Beer!


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] RTL8723BE and RTL8111/8168/8411

2015-03-03 Thread German
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:07:06 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 04:24:39 -0500, German wrote:
 
   However, you shouldn't need to add a network card module to this
   file, it should be loaded automatically by kernel hotplugging.
 
  Should it concern wifi module as well? Neil, please help me out with
  finding these modules in kernel config menus. Can't locate them
 
 You can find any modules in make menuconfig by pressing / and then typing
 a search string. That shows up modules you may not find when browsing
 them menus, because there are other options you need to enable first
 (which the search result shows).

thanks Neil, I'll try it. And yes, I know module's names
 
 That assumes you know which modules you need. The easiest way to tell
 that is to boot from a live CD live system rescue Cd or the install disc
 and run lspci -k, which shows the modules used by each item.
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of
 room o


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] RTL8723BE and RTL8111/8168/8411

2015-03-03 Thread German
On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 09:03:10 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Tue, 3 Mar 2015 06:42:39 +, Mick wrote:
 
   Is syntax in /etc/conf.d/modules valid? Just want to make sure.
   
   modules_2_6=3c59x  
   
  This should be 'modules_3_18=' assuming that you are using kernel
  version 3.18.7 or some such.
 
 Or even just modules=. You only need the version numbers if you want to
 restrict loading to particular kernels.
 
 However, you shouldn't need to add a network card module to this file, it
 should be loaded automatically by kernel hotplugging.
 

Should it concern wifi module as well? Neil, please help me out with finding 
these modules in kernel config menus. Can't locate them
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 WinErr 00C: Memory hog error - More Ram needed. More! More! More!


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] RTL8723BE and RTL8111/8168/8411

2015-03-02 Thread German
Now when my system is finally booted, I would like someone walk me through the 
kernel config menu ( I couldn't locate the modules during install). 
Aformentioned modules are in the subject line.

Is syntax in /etc/conf.d/modules valid? Just want to make sure.

modules_2_6=3c59x

And finally, I'd like ( if possible) that my system on console displays gentoo 
logo instead of default three logos ( why are three of them anyway ) and 
compile in smaller fonts to use on my console. If someone walk me through how 
this can be done, this would be also great. Thanks so much!



-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi?

2015-03-02 Thread German
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:31:27 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:27 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
  Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
   
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
   
 On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com
 wrote:
 
  Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two
 .efi
 files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is
 /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created
 /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi during install by copying kernel image
 file
   to
 it and supposedly it was for efibootmng. I think gummiboot has
 created
   its
 own gummibootx64.efi. Is that safe to delete */boot/bootx64.efi?
 Thanks

 They are the same image; do an md5sum of both, you'll see that they
 have
 the same checksum.

 I believe Boot/BOOTX64.EFI is the default location where the BIOS
 (or
 whatever is called in UEFI systems) looks for an image to boot,
 and gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi is just a copy. I'm not sure, but I
 would
 not delete it:
   
gummiboot creates both copies of the file.
   
Well, no, I have created */boot/bootx64.efi manually and
   */gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi was created by gummiboot install.
  
   In my machines boot/bootx64.efi was created by gummiboot, and it's the
 same
   ile as gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi (same checksum).
 
  I just did md5sums and yes, gummibootx64.efi and bootx64.efi are the same
 
 Mmmh. So it was gummitboot and not created by hand?
 
 Anyway, as I said earlier; I think boot/bootx64.efi is the default
 location, and the other one is kinda a backup.

I did created it by hand, but I think gummiboot overwritten the entry. Anyway, 
thanks for clarification
and I'll leave both entries.

 
 Regards.
 --
 Canek Peláez Valdés
 Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi?

2015-03-02 Thread German
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
  Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
   
Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
   files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is
   /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created
   /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi during install by copying kernel image file
 to
   it and supposedly it was for efibootmng. I think gummiboot has created
 its
   own gummibootx64.efi. Is that safe to delete */boot/bootx64.efi? Thanks
  
   They are the same image; do an md5sum of both, you'll see that they have
   the same checksum.
  
   I believe Boot/BOOTX64.EFI is the default location where the BIOS (or
   whatever is called in UEFI systems) looks for an image to boot,
   and gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi is just a copy. I'm not sure, but I would
   not delete it:
 
  gummiboot creates both copies of the file.
 
  Well, no, I have created */boot/bootx64.efi manually and
 */gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi was created by gummiboot install.
 
 In my machines boot/bootx64.efi was created by gummiboot, and it's the same
 ile as gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi (same checksum).
 
 What does bootctl says?

bootctl: command not found. How to use bootctl?
 
 Regards.
 --
 Canek Peláez Valdés
 Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi?

2015-03-02 Thread German
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 02:10:33 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
  Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
   
Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
   files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is
   /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created
   /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi during install by copying kernel image file
 to
   it and supposedly it was for efibootmng. I think gummiboot has created
 its
   own gummibootx64.efi. Is that safe to delete */boot/bootx64.efi? Thanks
  
   They are the same image; do an md5sum of both, you'll see that they have
   the same checksum.
  
   I believe Boot/BOOTX64.EFI is the default location where the BIOS (or
   whatever is called in UEFI systems) looks for an image to boot,
   and gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi is just a copy. I'm not sure, but I would
   not delete it:
 
  gummiboot creates both copies of the file.
 
  Well, no, I have created */boot/bootx64.efi manually and
 */gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi was created by gummiboot install.
 
 In my machines boot/bootx64.efi was created by gummiboot, and it's the same
 ile as gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi (same checksum).

I just did md5sums and yes, gummibootx64.efi and bootx64.efi are the same

 
 What does bootctl says?
 
 Regards.
 --
 Canek Peláez Valdés
 Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi?

2015-03-02 Thread German
On Mon, 2 Mar 2015 01:41:19 -0600
Canek Peláez Valdés can...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:11 PM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi
 files. One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is
 /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created
 /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi during install by copying kernel image file to
 it and supposedly it was for efibootmng. I think gummiboot has created its
 own gummibootx64.efi. Is that safe to delete */boot/bootx64.efi? Thanks
 
 They are the same image; do an md5sum of both, you'll see that they have
 the same checksum.
 
 I believe Boot/BOOTX64.EFI is the default location where the BIOS (or
 whatever is called in UEFI systems) looks for an image to boot,
 and gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi is just a copy. I'm not sure, but I would
 not delete it: 

gummiboot creates both copies of the file.

Well, no, I have created */boot/bootx64.efi manually and 
*/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi was created by gummiboot install.

 
 Regards.
 --
 Canek Peláez Valdés
 Profesor de asignatura, Facultad de Ciencias
 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi?

2015-03-01 Thread German
Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi files. One 
is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is 
/boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi 
during install by copying kernel image file to it and supposedly it was for 
efibootmng. I think gummiboot has created its own gummibootx64.efi. Is that 
safe to delete */boot/bootx64.efi? Thanks

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] gummibootx64.efi OR bootx64.efi?

2015-03-01 Thread German
On Mon, 02 Mar 2015 01:47:52 -0500
Fernando Rodriguez frodriguez.develo...@outlook.com wrote:

 On Monday, March 02, 2015 12:11:51 AM German wrote:
  Out of curiosity I looked into my /boot partition and found two .efi files. 
 One is /boot/efi/gummiboot/gummibootx64.efi and another is 
 /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi. I remember I've created 
 /boot/efi/boot/bootx64.efi 
 during install by copying kernel image file to it and supposedly it was for 
 efibootmng. I think gummiboot has created its own gummibootx64.efi. Is that 
 safe 
 to delete */boot/bootx64.efi? Thanks
 
 It should be but the easiest certain way to find out is to move it and 
 reboot, 
 if the system doesn't boot then restore it. Also efibootmgr -v will show you 
 which one you're using.

I didn't install efibootmgr at all. I am using gummiboot.


 
 -- 
 Fernando Rodriguez
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] How to get inside of my faulty install?

2015-03-01 Thread German
On Sun, 1 Mar 2015 10:27:49 +0100
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Mar 1, 2015, at 6:58, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  Now I need to get to /boot partition of my faulty install and edit 
  gummiboot .conf file. Can someone walk me through on how to accomplish 
  this? ( step-by-step commands ). Of course I have a rescuecd at my 
  disposal. Thanks!
 
 Boot into the rescuecd
 Open your first disk with gdisk or parted:
 gdisk /dev/sda
 
 List partitions (penter in gdisk and print in parted)
 
 Find a partition of the type EF00. That is your UEFI boot partition. Mark 
 down the number of that partition. The number most likely 1.
 
 If you didn't find EF00 partition search the next disk (sdb).
 
 Mount your boot partition (in my setup it is sda1):
 mkdir /uefipartition
 mount -t vfat /dev/sda1 /uefipartition
 nano /uefipartition/loader/entries/gentoo.conf
 

Thanks, worked like a charm. I was able to boot!


 Just edit and save and you are done. If you have everything setup as in the 
 wiki (http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gummiboot) this will work. Neil gave the 
 same instructions... This is just a bit more detailed.
 
 I like to always keep grub installed because it is like swiss army knife for 
 booting. You can always get a shell and find your lost kernel image. Even if 
 it is still in /usr/src... So you kind of like never render your system to an 
 unbootable state. Nor would need to use rescue cd. And you can boot windows, 
 memtest, chainload etc!
 
 -- 
 -Matti
 
 
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Gummiboot ( Error loading \vmlinuz :Not found)

2015-02-28 Thread German
Ok, this was probably my third unsuccesful install on UEFI. This time with 
gummiboot. I've followed this guide:
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gummiboot

and did exactly what was written. What is the vmlinuz it is complaining about? 
Can it be that vmlinuz should read as vmlinuz-3.16-15-gentoo instead? Here is 
my config file, it is the same as in the guide:

title Gentoo Linux
linux /vmlinuz
options root=/dev/sda3

As always, thank you for your help

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Gummiboot ( Error loading \vmlinuz :Not found)

2015-02-28 Thread German



On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:06:54 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Sat, 28 Feb 2015 05:50:53 -0500, German wrote:
 
  and did exactly what was written. What is the vmlinuz it is complaining
  about? Can it be that vmlinuz should read as vmlinuz-3.16-15-gentoo
  instead? Here is my config file, it is the same as in the guide:
  
  title Gentoo Linux
  linux /vmlinuz
  options root=/dev/sda3
 
 The kernel file should be in your ESP and you need to give the full name,
 so something like
 
 linux /vmlinuz-3.16-15-gentoo
 
 Here's a config I use, as an example
 
 title   MythTV
 version 3.18.7-gentoo
 linux   /vmlinuz-3.18.7-gentoo
 options root=/dev/sda3 panic=10 net.ifnames=0 irqpoll

Thanks Neil, you are always come to my rescue
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 If at first you do succeed, try to hide your astonishment.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] How to get inside of my faulty install?

2015-02-28 Thread German
Now I need to get to /boot partition of my faulty install and edit gummiboot 
.conf file. Can someone walk me through on how to accomplish this? ( 
step-by-step commands ). Of course I have a rescuecd at my disposal. Thanks!

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] EFI install ( continum) [ system hangs at boot ]

2015-02-27 Thread German
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:12:24 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:53:32 -0500, German wrote:
 
  Ok gentooers. I did manage to install gentoo on EFI, it boots, however
  hangs at Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
  unknown-block ( 0,0)
  
  Does anyone have an idea what is going on?
 
 The kernel cannot find the block device containing your root filesystem.
 Either you have given the wrong root= option to the kernel

Are you talking about this?

UEFI does not pass kernel parameters to the kernel during normal boot, so you 
need to hardcode them via CONFIG_CMDLINE. Example for the root partition on 
/dev/sda2:
KERNEL Enable built-in kernel parameters

Processor type and features  ---
[*] Built-in kernel command line
(root=/dev/sda2)


 or you have
 not compiled in the driver your your hard disk driver.
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 I'm writing a book. I've got the page numbers done.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] EFI install ( continum) [ system hangs at boot ]

2015-02-27 Thread German
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:12:24 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:53:32 -0500, German wrote:
 
  Ok gentooers. I did manage to install gentoo on EFI, it boots, however
  hangs at Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on
  unknown-block ( 0,0)
  
  Does anyone have an idea what is going on?
 
 The kernel cannot find the block device containing your root filesystem.
 Either you have given the wrong root= option to the kernel

Where is this given? Can you elaborate?

 or you have
 not compiled in the driver your your hard disk driver.

I am using SSD Patriot Blaze. Is it also should be compiled somewhere in the 
kernel?
Why is the system boots at all?
 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 I'm writing a book. I've got the page numbers done.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] EFI install ( continum) [ system hangs at boot ]

2015-02-27 Thread German
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:15:04 +
Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:

 On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:49:20 -0500, German wrote:
 
   The kernel cannot find the block device containing your root
   filesystem. Either you have given the wrong root= option to the
   kernel  
  
  Are you talking about this?
  
  UEFI does not pass kernel parameters to the kernel during normal boot,
  so you need to hardcode them via CONFIG_CMDLINE. Example for the root
  partition on /dev/sda2: KERNEL Enable built-in kernel parameters
  
  Processor type and features  ---
  [*] Built-in kernel command line
  (root=/dev/sda2)
 
 Yes, if you are not using a boot manager.

Hmm.. I was using some sort of boot manager, efibootmgr, however there was no 
word in install docs how to configure it to point to root device.. So, are you 
advising on gummiboot? Are people happy with it? I found gentoo wiki how to 
configure it, so I must give it a try. Thanks for your input, I guess the 
problem is solved now. On to the next install with gummi


 
 
 -- 
 Neil Bothwick
 
 Top Oxymorons Number 24: New classic


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] About to attempt EFI install, which modules to compile?

2015-02-27 Thread German
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 06:57:28 +0200
Matti Nykyri matti.nyk...@iki.fi wrote:

  On Feb 27, 2015, at 5:02, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  
  Hi people. I am about to try today an EFI gentoo install with sysrecuecd. 
  It is all more or less clear to me in the install docs, however I am not 
  sure how to gather info about my hardware, which modules should be compiled 
  when installing kernel manually. Is there a way to gather this info? What 
  command should be issued to accomplish that? Also, I am sort of reluctant 
  to compile kernel manually. Is this possible to use genkernel to install 
  system in EFI mode or I must to use manual compilation? Thank you for your 
  advice and suggestions.
 
 Just did my first EFI install this week... So not a virgin anymore ;) I had 
 an old system so I attached the new drive to that for partitioning and 
 install.
 
 You use gpt with uefi. You need to reserve one partition for UEFI. Set the 
 type to EF00 and boot flag enabled (parted or gdisk can do this). Format to 
 fat32.
 
 Make a partition for gentoo and format it. Untar stage3 and portage snapshot 
 to it (snapshot is faster than rsync). Chroot. Emerge portage and grub. I 
 copied kernel from my old system to /boot. If you don't have this build a new 
 one. Run grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub/grub.cfg (mkdir if it doesn't exists. 
 (http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2)
 
 Install grub:
 grub2-install --target=x86_64-uefi /to/your/partition

Are you sure that grub is needed for EFI system? I doubt it. I used efibootmgr 
as per gentoo handbook. And it was also said that it is possible to boot EFI 
system without anything at all ( e.g. grub, efibootmgr)

 
 Then copy /boot/efi/EFI/gentoo/grubx64.efi to /boot/efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI
 
 Many asus mb's have bug in efi and require BOOTX64.EFI to be lower case = 
 bootx64.efi so rename it as necessary. My mb had that bug and a rename was 
 needed even though fat should be case insensitive.
 
 After this you can boot your new system and continue with the install :)
 
 Further reading:
 https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UEFIBooting
 
 -- 
 -Matti


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] EFI install ( continum) [ system hangs at boot ]

2015-02-27 Thread German
Ok gentooers. I did manage to install gentoo on EFI, it boots, however hangs at 
Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block ( 
0,0)

Does anyone have an idea what is going on? Is that fstab, something else? I 
appreciate any advice. I want my laptop runs Gentoo.

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] About to attempt EFI install, which modules to compile?

2015-02-26 Thread German
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 21:33:34 -0600
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 German wrote:
  Hi people. I am about to try today an EFI gentoo install with sysrecuecd. 
  It is all more or less clear to me in the install docs, however I am not 
  sure how to gather info about my hardware, which modules should be compiled 
  when installing kernel manually. Is there a way to gather this info? What 
  command should be issued to accomplish that? Also, I am sort of reluctant 
  to compile kernel manually. Is this possible to use genkernel to install 
  system in EFI mode or I must to use manual compilation? Thank you for your 
  advice and suggestions.
 
 
 I have no experience with EFI, yet.  I think this will help with one
 part of your post tho.  You can use lsmod while booted with sysrescue
 and get a list of what modules are being used.  I've done that before. 
 It helps. 
 
 Another command that can help and may be better. lspci -k.  That should
 look like this snippet:
 
 01:00.1 Audio device: NVIDIA Corporation GT216 HDMI Audio Controller
 (rev a1)
 Subsystem: NVIDIA Corporation Device 069a
 Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
 02:00.0 USB controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. Device 3483 (rev 01)
 Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd Device 5007
 Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd
 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
 RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 06)
 Subsystem: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd Motherboard
 Kernel driver in use: r8169
 04:06.0 Ethernet controller: Davicom Semiconductor, Inc. Ethernet 100/10
 MBit (rev 31)
 Subsystem: ARCHTEK TELECOM Corp Device 0008
 Kernel driver in use: dmfe
 
 What you are really looking for is the Kernel driver in use: part.  If
 you are making your own kernel, you use that info to find the module to
 enable, either built in or as a module.  I sometimes cheat and use this
 command:
 
 lspci -k | grep Kernel
 
 Make sure that K is upper case OR add the -i option to grep.  That
 command only lists the part I am really interested in and the driver
 name sometimes tells what it is for anyway.  Plus, it's generally best
 to enable the hardware you got. 
 
 Maybe someone else can come along and shine some light on the rest. 
 
 Dale
 
 :-)  :-) 
 
 

Thanks Dale, this was helpful

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] About to attempt EFI install, which modules to compile?

2015-02-26 Thread German
Hi people. I am about to try today an EFI gentoo install with sysrecuecd. It is 
all more or less clear to me in the install docs, however I am not sure how to 
gather info about my hardware, which modules should be compiled when installing 
kernel manually. Is there a way to gather this info? What command should be 
issued to accomplish that? Also, I am sort of reluctant to compile kernel 
manually. Is this possible to use genkernel to install system in EFI mode or I 
must to use manual compilation? Thank you for your advice and suggestions.

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-21 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:30:49 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Saturday 20 Dec 2014 18:20:44 Mick wrote:
  On Saturday 20 Dec 2014 17:07:47 German wrote:
   Thanks Poison. SystemRescueCD is capable of booting in uefi so I can
   install gen too from it? I have heard good things about it
  
  Yes, this is what I am going to use to attempt to install Gentoo in UEFI.
  
  I have used it for years now to install Gentoo with a conventional BIOS.
 
 I spake too soon!  :-(
 
 I just tried to boot my Asus MoBo A88XM-PLUS, after I disabled CMS and 
 switched Secure Boot to other OS (as opposed to MS Windows), with 
 sysrescuecd-4.4.1.
 
 Unfortunately I can't get a console due to this error:
 
  error: no suitable mode found.
  Booting in blind mode
 
 
 Any idea how to progress from here?  Is it possible with sysrescuecd?

Mick, you are going right after my steps ( or I go where you go ). Just tried
to boot sysresc 4.4.1 with exactly the same error message. Duh. Looks like many 
people with the same
problem.


 
 -- 
 Regards,
 Mick


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-21 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:00:51 +
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sunday 21 Dec 2014 11:44:04 German wrote:
  On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:30:49 +
  
  Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 
   I spake too soon!  :-(
   
   I just tried to boot my Asus MoBo A88XM-PLUS, after I disabled CMS and
   switched Secure Boot to other OS (as opposed to MS Windows), with
   sysrescuecd-4.4.1.
   
   Unfortunately I can't get a console due to this error:
error: no suitable mode found.
Booting in blind mode
   
   Any idea how to progress from here?  Is it possible with sysrescuecd?
  
  Mick, you are going right after my steps ( or I go where you go ). Just
  tried to boot sysresc 4.4.1 with exactly the same error message. Duh.
  Looks like many people with the same problem.
 
 OK, this is what I did to progress with the installation.
 
 1. Things that didn't work:
 
 Editing the kernel options for nomodesetting (disable KMS option) did not work
 
 Similarly, specifying forcevesa=1024x768 did not work.
 
 2. What worked:
 
 Typing blind after waiting for a while to make sure the CD had booted up to 
 set up the root passwd and then to start sshd, allowed to access the PC over 
 sshd and commence the installation.  Of course, this will only work if your 
 PC 
 is connected to the LAN.  I have no solution at the moment for air-gapped 
 machines.
 
 On the keyboard type blind:
 
 passwd root
 my_secret_root_passwd
 my_secret_root_passwd
 /etc/init.d/sshd restart
 
 Then find the IP address of the new PC.  In my case arping and some guessing 
 of the next IP that the router would have issued worked, but you can use arp-
 scan, nmap, or some such tool, or even check your router's dhcp tables.
 
 Then ssh root@new PC's IP, enter the passwd you set up above and you're 
 good 
 to go with the installation, following the hand book and the wiki suggestions 
 for UEFI.

Thanks for suggestion, Mick. Unfortunately I am not on a network and that is 
only PC I have at the moment.
Do you know if Knoppix allows UEFI boot?

 
 HTH.
 -- 
 Regards,
 Mick


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-21 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:55:06 -0500
Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:

 * German gentger...@gmail.com [141221 07:31]:
 [..SNIP..]
  Thanks for suggestion, Mick. Unfortunately I am not on a network and that 
  is only PC I have at the moment.
  Do you know if Knoppix allows UEFI boot?
 
 I've used Fedora and Linux Mint install disks for UEFI booting (I don't
 know about Knoppix.)
 
 Todd
 

Good to know. Thanks


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-21 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 12:17:19 -0500
Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 6:30 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  I just tried to boot my Asus MoBo A88XM-PLUS, after I disabled CMS and
  switched Secure Boot to other OS (as opposed to MS Windows), with
  sysrescuecd-4.4.1.
 
  Unfortunately I can't get a console due to this error:
 
   error: no suitable mode found.
   Booting in blind mode
 
 How about booting without Secure Boot?

I am booting without secure boot and get the same error
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-21 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 11:55:06 -0500
Todd Goodman t...@bonedaddy.net wrote:

 * German gentger...@gmail.com [141221 07:31]:
 [..SNIP..]
  Thanks for suggestion, Mick. Unfortunately I am not on a network and that 
  is only PC I have at the moment.
  Do you know if Knoppix allows UEFI boot?
 
 I've used Fedora and Linux Mint install disks for UEFI booting (I don't
 know about Knoppix.)
 
 Todd
 

BTW Todd, does Mint allow to boot only in console mode, i.e. without X and DE?

-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-20 Thread German
That's where I think the problem lies Mick. My system is uefi. Too bad that gen 
too officially doesn't support it. I just wish gentoo developers take a closer 
look at the issue and come out with uefi capable minimal installation CD and 
clear uefi installation documentation

Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

On Saturday 20 Dec 2014 05:28:49 Tomas Mozes wrote:
 On 2014-12-20 00:57, German wrote:
  Just a follow up to my original question. I've installed grub on
  /dev/SDA literally following the quide. And I just realized why I made
  /dev/sda1 partition obviously designed for grub? Should I have been
  install grub into /dev/sda1? I also have uefi system and I think it
  matters. Thanks everyone for clarifications
  
  German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
  Is anyone can advice on where to dig. It seems that grub isn't
  installed because I can't access it pressing ESC key and I return to
  bios. During installation there were no errors reported, the system
  installed grub just fine. Also grub.cfg found all my kernels and
  ramdisks? Thanks for any suggestion. What would you do?
 
 If you have your /dev/sda only for Gentoo, you would install grub into
 /dev/sda and have /dev/sda1 for /boot, for example:
 /dev/sda1: /boot
 /dev/sda2: /
 
 The bios will load grub from mbr of /dev/sda and since you specify that
 grub can find it's stuff on /dev/sda1 (root), it can continue to find
 the kernel, etc.. Once found, it can load the kernel and mount root,
 because it's the kernel parameter.
 
 For example:
 root(hd0,0)
 setup (hd0)
 
 Check out
 http://www.gnu.org/software/grub/manual/legacy/grub.html#Installing-GRUB-na
 tively
 
 Or for grub2:
 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2
 https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:X86/Installation/Bootloader
 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB
 http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GRUB2_Quick_Start
 
 You can also have your /boot and / on the same partition.

All of this is good advice, but ONLY IF the MoBo has been configured to boot 
in CMS/Legacy_BIOS mode.  Otherwise, UEFI will bail out at boot time because 
it does neither read, nor use the MBR bootloader.

Depending on the boot options provided by the motherboard, the hard drive can 
be configured to boot in legacy-BIOS using an MBR, in UEFI mode using an ESP 
partition, or both depending on the BIOS selection at boot time.

-- 
Regards,
Mick


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-20 Thread German
Thanks Poison. SystemRescueCD is capable of booting in uefi so I can install 
gen too from it? I have heard good things about it

Poison BL. poiso...@gmail.com wrote:

On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 10:34 AM, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 That's where I think the problem lies Mick. My system is uefi. Too bad that 
 gen too officially doesn't support it. I just wish gentoo developers take a 
 closer look at the issue and come out with uefi capable minimal installation 
 CD and clear uefi installation documentation

Well, while it's not covered in the official side of the install docs,
this wiki page was how I handled my system when I first ended up with
a UEFI laptop here (Win8 didn't even make it 12hrs for me ;) --

http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/UEFI_Gentoo_Quick_Install_Guide

It only has one minor issue, and that's the lack of mentioning first
and foremost that, to configure UEFI, you have to be UEFI booted
already (it does get around to noting it about the halfway mark). Any
UEFI compatible linux livecd/usb will work, though.

-- 
Poison [BLX]
Joshua M. Murphy



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-20 Thread German
Sorry Mick. I am on android tablet and have no clue how to modify message body

Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:

On Saturday 20 Dec 2014 17:07:47 German wrote:
 Thanks Poison. SystemRescueCD is capable of booting in uefi so I can
 install gen too from it? I have heard good things about it

Yes, this is what I am going to use to attempt to install Gentoo in UEFI.

I have used it for years now to install Gentoo with a conventional BIOS.

PS. Can you please avoid top-posting in this mailing list.  It breaks the 
logical question  answer of the thread.

-- 
Regards,
Mick


[gentoo-user]

2014-12-20 Thread German
Could register at systemrescuecd forums for now, so I thought to ask here. 
Trying to get systemrescuecd iso on USB stick. There is shell script on to 
accomplish just that. When I try to run it, it identifies my thumb drive, 
however reports that it is 0 mb. When disk is mounted, the volume in megabytes 
just right,  about 2 GB. Log file says that is not enough memory to install. 
Any ideas what might be a problem? And yes, I am about to try to install gen 
too from rescued USB drive in efi mode

Re: [gentoo-user] Size usb stick with fdisk

2014-12-20 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 03:37:29 +0100
Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
  Am 20.12.2014 um 23:08 schrieb German:
   Trying to get systemrescuecd iso on USB stick. There is shell
   script on to accomplish just that. When I try to run it, it identifies
   my thumb drive, however reports that it is 0 mb.
 
  don't use any scripts. Never gave me a bootable solution. Either burn to
  cd or do it manually.
 
 For me, the script that comes on sysresccd always worked (though I’ve never
 used EFI yet). The script determines the size of the device with blockdev
 --getsz /path/to/device
 
 What does that return if called manually and what size is reported in other
 programs (fdisk, dmesg after plugging it in)?


Hi. I would tell you if I knew how to do it in fdisk for instance. Can you 
provide me with
instructions please?

 -- 
 Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
 Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any social network.
 
 The USA took the path from barbarism to decadence
 without the detour over culture.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user]

2014-12-20 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 03:37:29 +0100
Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:

 On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
  Am 20.12.2014 um 23:08 schrieb German:
   Trying to get systemrescuecd iso on USB stick. There is shell
   script on to accomplish just that. When I try to run it, it identifies
   my thumb drive, however reports that it is 0 mb.
 
  don't use any scripts. Never gave me a bootable solution. Either burn to
  cd or do it manually.
 
 For me, the script that comes on sysresccd always worked (though I’ve never
 used EFI yet). The script determines the size of the device with blockdev
 --getsz /path/to/device
 
 What does that return if called manually and what size is reported in other
 programs (fdisk, dmesg after plugging it in)?

That's what it reports when /dev/sdd is mounted:

sudo blockdev --getsize64 /dev/sdd
2031091712

When not mounted it reports that no medium found. The same log from usb_inst.sh:

Installation on /dev/sdd at 2014-12-20_16:47
blockdev: cannot open /dev/sdd: No medium found
usb_inst.sh: error: The device [/dev/sdd] is only 0 MB. It is too small to copy 
all the files, an USB-stick of at least 512MB is recommended


But shell script should be run unmounted. Confused.

 -- 
 Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
 Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any social network.
 
 The USA took the path from barbarism to decadence
 without the detour over culture.


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user]

2014-12-20 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 07:20:16 +
J.  Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:

 On 21 December 2014 06:27:41 CET, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 03:37:29 +0100
 Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
 
  On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
   Am 20.12.2014 um 23:08 schrieb German:
Trying to get systemrescuecd iso on USB stick. There is shell
script on to accomplish just that. When I try to run it, it
 identifies
my thumb drive, however reports that it is 0 mb.
  
   don't use any scripts. Never gave me a bootable solution. Either
 burn to
   cd or do it manually.
  
  For me, the script that comes on sysresccd always worked (though I’ve
 never
  used EFI yet). The script determines the size of the device with
 blockdev
  --getsz /path/to/device
  
  What does that return if called manually and what size is reported in
 other
  programs (fdisk, dmesg after plugging it in)?
 
 That's what it reports when /dev/sdd is mounted:
 
 sudo blockdev --getsize64 /dev/sdd
 2031091712
 
 When not mounted it reports that no medium found. The same log from
 usb_inst.sh:
 
 Installation on /dev/sdd at 2014-12-20_16:47
 blockdev: cannot open /dev/sdd: No medium found
 usb_inst.sh: error: The device [/dev/sdd] is only 0 MB. It is too small
 to copy all the files, an USB-stick of at least 512MB is recommended
 
 
 But shell script should be run unmounted. Confused.
 
  -- 
  Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
  Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any social
 network.
  
  The USA took the path from barbarism to decadence
  without the detour over culture.
 
 Do you try 'umounted' right after inserting the USB before any mount commands 
 are run?

The thing here is that my usb stick is automaunted by the system. I am running 
Lubuntu. I unmount it simply by clicking on it in a LXDE.
 
 Some automounters send an 'eject' command which makes some USB sticks 
 disappear until they are unplugged and plugged back in.

Do you think it would  make sense to mount stick manually and then unmount it? 
Thanks


 
 --
 Joost
 -- 
 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



Re: [gentoo-user]

2014-12-20 Thread German
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 07:20:16 +
J.  Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:

 On 21 December 2014 06:27:41 CET, German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 03:37:29 +0100
 Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
 
  On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 12:34:55AM +0100, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
   Am 20.12.2014 um 23:08 schrieb German:
Trying to get systemrescuecd iso on USB stick. There is shell
script on to accomplish just that. When I try to run it, it
 identifies
my thumb drive, however reports that it is 0 mb.
  
   don't use any scripts. Never gave me a bootable solution. Either
 burn to
   cd or do it manually.
  
  For me, the script that comes on sysresccd always worked (though I’ve
 never
  used EFI yet). The script determines the size of the device with
 blockdev
  --getsz /path/to/device
  
  What does that return if called manually and what size is reported in
 other
  programs (fdisk, dmesg after plugging it in)?
 
 That's what it reports when /dev/sdd is mounted:
 
 sudo blockdev --getsize64 /dev/sdd
 2031091712
 
 When not mounted it reports that no medium found. The same log from
 usb_inst.sh:
 
 Installation on /dev/sdd at 2014-12-20_16:47
 blockdev: cannot open /dev/sdd: No medium found
 usb_inst.sh: error: The device [/dev/sdd] is only 0 MB. It is too small
 to copy all the files, an USB-stick of at least 512MB is recommended
 
 
 But shell script should be run unmounted. Confused.
 
  -- 
  Gruß | Greetings | Qapla’
  Please do not share anything from, with or about me with any social
 network.
  
  The USA took the path from barbarism to decadence
  without the detour over culture.
 
 Do you try 'umounted' right after inserting the USB before any mount commands 
 are run?
 
 Some automounters send an 'eject' command which makes some USB sticks 
 disappear until they are unplugged and plugged back in.

Thanks Joost. I wrote to usb stick just fine after I umount /dev/sdd1 manually. 
Those damn automounters.

 
 --
 Joost
 -- 
 Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
 


-- 
German gentger...@gmail.com



[gentoo-user] Returning to chrooted environment?

2014-12-19 Thread German
During installation, just before running genkernel all, pressed something by 
mistake in screen and that got me out of chroot. I have screen split up 
horizontally and now whatever I type appears on two terminals simultaneously. 
How do I enter in a stage where I left off and try to finish installation? 
Thanks a lot

[gentoo-user] Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-19 Thread German
Is anyone can advice on where to dig. It seems that grub isn't installed 
because I can't access it pressing ESC key and I return to bios. During 
installation there were no errors reported, the system installed grub just 
fine. Also grub.cfg found all my kernels and ramdisks? Thanks for any 
suggestion. What would you do?

[gentoo-user] Re: Fresh gen too install - unsuccesful

2014-12-19 Thread German
Just a follow up to my original question. I've installed grub on /dev/SDA 
literally following the quide. And I just realized why I made /dev/sda1 
partition obviously designed for grub? Should I have been install grub into 
/dev/sda1? I also have uefi system and I think it matters. Thanks everyone for 
clarifications

German gentger...@gmail.com wrote:

Is anyone can advice on where to dig. It seems that grub isn't installed 
because I can't access it pressing ESC key and I return to bios. During 
installation there were no errors reported, the system installed grub just 
fine. Also grub.cfg found all my kernels and ramdisks? Thanks for any 
suggestion. What would you do?

[gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

2014-12-18 Thread German
Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for athlon 5350 apu?

2014-12-18 Thread German
Thank you. I'll stick to -march=native for now

Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 02:38:48AM +0400, German wrote
 Couldn't find those in documentation. Thank you

  If you're building on the target machine, use the native CFLAG.  It
has been around for a while.  It detects the CPU, and builds for it
automagically.  You don't have to do any more grunt work, figuring out
the flags for your CPU.  Computers are supposed to do the hard work.  I
use...

FLAGS=-O2 -march=native -mfpmath=sse -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe 
-fno-unwind-tables -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS}

  Mind you, if you're cross-compiling on another system, and then moving
the binaries over, you will have to figure out the correct flags.  See
below for a method.

  Another problem is that there are also cpu-specific USE flags.  You
can get a good start on figuring them out, as well as CFLAGS, by running

grep flags /proc/cpuinfo

on the target machine.  There will be one line of output for each core.
You'll have multiple identical lines of output.

-- 
Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org
I don't run desktop environments; I run useful applications



[gentoo-user] Kernel Error

2010-02-14 Thread German Lopez Cortina
What can be this

/ bin / sh: lzma: command not found
make [2]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux.bin.lzma] Error 1
make [1]: *** [arch/x86/boot/compressed/vmlinux] Error 2
make: *** [bzImage] Error 2



  1   2   >