Re: [gentoo-user] Best whois client?

2013-03-27 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
from eix, it says that jwhois can do recursive queries
whatever that means.

-Kevin

On 03/27/2013 06:37 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
 On 03/27/2013 06:08 AM, Mick wrote:

  Like Stroller I've been using net-misc/whois for ever and it does
  what I want, but don't know what the other packages may be able to
  do/do better.  I would also be interested to find out why people
  prefer using these.


 They're all identical. The whois protocol is stupid simple; here's the
 entire spec from the RFC:

2.  Protocol Specification

A WHOIS server listens on TCP port 43 for requests from WHOIS
clients.  The WHOIS client makes a text request to the WHOIS server,
then the WHOIS server replies with text content.  All requests are
terminated with ASCII CR and then ASCII LF.  The response might
contain more than one line of text, so the presence of ASCII CR or
ASCII LF characters does not indicate the end of the response.  The
WHOIS server closes its connection as soon as the output is finished.
The closed TCP connection is the indication to the client that the
response has been received.

 Different data are located in different places, though. So if you're
 looking up an IP address, you'll want one server. If you're looking up
 an AS number, you'll want another. All the client does is run
 heuristics to figure out who (and how) to query. Then it dumps it to a
 terminal.

 In short, there are a lot of whois clients for the same reason there
 are a lot of telnet clients: it's something you can sit down and write
 in a weekend.

 Personally, I tried jwhois at first, but couldn't remember to type the
 'j'. So now I use non-j whois.






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Amazon-Instant video

2013-02-13 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
No thats not it, i am using the adobe plugin not pepperflash.
This is the message that I get

http://imgur.com/LoNB9RV

-Kevin

On 02/12/2013 09:14 AM, Bruce Hill wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 01:32:10AM -0600, Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
 I just got amazon prime for the instant videos (among other things) and
 figured i should
 be able to watch it on linux since its in flash.
 However, I have had no luck getting it to play an instant video,
 i've narrowed it down to videos with DRM, (because trailers play fine
 and DRM screws up everything)
 Google searches come up that it needs HAL (which is deprecated)
 I even managed to install HAL, and still no luck

 i keep getting error occurred and your player cannot be updated
 I have the latest flash, chrome and firefox. (tried both)

 Just wondering if others are having the same trouble or if someone has a
 solution.

 -Kevin
 Is this attached screenshot the type of message you get? If so, you should
 have clicked on the link there which states Why can't I watch videos on my
 Chrome browser in Linux? ... and this is the message it provides:

 The Flash Player Plugin in Chrome removed support for Digital Rights
 Management (DRM) in Linux as part of the upgrade from 11.3 to 11.4. This
 upgrade was bundled with the latest Chrome 22 update for Linux. If you applied
 the Chrome update, you are no longer able to watch DRM-protected content, such
 as movies and TV episodes. Trailers are unaffected as they do not use DRM. To
 get around this issue, you can use a different browser, such as Firefox. For
 information on Chrome and the Flash Player plug-in, see:
 https://support.google.com/chrome/bin/answer.py?hl=enanswer=108086.

 My Gentoo workstation is using firefox-18.0.1 and just updated to
 adobe-flash-11.2.202.262 but won't play the free instant video I tried.

 Since that's the latest version of flash in portage, I supposed you could try
 and get the later source and create a local overlay and try that.




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] Amazon-Instant video

2013-02-11 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
I just got amazon prime for the instant videos (among other things) and
figured i should
be able to watch it on linux since its in flash.
However, I have had no luck getting it to play an instant video,
i've narrowed it down to videos with DRM, (because trailers play fine
and DRM screws up everything)
Google searches come up that it needs HAL (which is deprecated)
I even managed to install HAL, and still no luck

i keep getting error occurred and your player cannot be updated
I have the latest flash, chrome and firefox. (tried both)

Just wondering if others are having the same trouble or if someone has a
solution.

-Kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} LWP::UserAgent slows website

2013-02-07 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
requests, etc

-Kevin

On 02/06/2013 07:13 PM, Grant wrote:
 I have a script that makes 6 successive HTTP requests via
 LWP::UserAgent.  It runs fine and takes only about 3 seconds, but
 whenever it is run I start receiving alerts that my website is
 responding slowly to requests.  This lasts for up to around 10
 minutes.  I've tried turning the timeout down to 3 seconds and I've
 tried LWPx::ParanoidAgent but the behavior is the same.

 Can anyone tell me how to go about tracking this down?

 - Grant





signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] java vs icedtea6

2013-01-15 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
I'm curious as well about the potential exploitability of icedtea. I
would think that since the icedtea vm is not the same as the sun/oracle
one and so I don't think the code base is the same, which would mean an
exploit in the sun/oracle jvm would not necessarily affect icedtea.
However, I know very little on this matter and seeing as i think both
are open sourced i have no idea how much or if there is any code overlap.

-Kevin

On 01/15/2013 06:32 PM, William Kenworthy wrote:
 Looking for comments:

 A while back I removed java during an upgrade on my main desktop system
 and left icedtea6-bin in place without any noticeable effect.


 Presumably icedtea6 suffers the same java bug (cant find anything in
 their bugzilla though?) thats got everybody riled at the moment, though
 the last security bug on gentoo bugzilla is 2011.


 I am happy not using a mainstream java and avoiding the fuss that goes
 with dealing with oracles nonsense download restrictions but have two
 questions:

 1. are there any real problems with using icedtea6?

 2. icedtea6 and icedtea6-bin ... any difference in features? - I have
 had a much more stable experience with openoffice vs openoffice-bin so
 presume build yourself would be the same here?


 The questions may seem redundant seeing I am using both icedtea and java
 on various systems, but others experience may not be the same, or have
 more knowledge which would be useful before I move everything over.

 BillK






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2013-01-04 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
Sure, ive attached one to this email.

-Kevin


On 01/03/2013 03:08 PM, Robert David wrote:
 This is wired, can you post screenshot?

 There does not seem to be some condition in code.

 Robert.

 On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 12:27:41 -0600
 Kevin Brandstatter kjbrandstat...@gmail.com wrote:

 i cleared out the  configs when i installed the release. Suspend
 works, it even locks now, but i still cant change the settings. no
 dbus problems that i can see

 -Kevin

 On 01/03/2013 04:26 AM, Robert David wrote:
 Did you try e with new config with e-17 release? Or you had some
 previous configs and was replaced with release. Because there was
 some config upgrade and old configs did not work and some was not
 replaced correctly (mixer gadget).

 And suspendig with E works ok? You use pm-suspend? Dont you have
 some dbus problems? As the events are send through dbus I think,
 for me it works even with running pm-suspend from console (E locks
 screen).

 Robert.


 On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 03:51:34 -0600
 Kevin Brandstatter kjbrandstat...@gmail.com wrote:

 The problem is the option to lock screen on suspend is greyed out
 and uncheckable.
 Did try building with all modules

 -Kevin

 On 12/28/2012 04:16 AM, Robert David wrote:
 Hi Kevin,

 what exactly you missing on screen lock in E17? I use E17 and
 screen lock is ok when suspending. It does not need some
 xscreenlock stuff, it is just part of e. Just check
 settings-sceen-screen_lock and checkin lock_on_suspend. Thats
 all:)

 If you missing something, just make sure you build with all the
 modules flags.

 x11-wm/enlightenment-0.17.0 was built with the following:
 USE=nls pam spell udev ukit -doc -emotion -static-libs
 ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES=access backlight battery clock comp
 conf-applications conf-dialogs conf-display conf-edgebindings
 conf-interaction conf-intl conf-keybindings conf-menus conf-paths
 conf-performance conf-randr conf-shelves conf-theme
 conf-window-manipulation conf-window-remembers connman cpufreq
 dropshadow everything fileman fileman-opinfo gadman ibar ibox
 illume2 mixer msgbus notification pager quickaccess shot start
 syscon systray tasks temperature tiling winlist wizard xkbswitch


 Robert.


 On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:51:26 -0600
 Kevin Brandstatter kjbrandstat...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12/27/2012 05:16 PM, Mick wrote:
 On Saturday 22 Dec 2012 01:29:57 Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
 So e17 just came out and ive been using for a bit. The only
 problem ive had with it is that i cant check the option to lock
 the screen on suspend. I don't think this is a problem on some
 of the other distributions so thought it could be a policy
 problem on gentoo.

 Curious if anyone else uses e17/has this problem and maybe a
 fix. or just for suggestions of where to look
 I can't select it here either, but I suspect that this may be
 because I do not use xscreenlock or equivalent.

 Have you tried posting either at the e17 or the
 enlightenm...@gentoo.org mailing lists?
 yes I first posted to the e17-users list. It was working for
 other people so i thought it might be distro specific, I emerged
 xscreensaver to see if that would fix it at all but no luck. I
 had this problem a while ago and i think it had something to do
 with polkit settings

 -Kevin




attachment: Screenshot - lockscreen.png

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2013-01-03 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
The problem is the option to lock screen on suspend is greyed out and
uncheckable.
Did try building with all modules

-Kevin

On 12/28/2012 04:16 AM, Robert David wrote:
 Hi Kevin,

 what exactly you missing on screen lock in E17? I use E17 and screen
 lock is ok when suspending. It does not need some xscreenlock stuff, it
 is just part of e. Just check settings-sceen-screen_lock and checkin
 lock_on_suspend. Thats all:)

 If you missing something, just make sure you build with all the modules
 flags.

 x11-wm/enlightenment-0.17.0 was built with the following:
 USE=nls pam spell udev ukit -doc -emotion -static-libs
 ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES=access backlight battery clock comp
 conf-applications conf-dialogs conf-display conf-edgebindings
 conf-interaction conf-intl conf-keybindings conf-menus conf-paths
 conf-performance conf-randr conf-shelves conf-theme
 conf-window-manipulation conf-window-remembers connman cpufreq
 dropshadow everything fileman fileman-opinfo gadman ibar ibox illume2
 mixer msgbus notification pager quickaccess shot start syscon systray
 tasks temperature tiling winlist wizard xkbswitch


 Robert.


 On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:51:26 -0600
 Kevin Brandstatter kjbrandstat...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12/27/2012 05:16 PM, Mick wrote:
 On Saturday 22 Dec 2012 01:29:57 Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
 So e17 just came out and ive been using for a bit. The only problem
 ive had with it is that i cant check the option to lock the screen
 on suspend. I don't think this is a problem on some of the other
 distributions so thought it could be a policy problem on gentoo.

 Curious if anyone else uses e17/has this problem and maybe a fix.
 or just for suggestions of where to look
 I can't select it here either, but I suspect that this may be
 because I do not use xscreenlock or equivalent.

 Have you tried posting either at the e17 or the
 enlightenm...@gentoo.org mailing lists?
 yes I first posted to the e17-users list. It was working for other
 people so i thought it might be distro specific, I emerged
 xscreensaver to see if that would fix it at all but no luck. I had
 this problem a while ago and i think it had something to do with
 polkit settings

 -Kevin






signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2013-01-03 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
i cleared out the  configs when i installed the release. Suspend works,
it even locks now, but i still cant change the settings. no dbus
problems that i can see

-Kevin

On 01/03/2013 04:26 AM, Robert David wrote:
 Did you try e with new config with e-17 release? Or you had some
 previous configs and was replaced with release. Because there was some
 config upgrade and old configs did not work and some was not replaced
 correctly (mixer gadget).

 And suspendig with E works ok? You use pm-suspend? Dont you have some
 dbus problems? As the events are send through dbus I think, for me it
 works even with running pm-suspend from console (E locks screen).

 Robert.


 On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 03:51:34 -0600
 Kevin Brandstatter kjbrandstat...@gmail.com wrote:

 The problem is the option to lock screen on suspend is greyed out and
 uncheckable.
 Did try building with all modules

 -Kevin

 On 12/28/2012 04:16 AM, Robert David wrote:
 Hi Kevin,

 what exactly you missing on screen lock in E17? I use E17 and screen
 lock is ok when suspending. It does not need some xscreenlock
 stuff, it is just part of e. Just check
 settings-sceen-screen_lock and checkin lock_on_suspend. Thats
 all:)

 If you missing something, just make sure you build with all the
 modules flags.

 x11-wm/enlightenment-0.17.0 was built with the following:
 USE=nls pam spell udev ukit -doc -emotion -static-libs
 ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES=access backlight battery clock comp
 conf-applications conf-dialogs conf-display conf-edgebindings
 conf-interaction conf-intl conf-keybindings conf-menus conf-paths
 conf-performance conf-randr conf-shelves conf-theme
 conf-window-manipulation conf-window-remembers connman cpufreq
 dropshadow everything fileman fileman-opinfo gadman ibar ibox
 illume2 mixer msgbus notification pager quickaccess shot start
 syscon systray tasks temperature tiling winlist wizard xkbswitch


 Robert.


 On Thu, 27 Dec 2012 18:51:26 -0600
 Kevin Brandstatter kjbrandstat...@gmail.com wrote:

 On 12/27/2012 05:16 PM, Mick wrote:
 On Saturday 22 Dec 2012 01:29:57 Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
 So e17 just came out and ive been using for a bit. The only
 problem ive had with it is that i cant check the option to lock
 the screen on suspend. I don't think this is a problem on some
 of the other distributions so thought it could be a policy
 problem on gentoo.

 Curious if anyone else uses e17/has this problem and maybe a fix.
 or just for suggestions of where to look
 I can't select it here either, but I suspect that this may be
 because I do not use xscreenlock or equivalent.

 Have you tried posting either at the e17 or the
 enlightenm...@gentoo.org mailing lists?
 yes I first posted to the e17-users list. It was working for other
 people so i thought it might be distro specific, I emerged
 xscreensaver to see if that would fix it at all but no luck. I had
 this problem a while ago and i think it had something to do with
 polkit settings

 -Kevin







signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2012-12-27 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
On 12/27/2012 05:16 PM, Mick wrote:
 On Saturday 22 Dec 2012 01:29:57 Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
 So e17 just came out and ive been using for a bit. The only problem
 ive had with it is that i cant check the option to lock the screen on
 suspend. I don't think this is a problem on some of the other
 distributions so thought it could be a policy problem on gentoo.

 Curious if anyone else uses e17/has this problem and maybe a fix. or
 just for suggestions of where to look
 I can't select it here either, but I suspect that this may be because I do 
 not 
 use xscreenlock or equivalent.

 Have you tried posting either at the e17 or the enlightenm...@gentoo.org 
 mailing lists?
yes I first posted to the e17-users list. It was working for other
people so i thought it might be distro specific, I emerged xscreensaver
to see if that would fix it at all but no luck. I had this problem a
while ago and i think it had something to do with polkit settings

-Kevin



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] E17 lock screen

2012-12-21 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

So e17 just came out and ive been using for a bit. The only problem
ive had with it is that i cant check the option to lock the screen on
suspend. I don't think this is a problem on some of the other
distributions so thought it could be a policy problem on gentoo.

Curious if anyone else uses e17/has this problem and maybe a fix. or
just for suggestions of where to look

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ1Q0VAAoJENfP/Gsfo0VKkdAH/3BdT99FW/NbDz+1X+KWAqOn
0j0AE0XGUNcNsttxIKCBAWqgsB93XS/ulg8JY6EL/GDk1PBzBF2YGFQ6ddd51hB5
GXaaOEdT24RK3+J7+POj6ogdweN4NcACfwiVm6jv7sZ72hmywQWycP0LSsMoOM4p
lnfejqX4Xlth7G1uPIoPtOnnbjhye6Idv3+LybblSYALNVvUPyif8cOj7vbhMgd4
D+oCtG3GNQXpuH/y1TVCA0KFC5OSQ8ix3ovJb9uwv//ErO4Ps/SufeJ14g9xNOGS
ZJNHhaFq6RyYspurvLprbdkDybs6ncbZrb7UhwvB8r3LprGqS0NqKDEQ2mdc3hY=
=+8p2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} A simple routing problem

2012-12-18 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/18/2012 05:27 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 03:41:44 PM IST, J. Roeleveld wrote:
 On Tue, December 18, 2012 04:44, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 
 SNIP
 
 Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit than the ADSL 
 connection. I am trying to use the fiber connection for all
 activities except some torrent downloading for which I want to
 use my ADSL connection. Once I'm able to route through the ADSL
 gateway, it would be easy for me to setup another ip on eth0 on
 my machine on which transmission could listen. All traffic on
 that ip would be routed through ADSL and otherwise the fiber.
 
 Nilesh,
 
 I read that you managed to fix it, but for completenes and, if
 applicable, a different solution would be a router with 2 or more
 WAN-ports that can do the routing for you. Added benefit there
 would be that if the fiber connection dies, it would be able to
 automatically route everything through the ADSL.
 
 -- Joost
 
 
 
 Yeah that solution is always there, but I'm not going for that
 since I'm evaluating the fiber connection (a new ISP in my
 locality). Won't need the ADSL may be after a month or so when I'll
 have unlimited plan on fiber.
 
 @Pandu, or may be the DSL ISP was down yesterday when I was
 trying.
 
 The problem is not exactly fixed yet, although I'm able to add
 static routes on the DDWRT router using route command (and it is
 working), there's no way to route all traffic from a source via the
 other router. It doesn't have iptables ROUTE target neither
 iproute2 support.. is there some other method do to this using
 iptables?
 
 The whole problem would be solved if I could add routes on my local
  machine, but that doesn't seem to work. It always goes via fiber
 which is the default route.
 
 The final solution to this problem would be putting in a Linux
 machine there. I'm trying to build Gentoo for the Raspberry Pi
 which can be used for this task, but stuck at Python since it won't
 cross compile. Anyway that's another topic.
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
you actually can add routes on a local machine. the real trick would
be to have them pushed from the dd-wrt box so that they dont have to
be manually set each time

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0KNXAAoJEAwpfz/ORQZCg4YH/3onXndm8ZrmMd/DhtSYYvMc
hZWRBu4qwIbTapqpWPDZ7nniIfrhfCOfc6bD4MNPO0a20RmC35zAZlLkmFEUMgVf
iJ/25AjLPhI2I8bnLVHkI6Cq5mcvxugK5FMirdD4B4qG9Vd+oUZEo5R/BEZll7rL
9+RuKozq8c/Zdr+MNu/jEQhPtBjHKH6/vWnznK2U7WraRv9jw6vQIoHaMNi2cxG7
vRaD03sPTy58bgHtn26l9bodITTtXYmCCwQYnKfltIraYkTtZOoOUW81NICdv66l
6Ckow8FrXTLr8zDU9LfAWLTb316cyzTRHU3uX1KXqe0RAv6r1QTZPnRYeR2ix9I=
=5g1g
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} A simple routing problem

2012-12-18 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/18/2012 09:14 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:39:43 PM IST, Kevin Brandstatter
 wrote: On 12/18/2012 05:27 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 03:41:44 PM IST, J. Roeleveld
 wrote:
 On Tue, December 18, 2012 04:44, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 
 SNIP
 
 Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit than the
 ADSL connection. I am trying to use the fiber connection
 for all activities except some torrent downloading for
 which I want to use my ADSL connection. Once I'm able to
 route through the ADSL gateway, it would be easy for me
 to setup another ip on eth0 on my machine on which
 transmission could listen. All traffic on that ip would
 be routed through ADSL and otherwise the fiber.
 
 Nilesh,
 
 I read that you managed to fix it, but for completenes and,
 if applicable, a different solution would be a router with
 2 or more WAN-ports that can do the routing for you. Added
 benefit there would be that if the fiber connection dies,
 it would be able to automatically route everything through
 the ADSL.
 
 -- Joost
 
 
 
 Yeah that solution is always there, but I'm not going for
 that since I'm evaluating the fiber connection (a new ISP in
 my locality). Won't need the ADSL may be after a month or so
 when I'll have unlimited plan on fiber.
 
 @Pandu, or may be the DSL ISP was down yesterday when I was 
 trying.
 
 The problem is not exactly fixed yet, although I'm able to
 add static routes on the DDWRT router using route command
 (and it is working), there's no way to route all traffic from
 a source via the other router. It doesn't have iptables ROUTE
 target neither iproute2 support.. is there some other method
 do to this using iptables?
 
 The whole problem would be solved if I could add routes on my
 local machine, but that doesn't seem to work. It always goes
 via fiber which is the default route.
 
 The final solution to this problem would be putting in a
 Linux machine there. I'm trying to build Gentoo for the
 Raspberry Pi which can be used for this task, but stuck at
 Python since it won't cross compile. Anyway that's another
 topic.
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
 you actually can add routes on a local machine. the real trick
 would be to have them pushed from the dd-wrt box so that they dont
 have to be manually set each time
 
 -Kevin
 
 
 How??
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 

with the route add command.
obviously not as clean as an iptables forward rule which is also an option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0KgFAAoJEAwpfz/ORQZCYDwH/0lZMsp+Ncr2kO5iVbuX5Oje
3PUuelWA3IxhF7xmRkNoyMZr+A5QGGWajp7JHPHSSJ/k+Iv7h3xYDABgRwm3tSaP
S0tM0VwFVLXHukhUo8vWFOqU6vmCrTuhNtiTYehFYXXS2pzc07kG+b27aH1RSKsD
6zrha22EbaNe7c4dtdVY4rQ/GtPbpiDjAjvQev0nEreP4uLtwWJmx6V6onlGObGi
0v6TVs9dB7fXQh2z5XaYt4BQ1ORqzi0o2ocKTOURJd23kQAXRDfI96+xjG8Bro77
AcaxjXq8bP/W8mdDqFL3w44CF7QDca3uXKAOlGC1Qbm9XVmkETpCQrlzL8aKM0k=
=oIGG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} A simple routing problem

2012-12-18 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/18/2012 09:38 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:59:41 PM IST, Kevin Brandstatter
 wrote: On 12/18/2012 09:14 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:39:43 PM IST, Kevin
 Brandstatter wrote: On 12/18/2012 05:27 AM, Nilesh
 Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 03:41:44 PM IST, J.
 Roeleveld wrote:
 On Tue, December 18, 2012 04:44, Nilesh Govindrajan
 wrote:
 
 SNIP
 
 Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit
 than the ADSL connection. I am trying to use the
 fiber connection for all activities except some
 torrent downloading for which I want to use my ADSL
 connection. Once I'm able to route through the ADSL
 gateway, it would be easy for me to setup another
 ip on eth0 on my machine on which transmission
 could listen. All traffic on that ip would be
 routed through ADSL and otherwise the fiber.
 
 Nilesh,
 
 I read that you managed to fix it, but for
 completenes and, if applicable, a different solution
 would be a router with 2 or more WAN-ports that can
 do the routing for you. Added benefit there would be
 that if the fiber connection dies, it would be able
 to automatically route everything through the ADSL.
 
 -- Joost
 
 
 
 Yeah that solution is always there, but I'm not going
 for that since I'm evaluating the fiber connection (a
 new ISP in my locality). Won't need the ADSL may be
 after a month or so when I'll have unlimited plan on
 fiber.
 
 @Pandu, or may be the DSL ISP was down yesterday when I
 was trying.
 
 The problem is not exactly fixed yet, although I'm able
 to add static routes on the DDWRT router using route
 command (and it is working), there's no way to route
 all traffic from a source via the other router. It
 doesn't have iptables ROUTE target neither iproute2
 support.. is there some other method do to this using
 iptables?
 
 The whole problem would be solved if I could add routes
 on my local machine, but that doesn't seem to work. It
 always goes via fiber which is the default route.
 
 The final solution to this problem would be putting in
 a Linux machine there. I'm trying to build Gentoo for
 the Raspberry Pi which can be used for this task, but
 stuck at Python since it won't cross compile. Anyway
 that's another topic.
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
 you actually can add routes on a local machine. the real
 trick would be to have them pushed from the dd-wrt box so
 that they dont have to be manually set each time
 
 -Kevin
 
 
 How??
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
 
 with the route add command. obviously not as clean as an iptables
 forward rule which is also an option
 
 
 I'm presently ssh'ing into the DDWRT router and doing this:
 
 route add -host hostname gw 192.168.0.32
 
 and it's pretty much working, except that I've to add a route to
 every host for which I want to use the ADSL connection.
 
 If I do the same on my local machine, it doesn't work and packets
 still end up going through my fiber connection.
 
 Would iptables ROUTE target help if I use that on my local
 machine?
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
I think you want the forward chain, im not sure what tools dd-wrt and
iptables has for it as more of my experience is pf and pfsense, but
their should be a way to forward packets headed for certain ports or
networks to the ADSL gateway. just have the rule listen on the
internal interface and redirect certain traffic to the other gateway

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQ0LFzAAoJEAwpfz/ORQZC5CcIALTqfU43j54PADVeQnjH2O+W
T8hzYT7jpD6llBhm2ApTHiROlWJmTnKo2VksDDyRE7GMDmocqvU9CWR9XvrOD8lF
RMi+G2A6aTGqWPFNzmhrcbxxYEijsVtUehmkPTGqWqIdkFFy7qK0Mv/gU+nUjqzR
bKxozG9MqByowHBmbFYbXf+fBoWDDlkrm7j0HgOe808mBGRMuiCBaKSB5SDyBGze
lCVMsQ7GsZasys4cqhPqUbS/jmGxUvpIK4SBzcVGM3HpT3SowuRZhyeP3qbeFg/4
u6Mq9WwpLi1d89zKM65BSEsZJFwLWmoml112Wt+zLoOJidsXp7XovUDUYSLiu8A=
=oL1a
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} open-source: chat, tasks, resources, code

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Brandstatter

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/16/2012 11:26 PM, Grant wrote:
 When I need a new web-based software tool, I consider writing it myself and 
 if that isn't feasible
I try to use something open-source and self-hosted. I need something for
chat, task management, resource management, and code management, all for
groups. I'm considering Campfire, Trello, Float, and GitHub
respectively, but I thought I'd check with you guys to see if any of
this is available in an open-source and self-hosted form, especially in
portage.

 - Grant
for hosted git theres gitosis and other web based git tools to host your
own private repository. For the rest im not too sure since I don't know
what your requirements are of the various bits.

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQz1GEAAoJEAwpfz/ORQZC85AH/0AGLLuwgJ7uHcFYcz3j1Y5l
UVympJzDjLo6nOAkdfE423cIbfMhb2xG7YUASy3s71sRdmkuZM4hKVZLspkGj2kZ
AQ1tcdYg67Lp0faQIOyc0V796P+WNtGJCrKNvvN7M3LIJm6AxjnpLHsryY05IQE6
Og0sVm/C+zqUOYfK9PWC2oFuM674pPVt1MbfjXJNdmL88TriW5Vv+QCeqprjVci1
TJ1RSAKfAsCOnc9XkKJZ7iq5RIRkXwrx7w+BZvg8nVd7p+77AAD1QsjgPKBh7Vju
VY6CiV5/6As6ljjRU+K3Wk6iGlhmZg82WKRB7eyX130Jee5bx+TipCIDiEy81u8=
=WWMz
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} open-source: chat, tasks, resources, code

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/17/2012 05:06 PM, Michael Mol wrote:

What ive done on one of my servers is created a git user account that
cant login interactively, or with a password. (nologin), whoever needs
access gives me their private key and i add it to the authorized_keys
for the git account.

This is obvoiusly very basic and you could create users for each
project etc, or use one of the many git server programs that will
allow to have more fine grained access control, Just depends on your
needs.

For chat, ive used campfire for the chicago marathon, its not much
more than a glorified irc system. IRC is perfectly fine if your on a
closed network. but i would keep it off the general internet.

resource and task management, i think eclipse and some ides have
integrated solutions, outside of that not really sure

- -Kevin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQz9CNAAoJENfP/Gsfo0VKoz4IAJ0GmU+RSPntz5nGOLqQO2W2
rWPfr+KdfE7lH6jQwBdztKtFkT8/00YrBgQJxlZJe+sQy5EP3QaCq8+Uscl86Bq8
d4TTCq3JyJr4eyo4Ycd8L06poediISt+++tTbWc324pofRCYWbHyyhe08Eux86PB
IXkemgCunwx1YIFEGPhPYGSf0kSCAeEvyNDCut+faYNvZbEolxdqFs/SBSXNvD4E
MHWzIConWqzlzHi5mn3l/B8yZmwEXQFIsgp3HgOhheIRafDYhR6wx8Kjca+Kbrz3
diteEpUIAS2+2g8+DigJz1vyhxSQyFZ4EjGlRGb4O1VzGONt7fVbFKar0/CV5hQ=
=J2VH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} open-source: chat, tasks, resources, code

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/17/2012 06:33 PM, Grant wrote:
 What ive done on one of my servers is created a git user account
 that cant login interactively, or with a password. (nologin),
 whoever needs access gives me their private key and i add it to
 the authorized_keys for the git account.
 
 This is obvoiusly very basic and you could create users for each 
 project etc, or use one of the many git server programs that
 will allow to have more fine grained access control, Just depends
 on your needs.
 
 For chat, ive used campfire for the chicago marathon, its not
 much more than a glorified irc system. IRC is perfectly fine if
 your on a closed network. but i would keep it off the general
 internet.
 
 An IRC server shouldn't listen on an internet-facing port?  Are
 there security issues?
 
 - Grant
 
 
 resource and task management, i think eclipse and some ides have 
 integrated solutions, outside of that not really sure
 
 - -Kevin
irc servers are notorious for botnets and the like and yes, are often
a prime target for remote exploitation. they can be secured like the
major systems, but it can be a bit more of a challenge

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQz9pZAAoJENfP/Gsfo0VKdjQH/1Dc0qWISZc8xcMFKgBGlTlR
ao8UHcyHIoJapWESVOq/VglGBOXwiW2gWfSeO5LD+td+7hwe+5ZgkIewrPij9Dx5
yXxXDae3Obcd2L5ROZ9AncctM26vpqwBzTyFm+MXuaJfdFXECLaA1aMNptIJF2fr
iLSUntTlOooa7Falv+RCDg0ROXbV9VBckYPb3nKC38gUJvebw71uc/soGC4bzM7l
+cZRx/hXbcvnqXk8mXBl+Ox2t/UJfJuXXh3brK0lg8ov9Adho/3yoyYOPAYYPFAA
JZVy1P7j1JfHBBl72QSOcGbK1NC9+vmaysm4dXQJV9pTL/uRp4va5F1Q0iMIbi8=
=szla
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} A simple routing problem

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/17/2012 07:26 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm stuck with a routing issue:
 
 I have a DD-WRT router, which has one WAN port and four LAN ports
 with WiFi.
 
 I have a fiber connection which is connected by dialing PPPoE using
 pppd on the router, so I have no choice but to connect the fiber
 connection on WAN port.
 
 I have yet another (much slower) ADSL link, with it's own router
 (LAN-only). I'm trying to connect the router to the DD-WRT router's
 LAN port. I'm able to access the router, but routing through the
 gateway (the ADSL router) fails.
 
 Here's a simple diagram:
 
 The LAN network I'm using on DDWRT is 192.168.0.0, which is the
 LAN network for the internal side and WiFi.
 
 The fiber connection is obviously public network.
 
 The other ADSL connection can be configured to change subnet, it
 has a LAN side and WAN side.
 
 How I can I route through the ADSL router without requiring a
 separate NIC/network for it?
 
what exactly are you trying to route? traffic out to the internet over
the ADSL? or just trying to connect the machines on that router to the
fiber line and route all traffic from both out on the fiber?

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQz+VkAAoJENfP/Gsfo0VKoYEH/RF2dS+OL1E3F6R6ttzg2hCQ
W40hpfLXoYJ9b9Imha+yLLLp4EaIDFfleCRDKVgqUd5P4iuj8Vb1bwct+Tig2tYf
LmS1GRoSzeWH8n3uAIel5Uq2+ZXHx+FLwP0Ld8JzRFCMElwGqDiKxIxdUctYpMad
y6RIBtoe2iOPanfBLdL7lBYu3MqThGc8QBV4oBRNUbPQsfdO4Q3NIqHc1WZwhyrX
BkfFgqp75K2LeCgu2snkqDo3ul+W1BTvI4e4fQk3ByUIxJ18Cpelfazvwsul74wS
IR+1EKqXvhTU2Iu8klkNlIt2ph+nbufm/BalvILpbhHQga4zCfYVG9UWj/Xx10E=
=Oajb
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} A simple routing problem

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/17/2012 07:44 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:09:16 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter
 wrote:
 On 12/17/2012 07:26 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm stuck with a routing issue:
 
 I have a DD-WRT router, which has one WAN port and four LAN
 ports with WiFi.
 
 I have a fiber connection which is connected by dialing PPPoE
 using pppd on the router, so I have no choice but to connect
 the fiber connection on WAN port.
 
 I have yet another (much slower) ADSL link, with it's own
 router (LAN-only). I'm trying to connect the router to the
 DD-WRT router's LAN port. I'm able to access the router, but
 routing through the gateway (the ADSL router) fails.
 
 Here's a simple diagram:
 
 The LAN network I'm using on DDWRT is 192.168.0.0, which is
 the LAN network for the internal side and WiFi.
 
 The fiber connection is obviously public network.
 
 The other ADSL connection can be configured to change subnet,
 it has a LAN side and WAN side.
 
 How I can I route through the ADSL router without requiring a 
 separate NIC/network for it?
 
 what exactly are you trying to route? traffic out to the internet
 over the ADSL? or just trying to connect the machines on that
 router to the fiber line and route all traffic from both out on
 the fiber?
 
 -Kevin
 
 
 Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit than the ADSL 
 connection. I am trying to use the fiber connection for all
 activities except some torrent downloading for which I want to use
 my ADSL connection. Once I'm able to route through the ADSL
 gateway, it would be easy for me to setup another ip on eth0 on my
 machine on which transmission could listen. All traffic on that ip
 would be routed through ADSL and otherwise the fiber.
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
well in that case if you know how to set it up so that the dd-wrt
router can see the ADSL gateway you can set a route on your box to
route traffic on a specific device to that gateway. In fact, you might
even be able to static route the torrent ports to that gateway from dd-wrt

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQz+kBAAoJENfP/Gsfo0VKmi0H/0MU+5/fZUPTsJCBqXzigaHT
/cg3Th/SCTyd7F07OPzL6tFXT+toy0DLgQ1jbwx60qk8eV2YWQH/k8g9XDYg4cQG
qYI0JEgt2Gbg5BZONAYRDPX7R/iFnU4mbPqkXR8S7lBxBXTLUaTrE5JOTQzBO38v
XlVgfm0oPS50Cl4HkwZHgQPv5FkOL3h+zqjzLm+3LXNbToOiRUvi9w37kJgBXzh8
h5NOn/BvFkvKtKVAAt4tStqxxNoCAfeTOBquCyxG9lnSMM8exx/zCpQrKVs4wTcF
UIXVeC7ZpKTRid9L5V6rSl63gSSaptfWfxLMDCBiBAECI4JGjjRMBSRaA67ldfw=
=yl3e
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} A simple routing problem

2012-12-17 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 12/17/2012 08:00 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:24:41 AM IST, Kevin Brandstatter
 wrote:
 On 12/17/2012 07:44 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 On Tuesday 18 December 2012 09:09:16 AM IST, Kevin
 Brandstatter wrote:
 On 12/17/2012 07:26 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 I'm stuck with a routing issue:
 
 I have a DD-WRT router, which has one WAN port and four
 LAN ports with WiFi.
 
 I have a fiber connection which is connected by dialing
 PPPoE using pppd on the router, so I have no choice but to
 connect the fiber connection on WAN port.
 
 I have yet another (much slower) ADSL link, with it's own 
 router (LAN-only). I'm trying to connect the router to the 
 DD-WRT router's LAN port. I'm able to access the router,
 but routing through the gateway (the ADSL router) fails.
 
 Here's a simple diagram:
 
 The LAN network I'm using on DDWRT is 192.168.0.0, which
 is the LAN network for the internal side and WiFi.
 
 The fiber connection is obviously public network.
 
 The other ADSL connection can be configured to change
 subnet, it has a LAN side and WAN side.
 
 How I can I route through the ADSL router without requiring
 a separate NIC/network for it?
 
 what exactly are you trying to route? traffic out to the
 internet over the ADSL? or just trying to connect the
 machines on that router to the fiber line and route all
 traffic from both out on the fiber?
 
 -Kevin
 
 
 Actually my fiber connection has a smaller limit than the ADSL 
 connection. I am trying to use the fiber connection for all 
 activities except some torrent downloading for which I want to
 use my ADSL connection. Once I'm able to route through the
 ADSL gateway, it would be easy for me to setup another ip on
 eth0 on my machine on which transmission could listen. All
 traffic on that ip would be routed through ADSL and otherwise
 the fiber.
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
 well in that case if you know how to set it up so that the
 dd-wrt router can see the ADSL gateway you can set a route on
 your box to route traffic on a specific device to that gateway.
 In fact, you might even be able to static route the torrent ports
 to that gateway from dd-wrt
 
 -Kevin
 
 
 I tried that. As the simplest test, I added this on ddwrt:
 
 route add -host 8.8.8.8 gw 192.168.0.32
 
 Where 192.168.0.32 is the private IP of my ADSL router. But when I
 say ping 8.8.8.8 from ddwrt, I don't get any response. Any idea why
 this happens?
 
 -- Nilesh Govindarajan http://nileshgr.com
 
is the ADSL configured to forward to the internet? how is the gateway
set up? it needs to be configured to route the outbound traffic to the
internet

- -Kevin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQz+zEAAoJENfP/Gsfo0VKj2IH/1MpbUBS5vPPJtAa2jJprlyh
kDWDwVs7NFRrJE4SjOlXZmijP/5loE9YIvijm4rSNurLgqNxseatAQugAdERN4Py
Hrp+bTtr0AJ2EBwlabQsg0B7u0sFXuEjerhw4qoctEDw8cvbuKL7s3PWZzrXt2mk
3q++duj+2Riru2ojfX4oXFfoKCyQ3URVeosDfwF/leL8HTbsaUUYOQYV1bTGfcO7
JFmzS8w6X7CbdAEqjbSn7fu5WjLV3EvUYs8n1Xc12mtgptKZs1MkiSAN52Wwdihw
1vkZggTBuGTbs9RfJzKbtt/++tBH8Lxf+R3NetBzgBkzo4W9IFVsznY4GKH0+AE=
=aWAr
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} dedicated server or cloud server?

2012-12-14 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
Cloud services are often far more expensive, I work with someone who did a
fair amount of research of the various costs of clouds. They are good for
dynamic scaling of resources but if your concentrating on one server or
another its likely your server load isn't highly intensive and a single
dedicated server could handle it. Also, there are the options of cheaper
webhosting, or a VPS, as a true dedicated server can be quite expensive due
to the cost of rackspace.

In terms of availability, it simply depends on replication and the
reliability of the data site. with a standard cloud server there is likely
not replication across sites and so the availability is determined by
availability of the data center. Dedicated servers dont have multi site
replication (unless you do it yourself), however many provide far better
uptime SLAs than a cloud provider.
For example, Amazon EC2 SLA guaruntees 99.95% uptime. whereas dedicated
servers or VPSs can generally offer between 99,99% and 99.% (depending
on who it is).

-Kevin Brandstatter



On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Florian Philipp li...@binarywings.netwrote:

 Am 14.12.2012 11:00, schrieb Grant:
   Would everyone here be in favor of a dedicated server over a cloud
   server from a host with good cloud infrastructure?  The cloud server
   concept is amazing but from what I'm reading a dedicated server at the
   same price point far outperforms it.
  
   - Grant
 
  Last time I did the calculation, a dedicated or normal virtualized
  infrastructure was more cost effective as long as you could accurately
  predict the performance you need.
 
  Cloud services only really help if you need a high dynamic range
  regarding scale and performance, e.g. a service that could get a lot of
  new users very fast or is only really active for short time spans.
 
  Doesn't a good cloud server also have potentially higher availability
  compared to dedicated?
 
  - Grant

 I'd be grateful if anyone can point me at a well conducted study on that
 topic. Until then I just say that my anecdotal evidence shows the
 opposite: My cheap-ass virtual server has an uptime of 492 days with
 only minor, previously announced network outages. During the same time,
 Amazon EC2 had what, 3 or 4 major outages?

 Regards,
 Florian Philipp




Re: [gentoo-user] recovery of fstab

2012-12-11 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
mount them and see whats there?
also, what order did you mount them in? it may make a difference


On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:

 Well I have a gentoo system I'm trying to recover.
 I've got it booted up via systemrescue.

 I do not have a copy of the fstab, so what is the best
 way to discover which partitions are /boot / and so on?

 (brain dead tonight)


 I guesses but the / is blank?

 df snip
 /dev/sda2 61438696  51276944  10161752  84% /mnt/gentoo/boot
 /dev/sda3 61438696  51276944  10161752  84% /mnt/gentoo


 /mnt/gentoo/boot is populated (mounted correctly) but the /dev/sda3
 which I'm guessing is / is empty ?

 Been a while since I had to recover a system so referals to good
 docs are most welcome

 No to mention an automount capability with systemrescue?

 James








Re: [gentoo-user] eix and bad colors.

2012-12-07 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
I've had the same problem.
it seems setting DARK=true in .eixrc fixes the problem of the almost black
on black background for me

-Kevin


On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:26 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:

 Mark Knecht wrote:
  On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:01 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
  Howdy,
 
  I was using eix a bit ago and I noticed the colors have changed.  Since
  I like to have white text and a black background, this is not working to
  well for me.  It seems some of the output is black text.  Put black text
  on a black background and I have missing text, usually the very thing I
  am looking for.  I have looked for a config somewhere in /etc but can't
  find where this is set.  I found where other colors are set but not for
  eix.
 
  Anyone have a hint as to where this is set or is it hard coded into eix?
 
  Thanks much.
 
  Dale
  Dale,
 If you (or someone else)  finds a nice concise setting for
  terminals that are black background, white text, I hope you'll post if
  back. I'm not going to have time to look at this right now but like
  you hate the way black on black text is looking! ;-)
 
  Cheers,
  Mark
 
 

 Well, I'm sort of tied up at the moment.  In the process of picking out
 a rifle.  I can only afford to do this once for a good long while so I
 got to pick a good one.  Anyway, I tried the settings Helmut posted, it
 didn't work.  I think the version I have installed doesn't allow that so
 I may have to upgrade it to test.  I also took a look at the eix man
 page.  I went like this:  O_O  I also CC'd myself on the bug and the dev
 is working on it like a bee making honey.  I think he is about to revert
 back to the old way since it is causing him grief.  If he does, then we
 will be happy and someone else can cry over the spilt milk.  lol

 If I figure out something or Helmut's config works, I'll post back.

 Dale

 :-)  :-)

 --
 I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or
 how you interpreted my words!





Re: [gentoo-user] openconnect and network manager

2012-12-06 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
no have you installed the networkmanager-openconnect plugin?

as a side note, i solved the problem by reloading the dbus service which
fixed the permissions issued i was having


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Patrick Holthaus 
patrick.holth...@uni-bielefeld.de wrote:

 Hey Kevin,

 Sorry, I can't help you with your problem. I'm also having issues with
 openconnect and networkmanager. The problem for me is that openconnect vpn
 devices won't even show up in the networkmanagement tool (kde). Did you
 expeirience similar?

 Thank you for your help.

 --
 Regards
 Patrick


Re: [gentoo-user] continue an installation

2012-12-06 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
coorect, you could concievable run something like
ebuild ebuildname qmerge if all the steps have been completed

-Kevin


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:44 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, 6 Dec 2012 08:45:10 +0100
 Willie WY Wong wong...@member.ams.org wrote:

  Hi list,
 
  Suppose that I tried to emerge a package, and the compilation phase
  went through without problems, but it got stopped in the installation
  phase. Is there a way to (after I fixed the problem) to tell portage
  to install the (now all already compiled binaries sitting in
  /var/tmp/portage) directly without having to redo the compiling
  phase?

 not with emerge, but you can use the lower-level command ebuild for
 that.

 portage  ebuild are analogous to yum  rpm or to apt* and dpkg

 man ebuild for more info

 
  Case in point:
 
  I just tried to update dev-lib/boost to 1.52. The compilation went
  without a hitch, but the installation died because of file collision
  against (I think) boost-1.49.0-r1000. Now that the colliding files are
  no longer there, is there a way to tell portage to go ahead an install
  boost-1.52 from the compiled sources in /var/tmp/portage ?
 
  Thanks,
 
  W



 --
 Alan McKinnon
 alan.mckin...@gmail.com





[gentoo-user] openconnect and network manager

2012-12-04 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
I'm having a bit of trouble tracking down the issue im having with
openconnect
it connects fine if i run from command line as root, as expected, but
network manager cant
seem to create the tun device.
This all works in ubuntu so im sure its just a permissions/configuration
issue, I just don't know where to look.

any ideas would be appreciated.

-Kevin B


Re: [gentoo-user] gst-plugins-ugly Update Error install phase

2012-12-02 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
ive had my own issues with the gstreamer libs.
but its with rebuilding, for some reason its failing saying there isnt a
make file


On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de wrote:

 Hello,

 i run update and by gstreamer i become the error message:

  Source compiled.
  Test phase [not enabled]: media-libs/gst-plugins-ugly-0.10.18

  Install gst-plugins-ugly-0.10.18 into
 /var/tmp/portage/media-libs/gst-plugins-ugly-0.10.18/image/ category
 media-libs
  * ERROR: media-libs/gst-plugins-ugly-0.10.18 failed (install phase):
  *   __eapi2_src_install is not supported


 Has someone an idea what is wrong? Has someone same msg and has realized
 the Error?


 Regards
 Silvio




Re: [gentoo-user] threads use flag for apache and php

2012-11-30 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
I would suggest using threads

-Kevin B


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.auwrote:

 ok, major update time and I am again in a bind with the threads use
 flag.

 PHP wants it, or doesnt and so does/doesnt apache and they wont play
 nice.  So if I have to go back and rebuild a whole lot of stuff one way
 or the other which should it be? - +threads for both, neither, one
 enabled ... no choice will be pain free :(

 Its a mainly desktop system running almost everything but generally
 lightly loaded.

 Suggestions?

 BillK







Re: [gentoo-user] threads use flag for apache and php

2012-11-30 Thread Kevin Brandstatter
well i guess it depends if your using php that takes advantage of
concurrency. If you dont then threads arent necessary,
for apache i would recommend threads because it does make use of them.

Kevin B


On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:13 PM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.auwrote:

 why? - threads sounds like a good thing, but is it really if its
 optional?

 Its looking like threads minus is the way to go for php as geos needs
 php built with -threads - I now suspect I am going to be locked into one
 way (hopefully there is one way!) once I sort out the build
 dependencies.

 BillK

 On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 16:57 -0600, Kevin Brandstatter wrote:
  I would suggest using threads
 
 
  -Kevin B
 
 
  On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:35 PM, William Kenworthy
  bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
  ok, major update time and I am again in a bind with the
  threads use
  flag.
 
  PHP wants it, or doesnt and so does/doesnt apache and they
  wont play
  nice.  So if I have to go back and rebuild a whole lot of
  stuff one way
  or the other which should it be? - +threads for both, neither,
  one
  enabled ... no choice will be pain free :(
 
  Its a mainly desktop system running almost everything but
  generally
  lightly loaded.
 
  Suggestions?
 
  BillK