[gentoo-user] gnubatch-1.4 make error [OT]
Hello, Maybe it is OT, but i am doing it on gentoo. I am trying to compile gnubatch-1.4 (http://www.gnu.org/s/gnubatch/). GCC-4.5.3, bison 2.4.3, flex 2.5.35. I get the following error message: cd build;make all make[1]: Entering directory `/home/gnubatch/build' gcc -O -g -Wall -fno-stack-protector -Ihdrs -I.. -c -o btcharge.o btcharge.c btcharge.c:35:13: warning: ‘Filename’ defined but not used cd lib;make make[2]: Entering directory `/home/gnubatch/build/lib' libtool --mode=compile gcc -O -g -Wall -fno-stack-protector -I../hdrs -I../.. -c -o advtime.o advtime.c libtool: compile: unable to infer tagged configuration libtool: compile: specify a tag with `--tag' make[2]: *** [advtime.o] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/gnubatch/build/lib' make[1]: *** [lib/libgnubatch_int.la] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/gnubatch/build' make: *** [build-src] Error 2 Anybody could explain, what should i do? Thank you in advance.
Re: [gentoo-user] gnubatch-1.4 make error [OT]
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote: On 10/04/2011 09:00 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 10/04/2011 04:14 AM, Marius Vaitiekunas wrote: You can try exporting LIBTOOL='/usr/bin/libtool --tag=CC' before you emerge it. This is usually a Makefile problem, I'd file a bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/ Oh, it isn't in portage. It's a bug in the Makefiles. The first one is in build/lib/Makefile, you can edit the CC line to read, CC = libtool --tag=CC --mode=compile gcc But, all other calls to libtool have the same problem, across multiple Makefiles. I was able to compile it eventually, but I had to edit them all. Yes, it isn't in portage.. I have compiled it by putting --tag=CXX. There were some other errors also. Not so easy job to build packages without portage :)
Re: [gentoo-user] otrs
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Am 22.09.2011 14:43, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: I am going the manual path right now, just to get things working asap. You know what? Didn't get it working! I always hit some bug around XML-Parser and couldn't find a solution anywhere. Even registered on OTRS-Forum, no luck there anyway. After a day spent on all this I simply deleted the VM and started to install another distro (the one starting with U ;-) ) just to get OTRS working for the customer asap. They will check it out now, I might try to get it working with gentoo later. For now I spent enough time and energy on that issue. thanks for the feedback anyway, Stefan As I told you, the best way to install on gentoo is installation from source. Deb packages have some problem also. If you need an easy installation via package manager, go with rpm distro.
Re: [gentoo-user] otrs
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at wrote: Anyone installed otrs with webapp-config? I just don't get it! otrs emerged fine, but I get: # webapp-config -I -h localhost -d 'otrs' otrs 3.0.10 * Fatal error: Unable to determine location of master copy * Fatal error(s) - aborting Could someone please help? google doesn't get me fitting answers for gentoo Thanks! Stefan Hi, I strongly suggest you to use source package installation method. I am using it without any problem.
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How's the openrc update going for everyone?
Hi, Maybe, a little OT. Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify? Thank You! -- mv
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How's the openrc update going for everyone?
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:33 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: Marius Vaitiekunas wrote: Hi, Maybe, a little OT. Could anybody tell me, how to make gentoo baselayout-2 system to be completely unicode utf-8? Which config files I should modify? Thank You! This is how I did mine. root@fireball / # cat /etc/make.conf | grep utf LC_ALL=en_US.utf8 root@fireball / # I think that is all I did. Then again, it seems I had to run some command but can't recall it. That help? Dale :-) :-) Thank you both for answers. I have some problems with GD library and unicode. As I can see from your posts nothing changed in baselayout-2. There is some more info, if it is not outdated: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/utf-8.xml
Re: [gentoo-user] The CHOST variable
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Nils Holland n...@tisys.org wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: Interestingly, Ubuntu has always built for basic arches, and they seem to get away with it. IIRC they are now on i586 but for the longest time used i386. No performance issues. You might want to investigate how they do their builds and see if you can use their tricks. The question is, I guess, if the target host, when of the same arch (i.e. i[3456]86) does actually have any influence on the code that gets generated in terms of performance or ability to run on other sub-arches. This is what I really couldn't find out so far and would find highly interesting to know. For example, why not just go (and stay) with CHOST=i386-pc-linux-gnu and on an i686 machine, set march or mcpu = i686 via CFLAGS if you want to optimize for the particular subarch at hand? Why should it be necessary / what would the (dis)advantages be of of such a setup vs. also having CHOST set to i686-pc-linux-gnu? Concering the Gentoo doc about changing the CHOST that was mentioned: Yep, I've read that. If I understood it correctly, problems when changing CHOST mainly seem to arise because of the way GCC and related basic build utils install themselves (using the host triplet as part of their path or executable name), leaving wrong / messed up references when changing the CHOST. For example, as I've said previously, the CHOST value gets passed to ./configure as --host for each package that gets build. That would make configure try to select a compiler called CHOST-gcc in order to compile the package, i.e. when CHOST is i486-pc-linux-gnu, a compiler called i486-pc-linux-gnu-gcc would be used. Include file directories for glibc and / or glibc itself sems to be selected by a similiar mechanism. All right, no problem, so far this only determines how things are called and where they are located, but are there any other real effects of all this stuff? The Gentoo CHOST document that was mentioned says something about nptl not being available on i386. If true, and if the host variable generally influences the availability of features, things would slowly start to make sens as to why the CHOST might be important. On the other hand, I've read through some documentation of the GNU C library (glibc) and didn't even find anything about nptl not being available on i386, not to mention anything else about different features on different subarches. You see, I'm probably not entirely getting it yet. ;-) Greetings, Nils Hi, I am not a big guru there, but i have changed CHOST variable successfully few years ago. If I remember, the steps were like that: Change CHOST variable. Bootstrap system (like building from stage 1): # /usr/portage/scripts/bootstrap.sh # emerge -e system # emerge -e world Before gentoo has been providing daily stages, I was installing my systems from stage1. It was a nice learning curve :) -- mv
Re: [gentoo-user] Adding more than one static IP
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Amar Cosic amar.co...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.comwrote: config_eth0=( 77.xxx.104.14/24 ) routes_eth0=( default via 77.xxx.104.1 ) config_eth0:1=( 77.xxx.104.100/24 ) routes_eth0:1=( default via 77.xxx.104.1 ) config_eth0:2=( 77.xxx.104.101/24 ) routes_eth0:2=( default via 77.xxx.104.1 ) config_eth0:3=( 77.xxx.105.100/24 ) routes_eth0:3=( default via 77.xxx.105.1 ) You should let us know what you're trying to achieve with this. Every time I have seen config like this, it has been because of fundamental misunderstandings of networking. More that one IP address on a subnet (unless there are VIPs) = fail. Remember routing occurs at layer 3, and for most configs should have no reference physical interface. The OS knows which interface the next hop can be found. In your config you've set the same route three times which makes no sense. (ok i've oversimplified, but for 99.9% of cases the above is true) I have this on Debian in /etc/network/interfaces: auto lo iface lo inet loopback auto eth0 iface eth0 inet static address 82.xxx.148.194 netmask 255.255.255.128 gateway 82.xxx.148.131 auto eth0:1 iface eth0:1 inet static address 82.xxx.148.195 netmask 255.255.255.128 auto eth0:2 iface eth0:2 inet static address 82.xxx.148.196 netmask 255.255.255.128 auto eth0:3 iface eth0:3 inet static address 82.xxx.148.197 netmask 255.255.255.128 What I want to know is what is equivalent for this on Gentoo. Let's just say this is VPS server with 4 IP's assigned to me as customer -- Amar Ćosić amar.co...@gmail.com Hi, I am using like that in /etc/conf.d/net - config_eth0=( ip1 netmask 255.255.255.224 ip2 netmask 255.255.255.255 ip3 netmask 255.255.255.255 ) routes_eth0=( default via your_gw ) - ifconfig doesn't show this info. I use ip command for that: # ip addr I hope it helps. -- mv
Re: [gentoo-user] modprobe warnings
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 8:48 PM, David Relson rel...@osagesoftware.comwrote: My /etc/modprobe.d directory is under configuration management using subversion. Whenever modprobe runs, it reads the files in the .svn directory and complains about all the stuff it doesn't understand, for example: Jan 15 08:57:22 osage modprobe: WARNING: /etc/modprobe.d/.svn/entries line 266: ignoring bad line starting with ' How can I turn off these warnings? Regards, David Hi, Give a try to mercurial. # emerge mercurial # vim /root/.hgrc [ui] Name Surname em...@example.com # cd /etc # hg init # hg add # hg status # hg commit -m Start! And You are ready to go :) Good luck. -- mv
Re: [gentoo-user] Eeek: many open ports
Hi, Could it be torrents..? On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote: Eeek!! Just fooling around with some software on my laptop, I found that my Gentoo desktop has an even dozen open inet ports with something listening to them, in addition to the ones I would expect (25, 80 and so on). They are all in the range 32768-6. Netstat agrees that they're open but does not disclose which process is listening. Does anybody know how to find this out? ++ kevin -- Kevin O'Gorman, PhD -- mv
Re: [gentoo-user] migrating disks (from mounts to disklabels
Hi, One question about ext4. Is it possible to resize partition without unmounting it like on reiserfs filesystem? On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.comwrote: Apparently, though unproven, at 03:44 on Friday 19 November 2010, Walter Dnes did opine thusly: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:20:52PM -0600, Dale wrote This is mine and it worked when I rebooted a bit ago. LABEL=boot/bootext2noatime1 2 LABEL=root /reiserfsdefaults0 1 LABEL=swapnoneswapsw0 0 LABEL=portage/usr/portageext3defaults0 1 LABEL=home/homereiserfsdefaults1 1 LABEL=data/datareiserfsdefaults0 1 I use a variety of file systems don't I? lol I hope that helps. I have my own weird setup that optimizes disk usage, without LVM. It consists of a 256 *MEGA*byte / partition (ext2fs), some swap, and the rest of the drive is one big reiserfs3 partition mounted as /home. /opt, /var, /usr/, and /tmp physically reside on the big /home partition, but are bindmounted into the / partition. Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 121601 9767600015 Extended /dev/sda5 1 33 265009+ 83 Linux /dev/sda6 341209 9446188+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/sda71210 121601 967048708+ 83 Linux /dev/sda5 / ext2 noatime,nodiratime,async 0 1 /dev/sda7 /home reiserfs noatime,nodiratime,async,notail 0 1 /home/bindmounts/opt/opt auto bind0 0 /home/bindmounts/var/var auto bind0 0 /home/bindmounts/usr/usr auto bind0 0 /home/bindmounts/tmp /tmp auto bind0 0 /dev/sda6 none swap sw0 0 Let me optimize that for you a little bit more: A single 1T reiser3 partition mounted at / This will optimize away the small performance loss introduced by that (empty) / on ext2 Seriously dude, this looks like a dumb scheme that gives you warm and fuzzies but doesn't actually accomplish anything except increased complexity. Feel free to publish verifiable metrics to back up your case. -- alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com -- mv
Re: [gentoo-user] how to rebuild gentoo on a somewhat different hardware
Hello, I think You could try: 1) change cflags in make.conf 2) bootstrap.sh 3) emerge -e system 4) emerge -e world In other words this is how to build a system from stage 1. On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: On 11/16/10 10:56:29, Alan McKinnon wrote: Backup your portage related data and re-install. Seriously - you know you are looking at doing emerge -e world and will need to fiddle stuff to make it complete successfully. If you just reinstall, put your old world file and /etc/portage/ back then let portage have at it, that is exactly what will happen. You'll have 30-45 minutes of setup work and a high level of confidence it will complete successfully. Trying to fix the existing installation is potentially many hours of poking around to see what changed, potentially several goes at running emerge -e world, hair pulling, and you will probably give up and just reinstall anyway. I'm assuming you are looking for the easiest, fastest route to success with the least pain, and that your days of poking into portage to see how things work for fun are long over. Thanks Alan, just one more question: where are information like the current eselect(ions) stored? Helmut. -- mv
