Re: [gentoo-user] Portage performance dropped considerably
No, it's not just you, running emerge -uNDvp world takes slightly over 18 minutes on my laptop (i5 M 430 @ 2.27GHz) - and when there was lot to update I had to wait over 1hr to just get the list of packages. I wonder if there's some profiling tool for portage. Also: time FEATURES=-xattr emerge owncloud -v real6m31.202s user2m42.057s sys 2m1.541s time FEATURES=xattr emerge owncloud -v real30m15.632s user22m44.369s sys 5m30.129s 5 times longer - for something that's essentially copying files. On 26 January 2014 15:35, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com wrote: Anyone else noticed this yet? Some portage update seems to have made emerge -uDN @world perform about 10 times slower than before. It used to take seconds, now it takes about 4 minutes only to tell me that there's nothing to update. And it does that every time, even directly in succession and with the caches warm. Is it just me?
Re: [gentoo-user] dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4 and glibc
No, it's not a typo - you have to add splitdebug to FEATURES variable in /etc/make.conf (or /etc/portage/make.conf). Splitdebug is not a USE flag. On 14 September 2012 21:48, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote: I got this message in elog: * Messages for package dev-util/valgrind-3.7.0-r4: * Valgrind will not work if glibc does not have debug symbols. * To fix this you can add splitdebug to FEATURES in make.conf * and remerge glibc. See: * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214065 * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274771 * https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=388703 but my glibc has no splitdebug USE flags: [I] sys-libs/glibc Installed versions: 2.15-r2(2.2)^s(08:44:11 08/10/12)(multilib - crosscompile_opts_headers-only -debug -gd -hardened -profile -selinux - vanilla) As a matter of fact nothing has: $ euse -i splitdebug global use flags (searching: splitdebug) no matching entries found local use flags (searching: splitdebug) no matching entries found Is this a typo? -- Regards, Mick
Re: [gentoo-user] Lynx, Links, or Elinks?
w3m,links and elinks. w3m and links as they support displaying images under framebuffer, and elinks for it's javascript support. If you don't need these features, any text browser is good for browsing html documentation :) On 9 December 2011 11:38, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote: As the subject says: Which text browser do you recommend? ( I just want to read some documentations in HTML. ) Rgds, -- FdS Pandu E Poluan ~ IT Optimizer ~ • LOPSA Member #15248 • Blog : http://pepoluan.tumblr.com • Linked-In : http://id.linkedin.com/in/pepoluan
Re: [gentoo-user] binutils broken revdep-rebuild
W dniu 04.02.2010 08:15, Steven pisze: I am having a recurring error for the last few weeks revdep-rebuild -p * Configuring search environment for revdep-rebuild * Checking reverse dependencies * Packages containing binaries and libraries broken by a package * update * will be emerged. * Collecting system binaries and libraries * Generated new 1_files.rr * Collecting complete LD_LIBRARY_PATH * Generated new 2_ldpath.rr * Checking dynamic linking consistency [ 37% ] * broken /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libbfd.la (requires -liberty) * broken * /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libopcodes.la * (requires -liberty) [ 100% ] * Generated new 3_broken.rr * Assigning files to packages * /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libbfd.la * - sys-devel/binutils * /usr/lib64/binutils/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/2.20/libopcodes.la * - sys-devel/binutils * Generated new 4_raw.rr and 4_owners.rr * Cleaning list of packages to rebuild * Generated new 4_pkgs.rr * Assigning packages to ebuilds * Generated new 4_ebuilds.rr * Evaluating package order * Generated new 5_order.rr * All prepared. Starting rebuild emerge --oneshot --pretend sys-devel/binutils:0 I am not to sure how to go about trouble shooting this problem. Everything seems to be running as usual aside from the revdep-rebuild broken error. Check if you have /etc/ld.so.conf.d/05binutils and not /etc/env.d/00glibc ( this file should contain LDPATH=include ld.so.conf.d/*.conf ), if so - rebuild glibc. If this is not the case, maybe try lafilefixer --justfixit. HTH
Re: [gentoo-user] binutils broken revdep-rebuild
W dniu 04.02.2010 12:45, Willie Wong pisze: On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 01:59:14AM -0800, Steven wrote: I tried all, and nothing seemed to solve the problem. I'm at a loss as to what this could be. When it says requires -liberty is liberty part of a package? I am not sure what it means by -liberty and were to acquire it. The library's name is iberty. The -l part is saying that it is a library. http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libiberty/ I don't have access to my gentoo computer at the moment, so I can't tell you where that comes from. But it is probably from either glibc, gcc, or libstdc++. I expect the previous poster who told you to remerge glibc knew the answer :) But if I am reading revdep-rebuild output correctly, it means that your binutils is compiled to be linked against that library. But the library cannot be found by revdep-rebuild. Hence the error. W libiberty.a comes from binutils. Looking at Stefan revdep-rebuild environment output it seems that revdep-rebuild doesn't handle 'include wildcard' statements in ld.so.conf. This bug is already reported #298651. Mariusz Ceier
