Re: [gentoo-user] kde-meta minus toys, games, etc

2006-06-02 Thread Mike Owen

On 6/2/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi All,

Apologies if this has been asked before.  I uninstalled my monolithic
KDE and am ready to install the split KDE ebuilds.  I want to install
everything except toys, games and educational packages.  Since the
DO_NOT_COMPILE is not meant to be used anymore, how would you suggest
I go about it?
--
Regards,
Mick


Install kdebase-meta, kdeutils-meta, kdeadmin-meta, etc.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Google Picasa for Linux!

2006-05-26 Thread Mike Owen

On 5/26/06, JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

It is official.

http://picasa.google.com/linux/

It installs and runs well with Gentoo.



Gentoo on the x86 arch you mean. It's a shame they released a binary
only version, especially one using a Wine wrapper around the original
Windows application.

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gziiping files in /usr/share/doc/packet

2006-04-28 Thread Mike Owen

On 4/28/06, Yrjö Hatakka [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

How can I turn this retarded behaviour off ?

--
ykä at home



There are a few bugs open on bugzilla for this. I personally hate it,
so I made a small patch for portage to disable it. If you want to
disable it for the future, edit /usr/lib/portage/bin/dodoc, and remove
the gzip line. Every time you update portage, you'll need to modify
that file.

Mike

--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Find IP of proxy

2006-04-06 Thread Mike Owen
On 4/5/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi All,

 At work there's a rather restrictive gateway in place for connecting
 LAN desktops to the Internet.  How would you go about finding its IP
 address?

 Assume that I am booting with Knoppix for this purpose.
 --
 Regards,
 Mick


I'm curious as to why you need the proxy info in the first place. It
sounds like you can connect out just fine, so why bother with
configuring a proxy?

If you are allowed to send icmp and udp traffic out of the network, a
traceroute should show you what hops are on your network. If routing
forces all traffic through this proxy, it'll probably be one of these
hops.

Or, they could be doing policy routing where only tcp port 80/443
traffic goes through the proxy, and all other traffic goes out some
other route. In that case, you'll need to use a tcp traceroute program
configured to probe on port 80, so it is forced through the proxy.

Anyways, it sounds like that company has a few issues with their
security policy if it's so easily circumvented.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Find IP of proxy

2006-04-06 Thread Mike Owen
On 4/6/06, Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 06/04/06, Mike Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  I'm curious as to why you need the proxy info in the first place. It
  sounds like you can connect out just fine, so why bother with
  configuring a proxy?

 No I can't connect to the Internet.  Also I believe that icmp traffic
 is blocked.  No pings are returned.


On the Windows side, do you have to authenticate to the proxy, or does
it just connect through it?


 
  If you are allowed to send icmp and udp traffic out of the network, a
  traceroute should show you what hops are on your network. If routing
  forces all traffic through this proxy, it'll probably be one of these
  hops.
 
  Or, they could be doing policy routing where only tcp port 80/443
  traffic goes through the proxy, and all other traffic goes out some
  other route. In that case, you'll need to use a tcp traceroute program
  configured to probe on port 80, so it is forced through the proxy.

 How do I do that?


emerge -vp tcptraceroute
 :P

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Versiera Internet Management and Monitoring System

2006-04-05 Thread Mike Owen
On 4/5/06, Frank Pikelner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  NetCraft Communications Incorporated today announced the immediate
snip spam

I can't believe Netcraft thinks that spamming mailing lists will get
people interested in their product. If anything, I think it would have
the opposite effect. I for one am now quite annoyed with them, where I
was merely ambivalent before.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Current state of the Gentoo installation process

2006-03-21 Thread Mike Owen
On 3/20/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 That sounds pretty good to me.  So if I do a stage 3 install as per
 the current Gentoo docs plus 'emerge -e system' I will end up with the
 same thing that I did with a stage 1 install?  I remember thinking
 that I was getting a deeper level of optimization by starting with
 stage 1.  I can't remember the details anymore though.

 - Grant


Yes, effectively it's the same thing. In both cases (Stage1 or Stage3
+ emerge -e system) you've built every package yourself. Starting with
Stage3 gives you a usable system right at the start, while with Stage1
you need to spend a fairly large amount of time getting the system
ready.

Also, if you start with Stage3, you may not even need to rebuild the
installed packages, as if it's been a little while since the Stage3
image was created, there will be new versions of everything, so you'd
be rebuilding when you do a 'emerge -u system' anyways.

HTH,
Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Current state of the Gentoo installation process

2006-03-20 Thread Mike Owen
On 3/20/06, Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello, I installed Gentoo on my four systems a while ago and I've just
 acquired a couple of new-to-me P3-500's.  I'd like to install Gentoo
 on these new systems but I'm a little confused by the changes made to
 the installation process recently.  I've never done anything but a
 stage 1 installation, but I remember reading that those instructions
 were removed from the installation documentation, and now I see a GUI
 and a command line installer on the latest LiveCD.  What is currently
 the best installation method if I'm in the stage 1 mindset?

 - Grant


Stage3 offers everything that a Stage1 does, it's just faster.
Especially on those 500 Mhz systems, I'd use the Stage3. If you really
must build every package by hand, use the Stage3 install, and then do
a 'emerge -e system'. This will cause it to rebuild every package. On
those systems though, unless you're using distcc or a cross-compiler
on a faster system, stick with the Stage3 install so you don't spend
24+ hours bootstrapping.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge lilo fails

2006-03-08 Thread Mike Owen
On 3/6/06, Erwin Lang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hi everyone!

 i tried to emerge lilo (`emerge -bva lilo') - but it aborts with the following
 error-message:

 open_wr:   /dev/loop5 (symlink to /dev/loop/5)
 open_wr:   /dev/loop5 (symlink to /dev/loop/5)


In the past, emerging LILO would choke while trying to mount/unmount
your /boot partition. It looks like it's doing the same with the loop
devices. Try unmounting all your loop devices, and then remerging
LILO.

HTH,
Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] accelerate emerge

2006-02-28 Thread Mike Owen
On 2/28/06, Iain Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 17:27 -0500, Walter Dnes wrote:
 
I have a different interpretation.

 I assume you know about FEATURES=parallel-fetch?

It's probably not the best idea to recommend ~arch versions of portage.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ways to update portage

2006-02-13 Thread Mike Owen
On 2/13/06, Daniel da Veiga [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I have this server at work, it has been running ok for a long time,
 but I'd like to install some new apps to it, but I have a strongly
 configured firewall (no rsync) and emerge-webrsync seems to fail every
 time.

 Is there another way to update portage tree? For my first update I
 downloaded the snapshot and decompressed it directly to the filesystem
 (but that requires a reboot and its kinda brute force). Is there a
 way to download the snapshot and make emerge or even emerge-webrsync
 to use the downloaded file instead of trying to download a new one?

 Thanks for any sugestion.



If you put the snapshot  + md5sum in the directory
$PORTAGE_TMPDIR/emerge-webrsync it will use those without downloading
a new snapshot.

Or, you can manually do the sync yourself. Extract the
portage-snapshot into a directory, and then use the following command:

rsync -av --progress --stats --delete --delete-after \
--exclude='/distfiles' --exclude='/packages' \
--exclude='/local' . ${PORTDIR%%/}

Either define PORTDIR, or replace that with the location of your
portage tree (/usr/portage by default).

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] How to determine if a partition is formated

2006-02-10 Thread Mike Owen
On 2/10/06, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Fdisk -l



Even easier:
waldo# file -s /dev/sdb1
/dev/sdb1: SGI XFS filesystem data (blksz 4096, inosz 256, v2 dirs)

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] emerge update world and modular xorg-x11

2006-01-31 Thread Mike Owen
On 1/31/06, Cláudio Henrique [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 (dependency required by media-gfx/gimp-2.2.8-r1 [ebuild])

Upgrade to gimp-2.2.9, which has support for Modular X.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] How many people use KDE?

2006-01-20 Thread Mike Owen
On 1/20/06, Linux Java [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I wanna to know KDE and Gnome which is more popular.



I used Gnome for years (5 or 6 maybe?), but have recently switched to
kde-3.4 and then now kde-3.5. For me, I wanted to try something
different, and it is a nice change. I may swap back eventually, or
even go back to Afterstep or Enlightenment, but for now kde-3.5 works
for me.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Emerge files sometimes just abort without error

2006-01-19 Thread Mike Owen
On 1/19/06, Daevid Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I've noticed lately that when I do an emerge -Davu world (for example),
 that some of the ebuilds just abort part way through compilation. No error.
 No anything. I'm just sitting there at a command prompt like nothing
 happened.

 What gives?


I've been seeing the same thing occasionally for the last 2-3 weeks
I'd say. I'm still trying to track it down, so I haven't filed a bug
report yet. About the only ~arch software on my box is modular X and
it's deps, although I think it may have started before I did that
upgrade.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] gentoo on xeon with 64 bits extention

2006-01-12 Thread Mike Owen
On 1/12/06, Catalin Neagoe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi folks,

 Anyone knows if there is gentoo for  xeon with 64 bits extention?
 'cause I've seen that there are only amd_64,ppc64 and sparc64 gentoo
 versions.
 Am I wrong?

 Thank you.

 --
 Catalin

Even though it's called amd64, it's for all x86_64 machines. I
believe at one time it was actually called x86_64, but then because
amd was the only one with an x86 compatible CPU, it was renamed to
amd64.

So yes, use the amd64 profile even though it's an em64t machine.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Autoconfiguring default route

2005-08-19 Thread Mike Owen
On 8/19/05, José Pablo Ezequiel Fernández
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I still can figure out how to configure my default route with the new
 configuration format (as stupid as that may sound).
 I have this:
 route_eth0=(default via 192.168.1.101)

Change that to routes_eth0 and it should work.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] kernel building tools

2005-05-25 Thread Mike Owen
On 5/25/05, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Is it OK to use 'make oldmenuconfig' to ensure that the options I had
 selected in a 2.6.x kernel also are selected for the newer 2.6. kernel?
 Isn't  'make oldmenuconfig' deprecated for 2.6 or does it still work?
 
 Also I perviously used xconfig  (make xconfig) in lieu of make menuconfig,
 but I cannot seem to find anything other than menuconfig. Surely
 there is a nicer gui to use to build kernels and track options selected
 in various kernel builds than the ole standby 'make menuconfig'.
 
 
 ideas?
 
 
 James
 

I typically just use make oldconfig, as the number of changes from
one version to the next aren't that great normally. Doing a make
oldconfig will prompt you for each new feature, so once you have your
baseline kernel set, make oldconfig is real quick. When moving between
different -rX versions, it often won't prompt at all.

Mike

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] / approaching 100%

2005-04-11 Thread Mike Owen
On Apr 11, 2005 3:43 PM, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi,
I've got a remote Gentoo machine where the root / partition is
 rapidly approaching 100% accoding to df. How can I fairly quickly
 determine where the disk space is getting used?
 

du -hs /* 

This will give you an easy to read listing of all the subdirectories
off of your root with the amount of disk used by each. If you add -c
to the options, it'll print a total at the end.

 thanks,
 Mark

Mike
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list