On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 08:24:02 -0600
Dale <rdalek1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Willie Wong wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 09:48:12PM -0600, Penguin Lover Dale
> > squawked: 
> >>     
> >
> > I would just love to help... but your Chrome Messenger seems to be
> > b0rked. 
> >
> > W
> >
> >   
> 
> OK.  I'm not sure how I did this before but here we go with version
> 2.0. 
> 
> I sync'ed last night, ran emerge -uvDNa world and got this:
> 
> r...@smoker / # emerge -uvDNa world
> 
> These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> 
> Calculating dependencies... done!
> 
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "~net-libs/ortp-0.7.1".
> (dependency required by "kde-base/kopete-3.5.10-r4" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by "kde-base/kdenetwork-meta-3.5.10" [installed])
> (dependency required by "kde-base/kde-meta-3.5.10" [installed])
> (dependency required by "@world" [argument])
> 
> r...@smoker / #
> 
> As I understand this, kde-meta:3.5 is in world, which it is, kde-meta 
> pulls in kdenetwork-meta which pulls in kopete.  It seems that kopete 
> wants to install ortp.  I don't need it but this is where we are
> since I am using kde-meta.  This is using the kde-sunset layman
> thingy.  I'm not big on layman stuff but it keeps me a working KDE
> since KDE 4 is not ready yet.
> 
> Anyway, it claims it needs ortp-0.7.1 which according to google
> exists somewhere but it's not in portage.  I get that from here:
> 
> r...@smoker / # equery list -p net-libs/ortp
> [ Searching for package 'ortp' in 'net-libs' among: ]
>  * installed packages
>  * Portage tree (/usr/portage)
> [-P-] [  ] net-libs/ortp-0.13.1-r1 (0)
> [-P-] [M~] net-libs/ortp-0.15.0 (0)
> [-P-] [  ] net-libs/ortp-0.15.0_p1 (0)
> [-P-] [M~] net-libs/ortp-0.16.0 (0)
> r...@smoker / #
> 
> Two options.  1:  Convince portage not to install ortp somehow since
> I don't need it anyway.  2:  Figure out where it is so portage can
> find the package it needs which appears to not be in the tree and may
> be a seriously old version to boot.  I prefer #1 but #2 would be OK.
> 
> I'm scared of option #3.  I don't want to add any more overlay
> stuff. It makes portage really slow here  It takes several minutes
> sometimes for it to calculate what is needed for updates and such
> even where there is very little to update.  Let's drift away from
> that if we can.  ;-) 
> 
> Since I am back to my trusty old Seamonkey 1, let's see if this works 
> better.  Ideas anyone?
> 
Add -jingle to wherever you want to keep your USE flags for kopete.
See kopete-3.5.10-r4 ebuild.
HTH
-- 
BigTone

Reply via email to