Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about systemd logging

2013-01-12 Thread Robin Atwood
On Friday 11 January 2013, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
 On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:46:29 +0700
 
 Robin Atwood robin.atw...@attglobal.net wrote:
  Thanks for the tips, now I can get more output to tty1 if I want. I
  still can't get any systemd messages to syslog-ng, however. A bit of
  a mystery.
 
 This may be way off as I expect systemd to never shape up to a point
 that I will use it, but with a bit of luck this may point you in the
 right direction. On Arch systemd avoiders had to change their
 syslog-ng.conf to the following to get their logging back.
 
 source src {
   unix-dgram(/dev/log);
   internal();
   file(/proc/kmsg);
 };

I already have that! It's the systemd source that seems to have run dry.

Cheers
-Robin
-- 
--
Robin Atwood.

Ship me somewheres east of Suez, where the best is like the worst,
 Where there ain't no Ten Commandments an' a man can raise a thirst
 from Mandalay by Rudyard Kipling
--










Re: [Bulk] Re: [gentoo-user] Questions about systemd logging

2013-01-10 Thread Kevin Chadwick
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 23:46:29 +0700
Robin Atwood robin.atw...@attglobal.net wrote:

 Thanks for the tips, now I can get more output to tty1 if I want. I
 still can't get any systemd messages to syslog-ng, however. A bit of
 a mystery. 

This may be way off as I expect systemd to never shape up to a point
that I will use it, but with a bit of luck this may point you in the
right direction. On Arch systemd avoiders had to change their
syslog-ng.conf to the following to get their logging back.

source src {
unix-dgram(/dev/log);
internal();
file(/proc/kmsg);
};