Re: [gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-10 Thread Willie Wong
On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 11:24:39PM +0200, Penguin Lover Hartmut Figge squawked:
 Hartmut Figge:
 
  * ERROR: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008 failed.
 
 The today 'emerge --sync' followed by 'emerge -pv -uDN world' showed
 that this package would be emerged. I was curious what would happen.
 
 Well, it failed. Looking for bugs i found
 http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262177
 in which 'texmf-update' was recommended as fix. That helped. But then
 
  * Package 'dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008' merged despite file
  * collisions. If necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole
  * content of the above message.
 

Judging by your previous post (you have nothing of texlive in your
world) and your current post, you may have just completely screwed up
your tex installation. 

Did you perhaps have tetex installed prior? Tetex has recently been
marked for removal and all users are encouraged to upgrade to texlive.
Did you follow the texlive guide?

http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml

W
-- 
What are you talking about? 
Never mind, eat the fruit. 
You know, this place almost looks like the Garden of Eden. 

Eat the fruit. 
Sounds quite like it too. 
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 854 days, 12:45



[gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-10 Thread Hartmut Figge
Willie Wong:

 Judging by your previous post (you have nothing of texlive in your 
 world) and your current post, you may have just completely screwed
 up your tex installation.

Because i followed the recommendation of 'texmf-update' mentioned in
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262177?

 Did you perhaps have tetex installed prior?

If so then automatically because of a dependency. At the moment tetex is
not installed.

 Tetex has recently been marked for removal and all users are
 encouraged to upgrade to texlive. Did you follow the texlive guide?
 
 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml

Why should i have searched for this migration guide, when texlive was
pulled in automatically yesterday and i had never noticed something of
tetex in my system?

Hartmut




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-10 Thread Willie Wong
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:49:27PM +0200, Penguin Lover Hartmut Figge squawked:
 Why should i have searched for this migration guide, when texlive was
 pulled in automatically yesterday and i had never noticed something of
 tetex in my system?

No, you shouldn't have. But I am confused about the file collision
message, especially since you didn't show the exact list of files that
collided!

W
-- 
`What's been happening here?' he demanded.
`Oh just the nicest things, sir, just the nicest things. 
can I sit on your lap please?'
`Colin, I am going to abandon you to your fate.'
`I'm so happy.'
`It will be very, very nasty for you, and that's just too 
bad. Got it?'
`I gurgle with pleasure.'

- Ford and Colin the robot. 
Sortir en Pantoufles: up 854 days, 16:14



[gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-10 Thread Hartmut Figge
Willie Wong:
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 05:49:27PM +0200, Penguin Lover Hartmut Figge squawked:

 Why should i have searched for this migration guide, when texlive was
 pulled in automatically yesterday and i had never noticed something of
 tetex in my system?

But there exists emerge.log. Looking for tetex i found

1188510596: Started emerge on: Aug 30, 2007 23:49:56
1188510596:  *** emerge  a2ps
[...]
1188510887:   emerge (5 of 6) app-text/tetex-3.0_p1-r3 to /

So there was indeed tetex installed pulled in by a2ps. And this
emerge.log is a fine thing. It reminded me on previous trouble with
texlive not long ago.

1238911367: Started emerge on: Apr 05, 2009 08:02:47
1238911367:  *** emerge --newuse --deep --update world
[...]
1238915281:   emerge (16 of 20) dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008 to /
[...]
1238915289:  *** exiting unsuccessfully with status '1'.
1238915293:  *** terminating.

I was not very happy about this and had to do something. emerge.log
shows what had happened.

1238916325:  *** emerge  unmerge tetex

:)

Didn't help, though. Then somehow i noticed that unmerging ddd could be
useful. And so it was.

1238916481: Started emerge on: Apr 05, 2009 09:28:01
1238916481:  *** emerge  unmerge ddd
1238916487: === Unmerging... (dev-util/ddd-3.3.11)
1238916487:   unmerge success: dev-util/ddd-3.3.11
1238916487:  *** exiting successfully.
1238916490:  *** terminating.
1238916494: Started emerge on: Apr 05, 2009 09:28:14
1238916494:  *** emerge --newuse --deep --update world
1238916499:  *** Finished. Cleaning up...
1238916499:  *** exiting successfully.
1238916499:  *** terminating.

'emerge -uDN world' had finished successfully. A following new emerge of
ddd also. Fine. Until yesterday. *g*

No, you shouldn't have. But I am confused about the file collision
message, especially since you didn't show the exact list of files that
collided!

No problem because summary.log exists.

 Messages generated by process 32095 on 2009-04-09 23:04:40 CEST for
package dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008:
[...]
Detected file collision(s):

/var/lib/texmf/web2c/tex/tex.fmt
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/tex/tex.log
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafont/mf.base
/var/lib/texmf/web2c/metafont/mf.log

 Messages generated by process 32095 on 2009-04-09 23:07:02 CEST for
package dev-texlive/texlive-latex-2008-r1:
[...]
Detected file collision(s):

/usr/bin/pdflatex
/usr/bin/latex

By the way, thanks for the link to
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml
which is now in my bookmarks. Should i have trouble with texlive in the
future i know what to do.

Hartmut




[gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-09 Thread ABCD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Alan McKinnon wrote:
 On Wednesday 08 April 2009 22:17:17 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
 Hello,

 Would anyone know which portage package would install the stmaryrd fonts?
 
 It's tetex.

No, it isn't.  teTeX is obsolete, and should not be used.  If you have
it installed, and have synced recently, you should have gotten a notice
saying to switch to TeXLive:

teTeX is obsolete and has been unsupported upstream since May of
2006. All users who still have teTeX installed should uninstall it
and install TeXLive using the upgrade guide accessible at the
following URL:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml

- --
ABCD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAknd1RQACgkQOypDUo0oQOqoYQCgnXcfAR2V76jT99YHRG9Wy/EO
sTEAoN8ZxN4+1zel920As8qIMqrz+KZL
=7TNk
-END PGP SIGNATURE-




Re: [gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-09 Thread Valmor de Almeida

ABCD wrote:

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Alan McKinnon wrote:

On Wednesday 08 April 2009 22:17:17 Valmor de Almeida wrote:

Hello,

Would anyone know which portage package would install the stmaryrd fonts?

It's tetex.


No, it isn't.  teTeX is obsolete, and should not be used.  If you have
it installed, and have synced recently, you should have gotten a notice
saying to switch to TeXLive:

teTeX is obsolete and has been unsupported upstream since May of
2006. All users who still have teTeX installed should uninstall it
and install TeXLive using the upgrade guide accessible at the
following URL:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/tex/texlive-migration-guide.xml

- --
ABCD


Thanks for checking. No I don't have tetex installed. I have just 
installed gentoo on a laptop and use texlive only.


--
Valmor




[gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Valmor de Almeida:
Willie Wong wrote:
 On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 12:32:26AM -0400, Penguin Lover Valmor de Almeida 
 squawked:

 However texlive-mathextra won't emerge. Any advice? Thanks,
 
 Not sure if this will help, but try *not* emerging it directly. Add
 mathextra to the USE for app-text/texlive and emerge --newuse texlive. 

For me

h...@e675 ~ $ emerge -pv texlive-mathextra

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies   . done!
[ebuild  N] dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008  USE=doc -source 0 kB
[ebuild  N] dev-tex/mplib-1.110  USE=lua 0 kB
[ebuild  N] dev-texlive/texlive-fontsrecommended-2008  USE=doc -source 
41,578 kB
[ebuild  N] dev-tex/luatex-0.30.3  USE=doc 0 kB
[ebuild  N] dev-texlive/texlive-latex-2008-r1  USE=doc -source 0 kB
[ebuild  N] dev-texlive/texlive-mathextra-2008  USE=doc -source 4,299 kB

Total: 6 packages (6 new), Size of downloads: 45,876 kB

These are the packages that I actually emerged to keep the system lean 
(from world file):

dev-texlive/texlive-fontsextra
dev-texlive/texlive-latex
dev-texlive/texlive-latexextra

Nothing of texlive in my world file.

But trying to emerge texlive-mathextra fails already at the first step.

 Emerging (1 of 6) dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008
[...]
 Unpacking texlive-module-metafont-2008.tar.lzma to 
 /var/tmp/portage/dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008/work
 Source unpacked in /var/tmp/portage/dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008/work
 Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008/work ...
 * Building format texmf/fmtutil/format.metafont.cnf
fmtutil: format directory 
`/var/tmp/portage/dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008/work/texmf-var/web2c' does not 
exist.
 *
 * ERROR: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008 failed.

Hartmut




[gentoo-user] Re: which package contains latex stmaryrd.sty

2009-04-09 Thread Hartmut Figge
Hartmut Figge:

 * ERROR: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008 failed.

The today 'emerge --sync' followed by 'emerge -pv -uDN world' showed
that this package would be emerged. I was curious what would happen.

Well, it failed. Looking for bugs i found
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262177
in which 'texmf-update' was recommended as fix. That helped. But then

 * Package 'dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2008' merged despite file
 * collisions. If necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole
 * content of the above message.

and

 * Package 'dev-texlive/texlive-latex-2008-r1' merged despite file
 * collisions. If necessary, refer to your elog messages for the whole
 * content of the above message.

Hmmm ...

Also i have now a new version of X
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/x/x11/xorg-server-1.5-upgrade-guide.xml

Soon i will shut down my current X and try to start the new one. Could
be interesting. *g*

Hartmut