Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
Hello! In contrast to previous speakers with more or less successful LibreOffice 3.6.0.4 build, on my machine it does not build at all. After 10 hours of compiling (which is a bit longer than a usual time for 3.5) it said: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development And the build log says: ## Quote start ## ... subsequent_filters-test.cxx:740:Assertion Test name: ScFiltersTest::testPasswordOld assertion failed - Expression: xDocSh.Is() - Failed to load password.ods subsequent_filters-test.cxx:740:Assertion Test name: ScFiltersTest::testPasswordNew assertion failed - Expression: xDocSh.Is() - Failed to load password.ods Failures !!! Run: 18 Failure total: 2 Failures: 2 Errors: 0 Error: a unit test failed, please do one of: export DEBUGCPPUNIT=TRUE# for exception catching export GDBCPPUNITTRACE=gdb --args # for interactive debugging export VALGRIND=memcheck# for memory checking and retry. ### Quote end ### So, can anyone suggest a way to fix it? Thanks! Vladimir - v...@ukr.net
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
Looks like developers have already caught this issue. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428328#c8 On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 11:50:31 +0300 v...@ukr.net wrote: Hello! In contrast to previous speakers with more or less successful LibreOffice 3.6.0.4 build, on my machine it does not build at all. After 10 hours of compiling (which is a bit longer than a usual time for 3.5) it said: --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development And the build log says: ## Quote start ## ... subsequent_filters-test.cxx:740:Assertion Test name: ScFiltersTest::testPasswordOld assertion failed - Expression: xDocSh.Is() - Failed to load password.ods subsequent_filters-test.cxx:740:Assertion Test name: ScFiltersTest::testPasswordNew assertion failed - Expression: xDocSh.Is() - Failed to load password.ods Failures !!! Run: 18 Failure total: 2 Failures: 2 Errors: 0 Error: a unit test failed, please do one of: export DEBUGCPPUNIT=TRUE# for exception catching export GDBCPPUNITTRACE=gdb --args # for interactive debugging export VALGRIND=memcheck# for memory checking and retry. ### Quote end ### So, can anyone suggest a way to fix it? Thanks! Vladimir - v...@ukr.net - v...@ukr.net
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
120812 v...@ukr.net wrote: Looks like developers have already caught this issue. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428328#c8 After nearly 3 hr compiling (previously 2 h 32 m ), it failed with : --- Oh dear - something failed during the build - sorry ! For more help with debugging build errors, please see the section in: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development internal build errors: ERROR: error 512 occurred while making /z/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.0.4/tail_build/prj it seems that the error is inside 'tail_build', please re-run build inside this module to isolate the error and/or test your fix: build_error.log should contain the captured output of the failed module(s) --- To rebuild a specific module: make tail_build.clean # not recommended, this will re-build almost everything make tail_build when the problem is isolated and fixed, re-run 'make' make[1]: *** [build-packimages] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/z/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.0.4' make: *** [build] Error 2 * ERROR: app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4 failed (compile phase): * (no error message) * * Call stack: * ebuild.sh, line 85: Called src_compile * environment, line 8980: Called die * The specific snippet of code: * make build || die * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4'`, * the complete build log and the output of `emerge -pqv '=app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4'`. !!! When you file a bug report, please include the following information: GENTOO_VM= CLASSPATH= JAVA_HOME= JAVACFLAGS= COMPILER= and of course, the output of emerge --info * The complete build log is located at '/var/log/emerge-logs/app-office:libreoffice-3.6.0.4:20120812-112934.log'. * For convenience, a symlink to the build log is located at '/z/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4/temp/build.log'. * The ebuild environment file is located at '/z/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4/temp/environment'. * Working directory: '/z/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.0.4' * S: '/z/tmp/portage/app-office/libreoffice-3.6.0.4/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.0.4' I'll try merging again with USE=xmlsec, as the bug fix recommends. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
120812 Philip Webb wrote: 120812 v...@ukr.net wrote: Looks like developers have already caught this issue. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428328#c8 I'll try merging again with USE=xmlsec , as the bug fix recommends. Yes, it compiled with that flag. While it used less memory than 2 emerges ago, it used more disk space ( 4 GB ) took much longer ( 3 h 2 m ). OTOH it also opens almost at once, so I'll take the trade-offs. -- ,, SUPPORT ___//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT`-O--O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
[gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
This has been slow and painful so far. First, the build stops repeatedly because of zero-length library files. I can restart the ebuild manually and each iteration builds one more (real) library. I've been doing this iterating for hours and I think I may have gotten past that part, but the build is far from done... Second, the ebuild is using only one CPU out of four, so this is taking much longer than before. Ugh. Anyone else seeing these problems?
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
walt writes: This has been slow and painful so far. First, the build stops repeatedly because of zero-length library files. I can restart the ebuild manually and each iteration builds one more (real) library. I've been doing this iterating for hours and I think I may have gotten past that part, but the build is far from done... Second, the ebuild is using only one CPU out of four, so this is taking much longer than before. Ugh. Anyone else seeing these problems? No, I just built it today, in the usual time of about 2.5 hours. Wonko
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
Am 09.08.2012 22:36, schrieb Alex Schuster: No, I just built it today, in the usual time of about 2.5 hours. ~1 hr here :-P (I *had* to say that ;-) )
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
2012/8/9 Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at Am 09.08.2012 22:36, schrieb Alex Schuster: No, I just built it today, in the usual time of about 2.5 hours. ~1 hr here :-P (I *had* to say that ;-) ) Hello, No problem building libreoffice-3.6.0.4. About 1h 38 min. Best regards -- Jacques
Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone compiled libreoffice-3.6.0.4 yet?
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:19 PM, walt w41...@gmail.com wrote: This has been slow and painful so far. First, the build stops repeatedly because of zero-length library files. I can restart the ebuild manually and each iteration builds one more (real) library. I've been doing this iterating for hours and I think I may have gotten past that part, but the build is far from done... Second, the ebuild is using only one CPU out of four, so this is taking much longer than before. Ugh. Anyone else seeing these problems? No problem here, either. It needs a huge amount of temp disk space, be sure you're not running out (especially if it is on /dev/shm for example).
